The IRE1α-XBP1 pathway, a key component of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response, is considered to be a critical regulator for survival of multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Therefore, the availability of small-molecule inhibitors targeting this pathway would offer a new chemotherapeutic strategy for MM. Here, we screened small-molecule inhibitors of ER stress-induced XBP1 activation, and identified toyocamycin from a culture broth of an Actinomycete strain. Toyocamycin was shown to suppress thapsigargin-, tunicamycin- and 2-deoxyglucose-induced XBP1 mRNA splicing in HeLa cells without affecting activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) and PKR-like ER kinase (PERK) activation. Furthermore, although toyocamycin was unable to inhibit IRE1α phosphorylation, it prevented IRE1α-induced XBP1 mRNA cleavage in vitro. Thus, toyocamycin is an inhibitor of IRE1α-induced XBP1 mRNA cleavage. Toyocamycin inhibited not only ER stress-induced but also constitutive activation of XBP1 expression in MM lines as well as primary samples from patients. It showed synergistic effects with bortezomib, and induced apoptosis of MM cells including bortezomib-resistant cells at nanomolar levels in a dose-dependent manner. It also inhibited growth of xenografts in an in vivo model of human MM. Taken together, our results suggest toyocamycin as a lead compound for developing anti-MM therapy and XBP1 as an appropriate molecular target for anti-MM therapy.
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy characterized by the accumulation of clonogenic mature plasma cells in bone marrow. Recently, bortezomib (BTZ), a proteasome inhibitor, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of MM. However, BTZ treatment often achieves only very short-duration responses and drug resistance tends to develop rapidly.1, 2 Therefore, there is a need to develop novel molecular targets for new therapeutic approaches.
Recent studies have suggested that XBP1, a basic region/leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factor of the CREB-ATF family, has an important role in the survival of MM cells. XBP1 is required for the terminal differentiation of B lymphocytes to plasma cells and is essential for immunoglobulin secretion.3, 4 Abundant or deregulated expression of XBP1 has been detected in MM cells5, 6 and in hepatocellular carcinomas.7, 8 Because of the production of abundant immunoglobulins and cytokines, MM cells must be able to survive under conditions of chronic endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. This involves the unfolded protein response (UPR) including activation of the IRE1α-XBP1 pathway. In addition, MM cells are located in the bone marrow milieu, which is usually considered hypoxic compared with other organs.9, 10 Therefore, MM cells have to survive and grow even at low oxygen, with poor nutrition and adverse pH in vivo. Thus, MM cells need to possess mechanisms to protect against ER stress. Among the UPR in MM cells, the IRE1α-XBP1 pathway has been implicated in the proliferation and survival of MM cells to a greater extent than in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or normal plasma cells.11 It has been reported to be a prognostic factor12 and could be a target for immunotherapy13 or chemotherapy.14 Based on previous reports, it is proposed that an inhibitor of IRE1α-XBP1 activation should be a potent therapeutic agent for MM.
The transcriptional activity of XBP1 is regulated by ER-located transmembrane kinase/endoribonuclease (RNase) protein IRE1α. Recent studies have proposed a model of ER stress-induced IRE1α activation and subsequent XBP1 activation as follows: (1) accumulation of unfolded proteins triggers oligomerization of luminal domains of IRE1α.15 (2) Oligomerization of IRE1α causes trans-auto-phosphorylation of the kinase activation loop domain, which leads to a conformational change.16, 17, 18, 19 (3) This conformational change permits cofactor (ADP) binding,16, 20 promoting back-to-back dimer configuration of cytosolic domains.21 (4) The oligomerization of cytosolic domains activates the RNase activity of IRE1α which subsequently cleaves XBP1 mRNA at two sites to initiate an unconventional splicing reaction.21 (5) IRE1α-induced cleavage of XBP1 mRNA results in the removal of a 26-nucleotide intron and the 5′ and 3′ fragments are subsequently joined by RNA ligase activity. This unconventional splicing reaction creates a translational frame shift to produce an active XBP1 transcription factor.22, 23
Previously, we reported a novel screening system for inhibitors of XBP1 activation, using luciferase reporter signals in HeLa/XBP1-luc cells.24 In the present study, we identified toyocamycin25 as an XBP1 inhibitor in the culture broth of an Actinomycete strain using this screening system (Figure 1a). We observed that toyocamycin inhibited IRE1α-induced ATP-dependent XBP1 mRNA cleavage in vitro without affecting IRE1α auto-phosphorylation. Moreover, this compound markedly inhibited not only ER stress-induced but also constitutively activated IRE1α-XBP1 pathway both in MM cell lines and primary MM cells, resulting in strong cytotoxic activity.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and reagents
Human epithelial adenocarcinoma HeLa cells and previously generated HeLa/XBP1-luc cells24 were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. Human MM and other hematological cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS. Human fibrosarcoma HT1080 was cultured in EMEM supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, 1% non-essential amino acids and 10% FBS. A BTZ-resistant MM cell lines, KMS-11/BTZ and OPM-2/BTZ, were established from the parental line, KMS-11 and OPM-2, respectively, under continuous exposure to BTZ over a half year.26 Toyocamycin, sangivamycin, tubercidin, tunicamycin, 2-deoxyglucose and 5-fluorouracil were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA). Thapsigargin was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). BTZ was purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals (North York, ON, Canada).
