Molecular Targets for Therapy (MTT)

Signal transduction mediated by the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway from cytokine receptors to transcription factors: potential targeting for therapeutic intervention


The Ras/Raf/Mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase (MEK)/extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK) cascade couples signals from cell surface receptors to transcription factors, which regulate gene expression. Depending upon the stimulus and cell type, this pathway can transmit signals, which result in the prevention or induction of apoptosis or cell cycle progression. Thus, it is an appropriate pathway to target for therapeutic intervention. This pathway becomes more complex daily, as there are multiple members of the kinase and transcription factor families, which can be activated or inactivated by protein phosphorylation. The diversity of signals transduced by this pathway is increased, as different family members heterodimerize to transmit different signals. Furthermore, additional signal transduction pathways interact with the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway to regulate positively or negatively its activity, or to alter the phosphorylation status of downstream targets. Abnormal activation of this pathway occurs in leukemia because of mutations at Ras as well as genes in other pathways (eg PI3K, PTEN, Akt), which serve to regulate its activity. Dysregulation of this pathway can result in autocrine transformation of hematopoietic cells since cytokine genes such as interleukin-3 and granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor contain the transacting binding sites for the transcription factors regulated by this pathway. Inhibitors of Ras, Raf, MEK and some downstream targets have been developed and many are currently in clinical trials. This review will summarize our current understanding of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signal transduction pathway and the downstream transcription factors. The prospects of targeting this pathway for therapeutic intervention in leukemia and other cancers will be evaluated.

Hematopoietic cytokines and the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway

Hematopoietic cell proliferation, differentiation and prevention of apoptosis are finely regulated by cytokines, a group of polypeptide hormones including interleukin-3 (IL-3), granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), erythropoietin and stem-cell factor (SCF, a.k.a. c-kit-L). Studies on these cytokines revealed their important regulatory functions on cell proliferation and apoptosis in hematopoietic cells of myeloid, erythroid and lymphoid lineages.1, 2, 3 IL-3 and GM-CSF are two of the first identified and best-characterized hematopoietic cytokines.4, 5

In vitro studies have shown that most nontransformed hematopoietic cell lines require cytokines such as IL-3 or GM-CSF for proliferation. These hematopoietic cytokines can induce various signaling pathways that transduce critical cell growth or anti-apoptotic signals from the cell membranes into the nucleus to modulate cell growth.4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Among the various signaling pathways triggered by hematopoietic factors is the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway, which has been shown by us as well as others to play important roles in cell proliferation and the prevention of apoptosis.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 An overview of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK cascade is presented in Figure 1. Many of the members of this pathway, including Ras, Raf, and their downstream transcription factor targets NF-κB, AP-1, c-Myc and Ets-1 were initially identified as proto-oncogenes. Aberrant activation of this pathway is commonly observed in malignantly transformed cells.4, 9, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27

Figure 1

Overview of Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway. This figure illustrates how the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway is regulated by Ras as well as various kinases, which serve to phosphorylate S/T and Y residues on Raf. Some of these phosphorylation events serve to enhance Raf activity (shown by a black P in a white circle), whereas others serve to inhibit Raf activity (shown by a white P in a black circle. Moreover, there are phosphatases such as PP2A, which remove phosphates on certain regulatory residues. Activation of the PI3K/PDK/AKT pathway is also shown, as this pathway interacts with the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway to regulate its activity. PI3K can be activated by two mechanisms; either the p85 PI3K subunit can bind the activated IL-3Rβ chain or Ras. Activated ERK can enter the nucleus and phosphorylate transcription factors such as Ets. The downstream transcription factors regulated by this pathway are indicated in diamond-shaped outlines.

Ras is a small GTP-binding protein, which is the common upstream molecule of several signaling pathways including Raf/MEK/ERK, PI3K/Akt and RalEGF/Ral.28, 29, 30, 31 Different mutation frequencies have been observed between Ras genes in human cancer (Ki-Ras>Ha-Ras), and these Ras proteins show varying abilities to activate the Raf/MEK/ERK and PI3K/Akt cascades as Ki-Ras has been associated with Raf/MEK/ERK while Ha-Ras is associated with PI3K/Akt activation.31 Raf is an serine/threonine (S/T) kinase and is normally activated by a complex series of events including: (i) recruitment to the plasma membrane mediated by an interaction with Ras;31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 (ii) dimerization of Raf proteins;37, 38, 39, 40, 41 and (iii) phosphorylation on different domains.43, 44, 45, 46, 47 Moreover, Raf activity is modulated by adaptor proteins, including Bag1, Hsp70 and 14-3-3.48, 49 Inhibition of Ras activity hinders Raf activation. Some of the sites of potential inhibition of the Ras/Raf and downstream MEK activity, using Raf-1 as a model, are presented in Figure 2.

Figure 2

Sites of inhibition of Raf-1 activation/inactivation. Activation of Ras occurs after cytokine receptor ligation and results in the farnesylation of Ras and membrane translocation. Ras recruits Raf-1 to the membrane by binding the Ras-binding domain present on Raf-1. Also occurring at this time is the transient dephosphorylation of S621 present on Raf-1. The S259 present on Raf-1 is then dephosphorylated by PP2A. This allows Raf-1 to be phosphorylated and activated by other kinases (PAK, Src family kinases and potentially PKC). Raf-1 then binds ATP and phosphorylates MEK, which in turn phosphorylates ERK. Raf-1 is then inactivated by protein dephosphorylation and binds 14-3-3. This results in a conformational change and Raf-1 is translocated to the cytoplasm and is inactive. The phosphorylation/dephosphorylation events alter the configuration of Raf-1 and can result in the disassociation of the 14-3-3 protein, which unlocks the Raf-1 protein allowing it to be phosphorylated by other kinases. The binding of the chaperonin protein 14-3-3 and the subsequent conformational changes and translocation to the cytoplasm are indicated. Sites where various small molecular weight inhibitors act also indicated. Certain sites of inhibition are currently more promising than others; however, it is speculated that in the future, combinations of inhibitors may prove more effective than treatment with a single inhibitor. This figure is based in part by the models proposed by Dr Walter Kolch.59, 60, 61, 62, 63

For Ras to be targeted to the cell membrane, it must be farnesylated by farnesyl transferase (FT). Targeting of Ras to the cell membrane occurs after IL-3 binding the IL-3 receptor and activation of Shc/Grb2/Sos. Pharmaceutical companies have developed many FT inhibitors and some are in clinical trials. The chemical structures of certain FT inhibitors are presented in Figure 3.

Figure 3

Chemical structures of Ras inhibitors. References documenting the use of these inhibitors in basic and clinical research are presented in Table 2.

Chaperonin proteins such as 14-3-3 and Hsp90 regulate Raf activity.48 Moreover, Raf activity is regulated by dimerization.37, 38, 39, 40, 41 These biochemical properties allow Raf activity to be sensitive to drugs that block protein:protein interactions such as geldanamycin and coumermycin.49, 52 Geldanamycin is a nonspecific Raf inhibitor as it also affects the activity of many proteins including the BCR–ABL oncoprotein, which has a critical role in the etiology of chronic myelogenous leukemia. Geldanamycin is currently in clinical trials.50 Raf-specific iinhibitors have been developed. Raf inhibitors range from small molecular weight cell membrane-permeable drugs that bind the kinase domain to antisense RNAs.50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 Some of these compounds and approaches are in clinical trials. Some of the studies performed with Raf inhibitors have shown significant promise in the treatment of diverse cancers, which have been difficult to treat (eg colorectal, ovarian). The structure of some of these Raf inhibitors is presented in Figure 4.

Figure 4

Chemical structures of a) Raf inhibitors and b) protein destabilizers. References documenting the use of these inhibitors in basic and clinical research are presented in Table 2.

Currently, the mammalian Raf gene family consists of Raf-1, A-Raf and B-Raf, which share three domains termed CR1, CR2 and CR3.4 Among these three domains, CR1 is the Ras-binding domain; CR2 is the regulatory domain that has recently been shown in some cells to regulate negatively Raf-1 activity by Akt or PKA phosphorylation at S259; and CR3 is the kinase domain which when phosphorylated on S338, tyrosine (Y) Y340 and Y341 positively regulates Raf-1 activity.35, 56, 57, 58, 59

There are at least 13 regulatory phosphorylation sites on Raf-1.43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64 Some of these sites (eg S43, S259 and S621) are phosphorylated when Raf-1 is inactive. This allows the 14-3-3 chaperonin protein to bind the Raf-1 protein and confer a conformation which is inactive. Upon cell stimulation, S621 becomes transiently dephosphorylated and protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) dephosphorylates S259.60 14-3-3 is then disassociated from Raf-1/.60, 61, 62 This allows Raf to be phosphorylated at other sites including S338, Y340, Y341 and others. A Src family kinase is likely responsible for phosphorylation at Y340 and Y341.44, 45, 46, 47, 59 The phosphatases that dephosphorylate S621 and other Raf phosphorylation sites, excluding S259, are unknown.

Y340 and Y341, the phosphorylation targets of Src family kinases, are conserved in A-Raf (Y299 and Y300), but are replaced with aspartic acid (D) at the corresponding positions in B-Raf (D492 and D493).44, 65, 66, 67 Hence, maximal activation of Raf-1 and A-Raf requires both Ras and Src activity, while B-Raf activation is Src–independent.66

A means to prevent Raf activation could be the development of specific Src family kinase inhibitors. Indeed, we have observed that Raf-responsive hematopoietic cells are very sensitive to the Src kinase inhibitor herbimycin A. Herbimycin A inhibits the c-Src kinase with an IC50 of 900 nM, whereas it inhibits other kinases (PDGF-R) at 10- to 100-fold higher concentrations. The concentrations of herbimycin A used in our study were within a 10-fold or lower range of the IC50. These hematopoietic cells proliferate in response to the introduced activated Raf oncogenes. Induction of apoptosis can be synergistically increased upon cotreatment of the Raf-responsive cells with inhibitors, which target Raf and Src or MEK and Src. The chemical structures of some Src kinase inhibitors are presented in Figure 5.

Figure 5

Chemical structures of Src inhibitors. The structures of the Src inhibitor herbimycin A and other Src inhibitors are presented. References documenting the use of these inhibitors in basic and clinical research are presented in Table 2.

The S338 present in Raf-1 is conserved among the three Raf isoforms; however, in B-Raf (S445), this residue is constantly phosphorylated.47 S338 phosphorylation on Raf-1 is stimulated by Ras.46, 66, 67 This Ras-induced phosphorylation on S338 of Raf-1 is dependent on p21-activated protein kinase (PAK).67, 68, 69 Other phosphorylation regulatory residues, including S43, S339, T491, S494, S497, S499, S619 and S621, have regulatory roles on Raf-1 activity. Protein kinase C (PKC) has been shown to activate Raf activity and induce crosstalk between PKC and Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathways.70, 71, 72, 73 S497 and S499 were identified as the target residues on Raf-1 for PKC phosphorylation.70, 71 However, other studies suggest that these sites were not necessary for Raf-1 activation.73, 74, 75 Certain PKC inhibitors may prove effective in blocking Raf-mediated growth. We have observed that the PKC inhibitors staurosporine and G06976 suppressed proliferation of Raf-responsive hematopoietic cells. The chemical structures of staurosporine and other PKC inhibitors are presented in Figure 6. UCN-01 is a modified staurosporine, whose efficacy is also being explored in clinical trials.75 Furthermore, there are PKC activators such as bryostatin-1, which are in clinical trials.76 These compounds may be useful in controlling Raf-mediated growth as while they initially activate PKC, this results in the subsequent downregulation of PKC through proteolytic cleavage of PKC.

Figure 6

Chemical structures of PKC a) inhibitors and b) activators. The structures of the PKC inhibitors staurosporine and UCN-01 (a) and the PKC activator bryostatin-1 (b) are presented. References documenting the use of these compounds in basic and clinical research are presented in Table 2.

Raf activity is also negatively regulated by phosphorylation on the CR2 regulatory domain. Recently, it was shown that Akt and PKA phosphorylate S259 on Raf-1 and inhibit its activity.78, 79 Furthermore, Akt phosphorylated B-Raf on S364 and S428 to inactivate its kinase activity.80 These S-phosphorylated Rafs associate with adaptor protein 14-3-3 and become inactive.69 This inhibitory effect of Akt on Raf activity is cell-type specific and depends on the differentiation state of the cells.77 It was suggested that some differentially expressed mediators are essential for the association between Akt and Raf. Inhibitors to PI3K, Akt and PKA may modulate the activity of the Raf pathway by suppressing the phosphorylation of S259 (see Figure 2). This should increase Raf-1 activity, which may lead to p21Cip1 expression, which has been shown to regulate cell cycle progression.80 This area remains controversial, as we have observed that PI3K and Akt inhibitors inhibit Raf-responsive growth. This may be because of an autocrine component of their growth, which requires PI3K activity.

Raf activity is also regulated by dephosphorylation. As stated previously, PP2A removes the phosphate from S259, which contributes to Raf-1 activation. Undoubtedly, there are other phosphatases that remove phosphates from additional regulatory residues on Raf. Okadaic acid inhibits PP2A and theoretically could be used to inhibit Raf activity. The development of specific phosphatase inhibitors could prove beneficial in inhibiting the effects of activation of the Raf pathway. The structure of okadaic acid and other phosphatase inhibitors are presented in Figure 7.

Figure 7

Chemical structures of phosphatase inhibitors. The structure of okadaic acid and other phosphatase inhibitors are presented. References documenting the use of these inhibitors in basic and clinical research are presented in Table 2.

Activated Rafs induce a signal transduction cascade, which includes the Mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase (MEK), extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK), ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK) and a set of transcription factors including NF-κB, cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein (CREB), Ets, AP-1 and c-Myc. MEK is a Y- and S/T-dual specificity protein kinase.82 Its activity is positively regulated by Raf phosphorylation on S residues in the catalytic domain, for example, S218 and S222 of mouse MEK1.32, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89 All three Raf family members are able to phosphorylate and activate MEK, but different biochemical potencies have been observed (B-Raf>Raf-1A-Raf).84, 85, 86 Specific inhibitors to MEK have been developed (PD98059 and UO126). Interestingly and controversially, it has recently been proposed that B-Raf is the major activator of MEK1 and that Raf-1 may require B-Raf to become activated. Furthermore, B-Raf may be temporally activated before Raf-1. There may be different subcellular localizations of B-Raf and Raf-1 within the cell that exert different roles in signaling and apoptotic pathways.85, 86 Second-generation MEK inhibitors such as PD184352 have been developed and are currently in clinical trials.88, 89 The structures of certain MEK inhibitors are presented in Figure 8.

