Increased corticotropin-releasing hormone immunoreactivity in monoamine-containing pontine nuclei of depressed suicide men

Abstract

A number of clinical investigations and postmortem brain studies have provided evidence that excessive corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) secretion and neurotransmission is involved in the pathophysiology of depressive illness, and several studies have suggested that the hyperactivity in CRH neurotransmission extends beyond the hypothalamus involving several extra-hypothalamic brain regions. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that CRH levels are increased in specific brainstem regions of suicide victims with a diagnosis of major depression. Frozen tissue sections of the pons containing the locus coeruleus and caudal raphe nuclei from 11 matched pairs of depressed suicide and control male subjects were processed for radioimmunocytochemistry using a primary antiserum to CRH and a [125]I-IgG secondary antibody. The optical density corresponding to the level of CRH-immunoreactivity (IR) was quantified in specific pontine regions from the film autoradiographic images. The level of CRH-IR was increased by 30% in the locus coeruleus, 39% in the median raphe and 45% in the caudal dorsal raphe in the depressed suicide subjects compared to controls. No difference in CRH-IR was found in the dorsal tegmentum or medial parabrachial nucleus between the subject groups. These findings reveal that CRH-IR levels are specifically increased in norepinephrine- and serotonin-containing pontine nuclei of depressed suicide men, and thus they are consistent with the hypothesis that CRH neurotransmission is elevated in extra-hypothalamic brain regions of depressed subjects.

Introduction

Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) is the primary chemical regulator mediating the stress-induced activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis stimulating the secretion of adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) from the anterior pituitary which in turn stimulates cortisol release from the adrenal gland. Hyperactivity of the HPA axis resulting in increased circulating cortisol levels is one of the most consistent biological alterations reported in depressed patients.1,2,3,4,5 Several lines of evidence support the theory that excessive secretion of CRH is involved in the hypercortisolism in depressed patients, and that the anatomical sites of CRH hypersecretion include the hypothalamus and possibly other extra-hypothalamic brain regions. For example, a blunted ACTH response to exogenous CRH administration,6,7,8 increased CRH cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels,9,10,11 increased numbers of CRH-immunoreactive12 and CRH mRNA-containing paraventricular hypothalamic neurons13 and decreased binding sites of CRH receptors in the frontal cortex of depressed subjects14 represent some of the biochemical changes that support the hypothesis of hyperactivity of CRH function in depression. However, other studies have failed to document changes in CSF CRH levels,15,16,17 brain tissue levels of CRH18,19 or CRH receptor binding sites in the cortex of depressed subjects19,20 and thus do not support the CRH hyperactivity hypothesis of depression. With the exception of the reports documenting alterations in CRH substrates in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and in the frontal cortex, there has been no additional direct evidence for CRH hyperactivity in other brain regions of depressed subjects.

In addition to the hormonal role of CRH, a variety of rodent studies have provided evidence supporting a neurotransmitter role for CRH in the central nervous system. In particular, both electrophysiological and biochemical studies have shown that CRH is involved in mediating the effects of stress on norepinephrine neurotransmission specifically at the level of the noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus (LC).21,22,23 Furthermore, recent electrophysiological studies have found that CRH has both excitatory and inhibitory effects on serotonin neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus.24,25,26 Given the evidence from animal studies supporting a functional role of CRH on LC and raphe neurons, it is interesting that both clinical and postmortem brain studies have documented alterations in various noradrenergic27,28,29 and serotonergic30,31,32 parameters in depressed subjects. Perhaps CRH has a similar functional role in the human brain and may contribute to the alterations in the monoamine systems in depressed patients? Indeed, recent immunocytochemical studies have shown that several monoaminergic nuclei in the human brainstem are innervated by CRH-containing axons including the locus coeruleus and raphe nuclei.33,34 Given the evidence for alterations in CRH, norepinephrine and serotonin neurotransmission in depressive illness together with the anatomical data suggesting an interaction of CRH on LC and raphe neurons in the human brainstem, we sought to test the hypothesis that the concentration of CRH immunoreactivity is increased in specific pontine nuclei in subjects with major depression who committed suicide.