Primary MM specimens
Nine primary MM specimens derived from eight patients with symptomatic MM were obtained after written informed consent at Nagoya City University Hospital. The assay protocols using patient samples were approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee. MM cells were purified from the marrow mononuclear cell fraction or pleural effusion using anti-CD138 antibody-coated beads with the aid of an automatic magnetic cell sorting system (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA, USA).26
Preparation of toyocamycin
The culture broth (3 l) of Streptmyces sp. 1893-56 was extracted with EtOAc, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. This suspension was extracted with hexane, and the insoluble fraction concentrated. The active fractions were then collected and further isolated by silica gel column chromatography (Silica gel 60, 60–230 μm; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) using a CHCl3-MeOH stepwise system. As a result, we obtained 5 mg of active compound. The UV spectrum, HRESI-MS measurement, and 1H NMR spectra of this active compound confirmed its identity as toyocamycin.
As previously reported,24 HeLa/XBP1-luc cells were seeded into 96-well plates at 2 × 104 cells/well, and then incubated with 0.1 μM of thapsigargin together with or without test compounds. After 24 h of incubation, the cells were lysed in Passive lysis buffer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), and luciferase activity measured using the luciferase assay system (Promega) and a luminometer (Wallac, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). IC50 values were determined from the dose–response curves of the inhibition of XBP1-luciferase activity, setting the result of thapsigargin treatment as 100%.
Reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR and real-time PCR analysis
HeLa cells and MM cell lines were incubated with test compounds for 4 or 6 h together with the ER stress inducers thapsigargin, tunicamycin, or 2-deoxyglucose. Briefly, total RNA was extracted from HeLa cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Aliquots of 2 μg of total RNA were treated with M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega) to produce first-strand complementary DNA (cDNA). For RT-PCR analysis, this first-strand cDNA was subjected to PCR with KOD plus polymerase (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) using a pair of primers corresponding to nucleotides 505–525 and 609–629 of XBP1 cDNA. The amplified products were separated by electrophoresis on an 8% polyacrylamide gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
For real-time RT-PCR analysis, the synthesized first-strand cDNA was amplified in triplicate using SYBR Premix ExTaq (TaKaBaBio, Shiga, Japan), and the products were detected on a MiniOpticon system (Bio-Rad, San Diego, CA, USA). PCRs were incubated for 10 s at 95 °C followed by 45 amplification cycles with 3 s denaturing at 95 °C, 10 s annealing at 60 °C and 10 s extension at 72 °C. The primers designed for quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis were as follows: for GRP78, 5′-IndexTermGCGCATGAAGGAGAAAGAAC-3′ and 5′-IndexTermTCACCATTCGGTCAATCAGA-3′; for ERdj4, 5′-IndexTermAAAATAAGAGCCCGGATGCT-3′ and 5′-IndexTermCGCTTCTTGGATCCAGTGTT-3′; for EDEM, 5′-IndexTermTGGACTGCAGGTGCTGATAG-3′ and 5′-IndexTermGGATTCTTGGTTGCCTGGTA-3′; and for GAPDH, 5′-IndexTermAGGTCGGAGTCAACGGATTT-3′ and 5′-IndexTermTAGTTGAGGTCAATGAAGGG-3′. Specificity of the PCR was evaluated by analyzing melting curves and sequences of the amplicons.
For the detection of spliced XBP1 isoform or all forms (spliced and unspliced), primer sets and Taqman probes were purchased from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA, USA). Quantitative PCR was performed using Taqman Gene Expression Assays and a StepOnePlus real-time PCR instrument according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Western blotting was performed as described.27 Primary antibodies used were: anti-KDEL from Enzo LifeScience (Farmingdale, NY, USA); anti-ATF6, anti-actin and anti-XBP1 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; anti-phospho-eIF2α (Ser51) and anti-eIF2α and anti-IRE1α from Cell Signaling (Boston, MA, USA); anti-tubulin and anti-FLAG (M2) from Sigma (St Louis, MO, USA); anti-phospho-Ser724-IRE1α from Novus Biologicals (Littleton, CO, USA).
In vitro XBP1 mRNA cleavage assay
In vitro XBP1 mRNA cleavage assays were performed as described previously.28 Briefly, 337-nucleotide RNA substrate (XBP1(266-602) RNA) consisting of the XBP1 intron (26 nucleotides) flanked on both sides by truncated exon sequences (228 nucleotides on the 5′ side and 83 nucleotides on the 3′ side), which contained the minimum sequence for ER stress-induced XBP1 splicing, was prepared by in vitro transcription using T7 RNA polymerase. N-terminally FLAG-tagged human IRE1α(467-977) was prepared by immunoprecipitation with anti-FLAG antibody from 293T cells transiently transfected with pCAX-FLAG-IRE1α(467-977) plasmid. The IRE1α(467-977)-induced XBP1(206-602) mRNA cleavage reaction was performed in the presence of 100 μM ATP. RNA fragments were resolved on a 7 M urea 6% PAGE gel and stained with ethidium bromide.
Apoptosis and cell proliferation assays
After exposure to toyocamycin or BTZ, apoptotic cells were evaluated using the Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Pharmingen, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The cell proliferation assay has been described previously.26 The percentage of specific apoptosis was calculated as follows: % specific apoptosis=(% AnnexinV-positive cells−% spontaneous AnnexinV-positive cells)/(100−% spontaneous positive cells) × 100.
