Treatment of localised resectable neuroblastoma. Results of the LNESG1 study by the SIOP Europe Neuroblastoma Group


Main objective of this study was to confirm that surgery alone is an effective and safe treatment for localised resectable neuroblastoma except stage 2 with amplified MYCN gene (MYCNA). Of 427 eligible stages 1–2 patients, 411 had normal MYCN and 16 had MYCNA. Of the 288 stage 1 patients with normal MYCN, 1 died of complications and 16 relapsed, 2 of whom died; 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 94.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 91.6–97) and 98.9% (95% CI: 97.7–100), respectively. Of the 123 stage 2 patients with normal MYCN, 1 died of sepsis and 22 relapsed, 8 of whom died (RFS 82.8%, 95% CI: 76.2–89.5; OS 93.2%, 95% CI: 88.7–97.8). In stage 2, OS and RFS were worse for patients with elevated LDH and unfavourable histopathology. Of 16 children with MYCNA, 7 were stage 1 (5 relapses and 4 deaths) and 9 were stage 2 (3 relapses and 2 deaths) patients. In conclusion, surgery alone yielded excellent OS for both stage 1 and 2 neuroblastoma without MYCNA, although stage 2 patients with unfavourable histopathology and elevated LDH suffered a high number of relapses. Both stage 1 and 2 patients with MYCNA were at greater risk of relapse.


Neuroblastoma, the most common extracranial solid tumour in childhood, originates from the primitive cells of the sympathetic nervous system (Caron and Pearson, 2005). Approximately half of the children diagnosed with neuroblastoma have metastatic disease on diagnosis and, except for infants (De Bernardi et al, 1992), have a low probability of cure (De Bernardi et al, 2003). The remaining children present with localised disease and have an overall better prognosis, mainly depending on the degree of tumour resection (Cecchetto et al, 1983; von Schweinitz et al, 2000). Indeed, completely resected tumours (INSS stage 1) (Brodeur et al, 1993) rarely relapse and do not usually undergo postoperative chemotherapy (Kushner et al, 1996; Alvarado et al, 2000). By contrast, localised but unresectable neuroblastomas (INSS stage 3) require primary chemotherapy before surgical excision is attempted, and in any case have a greater likelihood of relapse and a lower cure rate (Garaventa et al, 2002).

An intermediate condition involves primary tumour resection that has left behind a small residue (INSS stage 2). Some authors have suggested leaving these tumour residues untreated (De Bernardi et al, 1995; Perez et al, 2000); however, some of these tumours relapse (occasionally in a disseminated form) and then require intensive treatment, which is sometimes unsuccessful. At present, only abnormal MYCN gene status is believed to correlate with worse outcome in these patients, and postoperative treatment is therefore deemed necessary only in such cases (Rubie et al, 1997). A number of other factors, including regional lymph node involvement (Ninane et al, 1982; Rosen et al, 1984), tumour rupture (De Bernardi et al, 1995), unfavourable histology (Perez et al, 2000; Shimada et al, 2001), DNA index (Bagatell et al, 2005), and some biochemical markers (Hann et al, 1985; Zeltzer et al, 1986; Shuster et al, 1992), have been associated with greater risk of relapse and death.

In the early 1990s, the SIOP Europe Neuroblastoma Group (SIOPEN) activated the first Localised Neuroblastoma European Study (LNESG1). The principal objectives of this study were to confirm that surgery alone suffices in all stage 1 children and to assess whether the same is true for stage 2 children with normal MYCN gene status. A secondary objective of the LNESG1 study was to establish a European registry for all localised neuroblastomas.

In this report, we describe the outcome of both stage 1 and 2 patients stratified according to MYCN gene status.

Patients and methods

Patient registration and eligibility

The registration of children with suspected, localised neuroblastoma potentially eligible for the LNESG1 Study began in January 1995 and ended in October 1999. In an attempt to ensure the enrolment of children who had suffered major surgery-related complications, the investigators were requested to register all suspected cases with non-metastatic neuroblastoma before histological confirmation. Data were collected at the Study Coordinating Centre, located at the Institut Curie, Paris, France. Nine European countries (Austria, Belgium, France, Italy, The Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, and United Kingdom) participated in the study.

