Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Increased level and duration of expression in muscle by co-expression of a transactivator using plasmid systems

Abstract

Skeletal muscle is an attractive target for gene therapies to treat either local or systemic disorders, as well as for genetic vaccination. An ideal expression system for skeletal muscle would be characterized by high level, extended duration of expression and muscle specificity. Viral promoters, such as the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter, produce high levels of transgene expression, which last for only a few days at high levels. Moreover, many promoters lack muscle tissue specificity. A muscle-specific skeletal α-actin promoter (SkA) has shown tissue specificity but lower peak activity than that of the CMV promoter in vivo. It has been reported in vitro that serum response factor (SRF) can stimulate the transcriptional activity of some muscle-specific promoters. In this study, we show that co- expression of SRF in vivo is able to up-regulate SkA promoter-driven expression about 10-fold and CMV/SkA chimeric promoter activity by five-fold in both mouse gastrocnemius and tibialis muscle. In addition, co-expression of transactivator with the CMV/SkA chimeric promoter in muscle has produced significantly enhanced duration of expression compared with that shown by the CMV promoter-driven expression system. A dominant negative mutant of SRF, SRFpm, abrogated the enhancement to SkA promoter activity, confirming the specificity of the response. Since all the known muscle-specific promoters contain SRF binding sites, this strategy for enhanced expression may apply to other muscle-specific promoters in vivo.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wolff JA et al. Direct gene transfer into mouse muscle in vivo Science 1990 247: 1465–1468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolff JA et al. Long-term duration of plasmid DNA and foreign gene expression in mouse muscle Hum Mol Genet 1992 1: 363–369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Danko I et al. Pharmacological enhancement of in vivo foreign gene expression in muscle Gene Therapy 1994 1: 114–121

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coney L et al. Facilitated DNA inoculation induces anti-HIV-1 immunity in vivo Vaccine 1994 12: 1545–1550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aihara H, Miyazaki JI . Gene transfer into muscle by electroporation in vivo Nature Biotechnol 1998 16: 867–870

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mumper RJ et al. Protective interactive noncondensing (PINC) polymers for enhanced plasmid distribution and expression in rat skeletal muscle J Control Rel 1998 52: 191–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tripathy SK et al. Long-term expression of erythropoietin in the systemic circulation of mice after intramuscular injection of a plasmid DNA vector Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996 93: 10876–10880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Alila H et al. Expression of biologically active human insulin-like growth factor-I following intramuscular injection of a formulated plasmid in rats Hum Gene Ther 1997 8: 1785–1795

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Anwer K et al. Systemic effect of human growth hormone after intramuscular injection of a single dose of a muscle-specific gene medicine Hum Gene Ther 1998 9: 659–670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wells DJ, Goldspink G . Age and sex influence expression of plasmid DNA directly injected into mouse skeletal muscle FEBS Lett 1992 306: 203–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dai Y, Roman M, Naviaux RK, Verma IM . Gene therapy via primary myoblasts: long-term expression of factor IX protein following transplantation in vivo Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992 89: 10892–10895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chow KL, Schwartz RJ . A combination of closely associated positive and negative cis-acting promoter elements regulates transcription of the skeletal α-actin gene Mol Cell Biol 1990 10: 528–538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Petropoulos CP et al. The chicken skeletal muscle α-actin promoter is tissue specific in transgenic mice Mol Cell Biol 1989 9: 3785–3792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Barnhart KM et al. Enhancer and promoter chimeras in plasmids designed for intramuscular injection: a comparative in vivo and in vitro study Hum Gene Ther 1998 9: 2545–2553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nettelbeck DM, Jerome V, Muller R . A strategy for enhancing the transcriptional activity of weak cell type-specific promoters Gene Therapy 1998 5: 1656–1664

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee TC, Chow KL, Fang P, Schwartz RJ . Activation of skeletal α-actin gene transcription: the cooperative formation of serum response factor-binding complexes over positive cis-acting promoter serum response elements displaces a negative-acting nuclear factor enriched in replicating myoblasts and nonmyogenic cells Mol Cell Biol 1991 11: 5090–5100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen CY, Schwartz RJ . Competition between negative acting YY1 versus positive acting serum response factor and tinman homologue Nkx-2.5 regulates cardiac α-actin promoter activity Mol Endocrinol 1997 11: 812–821

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Walsh K . Cross-binding of factors to functionally different promoter elements in the c-fos and skeletal actin genes Mol Cell Biol 1989 9: 2191–2201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Croissant JD et al. Avian serum response factor expression restricted primarily to muscle cell lineages is required for α-actin gene transcription Dev Biol 1996 177: 250–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gius D et al. Transcriptional activation and repression by Fos are independent functions: the C terminus represses immediate–early gene expression via CarG elements Mol Cell Biol 1990 10: 4243–4255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Miwa T et al. Structure, chromosome location and expression of the human smooth muscle (enteric type) gamma-actin gene: evolution of six human actin genes Mol Cell Biol 1991 11: 3296–3306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gilman MZ, Wilson RN, Weinerg RA . Multiple protein-binding sites in the 5′-flanking region regulate c-fos expression Mol Cell Biol 1986 6: 4305–4316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee TC, Shi Y, Schwartz RJ . Displacement of BrdUrd-induced YY1 by serum response factor activates skeletal α-actin transcription in embryonic myoblasts Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992 89: 9814–9818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen CY et al. Activation of the cardiac α-actin promoter depends upon serum response elements Dev Genet 1996 19: 119–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gauthier-Rouviere C et al. Expression and activity of serum response factor are required for muscle determining factor MyoD in both dividing and differentiating mouse C2C12 myoblasts Mol Biol Cell 1996 7: 719–727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Belaguli N, Schildmeyer L, Schwartz RJ . Organization and myogenic restricted expression of the murine serum response factor gene J Biol Chem 1997 272: 18222–18231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Martin KA et al. A competitive mechanism of CarG element regulation by YY1 and SRF: implications for assessment of Phox1/Mhox transcription factor interactions at CarG elements DNA Cell Biol 1997 16: 653–661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gualberto A et al. Functional antagonism between YY1 and the serum response factor Mol Cell Biol 1992 12: 4209–4212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Coleman ME et al. Myogenic vector expression of insulin-like growth factor I stimulates muscle cell differentiation and myofiber hypertrophy in transgenic mice J Biol Chem 1995 270: 12109–12116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Ron Brywes’s laboratory for some of SRF constructs and Alain Rolland, Mike Fons and Sean Sullivan for their critical reading of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, S., MacLaughlin, F., Fewell, J. et al. Increased level and duration of expression in muscle by co-expression of a transactivator using plasmid systems. Gene Ther 6, 2005–2011 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3301032

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3301032

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links