Materials and methods

Tissue collection

All procedures in our study were approved by the University of Pittsburgh's Institutional Review Board for Biomedical Research. Human brain specimens were obtained in the course of routine autopsies conducted at the Allegheny County Coroner's Office, Pittsburgh, PA, after obtaining consent from a surviving family member. A total of 11 subjects who died by suicide and had a diagnosis of depression were each matched with one control subject for sex and as closely as possible for age and postmortem interval (Table 1). Of the pairs, 10 were also matched for race. For each subject, a consensus DSM-IV diagnosis was made by an independent panel of experienced clinicians after reviewing medical records and the results of structured interviews conducted with family members of the deceased. Of the suicide subjects, 10 had a diagnosis of major depression, and one had a depressive disorder NOS. Three of the depressed subjects also had an Axis II diagnosis of obsessive–compulsive personality disorder and one depressed subject had an Axis II diagnosis of paranoid personality disorder. Three subjects with depression had a prior history of alcohol abuse and one depressed subject had a history of opioid abuse, but these disorders were in remission in all four subjects at the time of death. The mean (±SD) age at the onset of depression was 50.9±17.3 years, and the average duration of illness was 4.8±6.2 years. Eight of the 11 depressed subjects had a family history of depression. Neuropathological condition of each brain specimen was evaluated by macroscopic and microscopic examination. Thioflavin-S staining revealed a few senile plaques in subjects 598, 600, 685, 699 and 795 but clinical and neuropathological criteria to establish a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease were not met. Toxicological screens were positive for chlordiazepoxide for one depressed subject (598) and CO for two other depressed subjects (614, 628). Also, three depressed subjects (598, 689, 698) were receiving antidepressants at the time of death and two of these depressed subjects (689, 698) were treated with antipsychotics at the time of death. Three depressed subjects (614, 596, 613) had been off antidepressant medication for 0.6, 1.8 and 7.1 years, respectively, and one subject (613) off antipsychotic medication for 7.6 years. The other five depressed subjects had no documented history of antidepressant medication.

Table 1 Demographic Characteristics of the Subjects

Tissue preparation and radioimmunocytochemistry

Upon removal of the brain from the cranium, the cerebellum was removed and the brainstem was separated by a transverse cut at the rostral border of the superior colliculi. The brainstems were then cut into midbrain/pons and caudal medulla blocks, immediately frozen in isopentane and then stored at −80°C. The frozen midbrain/pontine blocks were sectioned transversely at 20 μm, sections were thaw-mounted onto gelatin-coated microscope slides and every 10th tissue section stained for Nissl substance with cresyl violet. The slides were stored at −80°C until processed.

Slide-mounted tissue sections of the pons were selected for assay based on the anatomical distribution of CRH-immunoreactive (IR) axons previously reported in the human brainstem.33 The radioimmunocytochemical assay was performed as previously described35 with some modifications. Four tissue sections were selected at 200 μm intervals from each case and placed into 4% paraformaldehyde for approximately 17 h. The sections were then rinsed twice for 15 min in PBS containing 0.4% Triton X-100 and then incubated for 60 min in PBS with 1.5% normal goat, 0.5% normal human serum and 0.4% Triton X-100 to reduce background.

The CRH primary antiserum (rabbit anti-CRH (human, rat), Pennisula Laboratories, San Carlos, CA, USA) was preadsorbed with natural melanin as previously described.33 The concentration of the CRH primary antiserum used on the tissue sections from the subject pairs was determined from a dilution curve constructed from control brainstem tissue sections that were incubated with varying concentrations of the primary antibody (1:1000–1:20 000), processed for radioimmunocytochemistry and quantified using densitometry. The 1:5000 concentration of primary antibody was chosen for the experiments because this antibody concentration produced the best signal-to-noise ratio from the autoradiographic images. Tissue sections from each matched subject pair were incubated at 4°C for 16–18 h with the primary antiserum to CRH (1:5000) diluted in PBS containing 0.4% Triton X-100, 3.0% goat serum and 0.05% bovine serum albumin. The sections were then washed three times for 5 min in 0.4% Triton X-100 in PBS and then incubated with [125I]-labeled secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit IgG, F(ab′)2 fragment; NEN, Boston, MA, USA) using a dilution of 1:200 (0.5 μCi/ml) in 0.4% Triton X-100 in PBS for 120 min at room temperature. Following this incubation, the sections were washed for 15 min in 0.4% Triton X-100 in PBS followed by two 15 min washes in PBS. Two additional sections from each case were included to assess nonspecific binding of the [125I]-IgG and were processed as described above except that the primary antiserum was not included in the buffer. The slides were then dipped into 70% ethanol, dried and co-exposed with iodinated plastic standards to β-max Hyperfilm (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL, USA) for 24–36 h. Exposure time was adjusted so that the resultant autoradiographic signal was within the optimum range of film sensitivity.