Cell proliferation assays of the MM cell lines, primary MM cells from patients and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) from healthy individuals exposed to various concentrations of toyocamycin for 24 h were performed using the CEllTiter 96 AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay Kit (Promega) as described previously.26 The mean of three determinations at each concentration of BTZ was calculated, and IC50 values were obtained using XLfit 4.2 curve fitting software for Excel (ID Business Solutions Inc., Alameda, CA, USA).
Animals and the murine xenograft model
Animal studies were performed in conformity with the UK Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Guidelines for the Welfare of Animals in Experimental Neoplasia (second edition). The study method was described previously.29 Briefly, 0.5 × 107 RPMI8226 cells were inoculated subcutaneously into SCID mice previously administered with rabbit antiasialo-GM1 intraperitoneally (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan) 1 day before tumor inoculation. At 10 days after tumor inoculation, the tumor-bearing mice were divided into four groups of five mice each, such that the mean tumor volumes were approximately equal in the four groups. Tumor volume was calculated by the following formula: tumor volume (mm3)=0.5 × (major diameter) × (minor diameter)2. Mice were treated by intraperitoneal injection of 0.5 mg/kg toyocamycin twice weekly, 1.0 mg/kg toyocamycin once weekly, or 1.0 mg/kg BTZ twice weekly for 2 weeks. Volumes of tumors in toyocamycin-treated mice were compared with untreated or BTZ-treated animals during the treatment period.
The significance of differences in tumor volume between toyocamycin-treated mice and others were examined with the Mann–Whitney U-test. Data were analyzed with the aid of StatView software ver. 5.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). In this study, P<0.05 was considered significant.
Identification of toyocamycin as an inhibitor of ER stress-induced XBP1 mRNA splicing
Previously, we established a screening system for inhibitors of ER stress-induced XBP1 activation and identified the new active small molecules trierixin and quinotrierixin.24, 30 In the course of further screening for an inhibitor of ER stress-induced XBP1 activation, we isolated toyocamycin25 from a culture broth of an Actinomycete strain (Figure 1a). As shown in Figure 1b, 0.1 μM thapsigargin, an inhibitor of the ER calcium pump (SERCA), elevated XBP1-luciferase activity about 2.5-fold more than the control in HeLa/XBP1-luc cells. Toyocamycin suppressed thapsigargin-induced XBP1-luciferase activation in a dose-dependent manner with an IC50 value of 0.08 μM. To examine whether toyocamycin also inhibited thapsigargin-induced endogenous XBP1 mRNA splicing in HeLa cells, we next performed RT-PCR analysis of RNA isolated from toyocamycin-treated or -untreated HeLa cells. As shown in Figure 1c, toyocamycin suppressed thapsigargin-induced XBP1 mRNA splicing in a dose-dependent manner with an IC50 value of 0.18 μM. Furthermore, toyocamycin also suppressed tunicamycin, a N-glycosylation inhibitor, or 2-deoxyglucose, a hypoglycemia-mimicking agent, -induced XBP1 mRNA splicing with an IC50 value of 0.13 μM and 0.11 μM, respectively (Figure 1c). These results show that toyocamycin inhibits ER stress-induced XBP1 mRNA splicing.
The inhibitory activity of toyocamycin on RNA synthesis is not responsible for inhibition of ER stress-induced XBP1 mRNA splicing
Because previous studies have reported that toyocamycin inhibits RNA synthesis in mammalian cells,31, 32 we tested whether its inhibitory activity on ER stress-induced XBP1 mRNA splicing was due to the inhibition of RNA synthesis. As shown in Figure 1d, toyocamycin suppressed incorporation of [3H]-uridine into the macromolecular fraction of HeLa cells in a dose-dependent manner with an IC50 value of 12 μM without affecting incorporation of [3H]-thymidine or [3H]-leucine. This indicates that toyocamycin inhibits RNA synthesis in HeLa cells. However, the IC50 value of toyocamycin for RNA synthesis is much higher than for ER stress-induced XBP1 mRNA splicing. On the other hand, actinomycin D, a well-known RNA synthesis inhibitor, also blocked the incorporation of [3H]-uridine into HeLa cells in a dose-dependent manner with an IC50 value of 0.06 μM. However, as shown in Figure 1e, actinomycin D did not suppress thapsigargin-induced XBP1 mRNA splicing even at 0.1 μM (which caused 80% inhibition of RNA synthesis). These results indicate that actinomycin D does not inhibit ER stress-induced XBP1 mRNA splicing. Therefore, we conclude that the inhibitory activity of toyocamycin on ER stress-induced XBP1 mRNA splicing is not due to the inhibition of RNA synthesis.
The adenosine moiety of toyocamycin is important for inhibition of XBP1 mRNA splicing
We next investigated whether sangivamycin or tubercidin, a small molecule structurally related to toyocamycin (Figure 1a), also inhibited ER stress-induced XBP1 activation. As shown in Table 1, sangivamycin and tubercidin inhibited thapsigargin-induced XBP1-luciferase activation in a dose-dependent manner with IC50 values of 0.5 and 0.34 μM, respectively. Furthermore, sangivamycin and tubercidin also inhibited thapsigargin-induced endogenous XBP1 mRNA splicing evaluated by RT-PCR analysis (data not shown). On the other hand, 5-Aza-2-deoxycytidine (5Aza-C), a cytidine analog, or 5-fluorouridine, a uridine analog, neither inhibited thapsigargin-induced XBP1-luciferase activation nor endogenous XBP1 mRNA splicing even at 100 μM (Table 1 and data not shown). These results suggest that the adenine moiety of toyocamycin is important for inhibition of XBP1 activation.
