Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Manuscript
  • Published:

MDS

Flow cytometry evaluation of erythroid and myeloid dysplasia in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a flow cytometric approach to the evaluation of marrow dysplasia in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We first studied a cohort of 103 MDS patients as well as 46 pathological and healthy controls. Flow cytometry data were expressed as percentage of positive cells. Analysis of erythroid cells showed higher proportions of immature cells (P<0.001) and decreased levels of CD71 expression on nucleated red cells (P=0.02) in MDS. Analysis of myeloid cells showed lower proportions of CD10+ and higher proportions of CD56+ granulocytes (P<0.001), and increased ratios of immature to mature cells (P=0.007). Since no single immunophenotype could accurately differentiate MDS from other conditions, we used discriminant analysis for generating erythroid and myeloid classification functions using combinations of immunophenotypic parameters. These functions were prospectively validated in a testing cohort of 69 MDS patients and 46 pathological controls. A diagnosis of MDS was obtained in 60/69 cases (87%). No false-positive results were noticed among controls. Significant correlations between values of these functions and both degree of morphological dysplasia and the International Prognostic Scoring System were found. These findings indicate that flow cytometry evaluation of marrow dysplasia is feasible and may be useful in the work-up of individual MDS patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacobs A . Myelodysplastic syndromes: pathogenesis, functional abnormalities, and clinical implications. J Clin Pathol 1985; 38: 1201–1217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alessandrino EP, Amadori S, Cazzola M, Locatelli F, Mecucci C, Morra E et al. Myelodysplastic syndromes: recent advances. Haematologica 2001; 86: 1124–1157.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vardiman JW, Harris NL, Brunning RD . The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the myeloid neoplasms. Blood 2002; 100: 2292–2302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Flores-Figueroa E, Gutierrez-Espindola G, Guerrero-Rivera S, Pizzuto-Chavez J, Mayani H . Hematopoietic progenitor cells from patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: in vitro colony growth and long-term proliferation. Leuk Res 1999; 23: 385–394.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cazzola M, Ponchio L, Rosti V, Farina G, Pedrotti C, Bergamaschi G . Diagnostic approach to the myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia 1992; 6 (Suppl 4): 19–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bene MC, Bernier M, Castoldi G, Faure GC, Knapp W, Ludwig WD et al. Impact of immunophenotyping on management of acute leukemias. Haematologica 1999; 84: 1024–1034.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Elghetany MT . Surface marker abnormalities in myelodysplastic syndromes. Haematologica 1998; 83: 1104–1115.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stetler-Stevenson M, Arthur DC, Jabbour N, Xie XY, Molldrem J, Barrett AJ et al. Diagnostic utility of flow cytometric immunophenotyping in myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood 2001; 98: 979–987.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maynadie M, Picard F, Husson B, Chatelain B, Cornet Y, Le Roux G et al. Immunophenotypic clustering of myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 2002; 100: 2349–2356.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ogata K, Nakamura K, Yokose N, Tamura H, Tachibana M, Taniguchi O et al. Clinical significance of phenotypic features of blasts in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood 2002; 100: 3887–3896.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Del Canizo MC, Fernandez E, Lopez A, Vidriales B, Villaron E, Arroyo J et al. Immunophenotypic analysis of myelodysplastic syndromes. Haematologica 2003; 88: 402–407.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wells DA, Benesch M, Loken MR, Vallejo C, Myerson D, Leisenring WM et al. Myeloid and monocytic dyspoiesis as determined by flow cytometric scoring in myelodysplastic syndrome correlates with the IPSS and with outcome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2003; 102: 394–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DA, Gralnick HR et al. Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol 1982; 51: 189–199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernasconi P, Astori C, Cavigliano PM, Boni M, Malcovati L, Calatroni S et al. Cytogenetic and FISH analyses in five patients with hypoplastic bone marrow. Leukemia 2000; 14: 1322–1323.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Anonymous. An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (1985) ISCN 1985. Report of the Standing Committee on Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 1985; 21: 1–117.

  16. Bernasconi P, Cavigliano PM, Boni M, Calatroni S, Klersy C, Giardini I et al. Is FISH a relevant prognostic tool in myelodysplastic syndromes with a normal chromosome pattern on conventional cytogenetics? A study on 57 patients. Leukemia 2003; 17: 2107–2112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bernasconi P, Boni M, Cavigliano PM, Calatroni S, Brusamolino E, Passamonti F et al. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) having evolved from essential thrombocythemia (ET): distinctive chromosome abnormalities in patients treated with pipobroman or hydroxyurea. Leukemia 2002; 16: 2078–2083.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM, Fenaux P, Morel P, Sanz G et al. International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 1997; 89: 2079–2088.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fukushima PI, Nguyen PK, O'Grady P, Stetler-Stevenson M . Flow cytometric analysis of kappa and lambda light chain expression in evaluation of specimens for B-cell neoplasia. Cytometry 1996; 26: 243–252.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Landay AL, Muirhead KA . Procedural guidelines for performing immunophenotyping by flow cytometry. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1989; 52: 48–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stelzer GT, Marti G, Hurley A, McCoy Jr P, Lovett EJ, Schwartz A . U.S.–Canadian Consensus recommendations on the immunophenotypic analysis of hematologic neoplasia by flow cytometry: standardization and validation of laboratory procedures. Cytometry 1997; 30: 214–230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lacombe F, Durrieu F, Briais A, Dumain P, Belloc F, Bascans E et al. Flow cytometry CD45 gating for immunophenotyping of acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 1997; 11: 1878–1886.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Keeney M, Chin-Yee I, Weir K, Popma J, Nayar R, Sutherland DR . Single platform flow cytometric absolute CD34+ cell counts based on the ISHAGE guidelines. International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering. Cytometry 1998; 34: 61–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brando B, Barnett D, Janossy G, Mandy F, Autran B, Rothe G et al. Cytofluorometric methods for assessing absolute numbers of cell subsets in blood. European Working Group on Clinical Cell Analysis. Cytometry 2000; 42: 327–346.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Alessandrino EP, Amadori S, Barosi G, Cazzola M, Grossi A, Liberato LN et al. Evidence- and consensus-based practice guidelines for the therapy of primary myelodysplastic syndromes. A statement from the Italian Society of Hematology. Haematologica 2002; 87: 1286–1306.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schiller GJ . Myelodysplasia–therapeutic response to novel therapy and the need for new diagnostic groups. Leukemia 2003; 17: 1183–1185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Cazzola.

Additional information

This study was supported by a grant to MC from the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC, Research Project entitled ‘Genomic analysis of hematopoietic cells in myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative disorders’), Milan, Italy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malcovati, L., Della Porta, M., Lunghi, M. et al. Flow cytometry evaluation of erythroid and myeloid dysplasia in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia 19, 776–783 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2403680

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2403680

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links