Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Manuscript
  • Published:

ALL

Value of intravenous 6-mercaptopurine during continuation treatment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: final results of a randomized phase III trial (58881) of the EORTC CLG

Abstract

Between November 1990 and November 1996, EORTC Children Leukemia Group conducted a randomized trial in de novo acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoblastic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients using a Berlin–Frankfurt–Munster protocol to evaluate the monthly addition of intravenous 6-mercaptopurine (i.v. 6-MP) (1 g/m2) to conventional continuation therapy comprising per oral MTX weekly and 6-MP daily. Only during the first 18 months of the randomization period, 6-MP p.o. was interrupted for 1 week after each i.v. 6-MP. A total of 877 patients was randomized to either no i.v. 6-MP (Arm A) or additional i.v. 6-MP (Arm B). A total of 217 relapses (91 in Group A vs 128 in Group B) and 13 deaths in CR (5 vs 8) were reported; a total of 134 patients (55 vs 79) died. The median follow-up was 7.6 years. At 8 years, the disease-free survival rate was lower (P=0.005) in Arm B (69.1% (s.e.=2.2%)) than in Arm A (77.9% (s.e.=2.0%)), and the hazard ratio was 1.45 (95% CI 1.12–1.89). In conclusion, as delivered in this study, i.v. 6-MP was detrimental to event-free survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pinkel D . Five-year follow-up of ‘total therapy’ of childhood lymphocytic leukemia. JAMA 1971; 216: 648–652.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pui CH, Evans WE . Acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 605–615.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Riehm H, Feickert H, Lampert F . Cancer in children. Clinical Management. Berlin: Springer, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zimm S, Collins JM, Riccardi R, O’Neill D, Narang PK, Chabner B et al. Variable bioavailability of oral mercaptopurine. Is maintenance chemotherapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia being optimally delivered? N Engl J Med 1983; 308: 1005–1009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Estlin EJ, Lowis SP, Hall AG . Optimizing antimetabolite-based chemotherapy for the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2000; 110: 29–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Camitta B, Leventhal B, Lauer S, Shuster JJ, Adair S, Casper J et al. Intermediate-dose intravenous methotrexate and mercaptopurine therapy for non-T, non-B acute lymphocytic leukemia of childhood: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 1539–1544.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Camitta B, Mahoney D, Leventhal B, Lauer SJ, Shuster JJ, Adair S et al. Intensive intravenous methotrexate and mercaptopurine treatment of higher-risk non-T, non-B acute lymphocytic leukemia: A Pediatric Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 1383–1389.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacqz-Aigrain E, Nafa S, Medard Y, Bessa E, Lescoeur B, Vilmer E . Pharmacokinetics and distribution of 6-mercaptopurine administered intravenously in children with lymphoblastic leukaemia. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1997; 53: 71–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Covell DG, Narang PK, Poplack DG . Kinetic model for disposition of 6-mercaptopurine in monkey plasma and cerebrospinal fluid. Am J Physiol 1985; 248: R147–R156.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zimm S, Ettinger L, Holcenberg J, Kasen B, Vietti T, Belasco J et al. Phase I and clinical pharmacological study of mercaptopurine administered as a prolonged intravenous infusion. Cancer Res 1985; 45: 1869–1873.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Adamson PC, Zimm S, Ragab AH, Steinberg SM, Balis F, Kamen BA et al. A phase II trial of continuous-infusion 6-mercaptopurine for childhood solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1990; 26: 343–344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Duval M, Suciu S, Lutz P, Benoit Y, Robert A, Thyss A et al. Comparison of Escherichia coli-asparaginase with Erwinia-asparaginase in the treatment of childhood lymphoid malignancies: results of a randomized European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Children's Leukemia Group phase 3 trial. Blood 2002; 99: 2734–2739.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Millot F, Suciu S, Philippe N, Benoit Y, Mazingue F, Uyttebroeck A et al. Value of high-dose cytarabine during interval therapy of a Berlin–Frankfurt–Munster-based protocol in increased-risk children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma: results of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 58881 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 1935–1942.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Langermann H, Henze G, Wulf M, Rhiem H . Abschatzung der tumorzellmasse bei der akuten lymphoblastischen leukamie im kindesalter: prognotische bedeutung- und praktische anwendung. Klin Ped 1982; 194: 209–213.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Murphy S . Classification, staging and end results of treatment in childhood non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: dissimilarities from lymphomas in adults. Semin Oncol 1980; 7: 332–339.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Henze G, Fengler R, Hartmann R, Kornhuber B, Janka-Schaub G, Niethammer D et al. Six-year experience with a comprehensive approach to the treatment of recurrent childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL-REZ BFM 85). A relapse study of the BFM group. Blood 1991; 78: 1166–1172.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DA, Gralnick HR et al. Proposals for the classification of the acute leukaemias. French–American–British (FAB) co-operative group. Br J Haematol 1976; 33: 451–458.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Stein H, Banks PM, Chan JK, Cleary ML et al. A revised European–American classification of lymphoid neoplasms: a proposal from the International Lymphoma Study Group. Blood 1994; 84: 1361–1392.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Linder J, Ye Y, Armitage JO, Weisenburger DD . Monoclonal antibodies marking B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in paraffin- embedded tissue. Mod Pathol 1988; 1: 29–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Group FMCS. Morphologic, immunologic, and cytogenetic (MIC) working classification of acute lymphoblastic leukemias. Report of the workshop held in Leuven, Belgium, April 22–23, 1985. First MIC Cooperative Study Group. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1986; 23: 189–197.

