Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Three-dimensional buckled honeycomb boron lattice with vacancies as an intermediate phase on the transition pathway from α-B to γ-B


In the phase diagram of elemental boron, an unknown high-pressure form was identified as γ-orthorhombic boron (γ-B28), provoking studies of the extraordinary properties of its main building blocks, B12 icosahedra and B2 dumbbells. Although two low-pressure phases, α- and β-rhombohedral boron (α-B12 and β-B106), are also composed of icosahedra, the detailed kinetics and mechanisms of the structural transition from α-B12 or β-B106 to γ-B28 remain poorly understood. We report on new metastable boron phases formed during the transition in high-pressure high-temperature conditions that were discovered using the crystal structure search method. The metastable phases are understood to be a three-dimensional buckled defective honeycomb lattice in which boron vacancies lead to a dynamically and mechanically stable structure with triangular motifs. We suggest that the metastable phases act as intermediate states on the transition pathway from α-B12 to γ-B28 owing to their structural flexibility and low enthalpies, in the framework of Ostwald’s step rule.


Elemental boron exhibits a variety of allotropes and B-rich compounds owing to its electron deficiency compared with carbon that results in the ability to form multicenter bonds such as two- and three-center bonds.1, 2 Among the three-dimensional (3D) polymorphs, two rhombohedral phases (α-B12 and β-B106) and a γ-orthorhombic phase (γ-B28) are known as pure boron allotropes with structural units called icosahedra (B12), and their crystal symmetries are determined by the arrangement of icosahedra building blocks.1 Although the α- and β-rhombohedral phases can be crystallized from amorphous B,3, 4 their relative stability at ambient conditions is debated. There is a general consensus that although denser α-B12 is in a stable phase at elevated pressures, it transforms to β-B106 as the temperature increases.5, 6, 7 However, based on extrapolation of the phase boundary, α-B12 has been claimed to be stable at normal conditions.8 Conversely, γ-orthorhombic boron is stable at high pressures and its crystal structure is now well established based on theoretical and experimental studies.5 Various experiments have demonstrated that γ-B28 can be synthesized from several starting materials, including amorphous boron, α-B12, and β-B106, at pressures of 7–20 GPa and temperatures of 1500–2500 K.5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Other boron phases such as α-tetragonal (T-B50 or T-B52) and β-tetragonal boron (T-192 or β-B192) also contain icosahedra but have been suggested to be intermediate phases formed during structural transformations under high-pressure high-temperature conditions according to Ostwald’s step rule.5, 6, 9, 10

Although α-B12 and γ-B28 contain distorted cubic close-packed B12 icosahedra, the structural difference is that γ-B28 has additional B2 dumbbells occupying all the octahedral cavities. The bonding characteristics of the icosahedra and B2 units are well studied in these two allotropes: two- and three-center bonds coexist within and between icosahedra, enabling icosahedra that satisfy electron counting rules and possess bond polarity attributed to the spatial asymmetry of the charge densities in three-center bonds.11, 12, 13 In γ-B28, despite the predominantly covalent bonding nature between the B atoms, there is a partial charge transfer between the B2 units and the B12 icosahedra in a NaCl-type structure, resulting in polar covalent bonds.5 The partial ionicity of γ-B28 is supported by experimental measurement of the electron density distribution13 and explains the pressure dependence of the band gap, which is less than that of covalent α-B12, and the transverse optical-longitudinal optical phonon splitting, which commonly occurs in polar materials.5, 14, 15 Because B2 units are absent in the α-B12 phase, the mechanism for the pressure-induced transformation from α-B12 to γ-B28 is not well understood. The α-B12 and γ-B28 phases have different numbers of atoms per unit cell, necessitating a large supercell size to describe realistically the phase transition in theoretical simulations. Despite such difficulties, a few studies have attempted to explain the transition mechanism between the two allotropes. First-principles calculations suggested that there may be three new boron phases, which are induced from γ-B28 under deformation, on the transition pathway from α-B12 to γ-B28.16 However, to match the number of atoms with that of γ-B28, additional boron atoms were intentionally inserted into α-B12. Our understanding of the kinetic pathway to γ-B28 is lacking, and the existence of metastable intermediate phases remains an open question.