Toyocamycin selectively inhibits the IRE1α-XBP1 pathway
We next examined the effect of toyocamycin on the transcriptional activity of XBP1. Consistent with the regulation of transcription of EDEM and ERdj4 by the IRE1-XBP1 pathway,33, 34 toyocamycin suppressed tunicamycin-increased EDEM and ERdj4 mRNA with an IC50 of 0.079 and 0.172 μM, respectively (Figure 2a). These results suggest that toyocamycin might be inhibiting the transcriptional activity of XBP1 due to inhibition of ER stress-induced XBP1 mRNA splicing. On the other hand, because ER stress activates the three ER transmembrane proteins, IRE1, ATF6 and PERK, we also investigated whether toyocamycin inhibited ER stress-induced activation of ATF6 and PERK. ATF6 is constitutively synthesized as a type-II transmembrane protein in the ER.35 This membrane-bounded precursor form, designated as pATF6(P), is transported to the Golgi apparatus in response to ER stress, where it is cleaved by the sequential actions of Site-1 and Site-2 proteases.36, 37, 38, 39 The cytoplasmic region of ATF6 thus liberated from the membrane is translocated into the nucleus, where it functions as an active transcription factor. PERK is a serine–threonine protein kinase that phosphorylates eukaryotic initiation factor-2α (eIF2α) on Ser51.40, 41 Therefore, we assessed ATF6 activation and PERK activation by measuring the amount of the precursor form of ATF6 (pATF6(P)) and the phosphorylation of eIF2α on Ser51, respectively. As shown in Figure 2b, tunicamycin decreased the 90 kDa membrane-bound precursor form of ATF6 (pATF6(P)) and phosphorylated eIF2α on Ser51, indicating that it activated both ATF6 and PERK. However, toyocamycin inhibited neither the tunicamycin-induced decrease of pATF6(P) nor phosphorylation of eIF2α on Ser51. These results indicate that toyocamycin selectively inhibits the ER stress-induced activation of the IRE1α-XBP1 pathway.
Toyocamycin inhibits IRE1α-induced XBP1 mRNA cleavage
We next investigated the mechanism by which toyocamycin inhibits ER stress-induced activation of the IRE1α-XBP1 pathway. Overexpression of IRE1α has been reported to lead to IRE1α homo-oligomerization, which occurs without accumulation of unfolded proteins in the ER or GRP78 dissociation from IRE1α.42, 43 Indeed, as shown in Figure 2c, overexpression of IRE1α induced Ser724 phosphorylation and XBP1 mRNA splicing even under normal conditions in 293T cells transiently transfected with pcDNA3-IRE1α-FLAG plasmid. Although toyocamycin did not affect the Ser724 phosphorylation of IRE1α, it inhibited IRE1α overexpression-induced XBP1 mRNA splicing in a dose-dependent manner. On the other hand, toyocamycin inhibited IRE1α (467-977)-induced XBP1 mRNA cleavage in vitro (Figure 2d). Thus, these results indicate that toyocamycin inhibits IRE1α-induced XBP1 mRNA cleavage.
Toyocamycin inhibits constitutive activation of XBP1 in MM cell lines
As shown in Figure 3a, most MM cell lines have activated XBP1 protein expression, represented as the overexpression of spliced XBP1 isoform, whereas non-MM cells including other hematological malignant and solid tumor cells have little activation of XBP1. This suggests that the IRE1α-XBP1 pathway is constitutively active in MM cells but not in non-MM cells. Among 10 MM cell lines, 7 MM cells including FR4, RPMI8226, XG7, OPM-2, ILKM2, ILKM8 and AMO1 express high levels of spliced-XBP1, whereas other 3 including U266, KMS-11 and SKMM1 express relatively lower levels.
We next tested the influence of toyocamycin on the constitutive activation of XBP1 in MM cell lines. After treatment with 10 nM or higher concentrations of toyocamycin, the levels of spliced isoform of XBP1 protein in RPMI8226 cells declined and resulted in caspase activation (Figure 3b). The level of spliced-XBP1 mRNA in RPMI8226 cells decreased at 6 h after exposure to 100 nM toyocamycin (Figure 3c). The protein levels of spliced-XBP1 also decreased by toyocamycin treatment, whereas phosphorylated levels of IRE1α remained unchanged. A similar reduction in the levels of spliced-XBP1 following toyocamycin treatment was also confirmed in two other MM cell lines, such as XG7 and U266, harboring high or low active XBP1 expression at baseline, respectively (Figure 3d). Furthermore, toyocamycin inhibited thapsigargin-induced expression of spliced XBP1 protein without affecting IRE1α phosphorylation on Ser724 (Supplementary Figure 3).
Toyocamycin induces marked apoptosis of MM cell lines harboring high levels of spliced-XBP1
Two MM cell lines with highly expressed spliced-XBP1, including RPMI8226 and XG7, showed robust dose-dependent apoptosis after exposure to various concentrations of toyocamycin for 24 h, as assessed by the number of Annexin V-positive cells (Figure 3e). These cells showed marked apoptosis at 30 nM or higher concentrations of toyocamycin, whereas U266 cells with relatively low spliced-XBP1 expression showed mild apoptosis compared with that of RPMI8226 and XG7.