To be eligible in the study, patients had to fulfil all of the following criteria: age on diagnosis below 20 years, histological diagnosis of neuroblastoma (excluding ganglioneuroma), evaluation of MYCN gene status, primary tumour resectability, the absence of metastasis, and no previous therapy. Informed consent was provided by a parent or guardian for each patient enrolled in the study. Study approval was obtained from the local institutional review boards.

Diagnostic procedures and metastatic workup

The diagnostic imaging of the tumour included ultrasound scan plus computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging (Siegel et al, 2002). These investigations were carried out in an effort to detect features (defined as surgical risk factors) that are believed to reduce the probability of complete tumour resection and that lead to increased risk of surgery-related complications. Immediate surgery was recommended for patients without surgical risk factors, whereas the remaining patients were to receive chemotherapy in preparation for surgery. Details regarding surgical risk factors and surgical guidelines have been reported elsewhere (Cecchetto et al, 2005).

Bone marrow infiltration was ruled out on the basis of four negative specimens (two bone marrow aspirates and two trephine core biopsies for children aged 1 year or more; 2–4 aspirates for infants). Skeletal involvement was evaluated by MIBG (iodine-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy) or by technetium-99m-MDP scintigraphy in the absence of MIBG uptake or if MIBG scintigraphy had not been performed prior to surgery. Involvement of other organs, mainly the liver, lung, skin, and distant lymph nodes, was studied by ultrasound scan and/or computed tomography.

Biochemical studies included the assay of catecholamine metabolites, that is vanillylmandelic acid and homovanillic acid in the urine (Strenger et al, 2007), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay in the serum. Vanillylmandelic acid, homovanillic acid, and LDH levels were considered to be abnormal if they exceeded twice the upper normal value.


Histological diagnosis was performed by the local pathologists according to the Shimada system and the related classification (Shimada et al, 1999, 2001). Non-MYCN amplified stage 2 tumours were reviewed by an European Pathology Panel (Navarro et al, 2006).

Biological studies

To guarantee the reproducibility of the results, 11 laboratories from 9 European countries set up an European Neuroblastoma Quality Assessment (ENQUA) Group (Ambros et al, 2003). This led to the establishment of common rules with regard to the handling of tumour materials, methods, and DNA probes to be used, and the interpretation of DNA blots and fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) analyses. The evaluation of MYCN gene status in tumour cells was a prerequisite to enrolling patients in the study. MYCN gene amplification (MYCNA) was defined as a copy number of 10 or more, or a greater than fourfold increase in the MYCN signal number in comparison with the reference probe located on chromosome 2. Evaluation of DNA content was strongly recommended.

Adjuvant therapy

Stage 1 patients, regardless of MYCN gene status, and stage 2 patients without MYCNA received no adjuvant therapy (except for those with symptomatic spinal cord compression) (De Bernardi et al, 2005) and were carefully followed up. Stage 2 patients with MYCNA were treated according to institutional guidelines.


Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was performed within 1 month of surgery to assess the degree of the residual tumour, if any. Patients were subsequently evaluated by clinical examination and ultrasound scan at least once every 3 months in the first year, and every 3–6 months over the following 5 years.

Tumour relapse and progression

In the event of relapse or progression, complete disease evaluation was carried out, including histological (or cytohistological) examination, assay of MYCN status, and metastatic workup. Local relapse was preferentially treated by surgery and standard-dose chemotherapy according to national protocols. Metastatic relapse was treated according to the current national stage 4 protocols.

Statistical analyses

The prospective European registration of localised neuroblastoma was activated in January 1995. Stage 1, 2 and 3 subjects were to be registered. According to LNESG1 protocol, 140 stage 2 patients without MYCNA were to be enrolled in this trial that involved surgery as the only treatment in an effort to assess whether the conservative approach alone was enough to keep the 3-year survival rate above 90%. Enrollment was expected to last 3.5 years. Four and a half years after the beginning of the study (which lasted from January 1995 to October 1999), a total of 123 stage 2 patients had been recruited, representing 16.7% of all localised neuroblastomas. At that time, the trial, as well as the prospective registration, was closed. The frequency of clinical, biological, and pathological features in various subgroups was compared by the χ2 test or by two-tailed Fisher's exact test when necessary.