Quantitative image analysis

The quantification of the film autoradiographic images was accomplished using a personal computer-based image analysis system (the Microcomputer Imaging Device, MCID; M5) from Imaging Research, Inc. (St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada). Optical density values quantified from the iodinated standards (Amersham) were entered with their corresponding radioactivity values (nCi/mg protein) into a calibration table, and the relationship between tissue radioactivity and optical density determined using the MCID software. Each assayed tissue section was subsequently stained with cresyl violet. An image of the Nissl-stained section was digitized and used as an overlay on the autoradiographic image to allow specific pontine nuclei to be outlined. Based on the regional distribution of CRH-IR axons in the human pons,33 the cellular boundaries of the LC, medial parabrachial nucleus (MPB), dorsal tegmental nucleus (DTg), caudal nucleus of the dorsal raphe (cDR) and the median raphe (MR) were individually outlined on the Nissl-stained image. The optical density, corresponding to CRH-IR, was then quantified within each outlined region from the autoradiographic image. CRH-IR values (nCi/mg) for each pontine nucleus were derived by interpolation from the standard curve. Nonspecific binding of the secondary antibody to the tissue sections was measured from each pontine region for each case. The background values were averaged across the two sections, and this value was subtracted from each data point. The nonspecific binding averaged 18% of the total binding across all subjects. The CRH-IR value per sampled pontine nucleus was then adjusted for the sampling area by dividing the CRH-IR value by the scan area (pixel units) of the outlined region.

Statistical analyses

The data were analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of variance. The within factors were the subject pairing (control and depressed subjects) and the pontine regions (LC, MPB, DTg, cDR and MR). Each of the variables of interest were analyzed separately. Following a statistically significant omnibus test, Scheffe's post hoc procedure was performed to examine pairwise differences. In addition, multiple regression models were used to investigate the independent and concomitant effects of age, postmortem interval, age at onset and the duration of illness on the dependent variable of CRH-IR levels for each pontine region. A Mann–Whitney U test was used to examine the mean differences in CRH-IR levels in the pontine regions between depressed subjects receiving antidepressants and those depressed subjects with no known history of antidepressant medication. All statistical assumptions were met, and the statistical significance was defined as P≤0.05.

Results

The quantitative autoradiographic measurements of CRH-IR among the pontine nuclei from the control subjects revealed that the DTg contained the highest concentration of CRH-IR, this was followed in rank order by the MPB>LC=cDR>MR (Figure 1).

Figure 1
figure1

Histogram of the mean levels of CRH-IR in the pontine nuclei of depressed and control subjects. The concentration of CRH-IR was increased by 30% in the locus coeruleus (LC, control: 30.3±9.2, depressed: 39.3±9.2; mean±SD), by 45% in the caudal dorsal raphe (cDR, control: 27.4±9.4, depressed: 39.8±15.5), and by 39% in the median raphe (MR, control: 11.2±3.3, depressed: 15.6±3.5) in the depressed group compared to the control group. The mean CRH-IR level did not differ in the dorsal tegmental nucleus (DTg, control: 79.1±22.2, depressed: 91.0±27.2) or medial parabrachial nucleus (MPB, control: 53.8±19.9, depressed: 51.3±10.6) of the depressed subjects compared to controls.

As shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2, the mean level of CRH-IR in the depressed subjects was significantly increased by 30% in the LC (F1,20=9.0, P=0.007), by 45% in the cDR (F1,20=5.4, P=0.03) and by 39% in the MR (F1,20=7.6, P=0.012) relative to the control subjects. The mean level of CRH-IR was not significantly different in the MPB (F1,20=1.8, P=0.19) or DTg (F1,20=3.2, P=0.09) of the depressed subjects compared to controls. The difference in CRH-IR between subject groups in the LC, cDR and MR could not be attributed to the effects of age or PMI. Comparison of individual matched pairs revealed that the mean CRH-IR level was increased in the LC in eight of the 11 depressed subjects and increased in the cDR and MR in nine of the 11 depressed subjects compared to the matched control subjects (Figure 3). A significant positive correlation was found between the magnitude of the increase in CRH-IR levels in the LC and the age at onset of depression (r=0.68, P=0.02), but no significant relationships were found in the cDR or MR (cDR: r=0.33, P=0.32; MR: r=0.41, P=0.21) nor were there any significant relationships between the increase in CRH-IR in the three pontine regions of the depressed subjects and the duration of illness (LC: r=−0.40, P=0.23; cDR: r=0.32, P=0.34; MR: r=−0.01, P=0.99).

Figure 2
figure2

Scatter plots illustrating the CRH-IR concentrations in the LC, cDR and MR for each subject in the two diagnostic groups. Horizontal lines indicate group means.