In this work, we report the discovery of metastable boron phases, which appear in the energy landscape at high pressures, using an ab initio evolutionary crystal structure search method. In metastable allotropes, icosahedra are completely broken, resulting in a 3D buckled honeycomb lattice with triangular motifs and B vacancies. With a certain fraction of B vacancies, the metastable structures become dynamically and mechanically stable, but are otherwise unstable. First-principles molecular dynamics (MD) simulations show that B vacancies are mobile under extreme conditions such as high pressures and high temperatures, indicating that various metastable phases can exist depending on the concentration of B vacancies. Based on the results, we provide a microscopic description of the transition pathway from α-B12 to γ-B28 in which metastable phases act as intermediate states during the structural transition in the framework of Ostwald’s step rule.

Materials and methods

The enthalpy minimization and electronic structure calculations were performed within the framework of density functional theory. We used the functional form proposed by Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof for the exchange-correlation potential17 and the projector augmented wave potentials,18 as implemented in the VASP (Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package) code.19 A plane wave basis set was used to expand the wave functions with an energy cutoff of 600 eV. For Brillouin zone integration, a k-point set was generated with a grid spacing of 0.2 Å−1. The ionic coordinates were fully optimized until the residual forces were <0.01 eV Å−1. To obtain the phonon vibrational frequencies at arbitrary wave vectors, the dynamical matrices were calculated using a finite difference method, as implemented in the Phonopy software.20 We used a generalized solid-state climbing image nudged elastic band (CI-NEB) method,21, 22 which is a modified version of the nudged elastic band method, to determine the transition pathways and energy barriers in the solid–solid transformations. For first-principles constant pressure–temperature MD simulations, we used the method of Parrinello and Rahman23 as implemented in the VASP code in which the temperature is controlled by a Langevin thermostat24 with an increasing energy cutoff up to 800 eV to eliminate the Pulay stress and a time step of 1 fs was selected.

Results and discussion

To search for new crystal structures of elemental B under pressure, we used an ab initio evolutionary crystal structure search method, as implemented in the AMADEUS code.25 This method is based on a combination of the conformational space annealing algorithm for global optimization with first-principles density functional calculations. The conformational space annealing algorithm uses three aspects: local energy/enthalpy minimization, a genetic algorithm to generate daughter solutions and simulated annealing to measure the similarities or differences between two solutions. This computational search algorithm is very efficient to search for stable and metastable structures because it maintains a population consisting of distinct low-enthalpy configurations in each generation. Thus, the conformational space annealing algorithm is similar to the current version of USPEX.26, 27 The efficiency of the AMADEUS code has been demonstrated by successful applications for exploring Si and C allotropes with direct band gaps.28, 29, 30 For a system with 28 B atoms per unit cell, we found that the γ-B28 structure containing B12 icosahedra is the most stable configuration at 40 GPa pressure (see Supplementary Figure S1), in agreement with a previous result based on another evolutionary crystal search algorithm, USPEX.5 In addition, we found a new B allotrope with the second-lowest enthalpy structure, which has 14 atoms in the primitive cell with the C2/m space group (Figure 1a).

Figure 1
figure 1

Structures and vibrational spectra of three-dimensional hexagonal boron. (a) Top and side views of the atomic structures of the hex-B0 and hex-B1/8 allotropes in the three-dimensional buckled honeycomb lattice, which have P63/mmc and C2/m space groups, respectively. The blue and green circles represent the B atoms with different heights in each buckled layer, and red circles indicate B vacancies in the hex-B1/8 allotrope. (b) The phonon spectra of the hex-B0 and hex-B1/8 allotropes at zero pressure.

