Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Detoxifying Death in the Neonate: in Search of Meaningfulness at the End of Life

Journal of Perinatology volume 23, pages 333–336 (2003)Cite this article

Abstract

At the end of life, when curative measures have failed to conquer the terminal nature of a disease, it is imperative to introduce healing measures that deal with the human suffering associated with illness. When dealing with critically ill neonates with lethal conditions, it may be necessary to institute healing measures at the beginning of life. In such cases, healing measures must incorporate customary palliative measures but should not be limited to them. The purpose of this paper is to describe two families' approaches to palliation at the end of life in their newborn infants with Trisomy 18, a genetic abnormality usually associated with a markedly decreased life expectancy. We shall consider the concepts of interference versus intervention as we examine subtle medical differences between the two cases. We will address medical, legal, and ethical issues in each case, but special attention will be given to the provision of compassionate care. People face physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual challenges as they go through life. The families' approaches with their infants at the end of their lives may support the premise that the latter two challenges, emotional and spiritual, confront us the most at the end. Encouraging families to engage with their dying infants helps detoxify the experience and make it more meaningful.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Lerner M . Healing and curing: the starting point for informed choice. In: Choices in Healing: integrating the best of conventional and compllementary approaches to cancer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1994. p. 13–25.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Engel GL . The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977;196:129–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Milstein JM . Alternative birthing sites: interference versus intervention. J Perinatol 1982;2:83–85.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sacramento Healthcare Decisions. Community recommendations for appropriate, humane medical care for dying or irreversibly ill patients. In: ECHO: Extreme Care, Humane Options. Carmichael, CA: Sacramento Healthcare Decisions, Marjorie Ginsberg (project director); 1997: p. 1–19.

  5. Loewy EH . Autonomy and responsibility and Beginning of life. In: Textbook of Healthcare Ethics. New York, London: Plenum Press; 1996: p. 59–78, 207–238.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Loewy RS, Loewy EH . The Ethics of Terminal Care: Orchestrating The End Of Life. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frager G . Palliative care and terminal care in children. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 1997;6:889–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Children's International Project on Palliative/Hospice Services (ChIPPS). Compendium of Pediatric Palliative Care. Alexandria, VA: National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization: 2000.

  9. Milstein JM, Little TH . Invoking spirituality in medical care. Altern Ther Health Med 2000;6:118–120.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beck M . Expecting Adam. New York: Berkley Books: 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Worden WJ . Grief Counseling and Grief Therapy. Boston: Springer Publications; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Stephen and Paula Bennett for their ongoing encouragement, Francis Poulain for manuscript review, and Tanya Jarvik for editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Neonatalogy, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, USA

    Jay M Milstein MD

Authors
  1. Jay M Milstein MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This paper was presented in part at the Southern Society for pediatric Research, New Orleans February, 2002.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Milstein, J. Detoxifying Death in the Neonate: in Search of Meaningfulness at the End of Life. J Perinatol 23, 333–336 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210903

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210903

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links