Strong enhancement of phonon scattering through nanoscale grains in lead sulfide thermoelectrics

Abstract

We present nanocrystalline PbS, which was prepared using a solvothermal method followed by spark plasma sintering, as a promising thermoelectric material. The effects of grains with different length scales on phonon scattering of PbS samples, and therefore on the thermal conductivity of these samples, were studied using transmission electron microscopy and theoretical calculations. We found that a high density of nanoscale grain boundaries dramatically lowered the thermal conductivity by effectively scattering long-wavelength phonons. The thermal conductivity at room temperature was reduced from 2.5 W m−1 K−1 for ingot-PbS (grain size >200 μm) to 2.3 W m−1 K−1 for micro-PbS (grain size >0.4 μm); remarkably, thermal conductivity was reduced to 0.85 W m−1 K−1 for nano-PbS (grain size 30 nm). Considering the full phonon spectrum of the material, a theoretical model based on a combination of first-principles calculations and semiempirical phonon scattering rates was proposed to explain this effective enhancement. The results show that the high density of nanoscale grains could cause effective phonon scattering of almost 61%. These findings shed light on developing high-performance thermoelectrics via nanograins at the intermediate temperature range.

Introduction

Thermoelectric materials capable of scavenging electric power from sources of waste heat are currently attracting significant attention as part of the search for sustainable alternative energy sources.1, 2 For thermoelectric applications, the performance of a material is evaluated by its dimensionless figure of merit ZT=(S2σ/κ)T, where S, σ, κ and T are the Seebeck coefficient, electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity and absolute temperature, respectively. For a material to have excellent thermoelectric performance, a combination of a high power factor (S2σ) and low thermal conductivity (κ) is required.1, 2 However, the interdependence of S, σ and κ complicates the development of strategies for improving ZT beyond 3.0, a feat that could revolutionize thermal energy conversion efficiency. Thus far, nanostructuring (that is, embedding nanoscale precipitates) in bulk materials has been shown to be a particularly effective route for enhancing ZT by significantly lowering thermal conductivity.3, 4, 5 However, the existence of nanoscale precipitates also intensifies the scattering of charge carriers that, in turn, decreases the power factor. Furthermore, controlling the size and morphology of nanoscale precipitates embedded in a parent matrix remains challenging for material synthesis. Therefore, alternative methods capable of reducing thermal conductivity as effectively as nanoscale precipitates but with improved control are desirable. Introducing grain boundary scattering in nanocrystalline bulk materials is a promising strategy to achieve this goal.6 In contrast to nanoscale precipitates, nanograin phonon scattering centers are an intrinsic material feature that can be well controlled, and it simplifies device fabrication as well as integration into a larger system and potentially prolongs material lifetime.

Grain boundary phonon scattering has been shown to be important for improving the thermoelectric performance of Bi2Te3-, PbTe- and SiGe-based alloys.6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 Notably, Ren and co-workers6, 8, 12 achieved significant enhancements of ZT in nanograined bulk Bi2Te3-based thermoelectric materials by exploiting nanoscale grain boundary scattering to achieve reduced thermal conductivity. This success has provided motivation for subsequent research, both experimental and theoretical, on nanograins.7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 Recently, Biswas et al.9 reported high-performance bulk thermoelectrics PbTe-4% SrTe-2% Na with multiscale hierarchical architectures in which mesoscale grain boundaries could effectively scatter phonons with long mean free paths. Thus, it would be interesting to explore nanoscale grain boundaries for lattice thermal conductivity reduction. When a high density of boundaries or interfaces between nanoscale grains is introduced throughout thermoelectric materials, phonons can be intensively and extensively scattered and thermal conductivity is significantly reduced.9 It is well known that charge carriers can also be strongly scattered by abundant nanograin boundaries, leading to a pronounced decrease in electrical conductivity. However, a decrease in thermal conductivity resulting from increased phonon scattering at grain boundaries can compensate for diminished carrier mobility15 to achieve a net increase in ZT by keeping a balance between thermal transport and electrical mobility.

In the present work, we performed a systematic study of the roles of grains with varied length scales, from micro to nano, with a special emphasis on the thermal transport properties of PbS. The results indicated that nanograins with a high density of grain boundaries are more effective for lowering thermal conductivity than nanoprecipitates and are also effective for suppressing the bipolar effect. A high ZT value of 0.5 was achieved for nanocrystalline PbS materials at 923 K, almost a twofold enhancement with respect to the 0.3 measured at 923 K for a grain boundary-free ingot-PbS.

Experimental procedures

Starting materials

Lead (II) oxide, Pb wire (99.99%, American Elements, Los Angeles, CA, USA), S shot or chunk (99.999%, Inc., Canada), 4-Aminothiophenol, oleic acid, diphenyl ether, 1-octadecene and oleylamine (OAm) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA) and used as received without further purification.

Preparation of PbS nanoparticles

For a typical synthesis, 4.5 mmol of lead (II) oxide, 21 ml of diphenyl ether and 9 ml of oleic acid were mixed in a three-neck flask. The mixture was heated to 150 °C under argon (Ar) protection until a clear Pb source solution was obtained. A sulfur-OAm precursor solution was prepared separately in a three-neck flask by dissolving 3 mmol of sublimed sulfur powder in 3 ml OAm at 100 °C for 1 h under Ar protection. After cooling to room temperature, 4.5 ml of OAm and 22.5 ml of diphenyl ether were added. Subsequently, the sulfur-OAm precursor solution was quickly transferred into the Pb-source solution. To avoid the introduction of air into the reaction system, the transfer process was protected by an Ar atmosphere. The temperature of the reaction solution was increased and kept at 180 °C for 10 min to allow growth of PbS nanoparticles to the desired size. The reaction was then quenched by immersing the flask in an ice bath. The PbS nanoparticles were precipitated by ethyl alcohol, centrifuged for three cycles and dried under vacuum. The isolated PbS nanoparticles were redispersed in hexane to form a stable colloidal suspension suitable for future characterization. Then, 5.0 and 6.0 mmol of Pb precursors were used for the synthesis of the nano-PbS-2 and nano-PbS-3 samples with 1 at% and 2 at% excess Pb, respectively. For a typical ligand exchange reaction, 1.0 g oleic acid capped PbS nanoparticles were dispersed in 100 ml of methanol to achieve a typical nanoparticle concentration of 10 mg ml−1. The obtained solution was degassed with Ar for 30 min to remove any O2. Then, 1.0 g 4-aminothiophenol was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h under Ar protection. The PbS nanoparticles were centrifuged and washed with methanol three times. The obtained solid was dried under vacuum and stored inside a nitrogen glove box. The prepared nanoparticles were thoroughly washed by multiple precipitation and redispersion steps. Washed nanoparticles were dried under an Ar atmosphere. To completely remove any residual organic ligands, the nanoparticles were heated to 500 °C for 1 h under an Ar flow inside a tube furnace. The annealed nanoparticles were ground into a fine powder.