Figure 3
figure3

Bar graph of the difference in CRH-IR levels between the depressed and control subject pairs in the LC, cDR and MR. Positive values indicate an increase in the depressed subject.

The potential confounding effects of current or past antidepressant medication on CRH-IR levels in the LC, cDR and MR was examined in the depressed subject group. Three of the depressed subjects (598, 689, 698) were receiving antidepressants at the time of death. The remaining eight depressed subjects had no documented history that they were currently receiving antidepressants at the time of death. The mean (SD) increases in CRH-IR within pairs were 4.68 (22.2) and 10.6 (11.6) for the LC, 8.69 (21.6) and 13.8 (15.1) for the cDR, and 3.06 (1.8) and 4.96 (4.88) for the MR for the depressed subjects on and off antidepressants at the time of death, respectively. However, the difference between these groups did not reach statistical significance for any pontine region (LC: M–WU=8.0, P=0.50, cDR: M–WU=9.0, P=0.63, MR: M–WU=8.0, P=0.50).

Representative immunoautoradiographic images of CRH-IR concentrations in the specific pontine nuclei of a control (551) and depressed (613) subject pair are shown in Figure 4. The elevated immunoautoradiographic signal, corresponding to CRH-IR, is revealed by the increased density of yellow and orange pixels in the LC, MR and cDR regions in the depressed subject compared to the matched control.

Figure 4
figure4

Representative color-enhanced immunoautoradiographic images of CRH-IR concentrations in specific pontine nuclei of a matched control (a) and depressed subject (b) pair. The red outlined regions correspond to the specific pontine nuclei sampled for CRH-IR. Note the higher immunoautoradiographic signal in the LC, cDR and MR regions in the depressed subject, as revealed by the greater density of yellow and orange pixels in these regions compared to the control subject. Calibration bar=1 mm.

Discussion

The present study found that the concentration of CRH-IR was increased in the LC, cDR and MR of depressed suicide men, but was unchanged in the adjacent pontine structures of the MPB and DTg compared to matched control subjects. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that CRH is hypersecreted in the brain of individuals with major depression, and they support the theory that the hyperactivity in CRH neurotransmission extends beyond the hypothalamus and occurs in other brain regions of depressed subjects.

Within the last 15 years, a considerable amount of data has accumulated from studies measuring various indices of CRH function in depressed subjects (for review see Mitchell36). The majority of these studies measured CRH levels from the CSF of depressed patients, and although several reports found elevated CSF CRH levels in the depressed subjects,9,10,11 a number of other studies failed to replicate these findings.15,16,17 The inconsistency among these studies may be attributable to differences in methodology, study design and subject characteristics. For example, in several of the studies that found no change in CRH levels between subject groups, the depressed group was not uniform and had included individuals with major depression as well as bipolar depressed subjects. Given that Berrettini et al37 previously found no change in CSF CRH levels in 41 bipolar outpatients compared to controls, it is possible that any increase in CRH in the major depressives may have been masked by the inclusion of bipolar subjects in these studies.

In addition to the in vivo studies measuring CSF CRH levels in depressed patients, several studies have examined various CRH parameters in postmortem samples of suicide and depressed subjects. Arató et al11 measured cisternal CSF CRH levels from individuals that committed suicide and found that CRH levels were significantly higher in the suicide group relative to the control group. Nemeroff et al14 measured CRH receptor binding sites in the frontal cortex of suicide victims and reported a decrease in the number of CRH receptor binding sites in the suicide subjects. However, it is important to note that the psychiatric diagnosis of the suicide victims in both these studies was not reported. Subsequent receptor binding studies failed to detect a decrease in CRH binding sites in frontal, motor or occipital cortices of subjects with major depression that died of natural causes or by suicide.19,20 The study by Leake et al19 also measured the concentration of CRH-IR in frontal and occipital cortices by radioimmunoassay, but found that the cortical levels of CRH did not differ between the depressed and control subject groups. This report confirmed an earlier study by this same group showing that CRH-IR levels did not differ in frontal, temporal, motor or parietal cortices between the depressed and control groups.18

The postmortem CRH data discussed above are conflicting and do not provide convincing evidence to support the theory of CRH hyperactivity in depression, but recent neuromorphological studies have revealed some intriguing CRH abnormalities in depressed subjects.12 Raadsheer et al12 using immunocytochemical and unbiased stereological techniques counted the number of CRH-IR neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) of depressed and control subjects. A four-fold increase in the number of PVN CRH-IR neurons was found in the depressed subjects: however, there was no change in the size of CRH cells or in PVN volume between the subject groups.12 A subsequent in situ hybridization study by this group conducted in the same brain specimens revealed an increase in the number of CRH mRNA-containing PVN cells in the depressed subjects relative to controls, but the mRNA concentration per cell was not changed between the subject groups. 13 There are some limitations of these two reports which include the small sample size of the depressed group (n=6), the diagnostic heterogeneity of the depressed subjects (three major depression, three bipolar depression) and the positive medication history in the last month of life for all the depressed subjects. Nonetheless, these findings have identified a specific brain nucleus exhibiting a cellular abnormality that may contribute to the excessive CRH neurotransmission in the brain of depressed subjects. Further studies in a larger, diagnostically homogeneous depressed group are warranted to confirm these morphological alterations.