The metastable C2/m allotrope contains no B12 icosahedra, in contrast to α-B12 and γ-B28, and exhibits a metallic band structure (see Supplementary Figure S2). The crystal structure of the C2/m allotrope is composed of buckled hexagonal layers and B vacancies. In the absence of B vacancies, the buckled layers are simply stacked without lateral displacements, forming a 3D hexagonal lattice with the P63/mmc space group (Figure 1a). Each layer has a buckled honeycomb geometry, similar to monolayer silicene,31 but with more significant buckling. Owing to strong interlayer bonding, the B atoms have an eightfold coordination with similar intra- and interlayer bond lengths, leading to triangular motifs. Although the hypothetical P63/mmc structure is unstable because it violates the electron counting rules, it turns into a dynamically stable structure by introducing B vacancies, similar to the two-dimensional (2D) α-sheet.32 In the C2/m phase, two B atoms in the unit cell that corresponds to eight primitive cells in the P63/mmc structure are missing, resulting in a vacancy concentration of ν=1/8. The optimized structural parameters for the P63/mmc and C2/m structures are summarized in Supplementary Table 1. Recently, two metastable B allotropes with the P21/c and C2/c space groups, which do not contain B12 units, were reported,33, 34 and their concentrations of B vacancies were ν=1/7 and 1/9, respectively. To describe different vacancy concentrations, we use hex-Bν notation such as hex-B0, hex-B1/9, hex-B1/8 and hex-B1/7 for allotropes with the P63/mmc, C2/c, C2/m and P21/c space groups, respectively, in the 3D hexagonal lattice. The classification parameter ν is analogous to the hexagonal hole density η used to distinguish various planar forms from 2D triangular lattice.32 In 3D allotropes, we find that vacancies tend to disperse rather than aggregate, forming various configurations with different space groups.

To investigate the dynamical stability of hex-Bv, we examined the full phonon spectrum. It is known that a flat triangular boron lattice is unstable with respect to a buckled shape owing to occupation of the antibonding states from three-center bonds.32 When hexagonal holes are introduced in the 2D triangular lattice, for example, in the boron α-sheet, the lattice stability is greatly enhanced because hexagonal holes embedded in the triangular lattice serve as scavengers of extra electrons, giving rise to delocalized π-bonds near the holes instead of three-center bonds.35 Conversely, honeycomb and Kagome lattices are unstable owing to the lack of electrons from excess holes. In 2D metal-B systems such as MoB4,36 TiB237 and MgB6,38 the electron transfer from metal ions to B networks balances the number of electrons, stabilizing the honeycomb and Kagome lattices. Similarly, the stability of 3D hex-Bν allotropes can be understood as a 3D extension of the 2D triangular lattice. Notably, B vacancies in hex-Bν allotropes act as acceptors similar to hexagonal holes in the α-sheet and allow for balancing of the number of electrons, inducing delocalized π-bonds. For the hex-B1/8 and hex-B1/7 allotropes with the C2/m and P21/c space groups, no imaginary phonon modes were found (Figure 1b), indicating that these structures are dynamically stable. Conversely, the hex-B0 structure without vacancies suffers from extra electrons and exhibits imaginary phonon modes (Figure 1b). Notably, as hole carriers are added to the hex-B0 structure, the imaginary phonon modes disappear, confirming that B vacancies have a role in dynamical stability (see Supplementary Figure S3). In addition to the dynamical properties, we investigated the mechanical properties of the C2/m and P21/c structures by calculating the elastic constants (see Supplementary Table S2). Using stress–strain relations and Hill’s formula,39, 40 we note that the elastic constants satisfy mechanical stability criteria for the monoclinic cells of the C2/m and P21/c structures. Based on the results, it is inferred that the metastable C2/m and P21/c structures are likely formed under high pressure.

The relative enthalpies of hex-Bν and other boron allotropes (see Supplementary Figure S4) are plotted as a function of pressure in Figure 2a. The α-B12 phase first transforms to γ-B28 at 19 GPa and then to α-Ga-type B at 90 GPa, in agreement with previous calculations.5, 41 Near the transition pressure of 19 GPa, the enthalpy of the hex-B1/8 structure is 100 meVper atom higher than those of α-B12 and γ-B28. However, the hex-B1/8 and hex-B1/7 allotropes become more stable than the α-B12 phase as the pressure increases above 62 and 80 GPa, respectively (Figure 2a). Conversely, although the hex-B1/7 structure has 3 meV per atom lower energy than the hex-B1/8 structure at zero pressure, the hex-B1/8 structure becomes more stable at pressures >6 GPa. In recent experiments, it was suggested that α-tetragonal boron, T-B50 or T-B52, may act as an intermediate phase during the structural transition from β-B106 to γ-B28.6, 9 However, the relative enthalpies of T-B50 and T-B52 rapidly increase with increasing pressure, as shown in Figure 2a, indicating that the hex-B1/8 structure is more likely an intermediate phase.