Overall survival and relapse-free survival (RFS) curves were estimated according to the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by log-rank test, and were calculated from the day of tumour resection. Overall survival took all deaths into account. In RFS, local or distant recurrences were considered as events. Patients who did not relapse were censored at the time of death or last follow-up.


Between January 1995 and October 1999, a total of 905 children and adolescents with suspected localised neuroblastoma were registered in the LNESG1 Study by 107 European institutions. Of these, 215 children were excluded for various reasons: inadequately assessed MYCN gene (95 cases), staging errors (47), wrong diagnosis (28), previous treatment (13, including 5 stage 2 patients presenting with symptomatic spinal cord compression), undefined histology (9), parental refusal (5), and other reasons (18) (Table 1). Of the 690 children with non-metastatic neuroblastoma, 192 had stage 3 disease and 71 had a diagnosis of ganglioneuroma, leaving 427 eligible children with localised resectable neuroblastoma (Table 1). Out of these 427 children, 411 (288 stage 1 and 123 stage 2) had normal MYCN gene status, whereas 16 (7 stage 1 and 9 stage 2) had MYCNA (Table 1). The following results refer to the stage 1 and 2 patients stratified as per MYCN status.

Table 1 Patients in the LNESG1 study

Stage 1 and 2 patients without MYCNA

Patients’ characteristics at diagnosis

The main presenting characteristics of the 288 stage 1 and the 123 stage 2 children are listed in Table 2. There was a slight male predominance (M/F ratio, 1.4) among stage 1 patients, whereas the number of stage 2 males and females was almost the same. The median age of both stage 1 and stage 2 patients was 11 months, with similar percentages of patients in the two age groups considered (0–17, 18 months). Stage 1 patients had more abdominal tumours than stage 2 patients (68.4 vs 49.6%; P<0.0025), and they more often had favourable histological features, as evaluated by the local pathologists (88.4 vs 79.8%; P<0.04), normal vanillylmandelic acid (67.4 vs 44.4%; P=0.0008) and normal homovanillic acid urinary excretion (67.5 vs 50.7%; P=0.015). The percentages of normal vs abnormal LDH serum levels (93.1 vs 92.2%) and aneuploid vs di-tetraploid DNA index (64.3 vs 61.8%) were similar.

Table 2 Stage 1 and 2 patients without MYCNA. Characteristics at diagnosis

Surgery-related complications

Among the 411 stage 1 and 2 patients, 1 (a stage 1 infant) died of surgery-related complications 2 days after the operation, owing to massive bleeding and multiple organ failure. Thirty patients (7.3%) – 17 out of 288 stage 1 (5.9%) and 13 out of 123 stage 2 subjects (10.6%) – developed non-fatal complications: Horner's syndrome (6 cases), pleural effusion or ascitis (5), renal ischaemia or damage (4), intestinal perforation (3), serious bleeding (2), vascular damage (2), severe infections (2), tracheostomy (1), neurological damage (1), and others (4).

Clinical course and survival

Stage 1. Patient follow-up ranged from 3 to 134 months (median, 72). Of the 288 patients, 1 died shortly after surgery (see above), and 16 relapsed 1–48 months after diagnosis (median, 5) (Table 3); the estimated 5-year RFS rate was therefore 94.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 91.6–97.0) (Figure 1A). Relapses occurred at the site of the primary tumour in five cases, at distant sites in seven, and both locally and at distant sites in four cases. Sites of metastases included various combinations of the following: bone (six cases), bone marrow (five), and liver and skin (three cases each). Among the 10 patients who had been diagnosed between 0 and 11 months of age, relapses occurred locally, or in the liver, skin, or bone marrow, and were interpreted as a possible evolution towards stage 4. Five of these patients were simply observed, whereas five were treated with a few cycles of chemotherapy; all survived (Table 3). The remaining six patients who relapsed were older than 1 year on diagnosis; two of these died (one of progressive disease and one of chemotherapy-related toxicity) and four survived (Table 3). The estimated 5-year OS was 98.9% (95% CI: 97.7–100) (Figure 1B). The 5-year OS of the 16 patients who relapsed was 87.5% (95% CI: 71.3–100).