Figure 8

Chemical structures of MEK inhibitors. The structures of PD98059, U0126 and second-generation MEK inhibitors are presented. References documenting the use of these inhibitors in basic and clinical research are presented in Table 2.

ERKs are S/T kinases and their activity is positively regulated by phosphorylation mediated by MEK1 and MEK2. MEKs can phosphorylate ERK1 on T202, and Y204 and ERK2 on T185 and Y187 to activate their kinase activities.90 ERKs can directly phosphorylate a set of transcription factors including Ets-1, c-Jun and c-Myc. ERK can also phosphorylate and activate RSK, which then leads to the activation of the transcription factor CREB.90 Moreover, by an indirect mechanism, ERK can lead to transcription factor Nuclear Factor immunoglobulin κ chain enhancer-B cell (NF-κB) activation by phosphorylating and activating its regulator inhibitor κB Kinase (IKK) (see below). ERK1 and ERK2 are differentially regulated in certain cells. ERK2 has been associated with proliferation while ERK1 may inhibit the effects of ERK2 in certain cells.91

The localization of the different Rafs and the downstream kinases present in this cascade remains an intense area of research. While it was initially thought that the activated Rafs were present at the cytoplasmic membrane, recent evidence has demonstrated that some Rafs (Raf-1 and A-Raf) may carry out important antiapoptotic functions in the mitochondrion (eg phosphorylation and inactivation of Bad and regulation of VDAC channels).86, 92 Moreover, there may be temporal distributions of different Rafs in different lipid Rafts in the cells, which occur during mitogen stimulation.86 Downstream ERK and p90Rsk also have different subcellular localizations (cytoplasmic vs nuclear), which determine their effects on phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of key kinases (Cdk2), cyclins (cyclin E) transcription factors (Elk, c-Myc and CREB) involved in cell growth.92 An important caveat that must be considered with many of these studies is that they deal with overexpression of activated, fluorescent-tagged or even organelle-localization-tagged constructs that have been introduced into the cells by transfection. In these studies, the overexpressed or altered protein may be artificially localized to certain compartments of the cells, hence making the results difficult to interpret.

Proliferative and antiproliferative effects of Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling

Amplification of ras proto-oncogenes and activating mutations that lead to the expression of constitutively active Ras proteins are observed in approximately 30% of all human cancers.93, 94, 95 The effects of Ras on proliferation and tumorigenesis have been documented in immortal cell lines.96 However, antiproliferative responses of oncogenic Ras have also been observed in nontransformed cells including primary rat Schwann cells and primary fibroblast cells of human and murine origins.95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101 This p15Ink4b/p16Ink4a or p21Cip1-mediated premature G1 arrest and subsequent senescence is dependent on the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway.97, 102

Overexpression of activated Raf proteins is associated with such divergent responses as cell growth, cell cycle arrest or even apoptosis.103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114 Ectopic overexpression of Raf proteins is associated with cell proliferation in cells including human hematopoietic cells,111, 112, 113, 114 human erythroid progenitor cells,103 and A10 smooth muscle cells.107 However, overexpression of activated Raf proteins is associated with cell cycle arrest in cell lines including rat Schwann cells, mouse PC12 cells, human promyelocytic leukemia HL-60 cells and small cell lung cancer cell lines.107, 108, 109 Depending on the Raf isoform, overexpression of Raf can lead to cell proliferation or cell growth arrest in NIH-3T3 and mouse FDC-P1 cells. It is not clear why overexpression of the Raf gene can lead to such conflicting results, but it has been suggested that the opposite outcomes may be determined by the amount or activity of the Raf oncoprotein.81, 111

NIH-3T3 cells have been transfected with the three different Raf genes. The introduced A-Raf molecule was able to upregulate the expression of cyclin D1, cyclin E, Cdk2, and Cdk4 and downregulate the expression of Cdk inhibitor p27Kip1.81 These changes induced the cells to pass through G1 phase and enter S phase. However, in B-Raf- and Raf-1-transfected NIH-3T3 cells, there was also a significant induction of p21Cip1, which led to G1 arrest. Using FDC-P1 hematopoietic cells transfected with conditional mutant Raf-1, A-Raf and B-Raf genes as a model, we have demonstrated that moderate Raf activation, including A-Raf and Raf-1, led to cell proliferation, which was associated with the induction of cyclin expression and Cdks activity. However, ectopic expression of B-Raf led to apoptosis.113, 114

An alternative explanation for the diverse proliferative results obtained with the three Raf genes is the different biological effects of A-Raf, B-Raf and Raf-1. The individual functions of these three different Raf proteins are not fully understood. Even though it has been shown that all three Raf proteins are activated by oncogenic Ras,30, 66, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119 target the same downstream molecules, that is, MEK1 and MEK2,24, 61, 80, 120 and use the same adapter proteins 14-3-3 for conformational stabilization,119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125 different biological and biochemical properties among them have been reported and their functions are noncompensatable.24, 69, 104 For instance, the distribution of Raf proteins in mice is very different. The Raf-1 protein is expressed ubiquitously in almost all tissues examined, while A-Raf is predominately expressed in urogenital tissues and B-Raf in neuronal tissues.126, 127 Knockout mice with a homologous deletion of these Raf genes have revealed very different phenotypes.25, 128, 129 B-Raf−/− mice died embryonically with serious defects in vascular endothelial cell survival and differentiation indicated by an increased number of endothelial cell precursors and apoptotic cells in vascular endothelium.128 A-Raf−/− mice showed gastro-intestinal and neurological defects and died shortly after birth.25 Raf-1−/− mice also died embryonically and showed defects in the development of skin, lung and placenta.129 However, both A-Raf−/− and Raf-1−/− mice showed no sign of defects in apoptosis.130 Finally, it has recently been shown that the B-Raf gene is frequently mutated in certain cancers, especially melanomas. It may be easier for B-Raf mutations to contribute to tumor progression, as a single missense mutation may result in B-Raf activity, whereas multiple mutations may be required for Raf-1 or A-Raf activity to be detected.26

The abilities of the Ras isoforms to activate the three Raf molecules are different.66, 115, 118, 131, 132 In murine cells, Ras and Src stimulate the kinase activity of both Raf-1 and A-Raf. However, B-Raf kinase activity is controlled by Ras and other members of the small G protein family such as Rap1 in PC12 cells66, 131, 132, 133 or TC21 in NIH-3T3 cells.66, 133 Raf-isoform-specific interaction partners have been identified using three different Raf molecules as bait in yeast two-hybrid screens. For instance, the PA28α, a subunit of the 11 S regulator of proteasomes, was found to bind specifically to B-Raf but not Raf-1 or A-Raf.134 Both CK2β (the regulatory subunit of protein kinase CK2) and pyruvate kinase M2 have been shown to be A-Raf-specific interaction partners.119, 130 Thus, important subtleties exist among the functions of Raf-1, A-Raf and B-Raf as well as their regulation.

Downstream transcription factor targets of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway and their regulation of cell proliferation

The Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway can exert proliferative or antiproliferative effects through downstream transcription factor targets including NF-κB, CREB, Ets-1, AP-1 and c-Myc. ERKs can directly phosphorylate Ets-1, AP-1 and c-Myc, which lead to their activation. Alternatively, ERKs can phosphorylate and activate a downstream kinase target RSK, which then phosphorylates and activates transcription factors, such as CREB. Moreover, instead of a direct phosphorylation, ERKs can lead to transcription factor NF-κB activation by phosphorylating and activating its positive regulator IKK (see below). These transcription factors induce the expression of genes important for cell cycle progression, for example, Cdks, cyclins, growth factors, and apoptosis prevention, for example, antiapoptotic Bcl-2 and cytokines. However, under certain circumstances, strong Raf signaling has been shown to result in the inactivation of downstream transcription factors, including NF-κB and c-Myc, which may account for the Raf-induced antiproliferative responses observed in some studies.

Raf signaling and NF-κB

NF-κB is a dimeric transcription factor comprising members of the Rel gene family of DNA-binding proteins. NF-κB can modulate the expression of its target genes encoding cytokines, growth factors, other transcription factors, and regulators of cell proliferation and apoptosis by binding to the κB cis-acting element contained in their promoter regions.135, 136, 137, 138 Many target genes of NF-κB play important roles in proliferation, prevention of apoptosis, angiogenesis, metastasis, and immune responses.139, 140, 141, 142

So far, five members of the Rel family have been identified, which include RelA, RelB, c-Rel, p105/NF-κB1 and p100/NF-κB2.143 p105/NF-κB1 and p100/NF-κB2 are inactive precursors, which are processed into their active forms of p50 and p52, respectively, before dimerization. NF-κB is a collective name of homo- or heterodimers comprised of different combinations of two Rel proteins. Different subunit combinations have diverse functions in regulating transcription. The heterodimer comprising p50/NF-κB1 and RelA is the most frequently observed NF-κB complex. It is a potent activator of gene expression from κB sites because of the presence of two transactivating domains in the C-terminal region of RelA, and was defined as the classic NF-κB transcription factor complex.144, 145 This classic NF-κB was also used for most studies examining the activity of transcription factor NF-κB.

Before stimulation, NF-κB is normally sequestered in the cell cytoplasm by binding to IκBα, IκBβ and IκBɛ inhibitors.146 This binding masks the nuclear localization signal on NF-κB, thereby preventing nuclear translocation of NF-κB (Figure 9). The inhibitory effects of IκBs on NF-κB can be eliminated by the multisubunit IκB kinase cascades.147, 148, 149, 150 IKK core complex contains four IKK subunits: one IKKα, one IKKβ and two IKKγs. IKKα and IKKβ are the catalytic subunits, both of which can phosphorylate IκBs at specific S residues in the NH2-terminal domain. For instance, they can phosphorylate IκBα on S32 and S36 or IκBβ on S19 and S23.151, 152 Phosphorylated IκBs can be recognized by the IκB-E3 ubiquitin ligase SCF (Skp1-Cullin-F-box protein ligase complexes), and degraded through the proteosomes pathway.149, 153 IKKγ is required for stabilization of the IKK complex.154 Proteosome inhibitors may prove useful in inhibiting NF-κB activity in response to activation of the Raf/MEK/ERK cascade.

Figure 9

Raf signaling-induced NF-κB activation. Raf induces kinases (MEKK1 and NIK) that phosphorylate and activate IKK. IKK in turn phosphorylates I-κB, leading to its ubiquitination. This allows NF-κB to become phosphorylated by MSK1, PKA, IKK and CKII. Phosphorylated NF-κB forms a heterodimer with CBP, which stimulates gene expression in the nucleus.

Kinases including NF-κB-inducing Kinase (NIK) and Mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK Kinase Kinase-1 (MEKK1) phosphorylate subunits of IKK complex and modulate its activity.155, 156, 157 Even though NIK and MEKK1 can activate both IKKα and IKKβ, NIK preferentially activates IKKα by phosphorylation on S176,155, 156, 157 while MEKK1 preferentially activates IKKβ by phosphorylation on S177 and S181.158 These results indicate that NIK and MEKK1 independently phosphorylate and activate the IKK complex, and therefore differentially regulate NF-κB activity.155, 156, 157 NF-κB transcriptional activity is also regulated by its own phosphorylation by kinases including Casein kinase II (CKII) and IKK on the C-terminal transactivation domain159, 160, 161 as well as the N-terminal domain by PKA and Mitogen- and Stress-activated protein Kinase (MSK1).147, 162 PKA and MSK1 phosphorylate p65 on S276, which lead to the association of NF-κB with its transcriptional coactivator CBP/p300.147, 162 CK II and IKK phosphorylate p65 on the C-terminal transactivation domain at S529 and S536, respectively.159, 160, 161 These phosphorylation events regulate NF-κB activity by modulating its DNA binding, transactivation properties and interactions between transcription factor and regulatory proteins.147

Raf activation induces the expression of reporter genes driven by the NF-κB promoter.141, 163 Raf activates NF-κB through two pathways. (1) Raf can activate NF-κB in a rapid and direct fashion, which involves the activation of MEKK1 and IKKβ.164, 165, 166 (2) Raf may also activate NF-κB through an autocrine loop in some cell types.164, 167, 168, 169 Earlier work had suggested a possible role of RSK in the activation of NF-κB, since in vitro studies have shown that RSK could phosphorylate IκB on S32, which would lead to IκB degradation.170, 171 Further studies indicated that Raf-mediated NF-κB activation is independent of the MEK/ERK/RSK pathway, but dependent on MEKK1.165 Raf-induced MEKK1 preferentially activates IKKβ and has little effect on IKKα.151, 165 This activation is possibly through direct phosphorylation.157 However, potent Raf inhibits NF-κB activity in the human glioblastoma cell line, T98G, through the MEK/ERK pathway. So, the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway may in some circumstances exert a negative regulatory role in NF-κB activity.172

Regulation of NF-κB activity is a key therapeutic target. Some inhibitors of NF-κB are presented in Figure 10. Moreover, the inhibitor of NF-κB (I-κB) is also a therapeutic target. Overexpression of protease-resistant forms of IκB (aka super-repressor) inactivates NF-κB activity in certain cells.4, 173 They have been introduced into cells by adenoviral and retroviral vectors.

Figure 10

Chemical structure of NF-κB inhibitors. References documenting the use of these inhibitors in basic and clinical research are presented in Table 2.

