Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Are consecutive nightly recordings required for valid evaluation of sleep-associated erections?

Abstract

We questioned the need for more than one RigiScan recording for accurate assessment of sleep-associated penile erections and determine the necessity of consecutive nightly recordings for valid evaluation of sleep-associated erections. Men complaining of erectile dysfunction (ED) and referred to RigiScan evaluation for the first time participated. Recordings were performed at the patient's home during two consecutive nights, and data on test time, number of erections, erection duration, minimal and maximal base and tip tumescence and rigidity were retrieved for both nights. Normal erectile function was defined with the recording of at least one erection (70 out of 100% tip rigidity lasting for at least 10 min during either night). The main outcome measures were RigiScan recordings. Group 1 consisted of 29 men (mean age 42.4±13.8 years, range 22–71) who had normal erections, all during the first night. Group 2 consisted of 26 men (mean age 48.6±13.5 years, range 25–70) who failed to fulfill both criteria for normal erection. In Group 2, only the values for penile base rigidity and erection duration were normal during the first night: the parameters of maximal base tumescence, tip rigidity, number of effective erections and duration of effective erections that were impaired during the first night were significantly worse (P<0.01) during the second night. The required information for the diagnosis of psychogenic ED was obtained during the first night in >50% of the participants. Men with normal erections during the first night can be spared the inconvenience and cost of re-testing. Consecutive night recording should be reserved for patients whose recorded data during the first night did not fulfill the criteria for normal erection.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The process of care model for evaluation and treatment of erectile dysfunction. The Process of Care Consensus Panel. Int J Impot Res 1999; 11: 59–70 (discussion 70–74).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Karacan I, Williams RL, Thornby JI, Salis PJ . Sleep-related penile tumescence as a function of age. Am J Psychiatry 1975; 132: 932–937.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bradley WE, Timm GW, Gallagher JM, Johnson BK . New method for continuous measurement of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity. Urology 1985; 26: 4–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hatzichristou DG, Hatzimouratidis K, Ioannides E, Yannakoyorgos K, Dimitriadis G, Kalinderis A . Nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity monitoring in young potent volunteers: reproducibility, evaluation criteria and the effect of sexual intercourse. J Urol 1998; 159: 1921–1926.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A . The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997; 49: 822–830.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen J, Greenstein A, Sofer M, Matzkin H . Rigiscan versus snap gauge band measurements – is the extra cost worthwhile? Int J Impot Res 1999; 11: 315–318.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Helgason AR, Arver S, Adolfsson J, Dickman P, Granath F, Steineck G . ‘Potency’: the validation of information from a self-administered questionnaire using objective measurements of night-time erections and test-retest reliability. Br J Urol 1998; 81: 135–141.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Montorsi F, Maga T, Strambi LF, Salonia A, Barbieri L, Scattoni V et al. Sildenafil taken at bedtime significantly increases nocturnal erections: results of a placebo-controlled study. Urology 2000; 56: 906–911.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Greenstein A, Chen J, Salonia A, Sofer M, Matzkin H, Montorsi F . Does sildenafil enhance quality of nocturnal erections in healthy young men? A NPT-RigiScanTM study. J Sex Med 2004; 1: 314–317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gingell C, Sultana SR, Wulff MB, Gepi-Attee S . Duration of action of sildenafil citrate in men with erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2004; 1: 179–184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Montorsi F, Oettel M . Testosterone and sleep-related erections: an overview. J Sex Med 2005; 2: 771–784.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mann K, Pankok J, Connemann B, Röschke J . Temporal relationship between nocturnal erections and rapid eye movement episodes in healthy men. Neuropsychobiology 2003; 47: 109–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Greenstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greenstein, A., Mabjeesh, N., Sofer, M. et al. Are consecutive nightly recordings required for valid evaluation of sleep-associated erections?. Int J Impot Res 19, 196–199 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901512

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901512

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links