Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

Acute Urinary Retention: a review of the aetiology and management

Abstract

Acute retention of urine (AUR) is a common urological emergency characterised by a sudden inability to pass urine associated with lower abdominal pain. In recent years, the natural history and incidence of AUR has become better understood, however, further research into methods to prevent it and evaluation of the impact an episode of AUR has on the patient is required. This review provides an overview of the current management of AUR in men and the impact of the condition on patients' quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Emberton M, Anson K . Acute urinary retention in men: an age old problem. BMJ 1999; 318: 921–925.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Choong S, Emberton M . Acute urinary retention. Br J Urol 2000; 85: 186–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ball A, Feneley R, Abrahams P . The natural history of untreated “prostatism”. Br J Urol 1981; 53: 613–616.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Birkhoff J, Wiederhorn A, Hamilton M, Zinsser H . Natural history of benign prostatic hypertrophy and acute urinary retention. Urology 1976; 7: 48–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McConnell JD . The long term effects of medical therapy on the progression of BPH. Results from the MTOPS trial. J Urol 2002; 167, Abstract 1042.

  6. Beard R, Hindley R, Borley N, Cox C The management of acute urinary retention in the South Thames Region. South Thames Health Authorities Urology Audit, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Higgins PM, Karia SJ, Mehta . The management of acute retention of urine. Br J Urol 1981; 53: 344–348.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Powell PH, Smith PJB, Feneley RCL . The identification of patients at risk from acute retention. Br J Urol 1980; 52: 520–522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Murray K, Massey A, Feneley RCL . Acute urinary retention—a urodynamic assessment. Br J Urol 1984; 56: 468–473.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Waterhouse N et al. Urinary retention after total hip replacement. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987; 69: 64–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Raz S, Zeigler M, Caine M . Pharmacological receptors in the prostate. Br J Urol 1973; 45: 663.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spiro LH, Labay G, Orkin LA . Prostatic infarction. Role in acute urinary retention. Urology 1974; 3: 345–347.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Strachan JR, Corbishley CM, Shearer RJ . Post-operative retention associated with acute prostatic infarction. Br J Urol 1993; 72: 311–313.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McNeill SA et al. Serum PSA levels and histological changes associated with acute urinary retention. BJU Int 2000; 83 (Suppl 4): Abstract P65.

  15. Zhou Y, Ling EA . Effects of acute complete outlet obstruction on the NADPH-diaphorase reactivity in the intra-mural ganglis of the guinea pig urinary bladder: light and electron microscopic studies. J Urol 1997; 158: 916–923.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Crowe R, Haven AJ, Burnstock G . Intramural neurons of the guinea pig urinary bladder: histochemical localisation of putative neurotransmitters in cultures and newborn animals. J Auton Nerv Syst 1986; 15: 319.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Abehouse BS . Infarct of the prostate. J Urol 1933; 3: 345–347.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Saboorian MH et al. Morphometric analysis of pathological specimens in men undergoing prostate surgery for acute retention or symptoms of BPH only. J Urol 1998; 159, Abstract 417.

  19. Jacobsen SJ et al. Natural history of prostatism: risk factors for acute urinary retention. J Urol 1997; 158: 481–487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pickard R et al. The management of men with acute urinary retention. Br J Urol 1998; 81: 712–720.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Meigs JB et al. Incidence rates and risk factors for acute urinary retention: the health professionals follow up study. J Urol 1999; 162: 376–382.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Roehrborn CG et al. Serum prostate-speific antigen concentration is a powerful predictor of acute urinary retention and need for surgery in men with clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 1999; 53: 473–479.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lieber M et al. PSA is the strongest predictor of BPH related outcomes: results of a 4 year placebo controlled trial. J Urol 1998; 159: 104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rhodes T et al. Serum PSA levels predict acute urinary retention in 40-79 year old community men in Olmsted county. J Urol 2000; 161 (Suppl 4): Abstract 1118.