Raf Signaling and CREB

CREB was initially identified as the transcription factor that functions as a regulatory effector of the cAMP signaling pathway. Further investigation revealed that CREB also plays important roles in signal transduction initiated by Ca2+, growth factors and stress signals.174, 175 CREB has been shown to regulate angiotensins, long-term memory and immune functions. The CREB/ATF is a gene family of basic leucine zipper DNA-binding proteins, including CREB, CREM, ATF-1, ATF-2, ATF-3 and ATF-4, that can form homodimers, heterodimers or even in some cases cross-family heterodimers with the other leucine zipper DNA-binding transcription factors in the Jun family.176, 177, 178

Genes regulated by the CREB/ATF transcription factors include cyclin A,178, 179 cyclin D1,180 c-Fos,181, 182 and Bcl-2.183, 184, 185 The cell cycle arrest effect caused by TGF-β is mediated through the downregulation of cyclin A. Djaborkhel et al179 showed that this downregulation occurred by CREB inactivation. TGF-β reduced CREB protein levels and induced its dephosphorylation. c-Fos expression was rapidly and transiently activated as part of a mitogenic response. Transcription factors including CREB, serum response factors (SRFs) and Elk-1 contribute to the c-Fos induction mediated by growth factors.186 The ternary complex factor (TCF) formed by two molecules of SRF and one molecule of Elk-1 binds to the serum response element (SRE) at position −300, while the CREB/ATF dimer binds to the CRE centered at position −60 of c-Fos promoter to induce its expression.181, 187 c-Fos is a component of the AP-1 transcription factor whose activity is important for cell proliferation. An outline of the effects of Raf signaling on CREB activation is presented in Figure 11.

Figure 11

Raf signaling-induced CREB activation. Possible mechanisms of phosphorylation of the CREB transcription factor by the Raf/MEK/ERK/Rsk, PKA, MSK1, CaMKIV pathways are indicated. The association of CBP with phosphorylated CREB and ATF allows the complex to induce the transcription of CREB-responsive genes. Rsk and MSK1 can phosphorylate CREB in the nucleus.

Activation of CREB is regulated by phosphorylation by several kinases and is mediated by coactivators such as CREB-binding protein (CBP) and p300.188 CREB/ATF, when associated with the adaptor protein CBP, recognize the CRE region in the promoter of its target genes (Figure 11). CBP provides the bridge between CREB/ATF and the general transcription factors such as RNA polymerase II.189, 190, 191 Furthermore, since CBP also possess a histone acetyltransferase activity, it may play regulatory roles in chromatin structure by modifying the acetylation state of histones.192 It may be possible to target the effects of Raf-mediated CREB activity by drugs, which inhibit histone deacetylation. The structures of some drugs, which inhibit histone deacetylation, are shown in Figure 12. Many of these drugs are in clinical trials.

Figure 12

Chemical structures of histone deacetylase inhibitors. The structures of various histone deacetylase inhibitors used in clinical trials are presented. References documenting the use of these inhibitors in basic and clinical research are presented in Table 2.

Protein kinases including PKA, Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent kinase IV (CaMKIV), MSK, p70S6K and RSK phosphorylate CREB.188, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197 All these kinases target CREB on S133 to activate CREB. Raf signaling activates CREB in several cell types with different treatments that lead to a mitogenic effect.7, 181, 198 This is believed to result from the direct phosphorylation of CREB by RSKs. RSK2 was shown to mediate growth factor induction of phosphorylation of CREB on S133 both in vivo and in vitro.173, 194, 199, 200, 201

Raf signaling and Ets-1

Ets is a family of transcription factors, which include Ets-1, Ets-2, Elk-1, SAP1, SAP2, E1AF, PEA3, PU1 and others.202 They share an 85 amino-acid sequence called the ETS DNA-binding domain. The Ets transcription factors regulate many genes including: transcription factor genes (p53,203, 204, 205 c-Fos204 and NF-κB205); cell cycle regulation genes (cyclin D1,206, Rb207 and p21Cip1208); apoptosis-related genes (Bcl-2,209 Bcl-XL,210 and Fas211); cytokine genes (GM-CSF212 and IL-3213); and growth factor genes (platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)214 and heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (HB-EGF)168).

Ets proteins usually associate with other transcription factors to transactivate their target genes (Figure 13). Ets proteins can be classified into three major subgroups according to the cis-acting elements they recognize, the transcription cofactors they bind to and their transactivating activity.202, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218 The first subgroup includes Ets-1 and Ets-2, which associate with other transcription factors such as AP-1 or NF-κB and bind to the Ets/AP-1 or Ets/NF-κB sites to induce gene expression. The second subgroup consists of Elk-1, SAP1 and SAP2. They are collectively named TCFs. They form a ternary complex by associating with a dimer of SRF and bind to the SRE to activate gene expression. The third subgroup is unique in that they function as transcriptional repressors. This ETS2 repressor factor (ERF) group includes ERF, NET, YAN and TEL.218, 219 In addition to an ETS DNA-binding domain, transcriptional repression domains were also identified in these repressor factors.220, 221 The molecular mechanisms of ERF-mediated repression are not clear.

Figure 13

Raf signaling-induced Ets activation. ERK can phosphorylate Ets and ELK, which lead to their ability to associate functionally with Ap-1 and SRF cis-acting elements and induce gene transcription.

Raf signaling regulates all three Ets subgroups through direct phosphorylation by the downstream ERK molecules.132, 189, 222, 223 Ets-1 and Ets-2 are phosphorylated by ERKs on T38 and T72, respectively, which lead to Ets activation.168, 216 In NIH-3T3 cells, activated Ets-2 cooperates with AP-1 and this heterodimer binds to the Ets/AP-1 site on the promoter of HB-EGF and induces its expression. Autocrine HB-EGF expression has been postulated to be involved in the transformation of NIH-3T3 cells by oncogenic Raf.168 The TCF Elk-1 is a target for all three MAPK pathways, that is, p38MAPK, JNK and ERK pathways, but through different residues.216, 217 ERK can bind to Elk-1 in the D-domain, which is located N-terminal from the C-terminal transcriptional domain (C-domain), and phosphorylate S383 and S389 in this domain.44, 224, 225, 226, 227 ERK-induced Elk-1 phosphorylation leads to enhanced DNA-binding and TCF-mediated transcriptional activation.186, 216, 217, 228 One of the best-characterized target genes for Elk-1 is c-Fos. Elk-1, after phosphorylation by ERK, binds to the SRE cis-acting element in the promoter region of c-fos and induces its transcription.182, 229, 230 ERK can physically associate with ERF and phosphorylate ERF on multiple sites, including S161, S246, S251 and T526.219, 222 Phosphorylated ERF is then exported from the nucleus into the cytoplasm and becomes inactive. This transportation inactivation of ERF is eliminated when ERK activity is inhibited.222 Furthermore, ERF mutants with the ERK phosphorylation sites mutated to alanine (A) are insensitive to ERK activation and block Ras-induced transformation of NIH-3T3 cells.222

Ets-binding sequences have been identified in the promoter regions of cytokines and growth factor genes including GM-CSF, IL-3, PDGF and HB-EGF. This suggests that the autocrine loop induced by Raf signaling may be mediated by Ets transcription factors. However, Ets binding sequences have also been identified in the promoter regions of genes that may inhibit cell cycle progression such as the Cdk kinase inhibitors (CKI) p21Cip1 and p16Ink4a,208, 231, 232, 233 and the tumor suppressor gene p53.203 This latter observation may account for the Raf-induced cell cycle arrest observed in some cell types.

Raf signaling and AP-1

The AP-1 transcription factor is comprised of homodimers and heterodimers of Jun and Fos gene family members.234, 235, 236 Their transactivating activity has been associated with cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis.234-238 Their activity is finely regulated, both by protein levels and post-translational modification. This regulation occurs during the cell cycle, which suggests important regulatory roles that they play in cell proliferation. Genes such as cyclin D1, cyclin A, p53, p16Ink4a, IL-2, IL-3 and GM-CSF are under AP-1 control through the putative cis-acting AP-1 sites in their promoter and enhancer regions.235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241

The Jun gene family consists of c-Jun, JunB and JunD, which can form homodimers or heterodimers with Fos proteins. The Fos gene family consists of c-Fos, FosB, Fra1 and Fra2, which do not form homodimers but can heterodimerize with Jun. Both Jun and Fos proteins also dimerize with other transcription factors including members of the ATF/CREB or Maf/Nrl families of proteins to transactivate gene expression under certain circumstances.242, 243, 244, 245 For instance, JunD can dimerize with ATF2 to transactivate cyclin A expression.178

Owing to the different AP-1 molecules formed by dimerization of the many AP-1 components as well as with other bZIP transcription factors, it has been difficult to clarify the precise role of individual AP-1 members in cell cycle progression. The most significant findings about AP-1 transcription factors on cell cycle regulation come from studies on Jun genes. In cycling cells, c-Jun protein levels remain high and they are activated by phosphorylation on the transactivating domain by kinases including ERKs (see below). In contrast, JunB protein levels remain low in cycling cells234 and are phosphorylated by the Cdk1/cyclin B kinase complexes during G2/M phase, which lead to JunB proteolysis.239

Fibroblast cells derived from c-Jun knockout mice display a severe proliferation defect, which was associated with low levels of cyclin D1 protein and Cdk4/6 activity.241 Moreover, fibroblasts carrying c-Jun alleles with S63 and S73 mutated to A also displayed a proliferation defect.246 On the contrary, fibroblasts that overexpressed JunB proteins had reduced proliferation because of an extended G1 phase and undergo premature senescence.237 Furthermore, hematopoietic cells derived from JunB knockout mice exhibited an increased proliferation rate.247 Similar to JunB, overexpressed JunD in fibroblast cells also inhibited proliferation.248

AP-1 sites have been identified in the promoter region of cyclin D1,239, 241 which suggests regulation of cyclin D1 by AP-1 transcription factors. It appears that c-Jun plays positive while JunB and JunD play negative regulatory roles on cell cycle progression.239, 240, 241 In normal fibroblast cells, c-Jun dimerizes with c-Fos and the c-Jun/c-Fos transcription factor then binds to the AP-1 site in the promoter of cyclin D1 to induce its expression.239, 240, 241, 324 JunB can compete with c-Fos to dimerize with c-Jun. JunB/c-Jun is an inactive AP-1 heterodimer in terms of its ability to transactivate cyclin D1. Cyclin D1 is therefore downregulated by the effects of JunB.239 Similar inhibitory effects of JunD on cyclin D1 expression were observed.239, 248, 249 c-Jun-deficient fibroblast cells also accumulated increased levels of p53, which led to an accumulation of p21Cip1 whose function has been associated with cell cycle arrest in fibroblast cells.240 These results suggest that c-Jun has an inhibitory effect on p53 expression, which was eliminated in c-Jun knockout cells. Furthermore, JunB is a positive transactivator for p16Ink4a gene transcription.237 JunB protein levels increased in primary fibroblast cells and they bound to the three AP-1 sites in the promoter region of the p16Ink4a gene to induce its transcription.

Regulation of c-Fos activity by Raf signaling is mainly at the transcriptional level through the activation of transcription factors Elk-1 and CREB. Elk-1 can be phosphorylated and activated by ERKs, while CREB can be phosphorylated and activated by RSKs. Phosphorylated Elk-1 binds to the SRE cis-acting element, while phosphorylated CREB binds to the CRE cis-acting element in the promoter of c-fos to induce its transcription.159, 229, 230

Regulation of c-Jun activity by Raf signaling occurs at both the transcriptional and post-translational levels. Cytokine induction of c-jun transcription is ERK-dependent.250, 251, 252 c-Fos, whose expression is also positively regulated by Raf signaling, can form heterodimers with c-Jun and bind the AP-1 site on the c-jun promoter region inducing its transcription.250 c-Jun activity is regulated by phosphorylation on the amino-terminal A1 transactivating domain and the carboxyl-terminal DNA-binding domain. Phosphorylation on the carboxyl-terminal domain at T231, S243 and S249 significantly reduces its DNA-binding ability and therefore inactivates c-Jun transactivation ability. On the other hand, phosphorylation at S63 and S73 in the A1 transactivation domain at the amino-terminal activates c-Jun. Protein kinases including glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β) and CKII were shown to phosphorylate this domain to inactivate c-Jun activity.253, 254 Activation of c-Jun by phosphorylation of S63 and S73 by Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) has been well documented.255, 256 Interestingly, the Raf signaling pathway also phosphorylates Jun at S63 and S73 in the transactivating domain, and also S243 in the carboxyl DNA-binding domain of c-Jun to regulate positively or negatively AP-1 activity.254, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261 ERK can directly phosphorylate these S residues.261, 262, 263, 264

Raf signaling and c-Myc

c-Myc is a transcription factor that regulates a distinct set of target genes whose functions are associated with cell proliferation or apoptosis.265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271 Deregulated expression of c-Myc is sufficient to drive continuous cell proliferation or apoptosis in response to growth-promoting or -inhibitory signals, respectively.265, 269 Moderate c-Myc expression modulates important proliferation-associated gene expression and leads to cell cycle progression.265, 268, 271 However, strong c-Myc expression induces apoptotic gene expression and leads to apoptosis.265, 268, 269

c-Myc induces cell proliferation by promoting an increase in cell mass as well as modulating the expression of genes that control cell cycle progression. Constitutive expression of a c-Myc transgene resulted in an increase in the size of B lymphocytes.270, 271, 272 This c-Myc-induced cell growth is independent of cell cycle phase and correlates with an increase in protein synthesis.271, 272 c-Myc also directly targets and modulates the expression of genes that regulate cell cycle progression, which include cyclin D1, cyclin D2, cyclin A, cyclin E, Cdk1, Cdk4, p15Ink4b, p21Cip1 and p27Kip1 (Table 1).273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285c-Myc heterodimerizes with Max and binds to the cis-acting E box element in the promoter of their target genes to transactivate its expression (Figure 14). However, c-Myc has also been shown to function as a transrepressor to inhibit transcription of specific genes.214, 286 by binding to the initiator (Inr)-like element, which is a consensus transcriptional initiation motif for transcription factor II-1 (TFII-1), found in certain promoter regions.269, 286, 287, 288 TFII-1 binds to the Inr element, and with additional transcription factors can either induce or repress gene expression. Binding of TFII-I with c-Myc in the Inr element prohibits additional binding of general factors and abolishes transcription.