MM cells with high spliced-XBP1 expression show marked growth inhibition compared with those with low spliced-XBP1 expression and to non-MM cells by toyocamycin treatment
We then evaluated the growth inhibitory effect of toyocamycin on seven MM cell lines with high spliced-XBP1 expression, three MM cell lines with low spliced-XBP1 expression and four non-MM cell lines. All MM cells with high spliced-XBP1 expression showed remarkable decline in cellular viability at 30 nM or higher concentrations of toyocamycin (Figure 4a, left) than the other MM cells with low spliced-XBP1 expression (Figure 4a, middle). Most non-MM cells showed the subtle reduction in cellular viability even at the higher concentrations of toyocamycin (Figure 4a, right). The mean IC50 values of toyocamycin on two MM cell groups, each having high or low spliced-XBP1 expression were 17.69±2.78 and 88.57±38.31 nM, respectively, and this difference was considered statistically significant (P=0.016) (Figure 4b).
Toyocamycin also induces marked apoptosis on BTZ-resistant MM cells
Two BTZ-resistant MM cell lines, KMS-11/BTZ and OPM-2/BTZ showed a little apoptosis progression even in the presence of 10 or 30 nM of BTZ, at which most MM cell lines including parental cells of these resistant ones were induced to marked apoptosis. However, they showed remarkable apoptosis in the presence of 30 or 100 nM of toyocamycin (Figure 4c).
Toyocamycin cooperates with BTZ to mediate anti-tumor effects on MM cells
At suboptimal concentrations toyocamycin mediated a little apoptosis induction (Figure 3e) in MM cells. However, treatment with 5 or 10 nM toyocamycin together with 6 nM BTZ-mediated additive or synergistic cytotoxicity in RPMI8226 cells (Figure 4d).
Toyocamycin is also cytotoxic for primary MM cells, associated with inhibition of IRE1α-XBP1 activation
Most freshly prepared primary MM cells had activated XBP1 expression, represented as a high ratio of XBP1-spliced isoform: all isoforms (1.74:3.43; median 2.48), although the mRNA levels are similar to those in healthy donor control PBMC (Figure 5a). The relative amount of spliced-XBP1 mRNA in five MM samples (#2, #4, #5, #8 and #9), which was quantitated by real-time PCR method, decreased after 6 h exposure to toyocamycin (Figure 5b). Most of the primary MM cells were sensitive to 10 nM BTZ (17.1–106.8; median 48.8) and they also showed dose-dependent reduced viability following toyocamycin treatment (Figure 5c). Of nine MM samples, sample no. 4 was derived from the pleural effusion of a patient with MM refractory to BTZ; these tumor cells were resistant to BTZ in vitro. Nonetheless, toyocamycin was also cytotoxic for these cells (Supplementary Figure 4). In contrast, toyocamycin showed little cytotoxicity against healthy PBMC even at higher concentrations for 24 h (Figure 5d). Three primary MM samples (#5, #8 and #9) with sufficient cell numbers for protein analysis, showed reduction in activated (spliced) XBP1 protein after 6 h treatment with toyocamycin (Figure 5e). As in the MM cell lines, the phosphorylation status of IRE1α was not affected by toyocamycin.
In vivo anti-tumor activity of toyocamycin alone and in combination with BTZ in a human MM xenograft model
To evaluate in vivo efficacy of toyocamycin on MM cells, SCID mice subcutaneously inoculated with RPMI8226 were treated with twice- or once-weekly intraperitoneal toyocamycin at either 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg. In addition, the combination treatment of toyocamycin with BTZ was tested. Toyocamycin alone showed robust anti-tumor activity resulting in smaller tumor volumes compared with controls on day 15. This was similar to the effect of BTZ (Figures 6a and b). No obvious difference in tumor inhibitory effect was seen on twice- or once-weekly injection of toyocamycin.
The combination treatment of BTZ with toyocamycin, either at 0.5 mg/kg or 1.0 mg/kg, showed a trend toward enhancing anti-tumor activity represented as smaller tumor volumes when compared with BTZ or toyocamycin alone (Figures 6a and b).
Several lines of evidence suggest the importance of the IRE1α-XBP1 pathway in tumor progression, adaptation to the hypoxic tumor microenvironment, as a prognostic marker and a potential therapeutic target in both solid tumors and MM. Here, we identified toyocamycin as an inhibitor of both ER stress-induced and constitutive activation of the IRE1α-XBP1 pathway in MM cells, and showed that it exerted synergistic or at least additive anti-tumor effects with BTZ. Furthermore, it induced marked apoptosis of primary MM cells as well as MM cell lines without showing any cytotoxicity to PBMCs from healthy donors. This anti-tumor effect was also confirmed in a mouse model in vivo.