Figure 2
figure 2

Enthalpies of various B allotropes. (a) The relative enthalpies of various B allotropes (see Supplementary Figure 4) plotted as a function of pressure. (b) The relative enthalpies of five hex-Bν allotropes with different concentrations of B vacancies, ν=5/32, 1/7, 1/8, 3/28 and 3/32, as a function of pressure.

To investigate a possible transition pathway, we assumed that all of the B12 icosahedra in α-B12 are broken during the structural transformation. Then, the intermediate structure can be represented by an arrangement of B vacancies in the hex-B0 structure. For two supercells containing 28 and 32 atoms in the hex-B0 structure, we considered various concentrations of B vacancies, such as ν=3/32, 3/28, 4/32 (=1/8), 4/28 (=1/7) and 5/32. For each vacancy concentration, we searched for the lowest enthalpy configuration of B vacancies at zero pressure using the AMADEUS protocol and examined the relative stability of five hex-Bν structures under pressure, as illustrated in Figure 2b. Among the hex-Bν allotropes, the hex-B1/7 allotrope had the lowest enthalpy for low pressures <6 GPa. In the pressure range of 6–80 GPa, the lowest enthalpy structure is the hex-B1/8 allotrope. As the pressure increases above 80 GPa, the B allotropes with low vacancy concentrations such as hex-B3/28 and hex-B3/32 become more stable. Thus, there is a tendency that denser structures with lower vacancy concentrations are preferred as the pressure increases.

Because the type of hex-Bν allotrope depends on the vacancy concentration, the migration of B vacancies strongly affects their structural stability. We calculated the B-vacancy migration barrier using a solid-state CI-NEB method.21, 22 For the hex-B1/8 structure, which has four vacancies in an orthorhombic hex-B0 unit cell, we considered three migration pathways, as shown in Figure 3a. Along pathway 1, a vacancy hops from one buckled layer to its adjacent layer, whereas it migrates to the first and third nearest neighbor sites within a buckled layer, which are denoted as pathways 2 and 3, respectively. The migration barriers along the three pathways are plotted for pressures from 20 to 50 GPa. Along pathways 1, 2 and 3, the migration barriers at 20 GPa are estimated to be 0.52, 1.24 and 1.53 eV, respectively. Although the interlayer hopping is relatively easier, it is expected that vacancy diffusion within the buckled layer also occurs at elevated temperatures. When γ-B28 is synthesized from amorphous boron, α-B12 and β-B106, extreme conditions such as high pressures and high temperatures are usually adopted.5, 6, 7, 8, 9 We examined the thermal motions of atoms in the hex-B1/8 structure by calculating the mean squared-displacements, defined as , through first-principles MD simulations at 1500 and 2200 K. For the γ-B28 phase, which was taken as a reference structure for comparison, we found almost no fluctuations in mean-squared displacement at 2200 K (see Supplementary Figure S5). In the case of hex-B1/8, although the mean-squared displacements are <0.5 Å2 at 1500 K, they significantly increase to 4–6 Å2 during 80 ps at 2200 K. The enhanced mean-squared displacements are largely accompanied by the migration of B atoms within the same buckled layer. Thus, our results support the general tendency of migration of B vacancies at high temperatures.

Figure 3
figure 3

Migration of B vacancy. (a) The migration barriers for B-vacancy as a function of pressure for three different pathways. Boron vacancies are indicated by red circles, and the arrows represent their moving directions. (b) The fluctuations of potential energy and density during first-principles molecular dynamics (MD) simulations plotted for the hex-B2/9 allotrope at 50 GPa and 1500 K. The vertical dotted line represents the simulation time when a structural transition occurs from hex-B2/9 to hex-B1/8 during constant pressure–temperature MD simulations.