Table 1 Growth-related target genes of Raf-induced transcription factors
Figure 14

Raf signaling-induced c-Myc activation. The Raf/MEK/ERK pathway can regulate c-Myc by phosphorylation of certain residues. ERK can phosphorylate c-Myc in the nucleus. Phosphorylated Myc forms heterodimers with MAX to regulate the transcription of c-Myc-responsive genes.

c-Myc directly activates transcription of cyclin D1, cyclin D2 and Cdk4, and leads to Cdk 4/6 activation,273, 274, 280, 285 which is associated with cell cycle progression. c-Myc activation is also associated with increased cyclin E/Cdk 2 activity.289 This effect comes from two events. (1) Cyclin D induced by c-Myc can sequestrate the Cdk2 inhibitor p27Kip1 from the cyclin E/Cdk2 complex90, 290, 291, 292 to eliminate its inhibitory effect. (2) Cyclin E is a target gene of c-Myc, which also leads to Cdk2 activation.277

c-Myc also directly represses transcription of Cdk kinase inhibitors including p27Kip1, p21Cip1, p15Ink4b and p16Ink4a281, 282, 283, 284 in many cases. Activation of c-Myc is associated with the downregulation of p27Kip1285, 289, 293, 294 Recently, it was shown that c-Myc/Max can function as a transrepressor and reduce p27Kip1 transcription through the Inr element identified in the p27Kip1 promoter region.282 Binding with Max facilitates c-Myc's binding and represses p27Kip1 promoter activity through these sites.282 Downregulation of p27Kip1 induced by c-Myc also contributes to the activation of cyclin E/Cdk 2 since p27Kip1 can specifically target cyclin E/Cdk 2 and inhibit its activity.277 Furthermore, c-Myc activation can also promote the degradation of p27Kip1 protein by directly activating the cul1 gene, which encodes a critical component of the ubiquitin ligase SCFSKP2.295, 296

p21Cip1 is another CKI, whose expression is controlled by c-Myc. Oligonucleotide microarray analysis revealed that p21Cip1 expression was repressed by c-Myc activation in primary human fibroblasts.285 Recently, it was shown that c-Myc can downregulate p21Cip1 by sequestering its transcriptional activator Sp1.281 TGF-β could induce the cell cycle arrest at G1 phase in epithelial cells. This G1 arrest was accompanied by a downregulation of the proto-oncogene c-Myc and an upregulation of the Cdk inhibitor p15Ink4b. These two events were not independent and downregulation of c-Myc expression by TGF-β is required for the activation of p15Ink4b, since ectopically overexpressed c-Myc abolished the p15Ink4 induction by TGF-β.297 Further investigation revealed the negative regulatory role of c-Myc on p15Ink4b expression. c-Myc/Max dimers could complex with the Myc-associated transcriptional factor Miz-1 at the p15 initiator and inhibit transcription activation by Miz-1.283, 284

The ability of c-Myc to trigger actively apoptosis in response to apoptosis stimulation was first shown by Askew et al.298 They observed that G1 arrest induced by cytokine withdrawal in myeloid 32D cells was abolished in clones that harbor an exogenous copy of c-Myc and constitutively express high levels of c-Myc. These c-Myc clones rapidly and actively induced apoptosis upon cytokine withdrawal without going through a G1 arrest. This resulted from the simultaneous induction of G1 progression and apoptosis by high dosage of c-Myc. Similar results were observed in primary rodent embryo fibroblasts and established Rat1 fibroblast cells.299 It was therefore suggested that in addition to inducing cell proliferation, C-Myc could also induce apoptosis. c-Myc is essential for the apoptotic effects induced by diverse agents including TNF-α, taxol, etoposide, doxorubicin and C2-ceramide.300, 301, 302, 303 The apoptosis induced by c-Myc is a protective mechanism to control tumor development and has therefore attracted a lot of attention because of its possible therapeutic importance. Recently, it was shown that the c-Myc-mediated cell apoptosis is through its ability to stimulate the proapoptotic molecule Bax activity in the mitochondria, which leads to cytochrome-C release and eventually apoptosis in response to apoptosis-inducing agents.303 In a c-myc null fibroblast cell line, Bax is not activated and cytochrome-C is not released into the cytoplasm after treatment with the apoptosis-inducing agent taxol. However, when a C-myc gene was reintroduced into these cells, both phenotypes were restored and associated with cellular apoptosis.303 Other apoptosis-associated genes including p53,304, 305 and tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated protein-1 (TRAP1),285 are also c-Myc targets. c-Myc, when overexpressed in fibroblast cells, is an essential negative regulator of PDGFβ-receptor expression.306 This may also account for the apoptosis induced by strong c-Myc activation.

The ability of c-Myc to modulate gene transcription is regulated by stoichiometry of the Myc, Max and Mad proteins, and the phosphorylation state of c-Myc.307 Eisenman and co-workers have proposed the Myc–Max–Mad network model to explain the regulation of c-Myc activity.308, 309 In this model, Max functions as the central molecule, which forms transactivating complexes when it dimerizes with c-Myc, or transrepressor complexes when it dimerizes with Mad or Mnt.308 Therefore, the levels of Myc–Max–Mad determine if the target genes are activated or repressed.

c-Myc can be phosphorylated on the central acidic domain and carboxyl-terminal domain by CK-II310, 311, 312, 313 and the amino-terminal transactivation domain by GSK-3β, EGF receptor T-669 (ERT) protein kinase and ERK260, 314, 315, 316, 317 (Figure 14). The function of CK-II-induced phosphorylation of c-Myc is not clear but it is biologically important and may be involved in dimerization.312, 318, 319, 320 Two critical amino-acid residues in the amino-terminal transactivating domain, that is, T58 and S62, were identified to be phosphorylation targets for GSK-3β,264, 315 ERT protein kinase260, 315, 316 and ERK.264, 315 Mutagenesis of T58 to A induced focus formation, whereas mutagenesis of S62 to A significantly inhibited cell transformation, and mutation of both residues restored wild-type activity.264, 315 It was therefore suggested that phosphorylation of S62 positively, while phosphorylation of T58 negatively, regulate c-Myc-mediated cell growth.264 Raf signaling has been shown to induce c-Myc activity in many cell types.169, 314, 321, 322

ERK can phosphorylate c-Myc on S62, which leads to increased c-Myc transactivation activity.260, 315, 316, 317 Phosphorylation of T58 by ERK was also observed.260 It was suggested that T58 phosphorylation facilitates rapid c-Myc proteolysis through the ubiquitin–proteosome pathway,309, 323 but phosphorylation on S62 significantly increases the c-Myc half-life.324 T58 phosphorylation is also essential for the sequestration of c-Myc by microtubulins.325 c-Myc binds with α-tubulin in the cytoplasm. This c-Myc–α-tubulin interaction prevents c-Myc from functioning as a transcription factor in the nucleus. In mitotic cells, this interaction is disrupted and c-Myc translocates to the nucleus to modulate gene expression. In the T58A mutant, c-Myc does not bind with α-tubulin and is a constitutively active transcription factor that induces cell proliferation.325 In summary, ERK phosphorylates c-Myc at S62 or T58 to regulate positively or negatively its transactivation activity. A summary of the growth-related targets of Raf-induced transcription factors is presented in Table 1.

Targeting the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway for therapeutic intervention

A goal of this review has been to introduce various sites, which have been targeted for therapeutic intervention. To this end, these therapeutic opportunities were mentioned when they were initially discussed, since we wanted the reader to be aware of these possibilities and to keep them in mind when they were reading the rest of the review. Some of these sites may be currently more attractive and significant than others. However, as this field matures, other sites, which may have initially appeared unattractive or impossible to target, may turn into key sites.

Mutations at three different Ras codons (12,13 and 61) convert the Ras protein into a constitutively active protein.93 These point mutations can be induced by environmental mutagens. Given the high level of mutations that have been detected at Ras, this pathway has always been considered a key target for therapeutic intervention. Ras mutations are frequently observed in certain hematopoietic malignancies including myelodysplastic syndromes.95 Ras mutations are often one step in tumor progression, and mutations at other genes (chromosomal translocations, gene amplification, tumor suppressor gene inactivation) have to occur for full-blown malignant phenotype to be manifested. Pharmaceutical companies have developed many FT inhibitors, which suppress the farnesylation of Ras, precluding it from localizing to the cell membrane. Some FT inhibitors were depicted earlier in Figure 3. Some of these FT inhibitors have shown great promise in clinical trials.348, 349, 350, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375 A listing of clinical and scientific studies to evaluate the usefulness of small molecular inhibitors is presented in Table 2.348, 349, 350, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380, 381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, 485, 486, 487, 488, 489, 490, 491, 492, 493, 494, 495, 496, 497, 498, 499, 500, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521, 522, 523, 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530, 531, 532, 533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539, 540, 541, 542, 543, 544, 545

Table 2 Small molecular weight membrane-permeable inhibitors

There are three different Ras genes: Ki-Ras, Ha-Ras and N-Ras. The biochemical differences between these Ras proteins have remained elusive. Ki-Ras mutations have been more frequently detected in human neoplasia than Ha-Ras mutations.546 Ras has been shown to activate both the Raf/MEK/ERK and the PI3K/Akt pathways. Thus, mutations at Ras should theoretically activate both pathways simultaneously. Ras mutations have a key role in malignant transformation as both of these pathways can prevent apoptosis as well as regulate cell cycle progression. Recently, it was shown that there is specificity in terms of the ability of Ki-Ras and Ha-Ras to induce the Raf/MEK/ERK and PI3K/Akt pathways.31 Ki-Ras preferentially activates the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway while Ha-Ras preferentially activates the PI3K/Akt pathway.31 Therefore, if Ras inhibitors could be developed which would specifically inhibit one particular Ras protein, it might be possible to inhibit one of the downstream pathways. This might under certain circumstances be advantageous, as Raf has cell cycle inhibitory effects under certain conditions. Furthermore, decreases in ERK expression may affect differentiation responses. Thus in certain tumors, one might desire to inhibit the effects Ras has on the PI3K/Akt pathway as opposed to the effects Ras has on Raf. Targeting of Ha-Ras as opposed to Ki-Ras might inhibit apoptosis suppression by Ha-Ras, but not inhibit the effects Ki-Ras has on inhibition of cell cycle progression or differentiation. A diagram illustrating the interactions between the Raf/MEK/ERK and PI3K/Akt cascades and potential sites of inhibition by small molecular weight inhibitors is presented in Figure 15.

Figure 15

Interactions between Raf/MEK/ERK and PI3K/Akt pathways and potential sites for intervention. Regulatory signals are transduced to either or both Ki-Ras and Ha-Ras, which results in the activation of Raf or PI3K or both. Akt can regulate the activity of both Raf-1 and B-Raf. This can result in the inactivation of both of these kinases, which would suppress their effects on p53 and p21Cip1, and the induction of cell cycle arrest. In normal cells, cell proliferation is tightly balanced with apoptosis. Uncontrolled cell proliferation and prevention of apoptosis results in the breakdown of this balance. Some of the sites targeted by small molecular weight inhibitors are illustrated.

Overexpression of the Raf/MEK/ERK cascade has been frequently observed in human neoplasia. A prime consequence of this activation may be the increased expression of growth factors, which can potentially further activate this cascade by an autocrine loop. Many cytokine and growth factor genes contain transcription-factor-binding sites, which are bound by transcription factors whose activity are often activated by the Raf/MEK/ERK cascade. Identification of the mechanisms responsible for the activation of this cascade has remained elusive. Genetic mutations at Raf, MEK or ERK were thought to be relatively rare in human neoplasia. For many years, it was felt that the activation of the Raf/MEK/ERK cascade was mainly because of mutations at Ras; however, this opinion has recently changed.

While mutations at the Raf gene in human neoplasia have been detected, they have not until recently gained the clinical importance that Ras mutations readily achieved. Owing to more innovative, high throughput DNA sequencing, scientists have recently discovered that the B-Raf gene is frequently mutated in certain cancers. Approximately 60% of the melanomas surveyed in one study were observed to have mutations at B-Raf.26 This result provides relevance to investigating signal transduction pathways as by understanding how B-Raf is activated, one Ras-dependent and one Ras-independent event, scientists could predict why a single missense mutation in B-Raf permitted ligand-independent activation, whereas similar mutation events would not be predicted to result in either Raf-1 or A-Raf activation because they required multiple activation events.

Raf inhibitors have been developed and some are being used in clinical trials.50, 51, 52, 53, 388, 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412. As stated previously Raf has at least 13 regulatory phosphorylation residues. Inhibition of Raf is a tricky affair as certain phosphorylation events stimulate Raf activity while others inhibit Raf activity and promote Raf association with 14-3-3 proteins, which render it inactive and present in the cytoplasm. Certain Raf inhibitors were developed, which inhibit the Raf kinase activity as determined by assays with purified Raf proteins and substrates (MEK). These inhibitors (eg L-779,450, ZM 336372, Bay 43-9006) bind the Raf kinase domain and therefore prevent its activity. Some Raf inhibitors may affect a single Raf isoform (eg Raf-1), others may affect Raf proteins, which are more similar (Raf-1 and A-Raf), while still other Raf inhibitors may affect all three Raf proteins (Raf-1, A-Raf and B-Raf). We have observed that the L-779,450 inhibitor suppresses the effects of A-Raf and Raf-1 more than the effects of B-Raf. Knowledge of the particular Raf gene mutated or overexpressed in certain tumors may provide critical information regarding how to treat the patient. Inhibition of certain Raf genes might prove beneficial while inhibition of other Raf genes under certain circumstances might prove detrimental. Thus, the development of unique and broad-spectrum Raf inhibitors may prove useful in human cancer therapy.

As stated previously, prevention of Raf activation by targeting kinases (eg Src, PKC, PKA, PAK or Akt) and phosphatases (eg PP2A) involved in Raf activation may be a mechanism to inhibit/regulate Raf activity. It is worth noting that some of these kinases normally inhibit Raf activation (Akt, PKA). A major limitation of this approach would be that these kinases and phosphatases could result in the activation or inactivation of other proteins and would have other effects on cell physiology.413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 463, 464

Dimerization of Raf proteins is critical for their activity. We often think of a single Raf protein carrying out its biochemical activity. However, different Raf isoforms dimerize with itself and other Raf isoforms to become active. Drugs such as coumermycin, which inhibit Raf dimerization, and others such as geldanmycin, which prevent interaction of Raf with 14-3-3 proteins, suppress Raf activity. Various Raf isoforms may dimerize and result in chimeric molecules, which may have different biochemical activities. Little is known about the prevention of heterodimerization of Raf proteins. Moreover Raf interacts with chaperonin proteins. Drugs such as geldanamycin that block protein:protein interactions, strongly inhibit Raf activation.50, 388, 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412

Downstream of Raf lies MEK. Currently, it is believed that MEK1 is not frequently mutated in human cancer. However, aberrant expression of MEK1 has been detected in many different types of cancer, and mutated forms of MEK1 will transform fibroblast, hematopoietic and other cell types. Useful inhibitors to MEK have been developed that display high degrees of specificity.465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, 485 The successful development of MEK inhibitors may be because of the relatively few phosphorylation sites on MEK involved in activation/inactivation. MEK inhibitors are in clinical trials.

