Abstract
Routine removal of the reservoir in explanting a malfunctioning three-piece penile implant raises debates because that the retained reservoir has little risk of erosion and it often needs a second incision to remove the reservoir. We reported a case whose retained reservoir resulted in nonbacterial inflammation around it and caused an ipsilateral hydronephrosis.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 8 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $32.38 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Goldstein I, Newman L, Baum N, Brooks M, Chaikin L, Goldberg K et al. Safety and efficacy outcome of Mentor alpha-I inflatable penile prosthesis implantation for impotence treatment. J Urol 1997; 157: 833–839.
Carson CC, Mulcahy JJ, Govier FE . Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes of the ANS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a long-term multicenter study. J Urol 2000; 164: 376–380.
Rajpurkar A, Bianco FF, Al-Omar Jr O, Terlecki R, Dhabuwala C . Fate of the retained reservoir after replacement of 3-piece penile prosthesis. J Urol 2004; 172: 664–666.
Munoz JJ, Ellsworth PI . The retained penile prosthesis reservoir: a risk. Urology 2000; 55: 949.
Jones L, Ryan R, Ghobriel A . The retrained reservoir in inflatable penile prosthesis explanation. J Urol 2002; 167 (Suppl): 150 (abstract 601).
Flanagan MJ, Krisch EV, Gerber WL . Complication of a penile prosthesis reservoir: venous compression masquerading as a deep venous thrombosis. J Urol 1991; 146: 847–848.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiann, BP., Ou, CW., Lin, JT. et al. Compression of ureter caused by a retained reservoir of penile prosthesis. Int J Impot Res 18, 316–317 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901402
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901402
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Alternative Reservoir and Balloon Placement in Complex Patients Undergoing Urologic Prostheses
Current Urology Reports (2018)
-
A retrospective analysis of risk factors for IPP reservoir entry into the peritoneum after abdominal wall placement
International Journal of Impotence Research (2017)
-
Pros and Cons of Ectopic IPP Reservoir Placement
Current Sexual Health Reports (2017)
-
Practice patterns of urologists performing penile prosthesis surgery vary based on surgeon volume: results of a practice pattern survey
International Journal of Impotence Research (2010)