Main

Career patterns of dental hygienists in Scotland by P. D. Callis and B. G. Wohlgemuth Br Dent J 2000; 189: 34–36

Comment

This paper about career patterns of dental hygienists in Scotland is timely with the introduction of the Scottish Parliament and its subsequent responsibility for healthcare delivery in Scotland. The point was made that to date very little information is known about the career patterns of dental hygienists thus making future manpower planning difficult.

This study was designed specifically to address this problem by providing up-to-date data on career patterns and establishing if there was a typical career pattern for hygienists. This would also enable manpower planning to be undertaken with some degree of effectiveness rather than the haphazard method as at present.

Although a response rate of only 58.7% was achieved, it is still possible to gain information from the group. Interestingly there was a peak of respondents in the 30–39 year age group which was unexpected in the light of the study population which includes the students qualifying from the three Scottish Schools within the last 10 years.

It was gratifying to see that the majority of respondents stayed in Scotland longterm after training which should be encouraging to the planners when considering investing money in PCD training in Scotland, particularly in the light of new legislation being introduced.

The results on working patterns of hygienists were again interesting with the suggestion that hygienists tended to work now in full-time posts rather than as suggested in previous studies, multiple part-time posts. However, there may have been some misinterpretation of the questionnaire and this needs to be clarified. They also showed that the majority of respondents worked in general dental practice and it was most interesting to note that up to the age of 39 most hygienists had worked continuously.

The issue of pay was addressed with dissatisfaction being high in all areas of the dental service but particularly in the hospital services. This obviously has implications for recruitment and retention and must be taken seriously when the pay structure is revisited.

Finally, in the light of the recent publicity surrounding recommendations concerning expanded duties and new classes of PCDs it is not surprising that retraining in the areas of dental therapy and orthodontics was of interest to the majority of hygienists. It is hoped that these new skills would be used in addition to existing skills and not in place of them.

A follow-up study to further investigate many of these areas would be a worthwhile exercise.