Downstream of MEK lies ERK. To our knowledge no small molecular weight ERK inhibitors have been developed yet: however, inhibitors to ERK could prove very useful as ERK can phosphorylate many targets (Rsk, c-Myc, Elk, etc.), which have growth-promoting effects. There are at least two ERK molecules regulated by the Raf/MEK/ERK cascade, ERK1 and ERK2. Little is known about the different in vivo targets of ERK1 and ERK2. However, ERK2 has been postulated to have proproliferative effects while ERK1 has antiproliferative effects.92, 548, 549, 550 Development of specific inhibitors to ERK1 and ERK2 might eventually prove useful in the treatment of certain diseases. The MAP kinase phosphatase-1 (MKP-1) removes the phosphates from ERK. MKP-1 is mutated in certain tumors and could be considered a tumor suppressor gene.92, 551, 552, 553, 554, 555, 556 An inhibitor to this phosphatase has been developed (Ro-31-8220).

Phosphatases and small molecular weight inhibitors aside, a number of other novel strategies exist for purposes of inhibiting the kinases responsible for signaling through the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway. For example, dominant-negative (DN) inhibitors function in such a manner that they inhibit the catalytic function of the endogenous protein of the same variety. For example, DN Ras inhibitors have been generated to inhibit endogenous Ras activity by blocking its ability to hydrolyze GTP or by sequestering Ras away from the membrane where it initiates signaling.557, 558 Antisense RNAs are yet another tool that is currently under exploration for the inhibition of kinase signaling. These oligonucleotides are synthesized so that their nucleotide sequence is complementary to the mRNAs of the target kinase. Consequently, the endogenous mRNAs are unable to be translated into functional protein, thereby affecting the overall kinetics of signals transduced by that kinase. Retroviral and plasmid vectors, as well as liposomal-based synthetic antisense oligonucleotides, are methods that are currently being explored effectively to utilize this avenue of inhibition.559, 560 The primary limitation of this therapeutic strategy has been the inability to deliver specifically these molecules to tumor cells in the clinic; however, because of the tremendous potential of such therapies, a number of pharmaceutical firms are extensively developing more effective means of administration. Furthermore, RNA interference (RNAi) is an extension of this antisense technology. RNAi employs the use of double-stranded RNA molecules that target cognate mRNAs for purposes of inhibition.560 Augmenting the argument for the use of RNAi in cancer therapy are a number of recent manuscripts outlining the effectiveness of such endeavors.562, 563 Lastly, aptamers are nucleic acids that are generated for purposes of binding to and inhibiting the function of specific kinases. Over several rounds of selective processing, minor nucleotide modifications are made and subsequent selection for a specific molecule leads to the generation of a high-affinity aptamer. This unique technology has generated inhibitory molecules against ERK2, a kinase responsible for many of the signaling events described in this review.564 It is important to note that the strategies outlined in this paragraph are in various stages of early development; given this, it is imperative that these potential therapies are further developed for effective translation into clinical settings.

Although the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway is a major effector of Ras's biological effects, Ras also elicits cellular responses via Raf-independent signaling pathways. The Rho family of small GTPases mediate some of the Raf-independent effects of Ras.565 DN inhibitors of Rho have been shown in some instances to prevent Ras-induced transformation.566 The Rho family of GTPases is proposed to have a role in cytoskeleton regulation and consists of Rho, Rac and cdc42.567 Rac has been shown to induce the activation of Rho; and Rho activation has been shown to lead to the activation of the JNK pathway.568 Rac resides downstream of cdc42; however, Ras activation has also been shown to lead to Rac activation independent of cdc42.565 The mechanism by which Ras activates Rac has been proposed to occur via the ability of Ras to activate PI3K,565, 568, 569 but may also occur via the convergence of the Ras and PI3K pathways.564


This review has concentrated on the mechanisms by which the Raf/MEK/ERK cascade is activated and how this pathway transmits its signals from membrane receptors to transcription factors, which regulate gene transcription. Owing to advances in the past decade, we have a better understanding of how signals are transmitted from cytokines to their receptors and the downstream Raf/MEK/ERK cascade by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation. This knowledge has permitted the isolation and development of specific inhibitors, which may prevent these phosphorylation/dephosphorylation events. Furthermore, it is now realized that the subcellular location of a protein is important in terms of the proteins activity/inactivity. The Ras proteins, whose activity are regulated by farnesylation, document this as inhibition of farnesylation prevents Ras translocation to the membrane and activity. Active Ras can bind Raf proteins and result in their translocation to the cellular membrane. By inhibiting Ras farnesylation, activation of the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway is suppressed. Furthermore, the different Raf proteins may have different subcellular localization patterns, which alter their activities. The prospects of inhibiting certain components of this pathway by DN genes are very attractive and may be easier in certain types of tumors than others. However, a key problem will be the successful delivery of the DN gene to the tumor cell. An area that is still in its infancy is the inhibition of transcription factors, which are induced by the Raf/MEK/ERK and other signal transduction cascades. As more information about these pathways and how they are regulated becomes available, it may be possible to develop better methods to inhibit them and understand why certain drugs may work while others may fail. Our scientific quest should never end, as and when we think we have a specific inhibitor, we may learn that the cell has developed mechanisms by which it can become resistant to that inhibitor. A prime example is the drug Gleevec (Imatinib). While this drug shows great promise in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia, clinicians have documented resistance to this drug in certain patients. Thus, additional research to combat resistance to this and additional drugs must be performed for us to be ultimately successful in combating leukemia.


  1. 1

    Chang F, Lee JT, Navolanic PM, Steelman JG, Blalock WL, Franklin RA et al. Involvement of PI3K/Akt pathway in cell cycle progression, apoptosis, and neoplastic transformation: a target for cancer chemotherapy. Leukemia 2003; 17: 590–603.

  2. 2

    Blalock WL, Navolanic PM, Steelman LS, Shelton JG, Moye PW, Lee JT et al. Requirement for the PI3K/Akt pathway in MEK1-mediated growth and prevention of apoptosis: identification of an Achilles heel in leukemia. Leukemia 2003; 17 (in press).

  3. 3

    Lee Jr JT, McCubrey JA . The Raf/MEK/ERK signal transduction cascade as a target for chemotherapeutic intervention. Leukemia 2002; 16: 486–507.

  4. 4

    Blalock WL, Weinstein-Oppenheimer C, Chang F, Hoyle PE, Wang X-Y, Algate PA et al. Signal transduction, cell cycle regulatory, and anti-apoptotic pathways regulated by IL-3 in hematopoietic cells: possible sites for intervention with anti-neoplastic drugs. Leukemia 1999; 13: 1109–1166.

  5. 5

    Geijsen N, Koenderman L, Coffer PJ . Specificity in cytokine signal transduction: lessons learned from the IL-3/IL-5/GM-CSF receptor family. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2001; 12: 19–25.

  6. 6

    McCubrey JA, Steelman LS, Hoyle PA, Blalock WL, Weinstein-Oppenheimer CR, Franklin RA et al. Differential abilities of activated Raf oncoproteins to abrogate cytokine dependency, prevent apoptosis and induce autocrine growth factor synthesis in human hematopoietic cells. Leukemia 1998; 12: 1903–1929.

  7. 7

    McCubrey JA, May WS, Duronio V, Mufson A . Serine/threonine phosphorylation in cytokine signal transduction. Leukemia 2000; 14: 9–21.

  8. 8

    McCubrey JA, Lee JT, Steelman LS, Blalock WL, Moye PW, Chang F et al. Interactions between the PI3K and Raf signaling pathways can result in the transformation of hematopoietic cells. Cancer Detect Prev 2001; 25: 375–393.

  9. 9

    Hoyle PE, Moye PW, Steelman LS, Blalock WL, Franklin RA, Pearce M et al. Differential abilities of the Raf family of protein kinases to abrogate cytokine dependency and prevent apoptosis in murine hematopoietic cells by a MEK1-dependent mechanism. Leukemia 2000; 14: 642–656.

  10. 10

    McCubrey J A, Steelman LS, Blalock WL, Lee JT, Moye PW, Chang F et al. Synergistic effects of PI3K/Akt on abrogation of cytokine-dependency induced by oncogenic Raf. Adv Enzyme Regnl 2001; 41: 289–323.

  11. 11

    McCubrey JA, Blalock WL, Saleh O, Pearce M, Burrows C, Steelman LS et al. Enhanced ability of daniplestim and myelopoietin-1 to suppress apoptosis in human hematopoietic cells. Leukemia 2001; 15: 1203–1216.

  12. 12

    Abegg AL, Vickery LE, Bremer ME, Donnelly AM, Doshi PD, Evans ML et al. The enhanced in vitro hematopoietic activity of leridisim, a chimeric dual G-CSF and IL-3 receptor agonist. Leukemia 2002; 16: 316–326.

  13. 13

    Srinivasa SP, Doshi PD . Extracellular signal-regulated kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways cooperate in mediating cytokine-induced proliferation of a leukemic cell line. Leukemia 2002; 16: 244–253.

  14. 14

    Weinstein-Oppenheimer C, Steelman LS, Algate PA, Blalock WL, Burrows C, Hoyle PE et al. Effects of deregulated Raf activation on integrin, cytokine-receptor expression and the induction of apoptosis in hematopoietic cells. Leukemia 2000; 14: 1921–1938.

  15. 15

    Moye PW, Blalock WL, Hoyle PE, Chang F, Franklin RA, Weinstein-Oppenheimer C et al. Synergy between Raf and BCL2 in abrogating the cytokine-dependency of hematopoietic cells. Leukemia 2000; 14: 1060–1079.

  16. 16

    Weinstein-Oppenheimer CR, Blalock WL, Steelman LS, Chang F, McCubrey JA . Raf signal transduction cascade as a target for chemotherapeutic intervention in growth factor-dependent tumors. Pharm Ther 2000; 88: 229–279.

  17. 17

    Franklin RA, McCubrey JA . Kinases positive and negative regulators of apoptosis. Leukemia 2000; 14: 2019–2034.

  18. 18

    White MK, McCubrey JA . Suppression of apoptosis role in cell growth and neoplasia. Leukemia 2001; 15: 1011–1021.

  19. 19

    Blalock WL, Pearce M, Steelman LS, Franklin RA, McCarthy SA, Cherwinski H et al. A conditionally-active form of MEK1 results in autocrine transformation of human and mouse hematopoietic cells. Oncogene 2000; 19: 526–536.

  20. 20

    Blalock WL, Moye PW, Chang F, Pearce M, Steelman LS, McMahon M et al. Combined effects of aberrant MEK1 activity and BCL2 overexpression on relieving the cytokine-dependency of hematopoietic cells. Adv Enzyme Regul 2000; 40: 305–337.

  21. 21

    Blalock WL, Pearce M, Chang F, Lee JT, Pohnert S, Burrows C et al. Effects of inducible MEK1 activation on the cytokine-dependency of lymphoid cells. Leukemia 2001; 15: 794–807.

  22. 22

    McCubrey JA, Steelman LS, Blalock WL, Lee JT, Moye PW, Chang F et al. Synergistic effects of PI3K/Akt on abrogation of cytokine-dependency induced by oncogenic Raf. Adv Enzyme Regul 2001; 41: 289–323.

  23. 23

    Samuels ML, Weber MJ, Bishop JM, McMahon M . Conditional transformation of cells and rapid activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade by an estradiol-dependent human Raf-1 protein kinase. Mol Cell Biol 1993; 13: 6241–6252.

  24. 24

    Pritchard CA, Samuels ML, Bosch E, McMahon M . Conditionally oncogenic forms of the A-Raf and B-Raf protein kinases display different biological and biochemical properties in NIH-3T3 cells. Mol Cell Biol 1995; 15: 6430–6442.

  25. 25

    Pritchard CA, Bolin L, Slattery R, Murray R, McMahon M . Post-natal lethality and neurological and gastrointestinal defects in mice with targeted disruption of the A-Raf protein kinase gene. Curr Biol 1996; 6: 614–617.

  26. 26

    Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, Stephens P, Edkins S, Clegg S et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature 2002; 417: 949–954.

  27. 27

    Bosch E, Cherwinski H, Peterson D, McMahon M . Mutations of critical amino acids affect the biological and biochemical properties of oncogenic A-Raf and Raf-1. Oncogene 1997; 11: 1021–1034.

  28. 28

    Wolthuis RMF, Bos JL . Ras caught in another affair the exchange factors for Ral. Curr Opin Genet Develop 1999; 9: 112–117.

  29. 29

    Peyssonnaux C, Provot S, Felder-Schmittbuhl MP, Calothy G, Eychéne A . Induction of postmitotic neuroretina cell proliferation by distinct Ras downstream signaling pathways. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20: 7068–7079.

  30. 30

    Yamamoto T, Taya S, Kaibuchi K . Ras-induced transformation and signaling pathway. J Biochem 1999; 126: 799–803.

  31. 31

    Yan J, Roy S, Apolloni A, Lane A, Hancock JF . Ras isoforms vary in their ability to activate Raf-1 and phosphoinositide 3-kinase. J Biol Chem 1998; 273: 24052–24056.

  32. 32

    Zhang BH, Guan KL . Regulation of the Raf kinase by phosphorylation. Exp Lung Res 2001; 2: 269–295.

  33. 33

    Warne PH, Viciana PR, Downward J . Direct interaction of Ras and the amino-terminal region of Raf-1 in vitro. Nature 1993; 364:352–355.

  34. 34

    Moodie SA, Willumsen BM, Weber MJ, Wolfman A . Complexes of Ras. GTP with Raf-1 and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase. Science 1993; 260: 1658–1661.

  35. 35

    Vojteck AB, Hollenberg SM, Cooper JA . Mammalian Ras interacts directly with the serine/threonine Raf. Cell 1993; 74: 205–214.