To examine the effects of pressure and temperature on the movement of vacancies, we performed constant-pressure MD simulations at 500 and 1500 K. For the initial configuration, we chose the hex-B2/9 structure with a relatively high concentration of vacancies in which 8 vacancies are randomly distributed in the 36-atom orthorhombic unit cell of hex-B0. From the enthalpy–vacancy–concentration curves shown in Figure 2b, the initial structure is expected to transform to hex-Bν allotropes with lower vacancy concentrations as the pressure increases. At a low temperature of 500 K, we found no structural change and only small fluctuations of the potential energy even when the pressure increased to 50 GPa (see Supplementary Figure S6). Conversely, at 1500 K, the potential fluctuations were greatly enhanced. At 40–50 GPa, the mass density significantly increased, accompanied by large potential fluctuations, indicating a reduction of the vacancy concentration (Figure 3b). During variable cell-shape MD simulations at 40 and 50 GPa, we found that the buckled planes were reoriented when vacancies migrated to form denser structures. Although the final configuration was not well identified due to thermal fluctuations, it is clear that B vacancies are very mobile at high pressures and high temperatures, thus the hex-Bν structure without B12 icosahedra is flexible, in contrast to α-B12 and γ-B28.

Although both α-B12 and γ-B28 consist of close-packed icosahedra, there is a structural discrepancy in that γ-B28 has additional B2 units inserted between icosahedra. During the transition from α-B12 to γ-B28, it is difficult to explain the formation of the B2 units if the icosahedra are preserved. To resolve this counting problem, it is necessary to introduce an intermediate phase that does not contain icosahedra. Therefore, we considered the hex-Bν allotrope to be the best candidate for the intermediate phase because of its low enthalpy and lack of icosahedra. Moreover, the number of B atoms per unit cell is flexible because the vacancies freely migrate under extreme conditions. Figure 4 shows a possible transition pathway from α-B12 to γ-B28 through two intermediate phases, hex-B1/7 and hex-B1/8, which was obtained using the solid-state CI-NEB method. The key features of this transition mechanism are that all of the icosahedra of α-B12 are broken, the intermediate hex-B1/7 structure turns to the hex-B1/8 structure by rearrangement of the vacancies, and γ-B28, consisting of icosahedra and dumbbells, is formed. In the initial process, some atoms in the icosahedra undergo large lattice relaxations and rebonding with active atoms in adjacent icosahedra, as shown in Figure 4a. As the icosahedra are completely disintegrated, the intermediate hex-B1/7 structure is formed, maintaining the same number of atoms per unit cell as that of α-B12. As the vacancies are rearranged, the hex-B1/7 structure immediately turns to the denser hex-B1/8 structure with a lower enthalpy, as demonstrated by MD simulations (Figure 3). To visualize the formation of γ-B28, we chose a 28-atom orthorhombic cell for the hex-B1/8 structure, as shown in Figure 4b. In the final process, the B atoms in dense regions are reconnected to each other and reform icosahedra and those in vacancy channels remain as dumbbells between the newly formed icosahedra.

Figure 4
figure 4

Transition pathways from α-B12 to γ-B28. The atomic structures during the stepwise transformations (a) from α-B12 to hex-B1/7 and (b) from hex-B1/8 to γ-B28, with the lowest enthalpy barriers (α1 and γ1 in Figure 5b) from the solid-state climbing image nudged elastic band (CI-NEB) method. The purple circles denote the B atoms that undergo major movements. The red arrows represent the directions of atomic movements, and the blue dotted lines indicate the formation of new bonds when a configuration changes to the next configuration. The red circles in (b) represent B2 dumbbells to be formed in γ-B28.

During the transition from α-B12 to hex-B1/7, we considered two different transition pathways: (i) a concerted transformation in which all the icosahedra in α-B12 are simultaneously broken via relaxations, and (ii) a stepwise transformation in which bond-breaking relaxations first occur for half of the icosahedra and are proceeded by the other half (see Supplementary Figure S7). Similar concerted and stepwise transformations are possible for the transition from hex-B1/8 to γ-B28. In Figure 5a, the enthalpy barriers are plotted as a function of pressure for the α-B12→hex-B1/7 and hex-B1/8→γ-B28 transitions. We found that the enthalpy barriers are lower for the stepwise transitions than for the concerted transitions. In addition, we note that the enthalpy barriers for α-B12→hex-B1/7 are higher than those of hex-B1/8→γ-B28, indicating that it is more difficult to break than to assemble the icosahedra. The calculated enthalpy barriers for the α-B12→hex-B1/7 transition were <.25 eV per atom at 20−50 GPa. In previous theoretical calculations for the graphite-to-diamond phase transition,42 the enthalpy barriers for the nucleation process were lower than those for the concerted pathways. Similarly, for boron allotropes, the enthalpy barrier will be lower if the transition occurs via nucleation. In the nucleation process, the hex-B1/7 and hex-B1/8 allotropes are still expected to appear because icosahedra are likely to be disintegrated at high-pressure high-temperature conditions.