The effects of antidepressants on CSF CRH concentrations in depressed patients have been examined by a number of studies. Most of the reports found that CSF CRH levels were decreased in the treated depressed patients,38,39,40 but one postmortem study found no change in cortical CRH levels between drug-treated and drug-free depressed suicide subjects.18 Since three depressed suicide subjects had a history of antidepressant use at the time of death, we examined whether current antidepressant use may have influenced the CRH concentrations in the pontine nuclei of our depressed suicide subjects. Although the depressed subjects with no known history of antidepressant treatment had larger mean increases in CRH levels in all three pontine regions than the depressed subjects receiving antidepressants at the time of death, the differences were not statistically significant.

Our findings reveal a localized increase in the concentration of CRH-IR in the LC, cDR and MR nuclei in the pons of depressed male subjects who have committed suicide. The increase in CRH-IR in these regions may correspond to an increased biosynthesis and transport of CRH to the nerve terminals and/or an increase in the density of CRH-IR axons innervating these pontine structures. One question that is raised from our observations; what is the origin of the CRH innervation of the human LC, cDR and MR? A number of tracing studies in nonhuman primates have shown that afferents to several midbrain and pontine structures including the DR, MR and LC originate from the dorsolateral and dorsomedial prefrontal cortices, anterior and posterior cingulate cortices, central nucleus of the amygdala and posterior hypothalamic regions.41,42,43,44,45,46 These findings are potentially interesting given that a number of these cortical and subcortical regions in the monkey have been reported to contain CRH-IR cell bodies.47,48,49 Unfortunately, one can only speculate on the origin of the CRH afferents to the LC and raphe nuclei in the human brain. However, given the anatomical tracing studies in monkeys, it is possible that biochemical or morphological alterations exist in CRH neurons located in the prefrontal cortex, amygdala or hypothalamus, which contribute to the elevated CRH levels in the terminal fields of the LC and raphe nuclei of depressed subjects.

It is important to note that our study was conducted only in male subjects. Therefore, it is possible that a gender difference may exist in the integrity of CRH biosynthesis in depressed subjects, and it will be critical for future studies to determine whether the elevation in CRH in the pontine nuclei is also present in depressed female subjects.

Considerable evidence has accumulated demonstrating a functional role of CRH on LC neurons. Both electrophysiological and biochemical studies have shown that CRH increases the spontaneous discharge rate of LC neurons, increases norepinephrine release and increases tyrosine hydroxylase protein levels in the LC.21,23,50,51,52 Furthermore, depending on the type of stressor, the stress-induced activation of LC neurons appears to be mediated by CRH presumably released from terminals within the LC region.21,22,53 These findings are consistent with the elevation in CRH levels in the LC following stress.54 Recent studies have also provided evidence of a neurotransmitter role for CRH on serotonin neurons in the DR. For example, injection of CRH into the ventricles or directly into the DR of rats inhibited the discharge rate of serotonin neurons in the DR.24,25 However, Lowry et al,26 using an in vitro slice preparation, reported that CRH had no effect on the firing rate of serotonin neurons from control rats, but significantly increased the firing rate of serotonin neurons from rats previously exposed to repeated restraint stress. Taken together, these studies support a neurotransmitter role for CRH in regulating the activity of noradrenergic LC and serotonergic raphe neurons.

Numerous clinical and postmortem brain studies have documented abnormalities in various noradrenergic and serotonergic parameters in subjects with mood disorders. In particular, postmortem studies have reported alterations in norepinephrine transporter binding sites and tyrosine hydroxylase protein levels in the LC27,28 and in serotonin 1A receptor binding sites in the DR30,32 of depressed suicide subjects. Given our findings of elevated CRH-IR levels in the LC and raphe nuclei of depressed suicide subjects, it is conceivable that the excessive CRH neurotransmission in these regions contributes to the altered functioning of the noradrenergic and serotonergic systems in depression and suicidal behavior. Within this context, it is interesting that a recent open-label clinical trial explored the antidepressant potential of a CRH receptor antagonist.55 Zobel et al55 administered R121919, a water-soluble pyrrolopyrimidine with high affinity for CRH-R1 receptors, to 24 patients with a major depressive episode and found that patient- and clinician-rated depression and anxiety scores were significantly improved over the course of treatment. These preliminary findings highlight the importance of continued research exploring the therapeutic potential of CRH receptor antagonists for treating mood disorders as well as continued investigations into the cellular interactions of CRH on the monoamine systems.