Previously, toyocamycin was reported to inhibit RNA synthesis and ribozyme function.31, 32, 44 This raised the possibility that it inhibited ER stress-induced XBP1 mRNA splicing and transcription of EDEM and ERdj4 genes through RNA synthesis inhibition. However, comparing the IC50 values of toyocamycin on RNA synthesis, ER stress-induced XBP1 mRNA splicing and transcription of UPR target genes revealed that its inhibitory activity on ER stress-induced XBP1 mRNA splicing and transcription of EDEM and ERdj4 genes was much stronger than the RNA synthesis blockade effect. Furthermore, although 100 nM actinomycin D completely inhibited both RNA synthesis (Figure 1d) and ER stress-induced transcription of GRP78 (Supplementary Figure 1), it did not inhibit ER stress-induced XBP1 mRNA splicing (Figure 2b). These results support the notion that the inhibitory activity of toyocamycin on RNA synthesis is not responsible for inhibition of XBP1 mRNA splicing and transcription of EDEM and ERdj4 genes. On the other hand, toyocamycin has also been reported to inhibit kinase activities, such as PKC,45 cdc246 or PI4K.47 Considering the structure of toyocamycin and its analogs, it was also predicted that it would inhibit IRE1 auto-phosphorylation. However, it inhibited IRE1 phosphorylation on Ser724 not only in IRE1-overexpressing 293T cells (Figure 2c) but also in MM cell lines (Figures 3c and 5e). Recent studies have suggested that the trigger for IRE1 endoribonuclease activity is not phosphorylation but a conformational change in the kinase domain induced by cofactor (ATP or ADP) binding. Therefore, it is likely that toyocamycin inhibits IRE1α-induced XBP1 mRNA cleavage through a cofactor-induced conformational change of IRE1α rather than inhibition of IRE1α auto-phosphorylation.
Previous studies have suggested that the IRE1α-XBP1 pathway has a critical role in ER stress-induced cytoprotection. 1NM-PP1, a small molecule selectively activating the IRE1α(I642G) mutant,18 protected cells from tunicamycin- or thapsigargin-induced cell death.48, 49 In contrast, overexpression of dominant-negative XBP1 or knockdown of XBP1 has been reported to enhance tunicamycin-induced apoptosis.50 Consistent with previous reports, we also found that toyocamycin synergistically induced cell death in ER-stressed HeLa, HT29 and HCT116 cells (Supplementary Figure 2 and data not shown). More recently, as with toyocamycin, STF-083010 was shown to inhibit IRE1 ndonuclease activity without affecting its kinase activity in vitro.14 However, these compounds mediate their inhibitory activity at ⩾60 μM, and show little MM cell apoptosis induction as single agents. STF-083010 also shows anti-tumor activity in human MM xenograft models. However, while toyocamycin suppressed tumor volume to around 50% at 1 mg/kg by once-weekly injection, the STF-083010 dose needed to be 30 mg/kg by once-weekly injection.14 In our study, adenosine analogs showed potent inhibition of ER stress-induced IRE1α-XBP1 activation at the nanomolar level. Compared with these, toyocamycin induced marked apoptosis in ER-stressed tumor cells and MM cells at much lower concentrations. In addition, it also inhibited the constitutive activation of XBP1 in MM cells even at suboptimal concentrations such as 10 nM. However, the mechanism by which toyocamycin mediates dose-dependent apoptosis remains unknown. Although three MM cell lines with low active XBP1 expression showed lower sensitivity to toyocamycin treatment than other seven MM cells with high active XBP1 expression, these three cell lines still demonstrated sensitivity to the drug at the nM concentration. It may be speculated that toyocamycin also triggers another stress-inducing factor at higher concentrations, which may induce strong apoptosis under IRE1α-XBP1-suppressed conditions. Further analysis needs be conducted to elucidate the whole picture of its mechanisms of action on MM cells.
An earlier phase I toyocamycin single-agent study also testing possible anti-tumor effects in patients with advanced solid tumors has been reported.51 However, because no apparent clinical responses were observed in that study, further clinical evaluation was not planned. In that study, toyocamycin showed no systemic side effects, such as organ dysfunction and cytopenia, and only local necrosis at the site of infusion was reported to occur when the drug was delivered into the soft tissues. This suggests that toyocamycin adverse events could be manageable if it is infused through central venous catheters. In addition, this study does not exclude potential clinical efficacy of toyocamycin against solid tumors, because it was a phase I trial lacking evaluation of stable disease often applied in more recent clinical trials of molecular-targeting therapies.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that the adenosine analog toyocamycin has a potent IRE1-XBP1 inhibitory effect on ER-stressed tumors and MM cells, as well as triggering dose-dependent apoptosis in these cells. These results provide a preclinical rationale for clinical trials of toyocamycin and other adenosine analogs alone and in combination with BTZ for treating MM.
Kumar S, Rajkumar SV . Many facets of bortezomib resistance/susceptibility. Blood 2008; 112: 2177–2178.
Shah JJ, Orlowski RZ . Proteasome inhibitors in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2009; 23: 1964–1979.
Reimold AM, Iwakoshi NN, Manis J, Vallabhajosyula P, Szomolanyi-Tsuda E, Gravallese EM et al. Plasma cell differentiation requires the transcription factor XBP-1. Nature 2001; 412: 300–307.
Shaffer AL, Lin KI, Kuo TC, Yu X, Hurt EM, Rosenwald A et al. Blimp-1 orchestrates plasma cell differentiation by extinguishing the mature B cell gene expression program. Immunity 2002; 17: 51–62.
Munshi NC, Hideshima T, Carrasco D, Shammas M, Auclair D, Davies F et al. Identification of genes modulated in multiple myeloma using genetically identical twin samples. Blood 2004; 103: 1799–1806.
Carrasco DR, Sukhdeo K, Protopopova M, Sinha R, Enos M, Carrasco DE et al. The differentiation and stress response factor XBP-1 drives multiple myeloma pathogenesis. Cancer Cell 2007; 11: 349–360.
Shuda M, Kondoh N, Imazeki N, Tanaka K, Okada T, Mori K et al. Activation of the ATF6, XBP1 and grp78 genes in human hepatocellular carcinoma: a possible involvement of the ER stress pathway in hepatocarcinogenesis. J Hepatol 2003; 38: 605–614.
