Main

Electro-chemically activated water in dental unit water linesJ. T. Marais, V. S. Brözel Br Dent J 1999; 187: 154–158

Comment

Water delivered from dental handpieces and syringe outlets is known to be highly contaminated with microorganisms. The implications of potential pathogens being iatrogenically transmitted to patients undergoing dental treatment are serious. It would appear that the use of municipal water directly connected to dental units could now be considered a sub-standard level of care.

Thirteen dental units in the faculty of dentistry, University of Pretoria, which had been using distilled water for 12 years, were divided into two groups. Two solutions were passed through the units and the degree of contamination with microorganisms compared. Group A used electrochemically activated water (ECA) and group B distilled water which served as the control.

Electro-chemically activated water is a product based on a Russian invention, which has been developed for use in dental unit water lines. ECA is considered harmless to human tissue, yet highly microbicidal. The raw product is tap water and saline. The solution is fed into a special unit, which activates the water using an electric current. Two kinds of ECA solution are produced anolyte and catholyte. Anolyte solution is thought to have the antimicrobial effect and catholyte a detergent or cleaning effect. After 48 hours the ECA solutions return to pure water.

At the start of the study water samples were taken from the 3-way syringes from all 13 units which produced counts of 3 × 104to 2 × 105 colony forming units per millimeter (CFU/ml), additionally pieces of tubing were examined. After 1 week group A (anolyte) gave a reading of 1 CFU/ml and group B 3 × 104 to 2.5 × 105 CFU/ml. The ethical problem arising from these readings led to the control group being altered. The lines, in the control units, were purged daily with both 0.5% sodium hypochlorite and double distilled deionised water.

The units were monitored for 5 weeks at the end of which group A gave counts of 1 CFU/ml, group B gave < 1 CFU/ml. SEM studies of the tubing showed at the beginning well-developed biofilm on all surfaces; at the end of the study group A showed clean tubing with no biofilm. Group B still showed biofilm but in a cracked or desquamated form.

It was concluded that the use of distilled water in independent water systems offers no protection against bacterial contamination. Electrochemically activated water effectively reduces bacterial counts and removes biofilm in dental water lines.