Abstract
In recent years, the use of RigiScan and ultrasound to assess erectile dysfunction has fallen from favour. However, in a small minority of specialist cases, where a vascular, neurogenic or psychogenic aetiology requires confirmation, there remains a need for further investigation. To establish if in a preliminary assessment the use of nocturnal RigiScan or male impotence diagnostic ultrasound system (MIDUS) represents best practice as a diagnostic investigation in patients with a history suggestive of vascular organic erectile disorder. Men attending both urological and psychosexual therapy clinics with erectile dysfunction were assessed using a generic assessment schedule. Patients with a history suggestive of vascular erectile disorder were offered the opportunity of dual investigation of their condition. After screening using a provocative RigiScan using visual stimuli that gleaned inconclusive results, patients were offered the chance to enter a study with both nocturnal RigiScan and MIDUS investigation. These were confined for the purposes of this study to RigiScan events, peak systolic flow velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic flow velocity (EDV) from ultrasound examination where an abnormal EDV is defined as in excess of 4.5 cm/s and a normal PSV is variously defined as being greater than 35 cm/s. In all, 38/43 (88%, 95% CI: 76–95%) of men had a nocturnal event exceeding 3 min on the RigiScan investigation. This compares with 17/43 (40%, 95% CI: 26–54%) of men with a normal EDV blood flow of less than 4.5 cm/s (P<0.017) and 32/43 (74%, CI: 60–85%) of men with a normal PSV flow greater than 35 cm/s (NS). Rigiscan and ultrasonography of the cavernosal vessels are of equal usefulness in suspected arterial penile disease although where veno-occlusive disease is suspected, ultrasonography is more specific.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 8 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $32.38 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wespes E, Amar E, Hatzichristou D, Montorsi F, Pryor J, Vardi Y . Guidelines on Erectile Dysfunction, Update March 2004, European Association of Urology.
Bassar MM, Atan A, Tekdogan UY . New concept of parameters of RigiScan in differentiating of vascular erectile dysfunction: Is it a useful test? Int J Urol 2001; 8: 686–691.
McMahon CG, Touma K . Predictive value of patient history and correlation of nocturnal penile tumescence, colour duplex Doppler ultrasonography and dynamic cavernosometry and cavernosography in the evaluation of erectile dysfunction. J Urol 1999; 162: 631–632.
Knoll LD, Abrams JH . Evaluation of penile ultrasonic velocitometry versus penile duplex ultrasonography to assess penile arterial hemodynamics. Urology 1998; 51 (1): 89–93.
Wylie KR, Steward D, Walters S . Does vibration offer any advantage over visual stimulation studies in the assessment of erectile capacity? Int J Impot Res 2001; 13: 329–337.
Gontero P, Sriprasa S, Wilkins CJ, Donaldson N, Muir GH, Sidhup S . Phenotolamine re-dosing during penile dynamic color Doppler ultrasound: a practical method to abolish a false diagnosis of venous leakage in patients with erectile dysfunction. Br J Radiol 2004; 77: 922–926.
Benson CB, Vickers MA . Sexual impotence caused by vascular disease, diagnosis by using duplex sonograph. AJR AMJ Roentgenol 1989; 153: 1149–1153.
Chiou RK, Pomeroy BD, Chen WS, Anderson JC, Wobig RK, Taylor RJ . Hemodynamic patterns of pharmacologically induced erections: evaluation by colour Doppler sonography. J Urol 1998; 159 (1): 109–112.
Bassiouny HS, Levine LA . Penile duplex sonography in the diagnosis of venogenic impotence. J Vasc Surg 1991; 13 (1): 75–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wylie, K., Davies-South, D., Steward, D. et al. A comparison between portable ultrasound (MIDUS) and nocturnal RigiScan when confirming the diagnosis of vascular organic erectile disorder. Int J Impot Res 18, 354–358 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901433
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901433