Medline, Embase, relevant dental journals, reference lists of included studies and the World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry.
Studies evaluating the predictive accuracy of panoramic radiography for postoperative inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury reporting on at least one of the seven signs of IAN injury and providing data to calculate false-positive (FP), true-positive (TP), false-negative (FN) and true-negative (TN) proportions were included.
Data extraction and synthesis
Data were abstracted independently by two reviewers. Positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity and specificity were extracted or calculated. Overall pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR) (LR-) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects model. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were also generated. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/social-community-medicine/projects/quadas/quadas-2/).
Eight studies were included. Only one study was considered to be at low risk of bias, one at low risk and the remainder at unclear risk. A summary of the pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratios are shown in the table.
For all seven signs, the added value of panoramic radiography is too low to consider it appropriate for ruling out postoperative IAN in the decision-making before MM3 surgery. The added value of panoramic radiography for determining the presence of diversion of the canal, interruption of the white line of the canal and darkening of the root can be considered sufficient for ruling in the risk of postoperative IAN injury in the decision-making before MM3 surgery.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $39.75 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Petersen LB, Vaeth M, Wenzel A . Neurosensoric disturbances after surgical removal of the mandibular third molar based on either panoramic imaging or cone beam CT scanning: A randomized controlled trial (RCT). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016; 45: 20150224.
Petersen LB, Olsen KR, Christensen J, Wenzel A . Image and surgery-related costs comparing cone beam CT and panoramic imaging before removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014; 43: 20140001.
Lee GS, Kim JS, Seo YS, Kim JD . Effective dose from direct and indirect digital panoramic units. Imaging Sci Dent 2013; 43: 77–84.
Ludlow J B, Timothy R . Walker C et al. Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015; 44: 201590
Address for correspondence: Dr Su, State Key Laboratory of Oral Disease, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Third Section, Renmin Road South, Chengdu, China. E-mail: email@example.com
Su N, van Wijk A, Berkhout E, Sanderink G, De Lange J, Wang H, van der Heijden GJMG. Predictive value of panoramic radiography for injury of inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 75: 663–679. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.12.013. Epub 2016 Dec 15. Review.PubMed PMID: 28041843.
About this article
Cite this article
Uribe, S. Radiographic prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury in third molar surgery. Evid Based Dent 18, 88–89 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6401259
The Routine Use of 3D Imaging May Not Reduce the Risk of Injuries to the Alveolar Inferior Nerve During Third Molar Extraction
Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice (2019)