Convergent lines of evidence support the hypothesis that CRH neurotransmission is over-active in the brain of individuals with major depression. The localized increase in CRH-IR concentrations in the LC and caudal raphe nuclei of depressed suicide subjects suggest that either a biochemical or a cellular alteration exists in the CRH neurons that innervate these pontine structures. It remains to be determined whether the elevated levels of CRH in the LC and raphe nuclei have a functional impact on norepinephrine and serotonin neurotransmission in subjects with major depression.

References

  1. 1

    Gibbons JL, McHugh PR . Plasma cortisol in depressive illness. J Psychiatr Res 1962; 1: 162–171.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Carpenter WT, Bunney WE . Adrenal cortical activity in depressive illness. Am J Psychiatry 1971; 128: 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Sachar EJ, Hellman L, Fukushima DK, Gallagher TF . Cortisol production in depressive illness. A clinical and biochemical clarification. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1970; 23: 289–298.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Carroll BJ, Curtis GC, Davies BM, Mendels J, Sugerman AA . Urinary free cortisol excretion in depression. Psychol Med 1976; 6: 43–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Linkowski P, Mendlewicz J, LeClercq R, Brasseur M, Hubain P, Goldstein J et al. The 24 hour profile of adrenocorticotropin and cortisol in major depressive illness. J Clin Endocrinol Methods 1985; 61: 429–438.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Gold PW, Loriaux DL, Roy A, Kling MA, Calabrese JR, Kellner CH et al. Responses to corticotropin-releasing hormone in the hypercortisolism of depression and Cushing's disease. N Engl J Med 1986; 314: 1329–1335.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Holsboer F, Von Bardeleben U, Gerken A, Stalla GK, Müller OA . Blunted corticotropin and normal cortisol response to human corticotropin-releasing factor in depression. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 1127.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Kathol RG, Jaeckle RS, Lopez JF, Meller WH . Consistent reduction of ACTH responses to stimulation with CRH, vasopressin and hypoglycaemia in patients with major depression. Br J Psychiatry 1989; 155: 468–478.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Nemeroff CB, Widerlöv E, Bissette G, Walléus H, Karlsson I, Eklund K et al. Elevated concentrations of CSF corticotropin-releasing factor-like immunoreactivity in depressed patients. Science 1984; 226: 1342–1344.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Banki CM, Bissette G, Arató M, O'Conner L, Nemeroff CB . CSF corticotropin-releasing factor-like immunoreactivity in depression and schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1987; 144: 873–877.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Arató M, Banki CM, Bissette G, Nemeroff CB . Elevated CSF CRF in suicide victims. Biol Psychiatry 1989; 25: 355–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Raadsheer FC, Hoogendijk WJG, Stam FC, Tilders FJH, Swaab DF . Increased numbers of corticotropin-releasing hormone expressing neurons in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus of depressed patients. Neuroendocrinology 1994; 60: 436–444.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Raadsheer FC, van Heerikhuize JJ, Lucassen PJ, Hoogendijk WJG, Tilders FJH, Swaab DF . Corticotropin-releasing hormone mRNA levels in the paraventricular nucleus of patients with Alzheimer's disease and depression. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152: 1372–1376.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Nemeroff CB, Owens MJ, Bissette G, Andorn AC, Stanley M . Reduced corticotropin releasing factor binding sites in the frontal cortex of suicide victims. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988; 45: 577–579.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Kling MA, Roy A, Doran AR, Calabrese MR, Rubinow DR, Whitfield HJ et al. Cerebrospinal fluid immunoreactive corticotropin-releasing hormone and adrenocorticotropin secretion in Cushing's disease and major depression: Potential clinical implications. J Clin Endocrinol Methods 1991; 72: 260–271.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Roy A, Pickar D, Paul SM, Doran A, Chrousos GP, Gold PW . CSF corticotropin-releasing hormone in depressed patients and normal control subjects. Am J Psychiatry 1987; 144: 641–645.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Pitts AF, Samuelson SD, Meller WH, Bissette G, Nemeroff CB, Kathol RG . Cerebrospinal fluid corticotropin-releasing hormone vasopressin, and oxytocin concentrations in treated patients with major depression and controls. Biol Psychiatry 1995; 38: 330–335.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Charlton BG, Cheetham SC, Horton RW, Katona CLE, Crompton MR, Ferrier IN . Corticotropin-releasing factor immunoreactivity in post-mortem brain from depressed suicides. J Psychopharmacol 1988; 2: 13–18.