Main

Tooth preparation techniques for porcelain laminate veneers by P A Brunton, A Aminian, and N H F Wilson Br Dent J 2000; 189: 260–262

Comment

The advantages of using porcelain laminate veneers to improve the appearance of unsightly teeth would appear obvious. The maintenance of substantial amounts of tooth structure including the palatal guidance and a reduced insult to the pulp would suggest that this is often the treatment of choice. However, there are currently fewer porcelain laminate veneers being prescribed in England and Wales.

Veneers, however, have their own specific difficulties. Following cementation a common perception of patients is that their restored teeth are too prominent. This problem, and that of an underlying discolouration shining through the veneer may account for dentists' dissatisfaction with the treatment. As with most laboratory fabricated restorations any underpreparation will produce a compromised result and a greater preparation depth will produce a more robust and aesthetically satisfactory restoration. However, this turns a treatment that could be considered reversible into one that is definitely (though minimally) invasive.

Most dentists in the UK prepare labial veneers using a freehand approach and many do not use local anaesthetic or a temporary veneer. It can be presumed that these teeth are then 'underprepared' (at least as far as the dental laboratory is concerned). To evenly remove 0.5 mm, and gain a more satisfactory restoration, the authors have used image analysis to investigate the use of depth orientation burs or a silicone index compared to freehand reduction.

Freehand reduction reduces the labial aspect by (approximately) 0.4 mm compared with 0.6 mm for the two other techniques. Both the guided methods will therefore tend to allow a more satisfactory appearance. The authors recognise the potential difficulties that may then result from exposure of cervical dentine and recommend routine use of a dentine bonding agent in the cementation of the final veneer.

On balance the authors recommend the use of a silicone index rather than depth orientation burs noting that, in addition to gaining a better guide to uniform tooth reduction, the index can be used to fabricate a temporary veneer. However, the use of a temporary veneer is made more of a necessity by the removal of more tooth structure and the temptation to place a dentine bonding agent over sensitive dentine should be resisted to avoid interfering with cementation of the final veneer.

A silicone index or specific depth-limiting bur adds to the cost involved but only a small amount of silicone is required and can often be 'stolen' from that dispensed for the working impression.