Table 3 Relapses/progressions in 16 stage 1 patients without MYCNA
Figure 1

Five-year RFS (A) and OS (B) according to INSS stage.

Stage 2. Patient follow-up ranged from 10 to 137 months (median, 80). Of the 123 patients, 1 died of sepsis due to surgery-related spleen atrophy 18 months after tumour resection, and 22 relapsed 1–90 months after diagnosis (median, 6) (Table 4); the estimated 5-year RFS rate was therefore 82.8% (95% CI: 76.2–89.5) (Figure 1A). Relapses occurred locally in 13 cases, at distant sites in 1, and both locally and at distant sites in 8. Sites of metastases included various combinations of the following: bone (five cases), bone marrow (five), liver and lung (one case each) (Table 4). The median interval between diagnosis and relapse was 6 months, both in cases of local relapse and in those of relapse at distant sites. Of the 12 patients below 1 year of age on diagnosis who relapsed, 2 died, whereas 6 deaths occurred among the 10 patients aged 1 year or older. The eight deaths occurred 5–55 months after relapse, with no difference between patients who relapsed locally and those who relapsed at distant sites (30 months for both). The estimated 5-year OS was 93.2% (95% CI: 88.7–97.8) (Figure 1B). The 5-year OS of the 22 patients who relapsed was 56.1% (95% CI: 32.5–79.7).

Table 4 Relapses/progressions in 22 stage 2 patients without MYCNA

Prognostic factors

Analyses aimed at assessing the impact of potential prognostic factors on OS and RFS were limited by the small number of events. Among stage 1 patients, no analysis of OS was possible (three events). Regarding RFS, the only prognostic factor we identified was gender, with males relapsing more often than females (5-year RFS 92.0 vs 97.5%; P<0.05) (Table 5). Normal LDH serum levels were associated with greater RFS (95.6 vs 83.3%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.061). Among stage 2 patients, no noticeable differences in either OS or RFS were observed with regard to gender, age, lymph node infiltration, vanillylmandelic acid and homovanillic acid urinary excretion, or DNA index (Table 5). Patients with unfavourable histopathologic features had significantly worse OS and RFS than those with favourable features (96.4 vs 75.9%, P<0.0004; and 85.5 vs 61.2%, P<0.0035, respectively) (Table 5). In addition, normal LDH serum levels were significantly associated with better OS and RFS (95.7 vs 50.0%; P<0.0001; 85.2 vs 62.5%; P=0.050, respectively) (Table 5).

Table 5 Five-year OS and RFS for stage 1 and stage 2 patients without MYCNA

Stage 1 and 2 with MYCNA

Of the 427 children with localised resectable neuroblastoma who were evaluated for MYCN gene status, 16 (3.7%) had abnormal copy numbers of the gene, including 7 stage 1 and 9 stage 2 patients. Five of the seven stage 1 patients suffered relapses: four local and one both local and in the bone and bone marrow. Four of these five patients eventually died. Of the nine stage 2 patients who received upfront chemotherapy according to the guidelines of the individual participating institutions, three relapsed, all locally and at distant sites; two eventually died.


This study focused on localised, resectable tumours and aimed at assessing whether surgery alone is an adequate and safe treatment for all stage 1 patients and for stage 2 patients without MYCNA (Rubie et al, 1997). Overall, 411 out of 905 enrolled patients were classified as either INSS stage 1 or stage 2 without MYCNA. The 288 stage 1 patients in this series did very well and had an OS of 98.9%; this is in line with previous literature reports (De Bernardi et al, 1995; Evans et al, 1996; Kushner et al, 1996; Alvarado et al, 2000; Perez et al, 2000), and confirms that neuroblastomas that are resected macroscopically and have normal MYCN status do not need adjuvant therapy and are commonly salvageable in the event of relapse. Indeed, only one of three deaths was due to disease progression, whereas the other two were related to treatment. Physicians should therefore avoid letting risks that are secondary to therapy exceed the risks related to this scarcely aggressive neoplasm. It is noteworthy that, of the 16 events recorded in these 288 stage 1 patients, all the 10 that occurred in infants did well, although 5 of them underwent observation only after the event had occurred. This fact was interpreted as the possible evolution towards stage 4S disease on the basis of the very young age (less than 6 months in 7 out of 10) and the sites of progressions (mainly the skin, bone marrow, and primary tumour). This is possibly the first observation of this type and may reflect the increased ability to detect stage 4S disease at an early phase, that is before the multifocal nature of the tumour has become evident. Unlike the other stage 1 patients, the seven with MYCNA who also underwent a wait-and-see strategy tended to have an unfavourable course; indeed, five of them relapsed and four eventually died, suggesting that adjuvant chemotherapy should be seriously considered for this rare population. A pooled analysis of existing evidence is warranted to clarify this issue.