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Leake A, Perry EK, Perry RH, Fairbairn AF, Ferrier IN . Cortical concentrations of corticotropin-releasing hormone and its receptor in Alzheimer type dementia and major depression. Biol Psychiatry 1990; 28: 603–608.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Hucks D, Lowther S, Crompton MR, Katona CLE, Horton RW . Corticotropin-releasing factor binding sites in cortex of depressed suicides. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1997; 134: 174–178.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Valentino RJ, Wehby RG . Corticotropin-releasing factor: evidence for a neurotransmitter role in the locus ceruleus during hemodynamic stress. Neuroendocrinology 1988; 48: 674–677.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Valentino RJ, Page ME, Curtis AL . Activation of noradrenergic locus coeruleus neurons by hemodynamic stress is due to local release of corticotropin-releasing factor. Brain Res 1991; 555: 25–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Melia KR, Duman RS . Involvement of corticotropin-releasing factor in chronic stress regulation of the brain noradrenergic system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88: 8382–8386.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Kirby LG, Rice KC, Valentino RJ . Effects of corticotropin-releasing factor on neuronal activity in the serotonergic dorsal raphe nucleus. Neuropsychopharmacology 2000; 22: 148–162.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Price ME, Curtis AL, Kirby LG, Valentino RJ, Lucki I . Effects of corticotropin-releasing factor on brain serotonergic activity. Neuropsychopharmacology 1998; 18: 492–502.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Lowry CA, Rodda JE, Lightman SL, Ingram CD . Corticotropin-releasing factor increases in vitro firing rates of serotonergic neurons in the rat dorsal raphe nucleus: evidence for activation of a topographically organized mesolimbocortical serotonergic system. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 7728–7736.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Ordway GA, Streator Smith K, Haycock JW . Elevated tyrosine hydroxylase in the locus coeruleus of suicide victims. J Neurochem 1994; 62: 680–685.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Klimek V, Stockmeier CA, Overholser J, Meltzer HY, Kalka S, Dilley G et al. Reduced levels of norepinephrine transporters in the locus coeruleus in major depression. J Neurosci 1997; 17: 8451–8458.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Wong ML, Kling MA, Munson PJ, Listwak S, Licinio J, Prolo P et al. Pronounced and sustained central hypernoradrenergic function in major depression with melancholic features: relation to hypercortisolism and corticotropin-releasing hormone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 325–330.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Stockmeier CA, Shapiro LA, Dilley GE, Kolli TN, Friedman L, Rajkowska G . Increase in serotonin-1A autoreceptors in the midbrain of suicide victims with major depression—postmortem evidence for decreased serotonin activity. J Neurosci 1998; 18: 7394–7401.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Drevets WC, Frank E, Price JC, Kupfer DJ, Holt D, Greer PJ et al. PET imaging of serotonin 1A receptor binding in depression. Biol Psychiatry 1999; 46: 1375–1387.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Arango V, Underwood MD, Boldrini M, Tamir H, Kassir SA, Hsiung SC et al. Serotonin 1A receptors, serotonin transporter binding and serotonin transporter mRNA expression in the brainstem of depressed suicide victims. Neuropsychopharmacology 2001; 25: 892–903.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Austin MC, Rhodes JL, Lewis DA . Differential distribution of corticotropin-releasing hormone immunoreactive axons in monoaminergic nuclei of the human brainstem. Neuropsychopharmacology 1997; 17: 326–341.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Ruggiero DA, Underwood MD, Rice PM, Mann JJ, Arango V . Corticotropin-releasing hormone and serotonin interact in the human brainstem: behavioral implications. Neuroscience 1999; 91: 1343–1354.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Ng MC, Iacopino AM . Quantitative measurement of neuronal calbindin-D28K by radioimmunocytochemistry. Mol Brain Res 1995; 32: 82–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Mitchell AJ . The role of corticotropin-releasing factor in depressive illness: a critical review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1998; 22: 635–651.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Berrettini WH, Nurnberger JI, Zerbe RL, Gold PW, Chrousos GP, Tomai T . CSF neuropeptides in euthymic bipolar patients and controls. Br J Psychiatry 1987; 150: 208–212.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Banki CM, Karmacsi L, Bissette G, Nemeroff CB . CSF corticotropin-releasing hormone and somatostatin in major depression: response to antidepressant treatment and relapse. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 1992; 2: 107–113.