Synthesis of PbS thermoelectric materials with varied grain sizes

Ingot-PbS was prepared by a melting reaction. Briefly, elemental Pb and S were mixed inside carbon-coated fused silica tubes. The tubes were then evacuated to a base pressure of 10−4 torr, flame-sealed, slowly heated to 723 K over 12 h, heated to 1423 K over 7 h, soaked at this temperature for 6 h and subsequently air-quenched to room temperature. The molten samples were intermittently mixed by rocking to reduce ingot bubbles and ensure homogeneous composition. The tubes were subsequently air-quenched to room temperature. Micro-PbS was prepared by hand-grinding the melt-grown ingots down to a powder size <5 mm3 using a mortar and pestle, followed by mechanical grinding with a mortar and pestle to reduce the powder size to <53 μm3. The grinding was carried out inside an Ar-filled glove box. The powders were subsequently densified using a spark plasma sintering (SPS) (SPS-211Lx, Dr Sinter, Kanagawa, Japan) system at 823 K with a hold time of 10 min in a Φ=20 mm graphite die under an axial compressive stress of 60 MPa in an Ar atmosphere. The nano-PbS polycrystallines were prepared by SPS using PbS nanoparticles synthesized by chemical reactions, as mentioned above. The SPS heating profile was the same as that used for micro-PbS.

Thermoelectric property measurement

The obtained samples were cut into bars with dimensions of 10 × 3 × 2 mm and were used for simultaneous measurements of the Seebeck coefficient and the electrical conductivity using an Ulvac Riko ZEM-3 (Ulvac, Yokohama, Japan) instrument under a helium atmosphere from room temperature to 923 K. The thermal conductivity was calculated from κ=D·Cp·ρ, where the thermal diffusivity coefficient D was measured using the laser flash diffusivity method on a Netzsch LFA457 (Netzsch, Selb, Germany) instrument, and the data were analyzed using a Cowan model with pulse correction. Cp, the specific heat capacity, was indirectly derived using a standard sample (Pyroceram 9606) in the range of 300–923 K. The density ρ was determined from the sample dimensions and masses and was confirmed by measurement with a gas pycnometer (Micromeritics Accupyc1340, Norcross, GA, USA). Hall coefficients were measured on a home-built system in magnetic fields ranging from 0 to 1.25 T, utilizing a simple four-contact Hall-bar geometry in both negative and positive polarity to eliminate Joule resistive errors.

Electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction

The transmission electron micrograph (TEM) investigations were carried out on a JEOL 2100F (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) microscope operated at 200 kV. Thin TEM specimens were prepared by conventional methods. The procedures included cutting, grinding, dimpling, polishing and Ar-ion milling on a liquid nitrogen cooling stage. Samples pulverized in an agate mortar were used for powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. The powder diffraction patterns were obtained using Cu Kα (λ=1.5418 Å) radiation in a reflection geometry on an Inel diffractometer (Inel, Stratham, NH, USA) equipped with a position-sensitive detector and operating at 40 kV and 20 mA.

Theoretical calculation procedure

A single-unit-cell calculation based on a 11 × 11 × 11 Monkhorst-Pack k-point grid was initially used to determine the equilibrium lattice parameter of the PbS rock-salt structure. The ab initio result, 0.585 nm, compared favorably with the experimental value of 0.593 nm. Next, the Born effective charges and dielectric tensor of the system were calculated. Finally, we harnessed the symmetry of the unit cell to determine a minimal set of atomic displacements, from which the full interatomic force constant matrix for a 5 × 5 × 5 unit cell could be obtained, and performed the corresponding calculations using a 3 × 3 × 3 Monkhorst-Pack grid. Combining the interatomic force constant matrix, the Born effective charges and the dielectric tensor were obtained, and the full phonon dispersions over the whole Brillion zone were built. Again, comparison with previous theoretical calculations and experimental data yielded reasonable agreements.

Results and discussion

PbS nanoparticles

The synthesized PbS nanoparticles were studied by powder XRD, and the results are shown in Figure 1a. The well-defined sharp peaks in the XRD pattern reveal the high crystallinity of the cubic rock-salt structured PbS nanoparticles (PDF#78–1055).16 Low- and intermediate-magnification TEM images of the PbS nanoparticles, shown in Figure 1b, indicate a narrow size distribution (6–12 nm, with 9 nm on average) of the PbS nanoparticles with a nearly cubic shape. The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (Figure 1c), with an aperture including a batch of nanoparticles and carbon background, further confirmed the presence of cubically structured PbS nanoparticles. Furthermore, the high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of a typical single particle in Figure 1d clearly shows the cubic lattice fringes of the PbS crystal. The fast Fourier transform (FFT) image along the [001] zone axis, included in the inset of Figure 1d, further confirmed the cubic structure of the as-synthesized PbS nanoparticles. The lattice parameter of the PbS nanoparticles was measured to be 0.593 nm that agrees well with the previously reported value of 0.594 nm.16 The high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) image of a single PbS nanoparticle and its energy-dispersion X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) spectrum images shown in Figure 1e indicate that the nanoparticles had a uniform distribution of Pb and S.

