Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Significant difference in outcome for adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on pediatric vs adult protocols in the Netherlands

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

References

  1. Boissel N, Auclerc MF, Lheritier V, Perel Y, Thomas X, Leblanc T et al. Should adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia be treated as old children or young adults? Comparison of the French FRALLE-93 and LALA-94 trials. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 774–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abromowitch M, Ochs J, Pui CH, Kalwinsky D, Rivera GK, Fairclough D et al. High-dose methotrexate improves clinical outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: St Jude Total Therapy Study X. Med Pediatr Oncol 1988; 16: 297–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Richards S, Gray R, Peto R, Gaynon P, Masera G . Duration and intensity of maintenance chemotherapy in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: overview of 42 trials involving 12 000 randomised children. Lancet 1996; 347: 1783–1788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Toyoda Y, Manabe A, Tsuchida M, Hanada R, Ikuta K, Okimoto Y et al. Six months of maintenance chemotherapy after intensified treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia of childhood. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 1508–1516.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dibenedetto SP, Guardabasso V, Ragusa R, Di Cataldo A, Miraglia V, D'Amico S et al. 6-Mercaptopurine cumulative dose: a critical factor of maintenance therapy in average risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1994; 11: 251–258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Arico M, Valsecchi MG, Camitta B . Outcome of treatment in children with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 998–1006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weisdorf DJ, Billett AL, Hannan P, Ritz J, Sallan SE, Steinbuch M et al. Autologous vs unrelated donor allogeneic marrow transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 1997; 90: 2962–2968.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bostrom BC, Sensel MR, Sather HN, Gaynon PS, La MK, Johnston K et al. Dexamethasone vs prednisone and daily oral vs weekly intravenous mercaptopurine for patients with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children's Cancer Group. Blood 2003; 101: 3809–3817.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Silverman LB, Gelber RD, Dalton VK, Asselin BL, Barr RD, Clavell LA et al. Improved outcome for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of Dana-Farber Consortium Protocol 91-01. Blood 2001; 97: 1211–1218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R Pieters.

Additional information

The full original manuscript in Dutch language has been submitted to ‘het Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde’.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Bont, J., Holt, B., Dekker, A. et al. Significant difference in outcome for adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on pediatric vs adult protocols in the Netherlands. Leukemia 18, 2032–2035 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2403538

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2403538

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links