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    De Bellis MD, Gold PW, Geracioti TD, Listwak SJ, Kling MA . Association of fluoxetine treatment with reductions in CSF concentration of corticotropin-releasing hormone and arginine vasopressin in patients with major depression. Am J Psychiatry 1993; 150: 656–657.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Heuser I, Bissette G, Dettling M, Schweiger U, Gotthardt U, Schmider J et al. Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of corticotropin-releasing hormone, vasopressin, and somatostatin in depressed patients and healthy controls: response to amitriptyline treatment. Depress Anxiety 1998; 8: 71–79.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Price JL, Amaral DG . An autoradiographic study of the projections of the central nucleus of the monkey amygdala. J Neurosci 1981; 1: 1242–1259.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Veazey RB, Amaral DG, Cowan WM . The morphology and connections of the posterior hypothalamus in the cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis). II. Efferent connections. J Comp Neurol 1982; 207: 135–156.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Arnsten AFT, Goldman-Rakic PS . Selective prefrontal cortical projections to the region of the locus coeruleus and raphe nuclei in the rhesus monkey. Brain Res 1984; 306: 9–18.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    An X, Bandler R, Ongur D, Price JL . Prefrontal cortical projections to longitudinal columns in the midbrain periaqueductal gray in macaque monkeys. J Comp Neurol 1998; 401: 455–479.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Freedman LJ, Insel TR, Smith Y . Subcortical projections of area 25 (subgenual cortex) of the macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol 2000; 421: 172–188.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Chiba T, Kayahara T, Nakano K . Efferent projections of infralimbic and prelimbic areas of the medial prefrontal cortex in the Japanese monkey Macaca fuscata. Brain Res 2001; 888: 83–101.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Paull WK, Phelix CF, Copeland M, Palmiter P, Gibbs FP, Middleton C . Immunohistochemical localization of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) in the hypothalamus of the squirrel monkey, Saimiri sciureus. Peptides 1984; 5: 45–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Lewis DA, Foote SL, Cha CI . Corticotropin-releasing factor immunoreactivity in monkey neocortex: an immunohistochemical analysis. J Comp Neurol 1989; 290: 599–613.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Bassett JL, Foote SL . Distribution of corticotropin-releasing factor-like immunoreactivity in squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus) amygdala. J Comp Neurol 1992; 323: 91–102.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Smagin GN, Swiergiel AH, Dunn AJ . Corticotropin-releasing factor administered into the locus coeruleus, but not the parabrachial nucleus, stimulates norepinephrine release in the prefrontal cortex. Brain Res Bull 1995; 36: 71–76.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Finlay JM, Jedema HP, Rabinovic AD, Mana MJ, Zigmond MJ, Sved AF . Impact of corticotropin-releasing hormone on extracellular norepinephrine in prefrontal cortex after chronic cold stress. J Neurochem 1997; 69: 144–150.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Page ME, Abercrombie ED . Discrete local application of corticotropin-releasing factor increases locus coeruleus discharge and extracellular norepinephrine in rat hippocampus. Synapse 1999; 33: 304–313.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Jedema HP, Finlay JM, Sved AF, Grace AA . Chronic cold exposure potentiates CRH-evoked increases in electrophysiologic activity of locus coeruleus neurons. Biol Psychiatry 2001; 49: 351–359.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Chappell PB, Smith MA, Kilts CD, Bissette G, Ritchie J, Nemeroff CB . Alterations in corticotropin-releasing factor-like immunoreactivity in discrete rat brain regions after acute and chronic stress. J Neurosci 1986; 6: 2908–2914.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Zobel AW, Nickel T, Künzel HE, Ackl N, Sonntag A, Ising M et al. Effects of the high-affinity corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 antagonist R121919 in major depression: the first 20 patients treated. J Psychiatr Res 2000; 34: 171–181.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by USPHS Grants MH57011 and MH45156. The authors thank Drs Gretchen Haas, Carol Sue Johnston, Cameron Carter and Matcheri Keshavan for their participation in the diagnostic conferences.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M C Austin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Austin, M., Janosky, J. & Murphy, H. Increased corticotropin-releasing hormone immunoreactivity in monoamine-containing pontine nuclei of depressed suicide men. Mol Psychiatry 8, 324–332 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4001250

Download citation

Keywords

  • axons
  • corticotropin-releasing factor
  • locus coeruleus
  • mood disorders
  • norepine-phrine
  • postmortem
  • raphe
  • serotonin

Further reading

Search