Figure 1
figure1

(a) XRD spectrum of the PbS nanoparticles produced. As a reference, the pattern corresponding to the cubic rock-salt PbS phase (PDF#78–1055) is also shown. (b) TEM image of PbS nanoparticles. The inset shows a histogram of measured particle size. (c) SAED pattern obtained from a batch of nanoparticles and some carbon background. The diameter of the first reflection 200 rings is 3.4711 nm. (d) HRTEM image of a single nanoparticle with an inserted fast Fourier transform (FFT) image along the [100] zone axis. The 200 fringe is 0.297 nm. (e) HAADF image of a single nanoparticle and its EDS Pb and S elemental mappings.

Thermoelectric properties

Three typical nanocrystalline PbS samples, nano-PbS-1, nano-PbS-2 and nano-PbS-3, were prepared by a SPS method, where nano-PbS-1 is stoichiometric and the amount of excess Pb in nano-PbS-2 and nano-PbS-3 was 1 at.% and 2 at.% by EDS, respectively. To make comparisons, ‘ingot-PbS’ and ‘micro-PbS’ polycrystalline samples were prepared by a melting reaction as controls; ‘micro-PbS’ was obtained by pulverization of the ingot in an agate mortar, followed by SPS. The XRD patterns of the ingot-PbS and nano-PbS samples shown in Supplementary Figure S1 resemble that of the PbS cubic structure without any secondary phases. The full widths at half maximum of the XRD peaks of nano-PbS are wider than those of ingot-PbS, consistent with the smaller particle size of the nano-PbS.

The thermoelectric properties of all the studied PbS samples, including ingot-, micro- and nano-PbS, are shown in Figure 2. It can be readily observed that the electrical conductivities for ingot- and micro-PbS samples decreased with increasing temperature, indicating a metallic transport behavior (Figure 2a). On the other hand, for the nano-PbS samples the electrical conductivities increased with increasing temperature, similar to what was found in nanocrystalline PbTe,7, 16 PbTe-PbSe17 and PbTe-PbS materials.11 When the temperature reached 923 K, the electrical conductivities for the three nano-PbS samples were comparable to those of ingot- and micro-PbS. The reduced electrical conductivities of nano-PbS materials at low temperatures could be attributed to the diminished carrier mobility that results from electron scattering at the large number of grain boundaries.7, 11, 16, 17 The Hall data show that the carrier mobilities were 405 and 277 cm2 V−1 s−1 for ingot- and micro-PbS, respectively, whereas the carrier mobilities of the nano-PbS samples were dramatically decreased to 10 cm2 V−1 s−1.

Figure 2
figure2

Thermoelectric properties as a function of temperature for PbS samples. (a) Electrical conductivity. (b) Seebeck coefficient. (c) Plot of ln(σT1/2) vs 1/(kT) for nano-PbS samples, along with a fit to Equation (2) to derive the energy barrier associated with grain boundary potential barrier scattering. The inset shows the electronic structure at the edges between two grains. (d) Power factor.

Figure 2b shows negative values of −205 and −243 μV K−1 for ingot-PbS and micro-PbS samples, respectively, at room temperature. In contrast, a very large, positive Seebeck coefficient (609 μV K−1) was observed for three nano-PbS samples at room temperature. The Seebeck coefficient for nano-PbS samples decreased with increasing temperature from room temperature to 500 K, and then became negative when the temperature was over 500 K. This transport behavior for the Seebeck coefficient can be associated with a progressive compensation by the thermally excited minor carriers that eventually dominate and cause a change in the sign of the Seebeck coefficient. The Seebeck coefficient can be considered macroscopically as the electrical response of a conductor under the external temperature field, including both the electron and hole contributions.7, 17, 18 If the contributions of electrons and holes to the electrical conductivity are represented by σe and σh, respectively, the total Seebeck coefficient S is given by7, 17, 18, 19:

where |Sh| and |Se| represent the contributions from holes and electrons to the Seebeck coefficient, respectively. Thus, the sign of the total Seebeck coefficient is not a simple comparison between the numbers of electrons and holes, but is instead determined by the values of σe|Se| and σh|Sh|. In other words, a conductor with a majority of negative carriers can have a positive Seebeck coefficient if the value of σe|Se| is smaller than that of σh|Sh|. The Hall coefficient measurements indicated that the major charge carriers for PbS are electrons. Therefore, the positive Seebeck coefficients measured for the nano-PbS samples could be explained by σh being much higher than σe from room temperature to 500 K. Because this phenomenon was only observed for the nano-PbS samples, it can likely be explained mechanistically by potential barrier scattering. Briefly, when the grain size is small enough, a potential barrier is formed at the grain boundary. Carriers with higher energies (mostly holes) can easily jump over the potential barrier, whereas lower-energy carriers (mostly electrons) will be filtered out or strongly scattered. To estimate the height of the energy barrier at the grain boundaries (EB), it can be assumed that the effective electrical conductivity varies according to:

where k is the Boltzmann constant and T is the absolute temperature.20 To support this assumption, a plot of ln(σT1/2) vs 1/(kT) is shown in Figure 2c, along with a fit to the above equation that yields a barrier height EB of 0.062 eV. The electronic structure at the boundary between two grains is depicted in the inset as well. This energy barrier can effectively filter out the lower-energy electrons, but fails to stop holes. Thus, the number of holes will be more than that of electrons, resulting in a positive Seebeck coefficient at low temperature.21 At elevated temperatures, an increasing number of electrons will gain enough thermal activation energy to jump over the potential barriers at the grain boundaries, eventually leading to the domination of electrons in electrical transport. This scenario explains the negative Seebeck coefficients observed at elevated temperatures. Interestingly, there is an upturn for the Seebeck coefficients of nano-PbS at high temperature. However, there may be complex reasons for this trend. The change in sign of the Seebeck coefficients of the nano-PbS samples indicated that holes and electrons are two competitive carriers in quantity. In addition, the carrier concentration ranges from 1 × 1018 to 2 × 1018 cm−3 for nano-PbS that makes the Seebeck coefficient very sensitive to slight changes in charge carrier behavior, especially in the transition from a degenerate to a nondegenerate semiconductor. Furthermore, being at the nanoscale makes the electrical transport properties much more complicated, especially at high temperatures because of factors such as surface-active nanoparticles and changes in the band gap because of nanostructuring.22