Figure 5
figure 5

Schematic diagram of the phase transition. (a) The enthalpy barriers as a function of pressure for various transition pathways from α-B12 to hex-B1/71 and α2) and from hex-B1/8 to γ-B281, γ2 and γ3), with the lowest enthalpy barriers for α1 and γ1 in Figure 4. The stepwise and concerted transformations are represented by red (α1, γ1 and γ2) and black (α2 and γ3) lines, respectively (see Supplementary Figure S7). (b) The enthalpy diagram for the transition from α-B12 to γ-B28 at 50 GPa with the hex-B1/7 and hex-B1/8 allotropes as intermediate phases in the framework of the Ostwald’s step rule. The dotted line indicates the enthalpy barrier for the transition from hex-B1/7 to hex-B1/8, which is considered the upper bound because of the restricted supercell geometry (see Supplementary Figure S8).

Figure 5b illustrates a schematic enthalpy diagram for the transition pathway from α-B12 to γ-B28 under pressure. In α-B12, because the interactions between icosahedra become stronger as the pressure increases, the icosahedra are vulnerable to bond-breaking relaxations. The enthalpy barrier for the transition from α-B12 to hex-B1/7 is slightly reduced from 0.25 to 0.21 eV per atom as the pressure increases from 20 to 50 GPa. This tendency agrees with the experimental observation that the kinetic barrier between β-B106 and γ-B28 decreases with increasing pressure.9 Once hex-B1/7 is formed after the icosahedra are broken, it immediately transforms to the hex-B1/8 structure with lower enthalpy. To clarify the transition pathway between the hex-B1/7 and hex-B1/8 structures, we used the solid-state CI-NEB method for a supercell with 84 atoms, the least common multiple of 12 and 28 that can describe both densities of ν=1/7 and 1/8. As vacancies migrate, the buckled hexagonal layers are reoriented and the density of vacancies changes from ν=1/7 to 1/8. In the NEB images along the pathway, the hex-B1/7 and hex-B1/8 structures coexist with grain boundaries (see Supplementary Figure S8). The enthalpy barrier for the hex-B1/7→hex-B1/8 transition was calculated to be 0.17 eV per atom at 50 GPa. This enthalpy barrier is considered the upper bound because atomic arrangements are restricted within the supercell elongated along one direction and only the concerted motions are considered rather than the nucleation process. A large supercell containing thousands of atoms may avoid such restrictions, but is far beyond the current first-principles calculation limit. Despite the restricted cell geometry, the transition pathway from hex-B1/7 to hex-B1/8 is obtained via reorientation of the buckled hexagonal planes without significant atomic rearrangements. At the final stage, icosahedra are reformed in the hex-B1/8 structure and extra B atoms remain as B2 dumbbells. In the transition from hex-B1/8 to γ-B28, the enthalpy barrier is only 0.08 eV per atom at 50 GPa. Based on the results, it is inferred that the metastable hex-B1/7 and hex-B1/8 phases act as intermediate states in the transformation from α-B12 to γ-B28 under extreme pressure and temperature conditions. The simulated x-ray diffraction patterns of the metastable phases (see Supplementary Figure S9) can be used to identify unknown intermediate phases that may appear during structural transformations.


In summary, we predicted several metastable boron phases using the evolutionary crystal structure search method and suggest that two metastable allotropes with C2/m and P21/c space groups have important roles as intermediate phases during the structural transformation from α-B12 to γ-B28 at high pressures and high temperatures. The metastable phases, formed after the B12 icosahedra are disintegrated, are understood to be a three-dimensional buckled honeycomb lattice with triangular motifs and become dynamically and mechanically stable in the presence of B vacancies. The first-principles MD simulations showed that B vacancies are mobile at high pressures and high temperatures, indicating the structural flexibility of the metastable phases in contrast to other known allotropes containing icosahedra. In the framework of Ostwald’s rule of stages, introduction of the metastable phases enables us to explain the mysterious origin of B2 units as well as the different arrangement of icosahedra in γ-B28. Our results provide insights into understanding the role of metastable B phases during structural transformations and assist in revealing the mechanisms of other unexplained solid-solid transitions between B allotropes that contain icosahedra.