  36. 36

    Li W, Melnick M, Perrimon N . Dual function of Ras in Raf activation. Development 1998; 125: 4999–5008.

  37. 37

    Marshall CJ . Raf gets it together. Nature 1996; 383: 127–128.

  38. 38

    Farrar MA, Alberola-Ila J, Perlmutter RM . Activation of the Raf-1 kinase cascade by coumermycin induced dimerization. Nature 1996; 383: 178–181.

  39. 39

    Luo Z, Tzivion G, Belshaw PJ, Vavvas D, Marshall M, Avruch J . Oligomerization activates c-Raf-1 through a Ras-dependent mechanism. Nature 1996; 383: 181–185.

  40. 40

    Weber CK, Slupsky JR, Kalmes HA, Rapp UR . Active Ras induces heterodimerization of c-Raf and B-Raf. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 3595–31324.

  41. 41

    Farrar MA, Tian J, Perlmutter RM . Membrane localization of Raf assists engagement of downstream effectors. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 31318–31324.

  42. 42

    Stone J, deLange T, Ramsay G, Jakobvits E, Bishop JM, Varmus H et al. Definition of regions in human c-myc that are involved in transformation and nuclear localization. Mol Cell Biol 1987; 7: 1697–1709.

  43. 43

    Chong H, Lee J, Guan KL . Positive and negative regulation of Raf kinase activity and function by phosphorylation. EMBO J 2001; 20: 3716–3727.

  44. 44

    Fabian JR, Daar IO, Morrison DK . Critical tyrosine residues regulate the enzymatic and biological activity of Raf-1 kinase. Mol Cell Biol 1993; 13: 7170–7179.

  45. 45

    Marais R, Wynne J, Treisman R . The SRF accessory protein Elk-1 contains a growth factor-regulated transcriptional activation domain. Cell 1993; 73: 381–393.

  46. 46

    Morrison DK, Heidecker G, Rapp UR, Copeland TD . Identification of the major phosphorylation sites of the Raf-1 kinase. J Biol Chem 1993; 268: 17309–17316.

  47. 47

    Mason CS, Springer CJ, Cooper RG, Superti-Furga G, Marshall CJ, Marais R . Serine and tyrosine phosphorylations cooperate in Raf-1, but not B-Raf activation. EMBO J 1999; 18: 2137–2148.

  48. 48

    Song J, Takeda M, Morimoto RI . Bag1-Hsp70 mediates a physiological stress signaling pathway that regulates Raf-1/ERK and cell growth. Nat Cell Biol 2001; 3: 276–282.

  49. 49

    Tzivion G, Shen YH, Zhu J . 14-3-3 proteins; bringing new definitions to scaffolding. Oncogene 2001; 20: 6331–6338.

  50. 50

    Blagosklonney MV . Hsp-90-associated oncoproteins: multiple targets of geldanamycin and its analogs. Leukemia 2002; 16: 455–462.

  51. 51

    Heimbrook DC, Huber HE, Stirdivant SM, Claremon D, Liverton N, Patrick DR et al. Identification of potent, selective kinase inhibitors of Raf. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 1998; 39: 558.

  52. 52

    Hall-Jackson CA, Eyers PA, Cohen P, Goedert M, Boyle FT, Hewitt N et al. Paradoxical activation of Raf by a novel Raf inhibitor. Chem Biol 1999; 6: 559–568.

  53. 53

    Lyons JF, Wilhelm S, Hibner B, Bollag G . Discovery of a novel Raf kinase inhibitor. Endocr-Related Cancer 2001; 8: 219–225.

  54. 54

    McPhillips F, Mullen P, Monia BP, Ritchie AA, Dorr FA, Smyth JF et al. Association of c-Raf expression with survival and its targeting with antisense oligonucleotides in ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 2001; 85: 1753–1758.

  55. 55

    Lau QC, Brusselbach S, Muller R . Abrogation of c-Raf expression induces apoptosis in tumor cells. Oncogene 1998; 16: 1899–1902.

  56. 56

    Daum G, Eisenmann-Tappe I, Fries HW, Troppmair J, Rapp UR . The ins and outs of Raf kinases. Trends Biol Sci 2000; 19: 474–480.

  57. 57

    Avruch J, Zhang XF, Kyriakis JM . Raf meets Ras: completing the framework of a signal transduction pathway. Trends Biol Sci 1994; 19: 279–28358.

  58. 58

    Khosravi-Far R, White MA, Westwick JK, Solski PA, Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M, Aelst LV et al. Oncogenic Ras activation of Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase-independent pathways is sufficient to cause tumorigenic transformation. Mol Cell Biol 1996; 16: 3923–3933.

  59. 59

    Marais R, Light Y, Paterson HF, Marshall CJ . Ras recruits Raf-1 to the plasma membrane for activation by tyrosine phosphorylation. EMBO J 1995; 14: 3136–3145.

  60. 60

    Dhillon AS, Meikle S, Yazici Z, Eulitz M, Kolch W . Regulation of Raf-1 activation and signaling by dephosphorylation. EMBO J 2002; 1: 64–71.

  61. 61

    Kolch W . To be or not to be: a question of B-Raf. Trends Neurosci 2001; 21: 498–500.

  62. 62

    Kolch W . Meaningful relationships the regulation of the Ras/Raf/Mek-ERK pathway by protein interactions. Biochem J 2000; 351: 289–305.

  63. 63

    Abraham D, Podar K, Pacher M, Kubicek M, Welzel N, Hemmings BA et al. Raf-1 associated protein phosphatase 2A as a positive regulator of kinase activation. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 22300–22304.

  64. 64

    Yeung K, Seitz T, Li S, Janosch P, McFerran B, Kaiser C et al. Suppression of Raf-1 kinase activity and MAP kinase signaling by RKIP. Nature 1999; 401: 173–177.

  65. 65

    Lee JE, Beck TW, Wojnowski L, Rapp UR . Regulation of A-Raf expression. Oncogene 1996; 12: 1669–1677.

  66. 66

    Marais R, Light Y, Paterson HF, Mason CS, Marshall CJ . Differential regulation of Raf-1, A-Raf, and B-Raf by oncogenic ras and tyrosine kinases. J Biol Chem 1997; 272: 4378–4383.

  67. 67

    Diaz B, Barnard D, Filson A, MacDonald S, King A, Marshall M . Phosphorylation of Raf-1 serine 338-serine 339 is an essential regulatory event for Ras-dependent activation and biological signaling. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17: 4509–4516.

  68. 68

    King AJ, Sun H, Diaz B, Barnard D, Miao W, Bagrodia S et al. The protein kinase Pak3 positively regulates Raf-1 activity through phosphorylation of serine 338. Nature 1998; 396: 180–183.

  69. 69

    King AJ, Wireman RS, Hamilton M, Marshall MS . Phosphorylation site specificity of the Pak-mediated regulation of Raf-1 and cooperativity with Src. FEBS Lett 2001; 497: 6–14.

  70. 70

    Kolch W, Heidecker G, Kochs G, Hummel R, Vahidi H, Mischak H et al. Protein kinase Cα activates RAF-1 by direct phosphorylation. Nature 1993; 364: 249–252.

  71. 71

    Cai H, Smola U, Wixler V, Eisenmann-Tappe I, Diaz-Meco MT, Moscat J et al. Role of diacylglycerol-regulated protein kinase C isotype in growth factor activation of the Raf-1 protein kinase. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17: 732–741.

  72. 72

    Cheng JJ, Wung BS, Chao YJ, Wang DL . Sequential activation of protein kinase C (PKC)-alpha and PKC-epsilon contributes to sustained Raf/ERK1/2 activation in endothelial cells under mechanical strain. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 31368–31375.

  73. 73

    Barnard D, Diaz B, Clawson D, Marshall M . Oncogenes, growth factors and phorbol esters regulate Raf-1 through common mechanisms. Oncogene 1998; 17: 1539–1547.

  74. 74

    Schonwasser DC, Marasis RM, Marshall CJ, Parker PJ . Activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway by conventional, novel and atypical protein kinase C isotypes. Mol Cell Biol 1998; 18: 790–798.

  75. 75

    Barry OP, Kazanietz MG . Protein kinase C isozymes, novel phorbol ester receptors and cancer chemotherapy. Curr Pharm Des 2001; 7: 1725–1744.

  76. 76

    Sredni B, Kalechman Y, Albeck M, Gross O, Aurbach D, Sharon P et al. Cytokine secretion effected by synergism of the immunomodulator AS101 and the protein kinase C inducer bryostatin. Immunology 1990; 70: 473–477.

  77. 77

    Rommel C, Clarke BA, Zimmermann S, Nuñez L, Rossman R, Reid K et al. Differentiation stage-specific inhibition of the Raf–MEK–ERK pathway by Akt. Science 1999; 286: 1738–1741.

  78. 78

    Reusch HP, Zimmermann S, Schaefer M, Paul M, Moelling K . Regulation of Raf by Akt controls growth and differentiation in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 33630–33637.

  79. 79

    Dhillon AS, Pollock C, Steen H, Shaw PE, Mischak H, Kolch W . Cyclic AMP-dependent kinase regulates Raf-1 kinase mainly by phosphorylation of serine 259. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22: 3237–3246.

  80. 80

    Guan KL, Figueroa C, Brtva TR, Zhu T, Taylor J, Barber TD et al. Negative regulation of the serine/threonine kinase B-Raf by Akt. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 27354–27359.

  81. 81

    Woods D, Parry D, Cherwinski H, Bosch E, Lees E, McMahon M . Raf-induced proliferation or cell cycle arrest is determined by the level of Raf activity with arrest mediated by p21Cip. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17: 5598–5611.

  82. 82

    Alessi DR, Saito Y, Campbell DG, Cohen P, Sithanandam G, Rapp U et al. Identification of the sites in MAP kinase kinase-1 phosphorylated by p74raf-1. EMBO J 1994; 13: 1610–1619.

  83. 83

    Huang W, Kessler DS, Erikson RL . Biochemical and biological analysis of Mek1 phosphorylation site mutants. Mol Biol Cell 1995; 6: 237–245.

  84. 84

    Papin C, Eychene A, Brunet A, Pages G, Pouyssegur J, Calothey G et al. B-Raf protein isoforms interact with and phosphorylate Mek-1 on serine residues 218 and 222. Oncogene 1995; 10: 1647–1651.

  85. 85

    Wu X, Noh SJ, Zhou G, Dixon JE, Guan KL . Selective activation of MEK1 but not MEK2 by A-Raf from epidermal growth factor-stimulated Hela cells. J Biol Chem 1996; 271: 3265–3271.

  86. 86

    Hekman M, Hamm H, Villar AV, Bader B, Kuhlmann J, Nickel J et al. Associations of B- and C-Raf with cholesterol, phosphatidylserine, and lipid second messengers: preferential binding of Raf to artificial lipid rafts. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 24090–24102.

  87. 87

    Mercer K, Chiloeches A, Huser M, Kiernan M, Marais R, Pritchard C . ERK signalling and oncogene transformation are not impaired in cells lacking A-Raf. Oncogene 2002; 21: 347–355.

  88. 88

    English JM, Cobb MH . Pharmacological inhibitors of MAPK pathways. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2002; 23: 40–45.

  89. 89

    Adjei AA . Signal transduction pathway targets for anticancer drug discovery. Current Pharm Des 2000; 6: 361–378.

  90. 90

    Xu S, Robbins D, Frost J, Dang A, Lange-Carter C, Cobb MH . MEKK1 phosphorylates MEK1 and MEK2 but does not cause activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92: 6808–6812.

  91. 91

    Blenis J . Signal transduction via the MAP kinases: proceed at your own RSK. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90: 5889–5892.

  92. 92

    Pouyssegur J, Volmat V, Lenormand P . Fidelity and spatio-temporal control in MAP kinase (ERKs) signaling. Biochem Pharm 2002; 64: 755–763.

  93. 93

    Flotho C, Valcamonica S, Mach-Pascual S, Schmahl G, Corral L, Ritterbach J et al. RAS mutations and clonality analysis in children with juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML). Leukemia 1999; 13: 32–37.

  94. 94

    Stirewalt DL, Kopecky KJ, Meshinchi S, Appelbaum FR, Slovak ML, Willman CL et al. FLT3, RAS, and TP53 mutations in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2001; 97: 3589–3595.

  95. 95

    Bartram CR . Mutations in ras genes in myelocytic leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood Cells 1988; 14: 533–538.

  96. 96

    McCubrey JA, Steelman LS, Wang X-Y, Algate PA, Hoyle PE, White C et al. Differential effects of viral and cellular oncogenes on the growth factor-dependency of hematopoietic cells. Int J Oncol 1995; 7: 295–310.

  97. 97

    Malumbres M, Castro IPD, Hernández MI, Jiménez M, Corral T, Pellicer A . Cellular response to oncogenic ras involves induction of the Cdk4 and Cdk6 inhibitor p15INK4b. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20: 2915–2925.

  98. 98

    Hirakawa T, Ruley HE . Rescue of cells from ras oncogene-induced growth arrest by a second complementing oncogene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85: 1519–1523.

  99. 99

    Bar-Sagi D, Feramisco JR . Microinjection of the ras oncogene protein into PC12 cells induces morphological differentiation. Cell 1985; 42: 841–848.

  100. 100

    Benito M, Porras A, Nebreda AR, Santos E . Differentiation of 3T3-L1 fibroblasts to adipocytes induced by transfection of ras oncogenes. Science 1991; 253: 565–568.

  101. 101

    Serrano M, Lin AW, McCurrach ME, Beach D, Lowe SW . Oncogenic ras provokes premature cell senescence associated with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a. Cell 1997; 88: 593–602.

  102. 102

    Adnane J, Jackson RJ, Nicosia SV, Cantor AB, Pledger WJ, Sebti SM . Loss of p21WAF1/CIP1 accelerates Ras oncogenesis in a transgenic/knockout mammary cancer model. Oncogene 2000; 19: 5338–5347.

  103. 103

    McGlynn AP, Padua RA, Burnett AK, Darley RL . Alternative effects of Ras and Raf oncogenes on the proliferation and apoptosis of factor-dependent FDC-P1 cells. Leukemia Res 2000; 24: 47–54.

  104. 104

    Muszynski KW, Ruscett FW, Heidecker G, Rapp UR, Troppmair J, Gooya JM et al. Raf-1 protein is required for growth factor-induced proliferation of hematopoietic cells. J Exp Med 1995; 181: 2189–2199.