Figure 2d shows the calculated power factor. The power factors of ingot-PbS and micro-PbS showed maximum values of 12.7 and 6.2 μW cm−1 K−2, respectively. The maximum power factor peaks were at higher temperatures for nano-PbS compared with ingot-PbS and micro-PbS. The power factor of nano-PbS-2 peaked at 3 μW cm−1 K−2 at 923 K, nearly two times higher than that of nano-PbS-1 (1.8 μW cm−1 K−2 at 850 K) and slightly higher than that of nano-PbS-3 (2.7 μW cm−1 K−2 at 900 K). The higher power factor of the nano-PbS-2 sample reflects an optimization of the carrier concentration by self-doping with excess Pb.

The total thermal conductivities as a function of temperature for the different samples are shown in Figure 3a. The heat capacities and thermal diffusivities are presented in Supplementary Figure S2. The total thermal conductivity (κtot) is essentially the sum of the electronic (κele) and lattice (κlat) contributions. Hence, κlat can be estimated by subtracting κele from κtot. The electronic part (κele) is roughly proportional to the electrical conductivity (σ) through the Wiedemann−Franz law, κele=L σ T, where L is the Lorenz number; here, 1.5 × 10−8 WΩK−2 (nondegenerate limit) was used.23 The κele is shown in Supplementary Figure S2c. For all nano-PbS samples, the thermal conductivity contribution from electrons was estimated to be <0.35% of the κtot, indicating that phonons dominate thermal transport. In fact, the above calculation for κlat is based on the assumption that only a single type of charge carrier is responsible for charge transport. However, thermoelectric materials are narrow-band semiconductors and always have both types of carriers (holes and electrons), especially at high temperatures. Minority carriers jump across the band gap, and the diffusing electron–hole pair gives rise to an additional thermal conductivity contribution, that is, bipolar thermal conductivity, that should be added to the total thermal conductivity. If this term is present, κlat could tend to be overestimated.24 For ingot-PbS, the upturn above 723 K shown in Figures 3a and b is suggestive of the bipolar effect. Importantly, the bipolar effect is an obstacle to improving thermoelectric performance, as it increases thermal conductivity and also decreases the overall Seebeck coefficient through the excitation of minor carriers at high temperatures. In contrast, an upturn in the micro-PbS sample is not apparent at high temperatures because the grain size of micro-PbS was reduced to several hundred nanometers compared with the above 200 μm grains of ingot-PbS.23 When the grain size was reduced further to tens of nanometers (nano-PbS), the upturn is observed in the thermal conductivity curve at high temperatures, indicating a ‘suppression’ of the bipolar effect.6 Here, ‘suppression’ only refers to suppressing the contribution of the bipolar effect to the total thermal conductivity because the bipolar effect is still present (Figure 2b). The mechanism of this ‘suppression’ could be related to electron scattering by the high density of nanoscale grain boundaries. The upturn because of the bipolar effect in thermal conductivity is mainly related to charge carrier transport. In the present work, the electronic thermal conductivity of nano-PbS is quite small, <8% (at 923 K) of the total contribution. Thus, the bipolar effect is not obvious in thermal conductivity (Figures 3a and b), whereas an upturn in the Seebeck coefficient is observed at high temperatures because of its strong dependence on charge carrier transport (Figure 2b). To summarize, nano-PbS suppresses the electronic and bipolar contributions to the total thermal conductivity through electron scattering at high density of grain boundaries, although electrical properties are deteriorated to some degree.

Figure 3
figure3

Thermoelectric properties as a function of temperature for PbS samples. (a) Total thermal conductivity. (b) Lattice thermal conductivity. (c) Figure of merit, ZT. The combined uncertainty for all measurements involved in the calculation of ZT is <15%.

Of course, the other important factor for reducing the total thermal conductivity is to lower the lattice thermal conductivity through strong phonon scattering at a high density of grain boundaries. Further analysis shows that both κtot and κlat of the three nano-PbS samples exhibit the same decreasing trend with increasing temperature over the entire temperature range tested. At room temperature, κtotκlat≈0.95, 0.85 and 0.88 W m−1 K−1 for nano-PbS-1, nano-PbS-2 and nano-PbS-3, respectively. These values are much lower than those of ingot-PbS (κtot≈2.66, κlat≈2.53 W m−1 K−1) and micro-PbS (κtot≈2.41, κlat≈2.36 W m−1 K−1). At 923 K, an extremely low thermal conductivity (κtot≈0.53, κlat≈0.5 W m−1 K−1) can be obtained in nano-PbS samples that is the lowest value reported to date for PbQ-based (Q=Te, Se, S) thermoelectric materials. Notably, both the total and lattice thermal conductivities showed a significant decrease in nano-PbS samples and were 65% of that of the ingot sample. This decrease indicates that the lattice thermal conductivity was significantly reduced by the high density of grain boundaries. Because of this significant reduction in lattice thermal conductivity, theoretical calculations were carried out that will be discussed later.

