Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Nonmuscle stem cells fail to significantly contribute to regeneration of normal muscle

Abstract

Whole, normal extensor digitorum longus muscles (EDL) were orthtopically transplanted into transgenic mice, expressing nuclear localing β-galactosidase (nlsβ-gal) under control of a muscle-specific promoter, in order to determine the extent to which nonmuscle derived, multipotent stem cells (which under experimental conditions exhibit myogenic potential) are spontaneously recruited from distal, nonmuscle organs to participate in the graft's regeneration. The host's contribution to the graft's regeneration was determined by evaluating the number and distribution of β-gal positive myonuclei in regenerated grafts. Fibers with β-gal positive nuclei accounted for 1% of the long-term (28- and 56-day) graft's myofibers. All were confined to the graft's periphery, adjacent to host's muscles. Failure to find myofibers with β-gal positive nuclei across the revascularized graft's girth demonstrated that there was no meaningful recruitment of nonmuscle stem cells from distal host organs, which must arrive at the graft via the circulation. Rather, stem cells residing in the graft at the time of transplantation accounted for 99.9% of the regenerated graft's myonuclei, with a minor contribution from the surrounding host muscles’ myosatellite cells (that occurred when the epimysia of graft or host muscles were damaged during transplantation). The significance of these findings to gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carlson BM . The regeneration of skeletal muscle. A review. Am J Anat 1973; 137: 119–149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morgan JE, Partridge TA . Muscle satellite cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2003; 35: 1151–1156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mauro A . Satellite cell of skeletal muscle fibers. J Biophys Biochem 1961; 9: 493–495.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zammit PS et al. Kinetics of myoblast proliferation show that resident satellite cells are competent to fully regenerate skeletal muscle fibers. Exp Cell Res 2002; 281: 39–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Webster C, Blau H . Accelerated age related decline in replicative life-span of Duchenne muscular dystrophy myoblasts: implications for cell and gene therapy. Somat Cell Mol Genet 1990; 16: 557–565.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gussoni E et al. Dystrophin expression in the mdx mouse restored by stem cell transplantation. Nature 1999; 401: 390–394.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JY et al. Clonal isolation of muscle-derived cells capable of enhancing muscle regeneration and bone healing. J Cell Biol 2000; 150: 1085–1100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson KA, Mi T, Goodell MA . Hematopoietic potential of stem cells isolated from murine skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 14482–14486.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Asakura A, Seale P, Girgis-Gabardo A, Rudnicki MA . Myogenic specification of side population cells in skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol 2002; 159: 123–134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Qu-Petersen Z et al. Identification of a novel population of muscle stem cells in mice: potential for muscle regeneration. J Cell Biol 2002; 157: 851–864.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Seale P et al. Pax7 is required for the specification of myogenic satellite cells. Cell 2000; 102: 777–786.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldring K, Partridge T, Watt D . Muscle stem cells. J Pathol 2002; 197: 457–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferrari G et al. Muscle regeneration by bone marrow-derived myogenic progenitors. Science 1998; 279: 1528–1530.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gussoni E et al. Long-term persistence of donor nuclei in a Duchenne muscular dystrophy patient receiving bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Invest 2002; 110: 807–814.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrari G, Stornaiuolo A, Mavilio F . Failure to correct murine muscular dystrophy. Nature 2001; 411: 1014–1015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Seale P, Rudnicki MA . A new look at the origin, function, and ‘stem-cell’ status of muscle satellite cells. Dev Biol 2000; 218: 115–124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. LaBarge MA, Blau H . Biological progression from adult bone marrow to mononucleate muscle fiber in response to injury. Cell 2002; 111: 589–601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. De Angelis L et al. Skeletal myogenic progenitors originating from embryonic dorsal aorta coexpress endothelial and myogenic markers and contribute to postnatal muscle growth and regeneration. J Cell Biol 1999; 147: 869–877.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Minasi MG et al. The meso-angioblast: a multipotent, self-renewing cell that originates from the dorsal aorta and differentiates into most mesodermal tissues. Development 2002; 129: 2773–2783.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hansen-Smith FM, Carlson B . Cellular responses to free grafting of the extensor digitorum longus muscle of the rat. J Neurol Sci 1979; 41: 149–173.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hansen-Smith FM, Carlson B, Irwin KL . Revascularization of the freely grafted extensor digitorum longus muscle in the rat. Am J Anat 1980; 158: 65–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Partridge TA, Grounds M, Sloper JC . Evidence of fusion between host and donor myoblasts in skeletal muscle grafts. Nature 1978; 273: 306–308.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jockusch H, Voight S . Migration of adult myogenic precursor cells as revealed by GFP/nlacZ labelling of mouse transplantation chimeras. J Cell Sci 2003; 116: 1611–1616.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schultz E, Jaryszak DL, Gibson MC, Albright DJ . Absence of exogenous satellite cell contribution to regeneration of frozen skeletal muscle. J Musc Res Cell Motility 1986; 7: 361–367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kelly R et al. Myosin light chain 3F regulatory sequences confer regionalized cardiac and skeletal muscle expression in transgenic mice. J Cell Biol 1995; 129: 383–396.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ontell M et al. Myosatellite cells, growth, and regeneration in murine dystrophic muscle: a quantitative study. Anat Rec 1984; 208: 159–174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang J et al. Limitations of nls beta-galactosidase as a marker for studying myogenic lineage or the efficacy of myoblast transfer. Anat Rec 1997; 248: 40–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bourke DL, Ontell M . Branched myofibers in long-term whole muscle transplants: a quantitative study. Anat Rec 1984; 209: 281–288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Thomas D, Klueber K, Bourke D, Ontell M . The size of the myofibers in mature grafts of the mouse extensor digitorum longus muscle. Muscle Nerve 1984; 7: 226–231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mueller GM, O'Day T, Watchko JF, Ontell M . Effect of injecting primary myoblasts versus putative muscle-derived stem cells on mass and force generation in mdx mice. Hum Gene Ther 2002; 13: 1081–1090.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Benoit PW, Belt WD . Destruction and regeneration of skeletal muscle after treatment with a local anaesthetic bupivacaine (Marcaine). J Anat 1970; 107: 547–556.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Sanes JR, Rubenstein JL, Nicolas JF . Use of a recombinant retrovirus to study post-implantation cell lineage in mouse embryos. EMBO J 1986; 5: 3133–3142.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Robert Kelly and Margaret Buckingham (Pasteur Institute, Paris) for providing the transgenic mice. This work was supported by NIH AR46479 to M Ontell.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Washabaugh, C., Ontell, M. & Ontell, M. Nonmuscle stem cells fail to significantly contribute to regeneration of normal muscle. Gene Ther 11, 1724–1728 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3302353

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3302353

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links