  105. 105

    Sanders MR, Lu H, Walker F, Sorbad S, Dainiak N . The Raf-1 protein mediates insulin-like growth factor-induced proliferation of erythroid progenitor cells. Stem Cells 1998; 16: 200–207.

  106. 106

    Kerkhoff E, Rapp UR . Induction of cell proliferation in quiescent NIH-3T3 cells by oncogenic c-Raf-1. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17: 2576–2586.

  107. 107

    Cioffi CL, Garay M, Johnston JF, McGraw K, Boggs RT, Hreniuk BD et al. Selective inhibition of A-Raf and C-Raf mRNA expression by antisense oligodeoxynucleotides in rat vascular smooth muscle cells: role of A-Raf and C-Raf in serum-induced proliferation. Mol Pharmacol 1997; 51: 383–389.

  108. 108

    Ravi RK, Weber E, McMahon M, Williams JR, Baylin S, Mal A et al. Activated Raf-1 causes cell cycle arrest in small cell lung cancer cells. J Clin Invest 1998; 101: 153–159.

  109. 109

    Lloyd AC, Obermuller F, Staddon S, Barth CF, McMahon M, Land H . Cooperating oncogenes converge to regulate cyclin/Cdk complexes. Genes Devel 1997; 11: 663–677.

  110. 110

    Yen A, Williams M, Platko JD, Der C, Hisaka M . Expression of activated Raf accelerates cell differentiation and RB protein down-regulation but not hypophosphorylation. Eur J Cell Biol 1994; 65: 103–113.

  111. 111

    Killmann NMB, McCubrey JA . Molecular targets for therapy signal, transduction inhibitors and imatinib. Leukemia 2002; 16: 1205.

  112. 112

    Hochhaus A, McCubrey JA, Killmann NMB . Spotlight imatinib: a model for signal transduction inhibitors and imatinib. Leukemia 2002; 16: 1205–1206.

  113. 113

    Chang F, McCubrey JA . P21Cip1 induced by Raf is associated with increased Cdk4 activity in hematopoietic cells. Oncogene 2001; 20: 4354–4364.

  114. 114

    Chang F, Steelman LS, McCubrey JA . Raf-induced cell cycle progression in human TF-1 hematopoietic cells. Cell Cycle 2002; 1: 220–226.

  115. 115

    Jelinek T, Dent P, Sturgill TW, Weber MJ . Ras-induced activation of Raf-1 is dependent on tyrosine phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol 1996; 16: 1027–1034.

  116. 116

    Kuroda S, Ohtsuka T, Yamamori B, Fukui K, Shimizu K, Takai Y . Different effects of various phospholipids on Ki-Ras-, Ha-Ras-, and Rap1B-induced B-Raf activation. J Biol Chem 1996; 271: 14680–14683.

  117. 117

    Voice J K, Klemke RL, Le A, Jackson JH . Four human ras homologs differ in their abilities to activate Raf-1, induce transformation, and stimulate cell motility. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 17164–17170.

  118. 118

    Weber CK, Slupsky JR, Hermann C, Schuler M, Rapp UR, Block C . Mitogenic signaling of Ras is regulated by differential interaction with Raf isozymes. Oncogene 2000; 19: 169–176.

  119. 119

    Hagemann C, Kalmes A, Wixler V, Wixler L, Schuster T, Rapp UR . The regulatory subunit of protein kinase CK2 is a specific A-Raf activator. FEBS Lett 1997; 403: 200–202.

  120. 120

    Shinkai M, Masuda T, Kariya K, Tamada M, Shrouzu M, Yokoyama S et al. Difference in the mechanism of interaction of Raf-1 and B-Raf with H-Ras. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1996; 22: 729–734.

  121. 121

    Fantl WJ, Muslin AJ, Kikuchi A, Martin JA, MacNicol AM, Gross RW et al. Activation of Raf-1 by 14-3-3 proteins. Nature 1994; 371: 612–614.

  122. 122

    Freed E, Symons M, MacDonald SG, McCormick F, Ruggieri R . Binding of 14-3-3 proteins to the protein kinase Raf and effects on its activation. Science 1994; 265: 1713–1716.

  123. 123

    Irie K, Gotoh Y, Yashar BM, Errede B, Nishida E, Matsumoto K . Stimulatory effects of yeast and mammalian 14-3-3 proteins on the Raf protein kinase. Science 1994; 265: 1716–1719.

  124. 124

    Papin C, Denouel A, Calothy G, Eychene A . Identification of signaling proteins interacting with B-Raf in the yeast two-hybrid system. Oncogene 1996; 12: 2213–2221.

  125. 125

    Tzivion G, Luo Z, Avruch J . A dimeric 14-3-3 protein is an essential cofactor for Raf kinase activity. Nature 1998; 394: 88–92.

  126. 126

    Storm SM, Cleveland JL, Rapp UR . Expression of raf family proto-oncogenes in normal mouse tissues. Oncogene 1990; 5: 345–351.

  127. 127

    Wadewitz AG, Winer MA, Wolgemuth DJ . Developmental and cell lineage specificity of raf family gene expression in mouse. Oncogene 1993; 8: 1055–1062.

  128. 128

    Wojnowski L, Zimmer AM, Bec TW, Hahn H, Bernal R, Rapp UR et al. Endothelial apoptosis in Braf-deficient mice. Nat Genet 1997; 16: 293–297.

  129. 129

    Wojnowski L, Stancato LF, Zimmer AM, Hahn H, Beck TW, Larner AC et al. Craf-1 protein kinase is essential for mouse development. Mech Dev 1998; 76: 141–149.

  130. 130

    Hagemann C, Rapp UR . Isotype-specific functions of Raf kinases. Exp Cell Res 1999; 253: 34–46.

  131. 131

    Vossler MR, Yao H, York RD, Pan M-G, Rim CS, Stork PJS . CAMP activates MAP kinase and Elk-1 through a B-Raf and Rap1-dependent pathway. Cell 1997; 89: 73–82.

  132. 132

    Shinkai M, Masuda T, Kariya K, Tamada M, Shirouzu M, Yokoyama S et al. Difference in the mechanism of interaction of Raf-1 and B-Raf with H-Ras. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1996; 223: 729–734.

  133. 133

    Rosario M, Paterson HF, Marshall CJ . Activation of the Raf/MAP kinase cascade by the Ras-related protein TC21 is required for the TC21-mediated transformation of NIH-3T3 cells. EMBO J 1999; 18: 1270–1279.

  134. 134

    Kalmes A, Hagemann C, Weber CK, Wixler L, Schuster T, Rapp UR . Interaction between the protein kinase B-Raf and the alpha-subunit of the 11S proteasome regulator. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 2986–2990.

  135. 135

    Pahl HL . Activators and target genes of Rel/NF-κB transcription factors. Oncogene 1999; 18: 6853–6866.

  136. 136

    Yamamoto Y, Gaynor RB . Therapeutic potential of inhibition of the NF-κB pathway in the treatment of inflammation and cancer. J Clin Invest 2001; 107: 135–142.

  137. 137

    Chen FE, Ghosh G . Regulation of DNA binding by Rel/NF-kappaB transcription factors: structural views. Oncogene 1999; 18: 6845–6852.

  138. 138

    Wang CY, Mayo MW, Komeluk RG, Goeddel DV, Baldwin Jr AS . NF-κB antiapoptosis: induction of TRAF1 and TRAF2 and c-IAP1 and c-IAP2 to suppress caspase-8 activation. Science 1998; 281: 1680–1683.

  139. 139

    Govind S . Control of development and immunity by Rel transcription factors in Drosophila. Oncogene 1999; 18: 6875–6887.

  140. 140

    Baldwin AS . Control of oncogenesis and cancer therapy resistance by the transcription factor NF-κB. J Clin Invest 2001; 107: 241–246.

  141. 141

    Finco TS, Westwick JK, Norris JL, Beg AA, Der CJ, Baldwin Jr AS . Oncogenic Ha-Ras-induced signaling activates NF-κB transcriptional activity, which is required for cellular transformation. J Biol Chem 1997; 272: 24113–24116.

  142. 142

    Schreck R, Baeuerle PA . NF-κB as inducible transcriptional activator of the granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor gene. Mol Cell Biol 1990; 10: 1281–1286.

  143. 143

    Gilmore TD . The Rel/NF-κB signal transduction pathway: introduction. Oncogene 1999; 18: 6845–6852.

  144. 144

    Schmitz ML, Baeuerle P . The p65 subunit is responsible for the strong transcription activating potential of NF-κB. EMBO J 1991; 10: 3805–3817.

  145. 145

    Ruben SM, Narayanan R, Klement JF, Chen CH, Rosen CA . Functional characterization of the NF-κB p65 transcriptional activator and an alternatively spliced derivative. Mol Cell Biol 1992; 12: 444–454.

  146. 146

    Whiteside ST, Israel A . I kappa B proteins: structure, function and regulation. Semin Cancer Biol 1999; 8: 75–82.

  147. 147

    Schmitz ML, Bacher S, Kracht M . IκB-independent control of NF-κB activity by modulatory phosphorylations. Trends Biochem Sci 2001; 26: 186–190.

  148. 148

    Israel A . The IKK complex: an integrator of all signals that activate NF-κB? Trends Cell Biol 2000; 10: 129–133.

  149. 149

    Karin M, Ben-Neriah Y . Phosphorylation meets ubiquitination: the control of NF-κB activity. Annu Rev Immunol 2000; 18: 621–663.

  150. 150

    Karin M . How NF-κB is activated: the role of the IκB kinase (IKK) complex. Oncogene 1999; 18: 6867–6874.

  151. 151

    DiDonato J, Mercurio F, Rosette C, Wu-Li J, Suyang H, Ghosh S et al. Mapping of the inducible IκB phosphorylation sites that signal its ubiquitination and degradation. Mol Cell Biol 1996; 16: 1295–1304.

  152. 152

    Zandi E, Karin M . Bridging the gap: composition, regulation, and physiological function of the IκB kinase complex. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19: 4547–4551.

  153. 153

    Tanaka K, Kawakami T, Tateishi K, Yashiroda H, Chiba T . Control of IκBα proteolysis by the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway. Biochimie 2001; 83: 351–356.

  154. 154

    Yamaoka S, Courtois G, Bessia C, Whiteside ST, Weil R, Agou F et al. Complementation cloning of NEMO, a component of the IκB kinase complex essential for NF-κB activation. Cell 1998; 93: 1231–1240.

  155. 155

    Ling L, Zhaodan C, Goeddel DV . NF-κB-inducing kinase activates IKK-α by phosphorylation of Ser-176. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 3792–3797.

  156. 156

    Nakano H, Shindo M, Sakon S, Nishinaka S, Mihara M, Yagita H et al. Differential regulation of IκB kinase α and β by two upstream kinases, NF-κB-inducing kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase kinase-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 3537–3542.

  157. 157

    Lee FS, Peters RT, Dang LC, Maniatis T . MEKK1 activates both IκB kinase α and IκB kinase β. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 9319–9324.

  158. 158

    Nemoto S, DiDonato JA, Lin A . Coordinate regulation of IκB kinases by mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 1 and NF-κB-inducing kinase. Mol Cell Biol 1998; 18: 7336–7343.

  159. 159

    Wang D, Westerheide SD, Hanson JL, Baldwin Jr AS . TNFα-induced phosphorylation of RelA/p65 on ser529 is controlled by casein kinase II. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 32592–32597.

  160. 160

    Sakurai H, Chiba H, Miyoshi H, Sugita T, Toriumi W . IκB kinases phosphorylate NF-κB p65 subunit on serine 536 in the transactivation domain. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 30353–30356.

  161. 161

    Wang D, Baldwin Jr AS . Activation of nuclear factor-κB-dependent transcription by tumor necrosis factor-α is mediated through phosphorylation of RelA/p65 on serine 529. J Biol Chem 1998; 73: 29411–29416.

  162. 162

    Zhong H, Voll RE, Ghosh S . Phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 by PKA stimulates transcriptional activity by promoting a novel bivalent interaction with the coactivator CBP/p300. Mol Cell 1998; 1: 661–671.

  163. 163

    Bruder JT, Heidecker G, Tan TH, Weske JC, Derse D, Rapp UR . Oncogene activation of HIV-LTR-driven expression via the NF-kappa B binding sites. Nucleic Acids Res 1993; 21: 5229–5234.

  164. 164

    Norris JL, Baldwin Jr AS . Oncogenic Ras enhances NF-κB transcriptional activity through Raf-dependent and Raf-independent mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 13841–13846.

  165. 165

    Baumann B, Weber CK, Troppmair J, Whiteside S, Israel A, Rapp UR . Raf induces NF-κB by membrane shuttle kinase MEKK1, a signaling pathway critical for transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 4615–4620.

  166. 166

    Ludwig L, Kessler H, Wagne M, Hoang-Vu C, Dralle H, Adler G et al. Nuclear factor-κB is constitutively active in C-cell carcinoma and required for RET-induced transformation. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 4526–4535.

  167. 167

    McCarthy SA, Samuels ML, Pritchard CA, Abraham JA, McMahon M . Rapid induction of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor/diphtheria toxin receptor expression by Raf and Ras oncogenes. Genes Dev 1995; 9: 1953–1964.

  168. 168

    McCarthy SA, Chen D, Yang BS, Garcia Ramirez JJ, Cherwinski H, Chen XR et al. Rapid phosphorylation of Ets-2 accompanies mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and the induction of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor gene expression by oncogenic Raf-1. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17: 2401–2412.

  169. 169

    Kerkhoff E, Houben R, Löffler S, Troppmair J, Lee J-E, Rapp UR . Regulation of c-myc expression by Ras/Raf signaling. Oncogene 1998; 16: 211–216.

  170. 170

    Schouten GJ, Vertegaal AC, Whiteside ST, Israel A, Toebes M, Dorsman JC et al. IκBα is a target for the mitogen-activated 90 kDa ribosomal S6 kinase. EMBO J 1997; 16: 3133–3144.

  171. 171

    Ghoda L, Lin X, Greene WC . The 90-kDa ribosomal S6 kinase (pp90rsk) phosphorylates the N-terminal regulatory domain of IκBα and stimulates its degradation in vitro. J Biol Chem 1997; 272: 21281–21288.