By combining the significant reduction of lattice thermal conductivity and ‘suppression’ of the bipolar effect (electronic contribution) by strong phonon and electron scattering at a high density of grain boundaries, respectively, high thermoelectric performance can be achieved. Although the electrical properties were deteriorated to some degree, the reduction of thermal conductivity more than compensated for the reduction of the electrical properties. Using the electrical and thermal transport properties, the ZT was calculated and is presented in Figure 3c. The maximum ZT value at 923 K increased from 0.3 for ingot-PbS to 0.5 for nano-PbS-2, and showed no sign of saturation at the highest temperatures. This value is the highest in PbQ nanocrystalline materials and is also higher than the highest ZT value of 0.35 reported for PbTe-PbSe core-shell nanocrystalline materials,17 as well as the ZT=0.38 at 670 K reported for nanocrystalline Ag2Te-PbTe materials.25 The low average ZT for nano-PbS samples over the whole operational temperatures stems from the extremely low electrical conductivity at low temperatures. Efforts to enhance electrical transport in nanocrystalline PbS by subtly tuning the carrier concentration26 are ongoing. One may argue that the nanoscale grains in PbS are unstable at elevated temperatures. Usually, grain growth will occur when the small size (several nm) grains are subjected to high temperatures.27 However, larger size (tens of nm or larger) grains should have enough resistance against the thermal ripening at high temperatures because the energy required for grain growth will dramatically increase as grain size increases. Therefore, not all nanomaterials are thermodynamically unstable,28 and this should be the case for our nanocrystalline PbS.

Microstructural features

To explore the microstructure of nano-PbS and investigate its relationship with thermoelectric performance, we employed various analytical TEM techniques to study the microstructural features of the nano-PbS-2 (Figures 4 and 5 and Supplementary Figures S3 and S4) and nano-PbS-3 (Figure 6 and Supplementary Figures S5 and S6) samples. For the nano-PbS-2 sample, the presence of nanoscale grains with sizes of 33 nm (or more specifically in the 14–58 nm interval) is evident in Figures 4a and b. The HRTEM image (Figure 4c) and its FFT image (Figure 4d) reveal low-angle grain boundaries. The grain boundary is a semi-coherent interface along the (002) plane. The relative rotation angle between two grains is 2.25°, so small that the spot splitting can only be observed at high-order reflections. Meanwhile, a high-angle grain boundary can also be found, as shown in Supplementary Figure S3. Because the grain size is very small, overlap between grains is also common in the sample. The high-magnification image (Figure 5a) shows a relatively small grain (15 nm), marked with yellow dashed lines, located below a larger grain. Figure 5b shows a representative HRTEM image of a homogeneous crystal lattice along the [001] zone axis. Although the majority of nanograins are free of nanoscale precipitates, small amounts of platelet-like precipitates (1.3 nm, ranging 0.5–2.2 nm) can be observed inside some nanograins because of Pb enrichment (Figure 5c). The projection traces of the nanoscale precipitates direct along [200] and [020], as shown in Figure 5c. Precipitate growth in a preferred direction reflects structural anisotropy. The small amount of Pb-rich precipitates inside the nanograins can also act as phonon scattering centers to some extent.

Figure 4
figure4

Microstructure of the nano-PbS-2 sample. (a) Low-magnification TEM image revealing nanoscale grains. (b) Grain size distribution histogram. (c) High-magnification lattice image showing a (002) grain boundary. (d) FFT image of (c) depicting the low-angle grain boundary along the [110] zone axis.

Figure 5
figure5

Microstructure of the nano-PbS-2 sample. (a) High-magnification lattice image along [110] zone axis showing the overlap between two grains. Insets are FFT images from the marked areas. (b) High-magnification lattice image showing an area without precipitates. (c) High-magnification lattice image showing a small density of platelet-like precipitates parallel or perpendicular to each other. The inset is the precipitate-size distribution histogram. (d) EDS elemental analysis of precipitates and the matrix.

Figure 6
figure6

Microstructure of the nano-PbS-3 sample. (a) Medium-magnification TEM image showing the presence of platelet-like precipitates. (b) Histogram of precipitate-size distribution. (c) High-magnification lattice image showing many perpendicular or parallel platelet-like precipitates along 〈200〉 directions. The inset FFT image confirms the endotaxially aligned structure between the Pb-rich precipitate and PbS matrix. An inset schematic of the corresponding precipitate morphology in three-dimensional space represents two plate-like precipitates perpendicular to each other, and the arrowhead indicates the direction of the TEM observations. (d) Lattice image and strain maps showing elastic strain (color scale) along only one direction in the platelet-like precipitates.

Low-magnification annular bright-field (ABF) and HAADF images are shown in Supplementary Figures S4 and S5, respectively. Along with EDS, these images can be used to compare the elemental concentrations in the precipitates and the matrix. Figure 5d and the inset in Supplementary Figure S5 show the statistics results from EDS spot analysis of nano-PbS-2 and nano-PbS-3 samples, respectively. Although it is difficult to quantitatively determine the exact compositions of individual precipitates because of their overlap with the matrix, the EDS analysis still qualitatively indicates a large increase in the Pb signal for the precipitates compared with the matrix, suggesting that the precipitates are Pb rich. The ABF images (Supplementary Figure S5a) and HAADF (Supplementary Figure S5b) images from the same area clearly show the precipitates (they appear darker in the bright-field image and brighter in the dark-field image) with more high-Z elements, consistent with the EDS spot analysis shown in the inset in Supplementary Figure S5. For nano-PbS-2, the concentration of Pb in the precipitates is 57.4%, whereas it is 52.8% in the matrix (Figure 5d); for nano-PbS-3, it is 58% in the precipitates and 52.9% in the matrix (inset of Supplementary Figure S5).

