Abstracts on this page have been chosen and edited by Dr Trevor Watts
Abstract
Only 19% of all subjects had a morphologically and functionally acceptable occlusion.
Main
Svedström-Oristo A-L, Pietilä I et al. Acta Odont Scand 2003; 61: 123–128
Orthodontic care is free up to age 18 in the Finnish health-care system. In the catchment area of one health centre, 121 of a total 159 16-year-olds were examined, and 57 had received orthodontic treatment. Active treatment was for a mean 2 yrs, and 80% had received non-extraction treatment. Principal techniques included cervical headgear and fixed appliances, with a quad helix in 1/4 of cases.
Occlusion was rated with the recently developed occlusal morphology and function index (OMFI). A morphologically unacceptable occlusion was present in 40% of untreated subjects, and 73% of treated patients, with postnormal canine relationship and excessive overbite as the main reasons. However, a functionally unacceptable occlusion was found respectively in 39% and 37% respectively, with lack of anterior guidance during protrusion as the commonest reason.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Occlusal status in orthodontically treated and untreated adolescents. Br Dent J 195, 143 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4810398
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4810398