Lee K, Tirasophon W, Shen X, Michalak M, Prywes R, Okada T et al. IRE1-mediated unconventional mRNA splicing and S2P-mediated ATF6 cleavage merge to regulate XBP1 in signaling the unfolded protein response. Genes Dev 2002; 16: 452–466.
Asosingh K, De Raeve H, de Ridder M, Storme GA, Willems A, Van Riet I et al. Role of the hypoxic bone marrow microenvironment in 5T2MM murine myeloma tumor progression. Haematologica 2005; 90: 810–817.
Martin SK, Diamond P, Gronthos S, Peet DJ, Zannettino AC . The emerging role of hypoxia, HIF-1 and HIF-2 in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2011; 25: 1533–1542.
Smith KD, Wrenshall LE, Nicosia RF, Pichler R, Marsh CL, Alpers CE et al. Delayed graft function and cast nephropathy associated with tacrolimus plus rapamycin use. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 1037–1045.
Bagratuni T, Wu P, Gonzalez de Castro D, Davenport EL, Dickens NJ, Walker BA et al. XBP1s levels are implicated in the biology and outcome of myeloma mediating different clinical outcomes to thalidomide-based treatments. Blood 2010; 116: 250–253.
Bae J, Carrasco R, Lee AH, Prabhala R, Tai YT, Anderson KC et al. Identification of novel myeloma-specific XBP1 peptides able to generate cytotoxic T lymphocytes: a potential therapeutic application in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2011; 25: 1610–1619.
Papandreou I, Denko NC, Olson M, Van Melckebeke H, Lust S, Tam A et al. Identification of an Ire1alpha endonuclease specific inhibitor with cytotoxic activity against human multiple myeloma. Blood 2011; 117: 1311–1314.
Bertolotti A, Zhang Y, Hendershot LM, Harding HP, Ron D . Dynamic interaction of BiP and ER stress transducers in the unfolded-protein response. Nat Cell Biol 2000; 2: 326–332.
Korennykh AV, Egea PF, Korostelev AA, Finer-Moore J, Zhang C, Shokat KM et al. The unfolded protein response signals through high-order assembly of Ire1. Nature 2009; 457: 687–693.
Shamu CE, Walter P . Oligomerization and phosphorylation of the Ire1p kinase during intracellular signaling from the endoplasmic reticulum to the nucleus. EMBO J 1996; 15: 3028–3039.
Papa FR, Zhang C, Shokat K, Walter P . Bypassing a kinase activity with an ATP-competitive drug. Science 2003; 302: 1533–1537.
Aragon T, van Anken E, Pincus D, Serafimova IM, Korennykh AV, Rubio CA et al. Messenger RNA targeting to endoplasmic reticulum stress signalling sites. Nature 2009; 457: 736–740.
Sidrauski C, Walter P . The transmembrane kinase Ire1p is a site-specific endonuclease that initiates mRNA splicing in the unfolded protein response. Cell 1997; 90: 1031–1039.
Lee KP, Dey M, Neculai D, Cao C, Dever TE, Sicheri F . Structure of the dual enzyme Ire1 reveals the basis for catalysis and regulation in nonconventional RNA splicing. Cell 2008; 132: 89–100.
Shen X, Ellis RE, Lee K, Liu CY, Yang K, Solomon A et al. Complementary signaling pathways regulate the unfolded protein response and are required for C. elegans development. Cell 2001; 107: 893–903.
Yoshida H, Matsui T, Yamamoto A, Okada T, Mori K . XBP1 mRNA is induced by ATF6 and spliced by IRE1 in response to ER stress to produce a highly active transcription factor. Cell 2001; 107: 881–891.
Tashiro E, Hironiwa N, Kitagawa M, Futamura Y, Suzuki S, Nishio M et al. Trierixin, a novel Inhibitor of ER stress-induced XBP1 activation from Streptomyces sp. 1. Taxonomy, fermentation, isolation and biological activities. J Antibiot 2007; 60: 547–553.
Nishimura H, Katagiri K, Sato K, Mayama M, Shimaoka N . Toyocamycin, a new anti-candida antibiotics. J Antibiot 1956; 9: 60–62.
Ri M, Iida S, Nakashima T, Miyazaki H, Mori F, Ito A et al. Bortezomib-resistant myeloma cell lines: a role for mutated PSMB5 in preventing the accumulation of unfolded proteins and fatal ER stress. Leukemia 2010; 24: 1506–1512.
Tashiro E, Maruki H, Minato Y, Doki Y, Weinstein IB, Imoto M . Overexpression of cyclin D1 contributes to malignancy by up-regulation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 via the pRB/E2F pathway. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 424–431.
Iwawaki T, Akai R . Analysis of the XBP1 splicing mechanism using endoplasmic reticulum stress-indicators. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006; 350: 709–715.
Yano H, Kayukawa S, Iida S, Nakagawa C, Oguri T, Sanda T et al. Overexpression of carboxylesterase-2 results in enhanced efficacy of topoisomerase I inhibitor, irinotecan (CPT-11), for multiple myeloma. Cancer Sci 2008; 99: 2309–2314.
Kawamura T, Tashiro E, Yamamoto K, Shindo K, Imoto M . SAR study of a novel triene-ansamycin group compound, quinotrierixin, and related compounds, as inhibitors of ER stress-induced XBP1 activation. J Antibiot 2008; 61: 303–311.