A higher density of precipitates can be observed in the nano-PbS-3 sample compared with the nano-PbS-2 sample because the former had a higher excess of Pb during preparation. These nanoscale precipitates reflect as platelet-like and spherical/ellipsoidal, with three crystallographic variants, as shown in Figure 6a and Supplementary Figures S5 and S6, respectively. The size of precipitates ranges from 0.7 to 3.6 nm, and the average size is 1.4 nm, as shown in the size distribution in Figure 6b. Figure 6c shows a representative HRTEM image of platelet-like precipitates obtained with the electron beam along the [001] zone axis; the inset SAED pattern confirms the endotaxially aligned structure between Pb-rich precipitate and PbS matrix. The platelet-like precipitates are organized either perpendicular or parallel to each other. They can appear as single plates (marked with red dashed ellipsoidal boxes) as well as crossed plates (marked with yellow dashed rectangular boxes). A schematic of the crossed precipitate morphology in three-diensional space shows two parallel plates crossed with another plate, and the arrowhead indicates the direction of the TEM observations. To analyze the possible strain around the interface between the platelet-like precipitate and the matrix, high-quality HRTEM images were analyzed by geometric phase analysis, a semiquantitative lattice image-processing approach for revealing spatially distributed strain fields.29 Figure 6d shows enlarged images and their analyzed geometric phase analysis results, namely the components ɛxx and ɛyy of the strain. The image shows two perpendicular platelet-like precipitates enclosed by dotted lines, and indicates that there is elastic strain only along the x direction for the left precipitate and only along the y direction for the right one. Thus, the strain distribution in platelet-like precipitates is anisotropic. This result is in contrast to spherical precipitates that have more uniform omnidirectional strain distributions.5 The platelet-like precipitates with the plate plane along {200} appear spherical/ellipsoidal if we observe them from [110] or other non-[100] directions,9, 29 as shown in Supplementary Figure S6. The PbS matrix and Pb-rich nanosized precipitates have similar symmetry, structure and lattice parameters, and the corresponding crystallographic planes and directions are completely aligned in three dimensions. Thus, they can effectively scatter phonons without deteriorating charge transmission.5

Theoretical calculations

Purely phenomenological models30 with a gray model assumption might be incapable of offering detailed insight into the mechanisms of thermal conduction and their interplay with the nanograins in nanocrystalline PbS materials. A strict treatment should involve detailed study of phonon propagation in the full phonon spectrum of the material. Today, ab initio calculations are optimal sources of this information, as they avoid the need for experimental input as well as the transferability problems of fitting parameters.31, 32, 33 Thus, a theoretical model based on a combination of first-principles phonon calculations for pristine PbS and a set of semiempirical phonon scattering rates was constructed to understand the underlying mechanism and importance of grain boundary phonon scattering. A local density approximation,34 in conjunction with projector-augmented-wave pseudopotentials,35 was employed for first-principles calculations, as implemented in the plane-wave-based density functional theory package VASP (on the basis of software licence agreements with the University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria).36 The energy cutoff was determined by adding 30% to the highest energy cutoff for the pseudopotentials. We checked the results of our structural minimizations by comparing our equilibrium lattice parameter of 0.585 nm with the experimental value of 0.593 nm. The phonon dispersions obtained from our supercell calculations were also compared with previous theoretical calculations and with experimental data.37, 38

In general, the lattice thermal conductivity can be obtained by summing the contribution of phonons from each branch α integrated over the Brillouin zone, as

where vz is the phonon’s group velocity in the transport direction, n0 denotes the Bose–Einstein distribution and Λ is the mean free path. For the bulk material, we incorporated impurity and anharmonic terms in their standard forms into the mean free path,39

The best-fit parameters obtained for the micro-PbS sample data for temperatures <700 K (where the charge carrier contribution is negligible) were A1=3.37 × 10−40 s4 m−1, B1=1.90 × 10−19 s2 m−1K−1 and B2=454.05 K. The calculated result was in excellent agreement with our experimental data (see Figure 7), and further justifies this choice of functional form. However, in the nano-PbS samples, two additional terms, representing the contributions to phonon scattering from the nanograined structure and from the precipitates, have to be considered. These mechanisms operate at different length scales, and hence it is reasonable to incorporate them with Matthiesen’s rule:

Figure 7
figure7

Fit of the theoretical model to the experimental thermal conductivity data of micro-PbS and nano-PbS-2. The separate effects of nano-grains and nano-precipitates are also shown.

The construction of these terms is greatly facilitated by the availability of detailed experimental data. Potential barriers between grains impose a limitation to the phonon mean free path that is equal to the average reciprocal grain size times a form factor F.40 The effect of Pb-rich precipitates is twofold: they act as localized scattering centers and, by changing the effective medium for phonons, they can affect the anharmonic term in . By treating the precipitates as approximately spherical particles of (variable) radius R distributed randomly in the sample with density ρ, the first term can also be constructed from experimental data and a single adjustable dimensional factor FA,41 whereas the second term will be treated as a perturbation to the B1 coefficient in Equation (5). Thus,

where c is the speed of sound in PbS.30, 42 The best-fit parameters found for the nano-PbS-2 sample were F=0.279, FA=1.09 × 103 and δB=0.57. Existing modeling efforts suggest that F arises not only from geometric features of the grains but also from how efficiently their boundaries can scatter phonons.43 In this context, an F appreciably <1.0 can be interpreted plausibly as a sign of less than totally diffusive boundaries. FA has been shown to be proportional to the square of the relative difference in densities between the host matrix and the precipitates. Because this difference is close to zero in the present study, scattering by precipitates is expected to be a comparatively minor factor that is confirmed in the following paragraphs.

Figure 7 shows a satisfactory fit of the above theoretical model to the experimental lattice thermal conductivity of micro-PbS and nano-PbS. More importantly, the separate effects of the terms and on the lattice thermal conductivity are highlighted. When only considering nano-precipitates, the calculated lattice thermal conductivity is 1.83 W m−1 K−1 at room temperature that is 78% of that of pure micro-PbS (2.36 W m−1 K−1). However, if only nano-grains are considered, the reduction is much more effective, down to 0.92 W m−1 K−1 (39% of that of pure micro-PbS). Although both of these effects cause an important reduction in the lattice thermal conductivity, they collectively indicate that most of the resulted enhancement comes from the nanograins. The effect of Pb-rich precipitates is minor in a first approximation to the problem.

The fact that grain boundaries and precipitate/matrix interfaces cause a modification of the effective medium observed by phonons large enough to change the coefficient of the anharmonic term by almost 65% is remarkable. Our calculations also showed that both interfaces/boundaries can effectively scatter phonons; however, phonon scattering by grain boundaries is dominant. Thus, the model yields results consistent with expectations based on experimental fact: the nano-PbS-2 sample has a low density of Pb-rich precipitates but also a very small grain size, making grain boundary scattering dominant.

