Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Full Paper
  • Published:

Characterization of the divergent eosinophil ribonuclease, mEar 6, and its expression in response to Schistosoma mansoni infection in vivo

Abstract

The eosinophil-associated ribonucleases (Ears) are rapidly evolving proteins found in multigene clusters that are unique to each rodent species. Of the 15 independent genes in the Mus musculus cluster, only mEars 1 and 2 are expressed at significant levels at homeostasis. Here we characterize the expression of mEar 6 in the liver and spleen in mice in response to infection with the helminthic parasite, Schistosoma mansoni. Interestingly, expression of mEar 6 is not directly related to the elevated levels of serum IL-5 or tissue eosinophilia characteristic of this disease, as no mEar 6 transcripts were detected in the liver or the spleen from uninfected IL-5-transgenic mice. The coding sequence of mEar 6 has diverged under positive selection pressure (Ka/Ks>1.0) and has a unique unpaired cysteine near the carboxy-terminus of the protein. The high catalytic efficiency of recombinant mEar 6 (kcat/Km=0.9 × 106/M/s) is similar to that of the cluster's closest human ortholog, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN/RNase 2). In summary, we have identified mEar 6 as one of only two RNase A superfamily ribonucleases known to be expressed specifically in response to pathophysiologic stress in vivo.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 2001; 409: 860–921.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Riordan J, D'Alessio G . Ribonucleases: Structures and Functions. Academic Press: San Diego, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beintema JJ, Kleineidam RG . The ribonuclease A superfamily: general discussion. Cell Mol Life Sci 1998; 54: 825–832.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beintema JJ, Schuller C, Irie M, Carsana A . Molecular evolution of the ribonuclease superfamily. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 1988; 51: 165–192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenberg HF . The eosinophil ribonucleases. Cell Mol Life Sci 1998; 54: 795–803.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenberg HF, Dyer KD, Tiffany HL, Gonzalez M . Rapid evolution of a unique family of primate ribonuclease genes. Nat Genet 1995; 10: 219–223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang J, Rosenberg HF, Nei M . Positive Darwinian selection after gene duplication in primate ribonuclease genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 3708–3713.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang J, Dyer KD, Rosenberg HF . Evolution of the rodent eosinophil-associated RNase gene family by rapid gene sorting and positive selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 4701–4706.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Larson KA, Olson EV, Madden BJ et al. Two highly homologous ribonuclease genes expressed in mouse eosinophils identify a larger subgroup of the mammalian ribonuclease superfamily. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 12370–12375.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Singhania NA, Dyer KD, Zhang J et al. Rapid evolution of the ribonuclease A superfamily: adaptive expansion of independent gene clusters in rats and mice. J Mol Evol 1999; 49: 721–728.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cormier SA, Yuan S, Crosby JR et al. TH2-mediated pulmonary inflammation leads to the differential expression of ribonuclease genes by alveolar macrophages. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2002; 27: 678–687.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cormier SA, Larson KA, Yuan S et al. Mouse eosinophil-associated ribonucleases: a unique subfamily expressed during hematopoiesis. Mamm Genome 2001; 12: 352–361.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nittoh T, Hirakata M, Mue S, Ohuchi K . Identification of cDNA encoding rat eosinophil cationic protein/eosinophil-associated ribonuclease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1997; 1351: 42–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McDevitt AL, Deming MS, Rosenberg HF, Dyer KD . Gene structure and enzymatic activity of mouse eosinophil-associated ribonuclease 2. Gene 2001; 267: 23–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Moreau JM, Dyer KD, Bonville CA et al. Diminished expression of an antiviral ribonuclease in response to pneumovirus infection in vivo. Antiviral Res 2003; 59: 181–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang D, Rosenberg HF, Chen Q et al. Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), an antimicrobial protein with chemotactic activities for dendritic cells. Blood 2003; 102: 3396–3403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sabin EA, Kopf MA, Pearce EJ . Schistosoma mansoni egg-induced early IL-4 production is dependent upon IL-5 and eosinophils. J Exp Med 1996; 184: 1871–1878.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dent LA, Strath M, Mellor AL, Sanderson CJ . Eosinophilia in transgenic mice expressing interleukin 5. J Exp Med 1990; 172: 1425–1431.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tominaga A, Takaki S, Koyama N et al. Transgenic mice expressing a B cell growth and differentiation factor gene (interleukin 5) develop eosinophilia and autoantibody production. J Exp Med 1991; 173: 429–437.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenberg HF, Domachowske JB . Eosinophils, eosinophil ribonucleases, and their role in host defense against respiratory virus pathogens. J Leukoc Biol 2001; 70: 691–698.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang J, Zhang YP, Rosenberg HF . Adaptive evolution of a duplicated pancreatic ribonuclease gene in a leaf-eating monkey. Nat Genet 2002; 30: 411–415.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoffmann KF, McCarty TC, Segal DH et al. Disease fingerprinting with cDNA microarrays reveals distinct gene expression profiles in lethal type 1 and type 2 cytokine-mediated inflammatory reactions. FASEB J 2001; 15: 2545–2547.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosenberg HF, Domachowske JB . Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin. Methods Enzymol 2001; 341: 273–286.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bystrom J, Wynn TA, Domachowske JB, Rosenberg HF . Gene microarray analysis reveals interleukin-5-dependent transcriptional targets in mouse bone marrow. Blood 2004; 103: 868–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are deeply indebted to Dr James Lee and Dr Nancy Lee, Mayo Scottsdale, for their generous gift of polyclonal anti-mEars antiserum and to Dr Klaus Matthaei, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, for his gift of RNA samples from IL-5 transgenic mice. We are also grateful to the staff of the NIAID 14BS Animal Facility for the care of the mice used in these studies. This work was partly supported by a JSPS Research Fellowship for Japanese Biomedical and Behavioral Researchers at NIH (2004–2006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T Nitto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nitto, T., Dyer, K., Mejia, R. et al. Characterization of the divergent eosinophil ribonuclease, mEar 6, and its expression in response to Schistosoma mansoni infection in vivo. Genes Immun 5, 668–674 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gene.6364143

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gene.6364143

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links