  25. Kurita Y et al. Transition zone index as a risk factor for acute urinary retention in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 1998; 51: 595–600.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Allardice JT et al. Acute urinary retention: which catheter? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1988; 70: 366–368.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Webb VJ, Booth CM . Cutting the cost of catheterisation for acute retention – a hospital or domiciliary procedure? Br J Urol 1995; 76: 443–445.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Horgan AF, Prasad B, Waldron DJ, O'Sullivan DC . Acute urinary retention. Comparison of supra-pubic and urethral catheterisation. Br J Urol 1992; 70: 149–151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ischan J, Hunt DR . Suprapubic catheters: a comparison of suprapubic versus urethral catheters in the treatment of acute urinary retention. Aust N Z Surg 1987; 57: 33–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Abrahams PH et al. Role of suprapubic catheterisation in the retention of urine. J R Soc Med 1980; 73: 845–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Patel MI, Watts W, Grant A . The optimal form of urinary drainage after acute retention of urine. Br J Urol Int 2001; 88: 26–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Taube M, Gajraj H . Trial without catheter following acute retention of urine. Br J Urol 1989; 63: 180–182.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Djavan B, Madersbacher S, Klinger C, Marberger M . Urodynamic assessment of patients with acute urinary retention: is treatment failure after prostatectomy predictable? J Urol 1997; 158: 1829–1833.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kumar V, Marr C, Bhuvangiri A, Irwin P . A prospective study of conservatively managed acute urinary retention: prostate size matters. Br J Urol 2000; 86: 816–819.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. McNeill AS et al. Long term follow up following presentation with first episode of acute urinary retention. J Urol 2000; 163 (Suppl 4): Abstract 1366.

  36. Caine M, Pfau A, Perlberg S . The use of alpha-adrenergic blockers in benign prostatic obstruction. Br J Urol 1976; 48: 255–263.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. De Mey . Alpha blockers for BPH: are there differences? Eur Urol 1999; 36: 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Somers WJ, Mora MJ, Mason MF, Padley RJ . The natural history of benign prostatic hypertrophy: incidence of urinary retention and significance of AUA symptom score. J Urol 1996; 155: 586A Abstract 1102.

    Google Scholar 

  39. McNeill SA et al. Sustained-release alfuzosin and trial without catheter after acute urinary retention: a prospective, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Urol 1999; 84: 622–627.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Clark RV et al. Effective suppression of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) by G1198745, a novel, dual 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor. J Urol 1999; 161, Abstract 1037.

  41. Roehrborn CG et al. Efficacy and safety of a dual inhibitor of 5 alpha reductase types 1 and 2 (dutasteride) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 2002; 60: 434–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Andersen JT et al. Finasteride significantly reduces acute urinary retention and need for surgery in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 1997; 49: 839–845.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Mc Connell JD et al. The effect of finasteride on the risk of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical treatment among men with benign prostatic enlargement. New Engl J Med 1998; 338: 557–563.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Byington RP et al. Reduction in cardiovascular events during pravastatin therapy. Pooled analysis of clinical events of the Pravastatin Atherosclerosis Intervention Program. Circulation 1995; 92: 2419–2425.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Lepor H et al. The efficacy of terazosin, finasteride or both in benign prostatic hypertrophy. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 533–539.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kirby RS et al. Results of the PREDICT (prospective European doxazosin and combination therapy) trial. J Urol 1999; 161: Abstract 266.

  47. McConnell JD . The long term effects of medical therapy on the progression of BPH. Results from the MTOPS trial. J Urol 2002; 167: Abstract 1042.

  48. Wasson JH et al. A comparison of transurethral surgery with watchful waiting for moderate symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplaia. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 75–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Higgins PM, French ME, Chadalavada SR . Management of acute retention of urine: a reappraisal. Br J Urol 1990; 67: 365–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kabalin JN et al. Holmium: YAG laser resection of prostate (HoLRP) for patients in urinary retention. J Endourol 1997; 11: 291–293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Isotalo T et al. A pilot study of a bioabsorbable self-reinforced poly L-lactic acid urethral stent combined with finasteride in the treatment of acute urinary retention from benign prostatic enlargement. Br J Urol Int 2000; 85: 83–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Makar AA, Thomas PJ, Fletcher MS, Harrison NW . Interstitial radiofrequency therapy of the prostate in the management of acute urinary retention. Br J Urol 1998; 81: 726–729.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Perry MJ et al. Thermo-expandable intraprostatic stent in bladder outlet obstruction: an 8 year study. Br J Urol Int 2002; 90: 216–223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Ogiste JS, Cooper K, Kaplan SA . Are stents still useful therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia? Curr Opin Urol 2003; 13: 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Reynard JM, Shearer RJ . Failure to void after transurethral resection of the prostate and mode of presentation. Urology 1999; 53: 336–339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Modi P et al. A 23 year review of the management of acute retention of urine: progressing or regressing? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2000; 82: 333–335.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Khoubehi B, Watkin NA, Mee AD, Ogden CW . Morbidity and the impact on daily activities associated with catheter drainage after acute urinary retention. Br J Urol Int 2000; 85: 1033–1036.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K Thomas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, K., Chow, K. & Kirby, R. Acute Urinary Retention: a review of the aetiology and management. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 7, 32–37 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500700

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500700

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links