Of 123 stage 2 patients without MYCNA who were enrolled in this study and who underwent observation alone after surgery, 1 died of surgery-related complications and 22 relapsed, 8 of whom died. Relapses occurred locally in almost all cases, with associated metastatic spread in about half of them, thus resulting in an RFS rate of 82.8%. The risk of relapse was significantly greater in association with unfavourable histological features, confirming the findings of other authors (Perez et al, 2000; Shimada et al, 2001), and elevated LDH serum levels, although in the latter case the small number of events precludes firm conclusions about the prognostic significance of this parameter. However, at variance with previous reports, the risk of relapse did not correlate significantly with the age at diagnosis (De Bernardi et al, 1995), regional lymph node infiltration (Ninane et al, 1982), and DNA index (Bagatell et al, 2005). These conflicting results may be accounted for by the small number of cases in the published series. Eight of the 22 stage 2 patients who relapsed died of disease, and the risk of progression and death was independent of the extent of relapse. Although the 5-year OS of 93.2% is in line with previous literature data (Matthay et al, 1989; De Bernardi et al, 1995; Perez et al, 2000), it indicates that, despite having a normal MYCN gene status, a non-negligible proportion of these patients are candidates for a worrisome clinical course and may die of disease progression. Clearly, further biological studies are needed to identify which patients might benefit from adjuvant treatment.

Interestingly, one-third of the nine stage 2 patients who had MYCNA and therefore received adjuvant therapy on an institutional basis relapsed and only two eventually died (22%), as against the four deaths (57%) observed among the seven stage 1 patients with MYCNA who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Although the small number of patients available for these analyses precludes any firm conclusions, our findings underline the need for studies aimed at evaluating the hypothesis that immediate postoperative chemotherapy may effectively act against the minimal post-surgical tumour residue in this particular setting.

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication


  1. Alvarado CS, London WB, Look AT, Brodeur GM, Altmiller DH, Thorner PS, Joshi VV, Rowe ST, Nash MB, Smith EI, Castleberry RP, Cohn SL (2000) Natural history and biology of stage A neuroblastoma: a Pediatric Oncology Group Study. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 22: 197–205

  2. Ambros IM, Benard J, Boavida M, Bown N, Caron H, Combaret V, Couturier J, Darnfors C, Delattre O, Freeman-Edward J, Gambini C, Gross N, Hattinger CM, Luegmayr A, Lunec J, Martinsson T, Mazzocco K, Navarro S, Noguera R, O’Neill S, Potschger U, Rumpler S, Speleman F, Tonini GP, Valent A, Van Roy N, Amann G, De Bernardi B, Kogner P, Ladenstein R, Michon J, Pearson AD, Ambros PF (2003) Quality assessment of genetic markers used for therapy stratification. J Clin Oncol 21: 2077–2084

  3. Bagatell R, Rumcheva P, London WB, Cohn SL, Look AT, Brodeur GM, Frantz C, Joshi V, Thorner P, Rao PV, Castleberry R, Bowman LC (2005) Outcomes of children with intermediate-risk neuroblastoma after treatment stratified by MYCN status and tumour cell ploidy. J Clin Oncol 23: 8819–8827

  4. Brodeur GM, Pritchard J, Berthold F, Carlsen NL, Castel V, Castelberry RP, De Bernardi B, Evans AE, Favrot M, Hedborg F (1993) Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment. J Clin Oncol 11: 1466–1477

  5. Caron HN, Pearson ADJ (2005) Neuroblastoma. In Cancer in Children, Voûte PA, Barrett A, Stevens MCG, Caron HN (eds), 5th edn, pp 337–352, Oxford University Press: Oxford