  1. Albert, B. & Hillebrecht, H. Boron: elementary challenge for experimenters and theoreticians. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 8640–8668 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li, X.-B., Xie, S.-Y., Zheng, H., Tian, W. Q. & Sun, H.-B. Boron based two-dimensional crystals: theoretical design, realization proposal and applications. Nanoscale 7, 18863–18871 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Decker, B. & Kasper, J. The crystal structure of a simple rhombohedral form of boron. Acta Crystallogr. 12, 503–506 (1959).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hughes, R. E., Kennard, C. H. L., Sullenger, D. B., Weakliem, H. A., Sands, D. E. & Hoard, J. L. The structure of β-rhombohedral boron. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 85, 361–362 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Oganov, A. R., Chen, J., Gatti, C., Ma, Y., Ma, Y., Glass, C. W., Liu, Z., Yu, T., Kurakevych, O. O. & Solozhenko, V. L. Ionic high-pressure form of elemental boron. Nature 457, 863–867 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurakevych, O. O., Le Godec, Y., Hammouda, T. & Goujon, C. Comparison of solid-state crystallization of boron polymorphs at ambient and high pressures. High Press. Res. 32, 30–38 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Solozhenko, V. L. & Kurakevych, O. O. Equilibrium p-T phase diagram of boron: experimental study and thermodynamic analysis. Sci. Rep. 3, 2351 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Parakhonskiy, G., Dubrovinskaia, N., Bykova, E., Wirth, R. & Dubrovinsky, L. Experimental pressure-temperature phase diagram of boron: resolving the long-standing enigma. Sci. Rep. 1, 96 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Qin, J., Irifune, T., Dekura, H., Ohfuji, H., Nishiyama, N., Lei, L. & Shinmei, T. Phase relations in boron at pressures up to 18 GPa and temperatures up to 2200°C. Phys. Rev. B 85, 014107 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ma, Y., Prewitt, C. T., Zou, G., Mao, H.-k. & Hemley, R. J. High-pressure high-temperature x-ray diffraction of β-boron to 30 GPa. Phys. Rev. B 67, 174116 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fujimori, M., Nakata, T., Nakayama, T., Nishibori, E., Kimura, K., Takata, M. & Sakata, M. Peculiar covalent bonds in α-rhombohedral boron. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4452 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. He, J., Wu, E., Wang, H., Liu, R. & Tian, Y. Ionicities of boron–boron bonds in B12 icosahedra. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 015504 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mondal, S., van Smaalen, S., Schönleber, A., Filinchuk, Y., Chernyshov, D., Simak, S. I., Mikhaylushkin, A. S., Abrikosov, I. A., Zarechnaya, E., Dubrovinsky, L. & Dubrovinskaia, N. Electron-deficient and polycenter bonds in the high-pressure γ-B28 phase of boron. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 215502 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oganov, A. R. & Solozhenko, V. L. . Boron: a hunt for superhard polymorphs. J. Superhard Mater. 31, 285–291 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oganov, A. R., Solozhenko, V. L., Gatti, C., Kurakevych, O. O. & Le Godec, Y. The high-pressure phase of boron, γ-B28: disputes and conclusions of 5 years after discovery. J. Superhard Mater. 33, 363–379 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. An, Q., Goddard III, W. A., Xiao, H. & Cheng, T. Deformation induced solid–solid phase transitions in gamma boron. Chem. Mater. 26, 4289–4298 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Togo, A. & Tanaka, I. First principles phonon calculations in materials science. Scr. Mater. 108, 1–5 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. & Jónsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901–9904 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sheppard, D., Xiao, P., Chemelewski, W., Johnson, D. D. & Henkelman, G. A generalized solid-state nudged elastic band method. J. Chem. Phys. 136, 074103 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182–7190 (1981).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Allen, M. P. & Tildesley, D. J. Computer Simulation of Liquids, Oxford University Press, Oxford, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lee, I.-H., Oh, Y. J., Kim, S., Lee, J. & Chang, K. J. Ab initio materials design using conformational space annealing and its application to searching for direct band gap silicon crystals. Comput. Phys. Commun. 203, 110–121 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Oganov, A. R. & Glass, C. W. Crystal structure prediction using ab initio evolutionary techniques: principles and applications. