Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Mapping epitope characteristics on carcinoembryonic antigen

Abstract

A method of epitope analysis is described in which the binding of one monoclonal antibody (MAb) to radiolabeled carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) competes with the subsequent binding of an immobilised second MAb. From the degree of blocking obtained, we have identified both structurally related and independent epitopes on CEA. Using this technique to study fifteen MAbs, we have been able to recognise at least 6 unrelated epitopes of the CEA glycoprotein. Further characterisation of these epitopes was accomplished by means of immunohistochemistry. Of the fifteen MAbs, 6 were specific for CEA and reacted with at least 3 unrelated regions of the glycoprotein. Of the remaining 9 MAbs, 2 cross-reacted with erythrocytes, 5 with components of liver and 7 with polymorphonuclear neutrophils. Cross-reactions with liver were varied showing differential antibody specificity for bile canaliculi, Kupffer cells and bile duct epithelium. A high degree of correlation between epitope relatedness and immunohistochemical specificity was found. Two CEA-specific and 4 cross-reactive MAbs were also shown to react with ion-sensitive sites on the CEA glycoprotein.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harwood, P., Britton, D., Southall, P. et al. Mapping epitope characteristics on carcinoembryonic antigen. Br J Cancer 54, 75–82 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1986.154

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1986.154

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links