Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Research
  • Published:

A prospective analysis of sexual functions during pregnancy

International Journal of Impotence Research volume 17, pages 154–157 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the sexual functions during pregnancy using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire. Pregnancies were recorded in a prospective cohort study comprising 40 healthy pregnant women. Pregnant women who had a stable relationship with their partner were enrolled in the study when were first diagnosed to be pregnant. During their antenatal visits, subjects were asked to complete the FSFI questionnaire and other information about their sexual life in each trimester. Each FSFI domain score was calculated and mean scores in each domain were compared according to the trimesters of pregnancy. Data of 37 subjects for the first, 36 for the second and 34 for the third trimesters of pregnancy were eligible for the analysis. The mean age was 25.5±4.5 y; mean parity was 0.4±0.7 and mean gravity was 1.6±0.9. The frequency of intercourse attempts during the last 4 weeks was 8.6±3 before pregnancy, and 6.9±2.5, 5.4±2.6 and 2.5±1.4 in the first, second and third trimesters of pregnancy, respectively. In all domains of FSFI, significant decline in domain scores was determined during pregnancy. The comparison of satisfaction and pain domain scores between first and second trimesters showed significant differences. All of the domain scores significantly decreased in the third trimester of pregnancy. Our results showed that sexual functions are significantly decreased during pregnancy and worsen as the pregnancy progresses. Childbearing couples should be given information about the sexual problems and fluctuations in the patterns of sexuality during pregnancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basson R et al. Report of the international consensus development conference on female sexual dysfunction: definitions and classifications. J Urol 2000; 163: 888–893.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anastasiadis AG et al. The epidemiology and definition of female sexual disorders. World J Urol 2002; 20: 74–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reamy K, White SE, Daneli WC, Levine ES . Sexuality and pregnancy: a prospective study. J Reprod Med 1982; 27: 321–327.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reamy K, White SE . Sexuality in pregnancy and the puerperium: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1985; 40: 1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Perkins RP . Sexuality in pregnancy: what determines behaviour? Obstet Gynecol 1982; 59: 189–198.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bartellas E et al. Sexuality and sexual activity in pregnancy. BJOG 2000; 107: 964–968.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ryding EL . Sexuality during and after pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984; 63: 679–682.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Oruc S et al. Sexual behaviour during pregnancy. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 39: 48–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. von Sydow K . Sexuality during pregnancy and after childbirth: a meta content analysis of 59 studies. J Psychosom Res 1999; 47: 27–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee JT . The meaning of sexual satisfaction in pregnant Taiwanese women. J Midwifery Womens Health 2002; 47: 278–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Solberg SD, Butler J, Wagner NN . Sexual behaviour in pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1973; 288: 1098–1103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Orji EO, Ogunlola IO, Fasubaa OB . Sexuality among pregnant women in South West Nigeria. J Obstet gynaecol 2002; 22: 166–168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosen R et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26: 191–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Onah HE et al. Nigerian male sexual activity during pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2002; 76: 219–223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones LRA . The use of validated questionnaires to assess female sexual dysfunction. World J Urol 2002; 20: 89–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. May KA, Mahlmeister LR . Comprehensive Maternity Nursing: Nursing Process and Child-bearing Family 2nd edn. JB Lippincott: Philadelphia, PA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Inciralti, Izmir, Turkey

    G Aslan & A Esen

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SSK Aegean Maternity and Women's Health Teaching Hospital, Izmir, Turkey

    D Aslan, A Kızılyar & Ç İspahi

Authors
  1. G Aslan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D Aslan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A Kızılyar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ç İspahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A Esen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G Aslan.

Additional information

Preliminary results of this study were presented as poster presentation at the 5th ESSIR Congress 2002, Hamburg, Germany.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aslan, G., Aslan, D., Kızılyar, A. et al. A prospective analysis of sexual functions during pregnancy. Int J Impot Res 17, 154–157 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901288

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901288

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links