Suhadolnik RJ, Uematsu T, Uematsu H . Toyocamycin: phosphorylation and incorporation into RNA and DNA and the biochemical properties of the triphosphate. Biochim Biophys Acta 1967; 149: 41–49.
Tavitian A, Uretsky SC, Acs G . The effect of toyocamycin on cellular RNA synthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1969; 179: 50–57.
Yoshida H, Matsui T, Hosokawa N, Kaufman RJ, Nagata K, Mori K . A time-dependent phase shift in the mammalian unfolded protein response. Dev Cell 2003; 4: 265–271.
Lee AH, Iwakoshi NN, Glimcher LH . XBP-1 regulates a subset of endoplasmic reticulum resident chaperone genes in the unfolded protein response. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23: 7448–7459.
Haze K, Yoshida H, Yanagi H, Yura T, Mori K . Mammalian transcription factor ATF6 is synthesized as a transmembrane protein and activated by proteolysis in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress. Mol Biol Cell 1999; 10: 3787–3799.
Ye J, Rawson RB, Komuro R, Chen X, Dave UP, Prywes R et al. ER stress induces cleavage of membrane-bound ATF6 by the same proteases that process SREBPs. Mol Cell 2000; 6: 1355–1364.
Shen J, Chen X, Hendershot L, Prywes RER . stress regulation of ATF6 localization by dissociation of BiP/GRP78 binding and unmasking of Golgi localization signals. Dev Cell 2002; 3: 99–111.
Okada T, Haze K, Nadanaka S, Yoshida H, Seidah NG, Hirano Y et al. A serine protease inhibitor prevents endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced cleavage but not transport of the membrane-bound transcription factor ATF6. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 31024–31032.
Nadanaka S, Yoshida H, Kano F, Murata M, Mori K . Activation of mammalian unfolded protein response is compatible with the quality control system operating in the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 15: 2537–2548.
Harding HP, Novoa I, Zhang Y, Zeng H, Wek R, Schapira M et al. Regulated translation initiation controls stress-induced gene expression in mammalian cells. Mol Cell 2000; 6: 1099–1108.
Harding HP, Zhang Y, Ron D . Protein translation and folding are coupled by an endoplasmic-reticulum-resident kinase. Nature 1999; 397: 271–274.
Tirasophon W, Lee K, Callaghan B, Welihinda A, Kaufman RJ . The endoribonuclease activity of mammalian IRE1 autoregulates its mRNA and is required for the unfolded protein response. Genes Dev 2000; 14: 2725–2736.
Zhou J, Liu CY, Back SH, Clark RL, Peisach D, Xu Z et al. The crystal structure of human IRE1 luminal domain reveals a conserved dimerization interface required for activation of the unfolded protein response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 14343–14348.
Yen L, Svendsen J, Lee JS, Gray JT, Magnier M, Baba T et al. Exogenous control of mammalian gene expression through modulation of RNA self-cleavage. Nature 2004; 431: 471–476.
Osada H, Sonoda T, Tsunoda K, Isono K . A new biological role of sangivamycin; inhibition of protein kinases. J Antibiot 1989; 42: 102–106.
Osada H, Cui CB, Onose R, Hanaoka F . Screening of cell cycle inhibitors from microbial metabolites by a bioassay using a mouse cdc2 mutant cell line, tsFT210. Bioorg Med Chem 1997; 5: 193–203.
Nishioka H, Sawa T, Hamada M, Shimura N, Imoto M, Umezawa K . Inhibition of phosphatidylinositol kinase by toyocamycin. J Antibiot 1990; 43: 1586–1589.
Lin JH, Li H, Yasumura D, Cohen HR, Zhang C, Panning B et al. IRE1 signaling affects cell fate during the unfolded protein response. Science 2007; 318: 944–949.
Han D, Upton JP, Hagen A, Callahan J, Oakes SA, Papa FR . A kinase inhibitor activates the IRE1alpha RNase to confer cytoprotection against ER stress. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008; 365: 777–783.
Lee AH, Iwakoshi NN, Anderson KC, Glimcher LH . Proteasome inhibitors disrupt the unfolded protein response in myeloma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 9946–9951.
Wilson WL . Phase I study with toyocamycin (NSC-63701). Cancer Chemother Rep 1968; 52: 301–303.
We thank Dr Masayuki Igarashi, Dr Masaki Hatano, Mrs Naoko Kinoshita and Dr Yoshio Nishimura (Institute of Microbial Chemistry, Tokyo, Japan) for fermentation of Actinomycete strain MK653-101F13, and Ms Chiori Fukuyama (Nagoya City University) for her skillful technical assistance. This study was partly supported by grants from Takeda Science Foundation. This work was partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (23791805) and a Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (21-8-5), Japan.
Y Shiotsu is an employee of Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd, Japan. S Iida received research funding from Kyowa Hakko Kirin and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. S Iida declares honoraria from Janssen Pharmaceutical KK. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on Blood Cancer Journal website
About this article
Cite this article
Ri, M., Tashiro, E., Oikawa, D. et al. Identification of Toyocamycin, an agent cytotoxic for multiple myeloma cells, as a potent inhibitor of ER stress-induced XBP1 mRNA splicing. Blood Cancer Journal 2, e79 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2012.26
- multiple myeloma
- ER stress
- adenosine analog
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry (2020)
The FEBS Journal (2019)
Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry (2019)
Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry (2019)