Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

National Human Exposure Assessment Survey: Analysis of exposure pathways and routes for arsenic and lead in EPA Region 5

Abstract

The National Human Exposure Assessment Survey (NHEXAS) Phase I field study conducted in EPA Region 5 (Great Lakes Area) provides extensive exposure data on a representative sample of approximately 250 residents of the region. Associated environmental media and biomarker (blood, urine) concentration data were also obtained for the study participants to aid in understanding of the relationships of exposures to both contaminant pathways and doses. Besides fulfilling the primary NHEXAS objectives, the NHEXAS data provided an opportunity to explore secondary usages, such as examining pathway to route of exposure relationships. A generic type of structural equation model was used to define the anticipated relationships among the various data types for both arsenic (As) and lead (Pb). Since, by design, only a few participants provided data for all sample types, implementing this model required that some media concentrations (outdoor air and soil) be imputed for subjects with missing information by using measurements collected in the same geographic area and time period. The model, and associated pairwise correlations, generally revealed significant but weak associations among the concentrations, exposures, and doses; the strongest associations occurred for the various air measurements (indoor versus outdoor and personal). The generally weak associations were thought to be partly due to the absence of complete coverage of nonresidential environmental media and to nonsynchronization of relevant measurement times and integration periods of collection across the various sample types. In general, relationships between the NHEXAS questionnaire data and the various concentration, exposure, and body-burden measures were also weak. The model results and the modeling exercise suggest several ways for optimizing the design of future exposure assessment studies that are aimed at supporting structural modeling activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CALIS:

Covariance analysis of linear structural equations

EPA:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

GF:

goodness of fit

GLM:

general linear model(s)

HH:

household(s)

LINEQS:

linear equations

MS:

mean square

NHEXAS:

National Human Exposure Assessment Survey

PSU:

primary sampling unit

SEA:

structural equation analysis

TAQ:

Time and Activity Questionnaire

WR:

weight ratio

References

  • Clayton A Pellizzari E Whitmore R Perritt R Quackenboss J, 1999. National Human Exposure Assessment Survey (NHEXAS): distributions and associations of lead, arsenic and volatile organic compounds in EPA Region 5, J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol. 9(5): 381–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pellizzari E Lioy P Quackenboss J Whitmore R Clayton A Freeman N Waldman J Thomas K Rodes C Wilcosky T, 1995. Population-based exposure measurements in EPA Region 5: a Phase I field study in support of the National Human Exposure Assessment Survey, J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol. 5(3): 327–358

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shumacker RE Lomax RG, 1996 A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ

  • Thomas KW Pellizzari ED Berry MR, 1999. Population-based dietary intakes and tap water concentrations for selected elements in the EPA Region V National Human Exposure Assessment Survey (NHEXAS), J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol. 9(5): 402–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1997 Exposure Factors Handbook: Volume 1. General Factors, EPA/600/P-95/002Fa

  • Whitmore RW Byron MZ Clayton CA Thomas KW Zelon HS Pellizzari ED Lioy PJ Quackenboss JJ, 1999. Sampling design, response rates, and analysis weights for the National Human Exposure Assessment Survey (NHEXAS) in EPA Region 5, J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol. 9(5): 369–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Thomas, L. Cauble, L. Klemm, M. Herrmann, and J. Roberds for their expert conduct of field activities; L. Michael for his development of the study database; and R. Bender for help with the modeling. We also thank the many participants who provided the data. This research was supported by EPA Cooperative Agreement CR821902-01-0.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CLAYTON, C., PELLIZZARI, E. & QUACKENBOSS, J. National Human Exposure Assessment Survey: Analysis of exposure pathways and routes for arsenic and lead in EPA Region 5. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 12, 29–43 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500198

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500198

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links