Abstract
The main objective of phase II clinical trials is to estimate treatment efficacy on a relatively small number of patients in order to decide whether the treatment ought to be studied in large-scale comparative trials. They play a key role in the drug development process, since the results determine whether or not to proceed to phase III trials. Multistage designs for phase II clinical trials proposed by Gehan, Fleming, Simon and Ensign are described and compared. Gehan's and Simon's designs have two stages, Fleming's designs can have two or more stages, and Ensign's three-stage design combines the first stage of Gehan with the two stages of Simon. Phase II clinical trial protocols and reports should include a description of the design selected with a justification for the particular choice. The present practice is very far from this ideal.
Author information
Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kramar, A., Potvin, D. & Hill, C. Multistage designs for phase II clinical trials: statistical issues in cancer research. Br J Cancer 74, 1317–1320 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.537
Issue Date:
Further reading
-
Pelvic Sentinel lymph node detection in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer (SHREC-trial)—the final step towards a paradigm shift in surgical staging
European Journal of Cancer (2019)
-
Re-formulating Gehan’s design as a flexible two-stage single-arm trial
BMC Medical Research Methodology (2019)
-
Evaluation of the quality of the reporting of phase II clinical trials in oncology: A systematic review
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology (2018)
-
Extended two-stage adaptive designs with three target responses for phase II clinical trials
Statistical Methods in Medical Research (2018)
-
Quality of reporting in oncology phase II trials: A 5-year assessment through systematic review
PLOS ONE (2017)