  6. Cecchetto G, Luzzatto C, Carli M, Guglielmi M, Zanesco L (1983) The role of surgery in non-localised neuroblastoma. Analysis of 59 cases. Tumori 31: 327–329

  7. Cecchetto G, Mosseri V, De Bernardi B, Helardot P, Monclair T, Costa E, Horcher E, Neuenschwander S, Tomà P, Rizzo A, Michon J, Holmes K (2005) Surgical risk factors in primary surgery for localised neuroblastoma: the LNESG1 study of the European International Society of Pediatric Oncology Neuroblastoma Group. J Clin Oncol 23: 8483–8489

  8. De Bernardi B, Balwierz W, Bejent J, Cohn SL, Garrè ML, Iehara T, Plantaz D, Simon T, Angelini P, Cama A, London WB, Kramer K, Katzenstein HM, Tortori-Donati P, Rossi A, D’Angio GJ, Evans AE (2005) Epidural compression in neuroblastoma: diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. Cancer Lett 228: 283–299

  9. De Bernardi B, Conte M, Mancini A, Donfrancesco A, Alvisi P, Tomà P, Casale F, Cordero di Montezemolo L, Cornelli PE, Carli M (1995) Localised resectable neuroblastoma: results of the second study of the Italian Cooperative Group for Neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol 13: 884–893

  10. De Bernardi B, Nicolas B, Boni L, Indolfi P, Carli M, Cordero di Montezemolo L, Donfrancesco A, Pession A, Provenzi M, Di Cataldo A, Rizzo A, Tonini GP, Dallorso S, Conte M, Gambini C, Garaventa A, Bonetti F, Zanazzo A, D’Angelo P, Bruzzi P (2003) Disseminated neuroblastoma in children older than one year at diagnosis: comparable results with three consecutive high-dose protocols adopted by the Italian Co-Operative Group for Neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol 21: 1592–1601

  11. De Bernardi B, Pianca C, Boni L, Brisigotti M, Carli M, Bagnulo S, Corciulo P, Mancini A, De Laurentis C, Di Tullio MT (1992) Disseminated neuroblastoma (stage IV and IV-S) in the first year of life. Outcome related to age and stage. Cancer 70: 1625–1633

  12. Evans AE, Silber JH, Shpilsky A, D’Angio GJ (1996) Successful management of low-stage neuroblastoma without adjuvant therapies: a comparison of two decades, 1972 through 1981 and 1982 through 1992, in a single institution. J Clin Oncol 14: 2504–2510

  13. Garaventa A, Boni L, Lo Piccolo MS, Tonini GP, Gambini C, Mancini A, Tonegatti L, Carli M, Cordero di Montezemolo L, Di Cataldo A, Casale F, Mazzocco K, Cecchetto G, Rizzo A, De Bernardi B (2002) Localised unresectable neuroblastoma: results of treatment based on clinical prognostic factors. Ann Oncol 13: 956–964

  14. Hann HW, Evans AE, Siegel SE, Wong KY, Sather H, Dalton A, Hammond D, Seeger RC (1985) Prognostic importance of serum ferritin in patients with Stages III and IV neuroblastoma: the Children's Cancer Study Group experience. Cancer Res 45: 2843–2848

  15. Kushner BH, Cheung NK, LaQuaglia MP, Ambros PF, Ambros IM, Bonilla MA, Ladanyi M, Gerald WL (1996) International neuroblastoma staging system stage 1 neuroblastoma: a prospective study and literature review. J Clin Oncol 14: 2174–2180

  16. Matthay KK, Sather HN, Seeger RC, Haase GM, Hammond GD (1989) Excellent outcome of stage II neuroblastoma is independent of residual disease and radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol 7: 236–244

  17. Navarro S, Amann G, Beiske K, Cullinane CJ, D’Amore ES, Gambini C, Mosseri V, De Bernardi B, Michon J, Peuchmaur M (2006) Prognostic value of International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification in localised resectable peripheral neuroblastic tumours: a histopathologic study of localised neuroblastoma European Study Group 94.01 Trial and Protocol. J Clin Oncol 24: 695–699