  21. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A . Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 1981; 47: 207–214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Reiter A, Schrappe M, Ludwig WD, Hiddemann W, Sauter S, Henze G et al. Chemotherapy in 998 unselected childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. Results and conclusions of the multicenter trial ALL-BFM 86. Blood 1994; 84: 3122–3133.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vilmer E, Suciu S, Ferster A, Bertrand Y, Cave H, Thyss A et al. Long-term results of three randomized trials (58831, 58832, 58881) in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a CLCG-EORTC report. Children Leukemia Cooperative Group. Leukemia 2000; 14: 2257–2266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Buyse M, Staquet M, Sylvester R . Cancer Clinical Trials: Methods and Practice. Oxford, England: Oxford Medical Publication, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cox D, Oakes D . Analysis of Survival Data. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Silverman LB, Declerck L, Gelber RD, Dalton VK, Asselin BL, Barr RD et al. Results of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Consortium protocols for children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (1981–1995). Leukemia 2000; 14: 2247–2256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bostrom B, Sensel M, Sather H, Gaynon P, La M, Johnston K et al. Dexamethasone versus prednisone and daily oral versus weekly intravenous mercaptopurine for patients with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children's Cancer Group. Blood 2003; 101: 3809–3817.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mahoney Jr DH, Shuster JJ, Nitschke R, Lauer S, Steuber CP, Camitta B . Intensification with intermediate-dose intravenous methotrexate is effective therapy for children with lower-risk B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 1285–1294.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kamps WA, Bokkerink JP, Hakvoort-Cammel FG, Veerman AJ, Weening RS, van Wering ER et al. BFM-oriented treatment for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia without cranial irradiation and treatment reduction for standard risk patients: results of DCLSG protocol ALL-8 (1991–1996). Leukemia 2002; 16: 1099–1111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Relling MV, Hancock ML, Boyett JM, Pui CH, Evans WE . Prognostic importance of 6-mercaptopurine dose intensity in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 1999; 93: 2817–2823.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Elion GB . The purine path to chemotherapy. Science 1989; 244: 41–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Schmiegelow K, Bjork OG, Glomstein A, Gustafsson G, Keiding N, Kristinsson J et al. Intensification of mercaptopurine/methotrexate maintenance chemotherapy may increase the risk of relapse for some children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 1332–1339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by grants from Télévie 2001 (Grant No 7.4561.01) and 5U10CA11488-18S2 and 2U10CA11488-19 through 5U10-CA11488-34 from the National Cancer Institute. Purinethol (6-mercaptopurine) for intravenous use, a product of Wellcome, was provided free of charge by the National Cancer Institute. The contents of this work are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official view of the National Cancer Institute or of Wellcome. Additional members of the EORTC CLG participated to this study: B Nelken (Lille), A Babin-Boilletot (Strasbourg), C Béhar (Reims), N Francotte (Montegnée), B Lescoeur (Paris), G Margueritte (Montpellier), F Millot (Poitiers), X Rialland (Angers) and F Méchinaud (Nantes). The members of different subcommittees: Dr M Malet (Caen), A Falkenrodt (Strasbourg), M Fournier (Lille), Dr N Dastugue (Toulouse), Drs A-M Manel and M-P Pages (Lyon). A warm thank to the previous data managers: I VandeVelde and G Solbu. Thanks to E Jacqz-Aigrain and G Milano for their careful review of an earlier version of this paper and their input in the Discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Otten.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Werff ten Bosch, J., Suciu, S., Thyss, A. et al. Value of intravenous 6-mercaptopurine during continuation treatment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: final results of a randomized phase III trial (58881) of the EORTC CLG. Leukemia 19, 721–726 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2403689

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2403689

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links