Concluding remarks

By combining experiments and theoretical calculations, we have presented a systematic study of the thermal conductivity of PbS materials with granular structures belonging to different length scales. We found that nanoscale grains can dramatically reduce the lattice thermal conductivity and partially suppress the bipolar effect. This scattering mechanism dominates over the effect of scattering by nano-precipitates. A theoretical model that calculated the full phonon spectrum ab initio further confirmed nanoscale grain scattering as the main factor influencing the reduced lattice thermal conductivity of the nanocrystalline PbS materials. These PbS nanocrystallines stand out as possible robust and low-cost alternatives to other high-performance thermoelectric materials.

Associated content

Electronic Supplementary Information available: powder XRD patterns of nano-PbS and ingot-PbS (Supplementary Figure S1); heat capacity, thermal diffusivity and electronic thermal conductivity as a function of temperature for PbS (Supplementary Figure S2); supporting microstructure for PbS-nano-2 and PbS-nano-3 samples (Supplementary Figures S3–S6).

References

  1. 1

    Kanatzidis, M. G. Nanostructured thermoelectrics: the new paradigm? Chem. Mater. 22, 648–659 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    He, J., Kanatzidis, M. G. & Dravid, V. P. High performance bulk thermoelectrics via a panoscopic approach. Mater. Today 16, 166–176 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Hsu, K. F., Loo, S., Guo, F., Chen, W., Dyck, J. S., Uher, C., Hogan, T., Polychroniadis, E. K. & Kanatzidis, M. G. Cubic AgPbmSbTe2+m: bulk thermoelectric materials with high figure of merit. Science 303, 818–821 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Biswas, K., He, J., Zhang, Q., Wang, G., Uher, C., Dravid, V. P. & Kanatzidis, M. G. Strained endotaxial nanostructures with high thermoelectric figure of merit. Nat. Chem. 3, 160–166 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Ikeda, T., Haviez, L., Li, Y. & Snyder, G. J. Nanostructuring of thermoelectric Mg2Si via a nonequilibrium intermediate state. Small 8, 2350–2355 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Poudel, B., Hao, Q., Ma, Y., Lan, Y., Minnich, A., Yu, B., Yan, X., Wang, D., Muto, A., Vashaee, D., Chen, X., Liu, J., Dresselhaus, M. S., Chen, G. & Ren, Z. High-thermoelectric performance of nanostructured bismuth antimony telluride bulk alloys. Science 320, 634–638 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Martin, J., Wang, L., Chen, L. & Nolas, G. S. Enhanced Seebeck coefficient through energy-barrier scattering in PbTe nanocomposites. Phys. Rev. B 79, 115311 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Zhu, G. H., Lee, H., Lan, Y. C., Wang, X. W., Joshi, G., Wang, D. Z., Yang, J., Vashaee, D., Guilbert, H., Pillitteri, A., Dresselhaus, M. S., Chen, G. & Ren, Z. F. Increased phonon scattering by nanograins and point defects in nanostructured silicon with a low concentration of germanium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 196803 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Biswas, K., He, J., Blum, I. D., Wu, C.-I., Hogan, T. P., Seidman, D. N., Dravid, V. P. & Kanatzidis, M. G. High-performance bulk thermoelectrics with all-scale hierarchical architectures. Nature 489, 414–418 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Kräemer, S., Shi, Y., Zhang, F., Snedaker, M., Ding, K., Moskovits, M., Snyder, G. J. & Stucky, G. D. Surfactant-free synthesis of Bi2Te3−Te micro−nano heterostructure with enhanced thermoelectric figure of merit. ACS Nano 5, 3158–3165 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Ibáñez, M., Zamani, R., Gorsse, S., Fan, J., Ortega, S., Cadavid, D., Morante, J. R., Arbiol, J., Cabot, A. & Core–Shell Nanoparticles, A. s. Building blocks for the bottom-up production of functional nanocomposites: PbTe–PbS thermoelectric properties. ACS Nano 7, 2573–2586 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Lan, Y., Poudel, B., Ma, Y., Wang, D., Dresselhaus, M. S., Chen, G. & Ren, Z. Structure study of bulk nanograined thermoelectric bismuth antimony telluride. Nano Lett. 9, 1419–1422 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Bux, S. K., Blair, R. G., Gogna, P. K., Lee, H., Chen, G., Dresselhaus, M. S., Kaner, R. B. & Fleurial, J.-P. Nanostructured bulk silicon as an effective thermoelectric material. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 2445–2452 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Liu, W., Yan, X., Chen, G. & Ren, Z. Recent advances in thermoelectric nanocomposites. Nano Energ. 1, 42–56 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Heremans, J. P., Thrush, C. M. & Morelli, D. T. Thermopower enhancement in lead telluride nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B 70, 115334 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Quan, Z., Siu Loc, W., Lin, C., Luo, Z., Yang, K., Wang, Y., Wang, H., Wang, Z. & Fang, J. Tilted face-centered-cubic supercrystals of PbS nanocubes. Nano Lett. 12, 4409–4413 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Scheele, M., Oeschler, N., Veremchuk, I., Peters, S.-O., Littig, A., Kornowski, A., Klinke, C. & Weller, H. Thermoelectric properties of lead chalcogenide core–shell nanostructures. ACS Nano 5, 8541–8551 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Popescu, A., Woods, L. M., Martin, J. & Nolas, G. S. Model of transport properties of thermoelectric nanocomposite materials. Phys. Rev. B 79, 205302 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Caillat, T., Borshchevsky, A. & Fleurial, J.-P. Properties of single crystalline semiconducting CoSb3 . J. Appl. Phys. 80, 4442–4449 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Taylor, W. E., Odell, N. H. & Fan, H. Y. Grain boundary barriers in germanium. Phys. Rev. 88, 867–875 (1952).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Seto, J. Y. W. The electrical properties of polycrystalline silicon films. J. Appl. Phys. 46, 5247–5254 (1975).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Androulakis, J., Peter, S. C., Li, H., Malliakas, C. D., Peters, J. A., Liu, Z., Wessels, B. W., Song, J.-H., Jin, H., Freeman, A. J. & Kanatzidis, M. G. Dimensional reduction: a design tool for new radiation detection materials. Adv. Mater. 