  18. Ninane J, Pritchard J, Morris Jones PH, Mann JR, Malpas JS (1982) Stage II neuroblastoma. Adverse prognostic significance of lymph node involvement. Arch Dis Child 57: 438–442

  19. Perez CA, Matthay KK, Atkinson JB, Seeger RC, Shimada H, Haase GM, Stram DO, Gerbing RB, Lukens JN (2000) Biologic variables in the outcome of stages I and II neuroblastoma treated with surgery as primary therapy: a children's cancer group study. J Clin Oncol 18: 18–26

  20. Rosen EM, Cassady JR, Kretschmar C, Frantz CN, Levey R, Sallan SE (1984) Influence of local–regional lymph node metastases on prognosis in neuroblastoma. Med Pediatr Oncol 12: 260–263

  21. Rubie H, Hartmann O, Michon J, Frappaz D, Coze C, Chastagner P, Baranzelli MC, Plantaz D, Avet-Loiseau H, Bénard J, Delattre O, Favrot M, Peyroulet MC, Thyss A, Perel Y, Bergeron C, Courbon-Collet B, Vannier JP, Lemerle J, Sommelet D (1997) N-Myc gene amplification is a major prognostic factor in localised neuroblastoma: results of the French Neuroblastoma 90 study. Neuroblastoma Study Group of the Societe Française d’Oncologie Pediatrique. J Clin Oncol 15: 1171–1182

  22. Shimada H, Ambros IM, Dehner LP, Hata J, Joshi VV, Roald B, Stram DO, Gerbing RB, Lukens JN, Matthay KK, Castleberry RP (1999) The International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (the Shimada system). Cancer 86: 364–372

  23. Shimada H, Umehara S, Monobe Y, Hachitanda Y, Nakagawa A, Goto S, Gerbing RB, Stram DO, Lukens JN, Matthay KK (2001) International neuroblastoma pathology classification for prognostic evaluation of patients with peripheral neuroblastic tumours: a report from the Children's Cancer Group. Cancer 92: 2451–2461

  24. Shuster JJ, McWilliams NB, Castleberry R, Castleberry R, Nitschke R, Smith EI, Altshuler G, Kun L, Brodeur G, Joshi V, Vietti T (1992) Serum lactate dehydrogenase in childhood neuroblastoma. A Pediatric Oncology Group recursive partitioning study. Am J Clin Oncol 15: 295–303

  25. Siegel MJ, Ishwaran H, Fletcher BD, Meyer JS, Hoffer FA, Jaramillo D, Hernandez RJ, Roubal SE, Siegel BA, Caudry DJ, McNeil BJ (2002) Staging of neuroblastoma at imaging: report of the radiology diagnostic oncology group. Radiology 223: 168–175

  26. Strenger V, Kerbl R, Dornbusch HJ, Ladenstein R, Ambros PF, Ambros IM, Urban C (2007) Diagnostic and prognostic impact of urinary catecholamines in neuroblastoma patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer 48: 504–509

  27. von Schweinitz D, Hero B, Berthold F (2000) The impact of surgical radicality on outcome in childhood neuroblastoma. Eur J Pediatr Surg 12: 402–409

  28. Zeltzer PM, Marangos PJ, Evans AE, Schneider SL (1986) Serum neuron-specific enolase in children with neuroblastoma. Relationship to stage and disease course. Cancer 57: 1230–1234

Download references


We warmly thank the many physicians who provided their patients’ data, Dr Emanuele SG D’Amore for his helpful suggestions, Ms Sara Calmanti and Ms Tania Caputo for their assistance with editing, and Mr Bernard Patrick for revising the English text. This study was supported, in part, by grants from the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer and Institut Curie (Paris, France) and the Associazione Italiana per la Lotta al Neuroblastoma (Genova, Italy).

Author information

Correspondence to B De Bernardi.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors state no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Bernardi, B., Mosseri, V., Rubie, H. et al. Treatment of localised resectable neuroblastoma. Results of the LNESG1 study by the SIOP Europe Neuroblastoma Group. Br J Cancer 99, 1027–1033 (2008) doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604640

Download citation


  • neuroblastoma
  • localised
  • MYCN gene
  • prognostic factors

Further reading