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 244704 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lyakhov, A. O., Oganov, A. R., Stokes, H. T. & Zhu, Q. New developments in evolutionary structure prediction algorithm USPEX. Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1172–1182 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee, I.-H., Lee, J., Oh, Y. J., Kim, S. & Chang, K. J. Computational search for direct band gap silicon crystals. Phys. Rev. B 90, 115209 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Oh, Y. J., Lee, I.-H., Kim, S., Lee, J. & Chang, K. J. Dipole-allowed direct band gap silicon superlattices. Sci. Rep. 5, 18086 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Oh, Y. J., Kim, S., Lee, I.-H., Lee, J. & Chang, K. J. Direct band gap carbon superlattices with efficient optical transition. Phys. Rev. B 93, 085201 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cahangirov, S., Topsakal, M., Aktürk, E., Şahin, H. & Ciraci, S. Two- and one-dimensional honeycomb structures of silicon and germanium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 236804 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tang, H. & Ismail-Beigi, S. Novel precursors for boron nanotubes: the competition of two-center and three-center bonding in boron sheets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 115501 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pickard, C. J. & Needs, R. J. Ab initio random structure searching. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 23, 053201 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhu, Q., Oganov, A. R., Lyakhov, A. O. & Yu, X. Generalized evolutionary metadynamics for sampling the energy landscapes and its applications. Phys. Rev. B 92, 024106 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Galeev, T. R., Chen, Q., Guo, J.-C., Bai, H., Miao, C.-Q., Lu, H.-G., Sergeeva, A. P., Li, S.-D. & Boldyrev, A. I. Deciphering the mystery of hexagon holes in an all-boron graphene α-sheet. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 11575–11578 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Xie, S.-Y., Li, X.-B., Tian, W. Q., Chen, N.-K., Zhang, X.-L., Wang, Y., Zhang, S. & Sun, H.-B. First-principles calculations of a robust two-dimensional boron honeycomb sandwiching a triangular molybdenum layer. Phys. Rev. B 90, 035447 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, L. Z., Wang, Z. F., Du, S. X., Gao, H.-J. & Liu, F. Prediction of a Dirac state in monolayer TiB2 . Phys. Rev. B 90, 161402 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Xie, S.-Y., Li, X.-B., Tian, W. Q., Chen, N.-K., Wang, Y., Zhang, S. & Sun, H.-B. A novel two-dimensional MgB6 crystal: metal-layer stabilized boron kagome lattice. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 1093–1098 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hill, R. The elastic behaviour of a crystalline aggregate. Proc. Phys. Soc 65, 349–354 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Le Page, Y. & Saxe, P. Symmetry-general least-squares extraction of elastic data for strained materials from ab initio calculations of stress. Phys. Rev. B 65, 104104 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. He, C. & Zhong, J. X. Structures, stability, mechanical and electronic properties of α-boron and α*-boron. AIP Adv. 3, 042138 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Khaliullin, R. Z., Eshet, H., Kühne, T. D., Behler, J. & Parrinello, M. Nucleation mechanism for the direct graphite-to-diamond phase transition. Nat. Mater. 10, 693–697 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by Samsung Science and Technology Foundation under Grant No. SSTFBA1401-08 and by the Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project of Korea Government.

Author contributions

WHH performed the theoretical calculations and data analysis and participated in manuscript preparation. All authors contributed to the scientific discussion. IHL performed the crystal structure search calculations, and SK calculated the x-ray diffraction patterns. KJC conducted the research, performed data analysis and participated in manuscript preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kee Joo Chang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the NPG Asia Materials website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, W., Oh, Y., Choe, DH. et al. Three-dimensional buckled honeycomb boron lattice with vacancies as an intermediate phase on the transition pathway from α-B to γ-B. NPG Asia Mater 9, e400 (2017).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links