23, 4163–4167 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Zhao, L.-D., Lo, S.-H., He, J., Li, H., Biswas, K., Androulakis, J., Wu, C.-I., Hogan, T. P., Chung, D.-Y., Dravid, V. P. & Kanatzidis, M. G. High performance thermoelectrics from earth-abundant materials: enhanced figure of merit in PbS by second phase nanostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 20476–20487 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Zhao, L. D., Wu, H. J., Hao, S. Q., Wu, C. I., Zhou, X. Y., Biswas, K., He, J. Q., Hogan, T. P., Uher, C., Wolverton, C., Dravid, V. P. & Kanatzidis, M. G. All-scale hierarchical thermoelectrics: MgTe in PbTe facilitates valence band convergence and suppresses bipolar thermal transport for high performance. Energ. Environ. Sci. 6, 3346–3355 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Cadavid, D., Ibáñez, M., Gorsse, S., López, A., Cirera, A., Morante, J. & Cabot, A. Bottom-up processing of thermoelectric nanocomposites from colloidal nanocrystal building blocks: the case of Ag2Te–PbTe. J. Nanopart. Res. 14, 1–10 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Wang, H., Pei, Y., LaLonde, A. D. & Snyder, G. J. Heavily doped p-type PbSe with high thermoelectric performance: an alternative for PbTe. Adv. Mater. 23, 1366–1370 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Song, X., Zhang, J., Yue, M., Li, E., Zeng, H., Lu, N., Zhou, M. & Zuo, T. Technique for preparing ultrafine nanocrystalline bulk material of pure rare-earth metals. Adv. Mater. 18, 1210–1215 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Minnich, A. J., Dresselhaus, M. S., Ren, Z. F. & Chen, G. Bulk nanostructured thermoelectric materials: current research and future prospects. Energ. Environ. Sci. 2, 466–479 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Hÿtch, M. J., Snoeck, E. & Kilaas, R. Quantitative measurement of displacement and strain fields from HREM micrographs. Ultramicroscopy 74, 131–146 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    He, J., Girard, S. N., Kanatzidis, M. G. & Dravid, V. P. Microstructure-lattice thermal conductivity correlation in nanostructured PbTe0.7S0.3 thermoelectric materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 20, 764–772 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Qiu, B., Bao, H., Zhang, G., Wu, Y. & Ruan, X. Molecular dynamics simulations of lattice thermal conductivity and spectral phonon mean free path of PbTe: bulk and nanostructures. Comp. Mater. Sci. 53, 278–285 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Tian, Z., Garg, J., Esfarjani, K., Shiga, T., Shiomi, J. & Chen, G. Phonon conduction in PbSe, PbTe, and PbTe1−xSex from first-principles calculations. Phys. Rev. B 85, 184303 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Dames, C. & Chen, G. in Thermoelectrics Handbook: Macro to Nano ed. Rowe D. M. Ch. 42 1, (Taylor & Francis: New York, (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Mingo, N. Calculation of Si nanowire thermal conductivity using complete phonon dispersion relations. Phys. Rev. B 68, 113308 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Perdew, J. P. & Zunger, A. Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems. Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048–5079 (1981).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Wakabayashi, I., Kobayashi, H., Nagasaki, H. & Minomura, S. The effect of pressure on the lattice parameters part I. PbS and PbTe Part II. Gd, NiO, and α-MnS. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 25, 227–233 (1968).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Kilian, O., Allan, G. & Wirtz, L. Near Kohn anomalies in the phonon dispersion relations of lead chalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 80, 245208 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Takashiri, M., Tanaka, S., Hagino, H. & Miyazaki, K. Combined effect of nanoscale grain size and porosity on lattice thermal conductivity of bismuth-telluride-based bulk alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 112, 084315 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Mingo, N., Hauser, D., Kobayashi, N. P., Plissonnier, M. & Shakouri, A. ‘Nanoparticle-in-alloy’ approach to efficient thermoelectrics: silicides in SiGe. Nano Lett. 9, 711–715 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    He, J., Zhao, L.-D., Zheng, J.-C., Doak, J. W., Wu, H., Wang, H.-Q., Lee, Y., Wolverton, C., Kanatzidis, M. G. & Dravid, V. P. Role of sodium doping in lead chalcogenide thermoelectrics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 4624–4627 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Minnich, A. J., Lee, H., Wang, X. W., Joshi, G., Dresselhaus, M. S., Ren, Z. F., Chen, G. & Vashaee, D. Modeling study of thermoelectric SiGe nanocomposites. Phys. Rev. B 80, 155327 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This contribution was supported primarily by the startup of the South University of Science and Technology of China, supported by the Shenzhen government, and the national 1000 plan for young scientists. This work was also partially supported by a grant-in-aid of ‘985 Project’ from Xi’an Jiaotong University, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21201138 and 11204228), the National Basic Research Program of China (2012CB619402 and 2014CB644003) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yongquan Qu or Li-Dong Zhao or Jiaqing He.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Author contributions

JQH and LDZ designed the entire project. LDZ synthesized the bulk samples and conducted the thermoelectric experiments. HJW, XTS and JQH performed the TEM experiments. JC and ZW performed the theoretical calculations. ZYZ and YQQ synthesized the PbS nanoparticles. HJW, JC, ZW, LDZ and JQH analyzed the results and wrote the manuscript.

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the NPG Asia Materials website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, H., Carrete, J., Zhang, Z. et al. Strong enhancement of phonon scattering through nanoscale grains in lead sulfide thermoelectrics. NPG Asia Mater 6, e108 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2014.39

Download citation

Keywords

  • grain
  • nanoscale
  • phonon
  • thermal conductivity
  • thermoelectrics

Further reading