Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Practical experience of randomization in cancer trials: an international survey

Abstract

The results from an international survey of 15 major cancer centres have clarified how randomization is being implemented in cancer trials. As regards the mechanics of obtaining treatment assignment for each patient a system of telephone registration to a central randomization office was widely used. We also advise formal checks for patient eligibility immediately before treatment assignment, and subsequent written confirmation of randomization to the investigators. As regards statistical methods, stratification of randomization by one or two prognostic factors (and institution in multicentre trials) is commonplace. Most centres used the standard approach of random permuted blocks within strata though some others used "dynamic" institution-balancing or "minimization" methods instead. The value of stratified allocation is chiefly for the trial's credibility in having comparable treatment groups, rather than for statistical efficiency. One should avoid overstratification and use only the really important prognostic factors. One essential is that randomization should in practice work for every patient, so undue complexity is to be avoided.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pocock, S., Lagakos, S. Practical experience of randomization in cancer trials: an international survey. Br J Cancer 46, 368–375 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1982.212

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1982.212

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links