Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Physicians Who Induce Labor for Fetal Macrosomia Do Not Reduce Cesarean Delivery Rates

Journal of Perinatology volume 21, pages 93–96 (2001)Cite this article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:To determine whether obstetricians with high rates of induction for the indication of fetal macrosomia had higher or lower cesarean section rates.

STUDY DESIGN:Data were analyzed from 1432 deliveries with birthweights >4000 g. Four physician populations were identified: a faculty service and three groups of private practitioners with induction rates 20% to 40%, 40% to 60% and >60%. The average cesarean section rate was determined for each group as well as the percentage of each group's deliveries occurring before 39 weeks, at 39, at 40, and after 40 weeks. In addition, the relative risk of cesarean delivery was calculated for the entire study population.

RESULTS:No correlation was found between the rate of induction of labor and the rate of cesarean section. Delivery of nulliparous and multiparous patients after 40 weeks carried an increased risk of cesarean section. Delivery of multiparous patients before 39 weeks did also. Obstetricians with induction rates >40% significantly decreased the incidence of delivery after 40 weeks, which lowered their cesarean section rates, but no net lowering occurred because of increased rate of cesarean section <39 weeks.

CONCLUSION:A fetal weight of 4000 g or more is not an indication for induction of labor. For multiparous patients, induction at 38 weeks or before is associated with an increased rate of cesarean delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Friesen CD, Miller AM, Rayburn WF Influence of spontaneous or induced labor on delivering the macrosomic fetus Am J Perinatol 1995 12(1) 63–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gonen O, Rosen DJ, Dolfin Z, Tepper R, Markov S, Feijgin MD Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: a randomized study Obstet Gynecol 1997 89 (6)913–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Conway DL, Langer O Elective delivery of infants with macrosomia in diabetic women: reduced shoulder dystocia versus increased cesarean deliveries Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998 178 (5)922–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mathews TJ Trends in stimulation and induction of labor 1989–1995 Stat Bull — Metropolitan Insurance Companies 1997 78(4)20–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Prysak M, Castronova FC Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a case-controlled analysis of safety and efficiency Obstet Gynecol 1998 92 (1)47–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Ohio, 3120 Glendale Avenue, Toledo, 43614, OH, USA

    Terrence J Horrigan MD

Authors
  1. Terrence J Horrigan MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horrigan, T. Physicians Who Induce Labor for Fetal Macrosomia Do Not Reduce Cesarean Delivery Rates. J Perinatol 21, 93–96 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7200500

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7200500

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links