  172. 172

    Funakoshi M, Tago K, Sonoda Y, Tominaga S, Kasahara T . A MEK inhibitor, PD98059 enhances IL-1-induced NF-κB activation by the enhanced and sustained degradation of IκBα. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001; 283: 248–254.

  173. 173

    Iordanov M, Bender K, Ade T, Schmid W, Sachsenmaier C, Engel K et al. CREB is activated by UVC through a p38/HOG-1-dependent protein kinase. EMBO J 1997; 16: 1009–1022.

  174. 174

    Muthusamy N, Leiden JM . A protein kinase C-, Ras-, and RSK2-dependent signal transduction pathway activates the cAMP-responsive element-binding protein transcription factor following T cell receptor engagement. J Biol Chem 1998; 273: 22841–22847.

  175. 175

    Haus-Seuffert P, Meisterernst M . Mechanisms of transcriptional activation of cAMP-responsive element-binding protein CREB. Mol Cell Biochem 2000; 212: 5–9.

  176. 176

    Boehlk S, Fessele S, Mojaat A, Miyamoto NG, Werner T, Nelson EL et al. ATF and Jun transcription factors, acting through an Ets/CRE promoter module, mediate lipopolysaccharide inducibility of the chemokine RANTES in monocytic Mono Mac 6 cells. Eur J Immunol 2000; 30: 1102–1112.

  177. 177

    Feuerstein N, Firestein R, Aiyar N, He X, Murasko D, Cristofalo V . Late induction of CREB/ATF binding and a concomitant increase in cAMP levels in T and B lymphocytes stimulated via the antigen receptor. J Immunol 1996; 156: 4582–4593.

  178. 178

    Shimizu M, Nomura Y, Suzuki H, Ichikawa E, Takeuchi A, Suzuki M et al. Activation of the Rat cyclin A promoter by ATF2 and Jun family members and its suppression by ATF4. Exp Cell Res 1998; 239: 93–103.

  179. 179

    Djaborkhel R, Tvrdík D, Eckschlager T, Raška I, Müller J . Cyclin A down-regulation in TGFβ1-arrested follicular lymphoma cells. Exp Cell Res 2000; 261: 250–259.

  180. 180

    Nagata D, Suzuki E, Nishimatsu H, Satonaka H, Goto A, Omata M et al. Transcriptional activation of the cyclin D1 gene is mediated by multiple cis-elements. including SP1 sites and a cAMP-responsive element in vascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 662–669.

  181. 181

    Vanhoutte P, Barrier J, Gilbert B, Pages C, Besson M, Hipskind RA et al. Glumate induces phosphorylation of Elk-1 and CREB, along with c-fos activation, via an extracellular signal-regulated kinase-dependent pathway in brain slices. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19: 136–146.

  182. 182

    Wang Y, Prywes R . Activation of the c-fos enhancer by the erk MAP kinase pathway through two sequence elements: the c-fos AP-1 and p62TCF sites. Oncogene 2000; 19: 1379–1385.

  183. 183

    Pugazhenthi S, Miller E, Sable C, Young P, Heidenreich KA, Boxer LM et al. Insulin-like growth factor-1 induces bcl-2 promoter through the transcription factor cAMP-responsive element-binding protein. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 27529–27535.

  184. 184

    Arcinas M, Heckman CA, Mehew JW, Boxer LM . Molecular mechanisms of transcriptional control of bcl-2 and c-myc in follicular and transformed lymphoma. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 5202–5206.

  185. 185

    Wilson BE, Mochon E, Boxer LM . Induction of bcl-2 expression by phosphorylated CREB proteins during B-cell activation and rescue from apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol 1996; 16: 5546–5556.

  186. 186

    Treisman R . Regulation of transcription by MAP kinase cascades. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1996; 8: 205–215.

  187. 187

    Treisman R . The serum response element. Trends Biochem Sci 1992; 17: 423–426.

  188. 188

    De Cesare D, Jacquot S, Hanauer A, Sassone-Corsi P . Rsk-2 activity is necessary for epidermal growth factor-induced phosphorylation of CREB protein and transcription of c-fos gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 12202–12207.

  189. 189

    Chrivia JC, Kwok RP, Lamb N, Hagiwara M, Montminy MR, Goodman RH . Phosphorylated CREB binds specifically to the nuclear protein CBP. Nature 1993; 365: 855–859.

  190. 190

    Nakajima T, Uchida C, Anderson SF, Parvin JD, Montminy M . Analysis of a cAMP-responsive activator reveals a two-component mechanism for transcriptional induction via signal-dependent factors. Genes Dev 1997; 11: 738–747.

  191. 191

    Nakajima T, Uchida C, Anderson SF, Lee CG, Hurwitz J, Parvin JD et al. RNA helicase A mediates association of CBP with RNA polymerase II. Cell 1997; 90: 1107–1112.

  192. 192

    Kouzarides T . Histone acetylases and deacetylases in cell proliferation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1999; 9: 40–48.

  193. 193

    Bito H, Deisseroth K, Tsien RW . CREB phosphorylation and dephosphorylation: a Ca2+- and stimulus duration-dependent switch for hippocampal gene expression. Cell 1996; 87: 1203–1214.

  194. 194

    Xing J, Ginty DD, Greenberg ME . Coupling of the RAS–MAPK-pathway to gene activation by RSK2, a growth factor-regulated CREB kinase. Science 1996; 273: 959–963.

  195. 195

    Matthews RP, Guthrie CR, Wailes LM, Zhao X, Means AR, McKnight GS . Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase types II and IV differentially regulate CREB-dependent gene expression. Mol Cell Biol 1994; 14: 6107–6116.

  196. 196

    De Groot R, Ballou LM, Sassone-Corsi P . Positive regulation of the cAMP-responsive activator CREM by the p70 S6 kinase: an alternative route to mitogen-induced gene expression. Cell 1994; 79: 81–91.

  197. 197

    Deak M, Clifton AD, Lucocq JM, Alessi DR . Mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase-1 (MSK1) is directly activated by MAPK and SAPK2/p38, and may mediate activation of CREB. EMBO J 1998; 17: 4426–4441.

  198. 198

    Impey S, Obrietan K, Wong ST, Poser S, Yano S, Wayman G et al. Cross talk between ERK and PKA is required for Ca2+ stimulation of CREB-dependent transcription and ERK nuclear translocation. Neuron 1998; 21: 869–883.

  199. 199

    Monaco L, Sassone-Corsi P . Cross-talk in signal transduction: Ras-dependent induction of cAMP-responsive transcriptional repressor ICER by nerve growth factor. Oncogene 1997; 15: 2493–2500.

  200. 200

    Böhm M, Moellmann G, Cheng E, Alvarez FM, Wagner S, Sassone-Corsi P et al. Identification of p90RSK as the probable CREB-Ser133 kinase in human melanocytes. Cell Growth Differ 1995; 6: 291–302.

  201. 201

    Lian JP, Huang R, Robinson D, Badwey JA . Activation of p90RSK and cAMP response element binding protein in stimulated neutrophils: novel effects of the pyridinyl imidazole SB 203580 on activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase cascade. J Immunol 1999; 163: 4527–4536.

  202. 202

    Wasylyk B, Hahn SL, Giovane A . The Ets family of transcription factors. Eur J Biochem 1993; 211: 7–18.

  203. 203

    Vananzoni MC, Robinson LR, Hodge DR, Kola I, Seth A . ETS1 and ETS2 in p53 regulatin: spatial separation of ETS binding sites (EBS) modulate protein: DNA interaction. Oncogene 1996; 12: 1199–1204.

  204. 204

    Liu SH, Ng SY . Serum response factor associated ETS proteins: ternary complex factors and PEA3-binding factor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1994; 201: 1406–1413.

  205. 205

    Lambert PE, Ludford-Menting MJ, Deacon NJ, Kola I, Doherty RR . The nfkb1 promoter is controlled by proteins of the Ets family. Mol Biol Cell 1997; 8: 313–323.

  206. 206

    Albanese C, Johnson J, Watanabe G, Eklund N, Vu D, Arnold A et al. Transforming p21ras mutants and c-Ets-2 activate the cyclin D1 promoter through distinguishable regions. J Biol Chem 1995; 270: 23589–23597.

  207. 207

    Tamir A, Howard J, Higgins RR, Li YJ, Berger L, Zacksenhaus E et al. Fil-1, an Ets-related transcription factor, regulates erythropoietin-induced erythroid proliferation and differentiation evidence for direct transcriptional repression of the Rb gene during differentiation. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19: 4452–4464.

  208. 208

    Beier F, Taylor AC, LuValle P . The Raf-1/MEK/ERK pathway regulates the expression of the p21Cip1/Waf1 gene in chondrocytes. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 30273–30279.

  209. 209

    Frampton J, Ramqvist T, Graf T . v-Myb of E26 leukemia virus up-regulates bcl-2 and suppress apoptosis in myeloid cells. Genes Dev 1996; 10: 2720–2731.

  210. 210

    Sevilla L, Aperlo C, Dulic V, Chambard JC, Boutonnet C, Pasquier O et al. The Ets2 transcription factor inhibits apoptosis induced by colony stimulating factor 1 deprivation of macrophages through a Bcl-xL-dependent mechanism. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19: 2624–2634.

  211. 211

    Li XR, Chong AS, Wu J, Roebuck KA, Kumar A, Parrillo JE et al. Transcriptional regulation of Fas gene expression by GA-binding protein and AP-1 in T cell antigen receptor.CD3 complex-stimulated T cells. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 35203–35210.

  212. 212

    Coles LS, Diamond P, Occhiodoro F, Vadas MA, Shannon MF . An ordered array of cold shock domain repressor elements across tumor necrosis factor-responsive elements of the granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor promoter. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 14482–14493.

  213. 213

    Nimer S, Zhang J, Avraham H, Miyazaki Y . Transcriptional regulation of interleukin-3 expression in megakaryocytes. Blood 1996; 88: 66–74.

  214. 214

    Maul RS, Zhang H, Reid JDT, Pedigo NG, Kaetzel DM . Identification of a cell type-specific enhancer in the distal 5′-region of the platelet-derived growth factor A-chain gene. J Biol Chem 1998; 273: 33239–33246.

  215. 215

    Mavrothalassitis G, Ghysdael J . Proteins of the ETS family with transcriptional receptor activity. Oncogene 2000; 19: 6524–6532.

  216. 216

    Yang B, Hauser CA, Henkel G, Colman MS, van Beveren C, Stacey KJ et al. Ras-mediated phosphorylation of a conserved threonine residue enhances the transactivation activities of c-Ets1 and c-Ets2. Mol Cell Biol 1996; 16: 538–547.

  217. 217

    Yang SH, Yates PR, Whitmarsh AJ, Davis RJ, Sharrocks AD . The Elk-1 ETS-domain transcription factor contains a mitogen-activated protein kinase targeting motif. Mol Cell Biol 1998; 18: 710–720.

  218. 218

    Yordy JS, Muise-Helmericks RC . Signal transduction and the Ets family of transcription factors. Oncogene 2000; 19: 6503–6513.

  219. 219

    Sgouras DN, Athanasiou MA, Beal Jr GJ, Fisher RJ, Blair DG, Mavrothalassitis GJ . ERF: an ETS domain protein with strong transcriptional repressor activity, can suppress ets-associated tumorigenesis and is regulated by phosphorylation during cell cycle and mitogenic stimulation. EMBO J 1995; 14: 4781–4793.

  220. 220

    Criqui-Filipe P, Ducret C, Maira SM, Wasylyk B . Net, a negative Ras-switchable TCF, contains a second inhibition domain, the CID, that mediates repression through interactions with CtBP and de-acetylation. EMBO J 1999; 18: 3392–3403.

  221. 221

    Giovane A, Pintzas A, Maira SM, Sobieszczuk P, Wasylyk B . Net, a new ets transcription factor that is activated by Ras. Genes Dev 1994; 8: 1502–1513.

  222. 222

    Le Gallic L, Sgouras D, Beal Jr G, Mavrothalassitis G . Transcriptional repressor ERF is a Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase target that regulates cellular proliferation. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19: 4121–4133.

  223. 223

    Sgambato V, Vanhoutte P, Pages C, Rogard M, Hipskind R, Besson MJ et al. In vivo expression and regulation of Elk-1, a target of the extracellular-regulated kinase signaling pathway, in the adult rat brain. J Neurosci 1998; 18: 214–226.

  224. 224

    Whitmarsh AJ, Shore P, Sharrocks AD, Davis RJ . Integration of MAP kinase signal transduction pathway at the serum response element. Science 1995; 269: 403–407.

  225. 225

    Hill CS, Marais R, John S, Wynne J, Dalton S, Treisman R . Functional analysis of a growth factor-responsive transcription factor complex. Cell 1993; 73: 395–406.

  226. 226

    Gille H, Sharrocks AD, Shaw PE . Phosphorylation of transcriptioin factor p62TCF by MAP kinase stimulates ternary complex formation at c-fos promoter. Nature 1992; 358: 414–417.

  227. 227

    Gille H, Kortenjann M, Thomae O, Moomaw C, Slaughter C, Cobb M et al. ERK phosphorylation potentiates Elk-1-mediated ternary complex formation and transactivation. EMBO J 1995; 14: 951–962.

  228. 228

    Price MA, Cruzalegui FH, Treisman R . The p38 and ERK MAP kinase pathways co-operate to activate ternary complex factors and c-fos transcription in response to activate ternary complex factors and c-fos transcription in response to UV light. EMBO J 1996; 15: 6552–6563.

  229. 229

    Meyer-Vehn T, Covacci A, Kist M, Pahl HL . Helicobacter pylori activates mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades and induces expression of the proto-oncogenes c-fos and c-jun. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 16064–16072.

  230. 230

    Premkumar DR, Adhikary G, Overholt JL, Simonson MS, Cherniack NS, Prabhakar NR . Intracellular pathways linking hypoxia to activation of c-fos and AP-1. Adv Exp Med Biol 2000; 475: 101–109.

  231. 231

    Ohtan N, Zebedee Z, Hout TJ, Stinson JA, Sugimoto M, Ohashi Y et al. Opposing effects of Ets and Id proteins on p16INK4a expression during cellular senescence. Nature 2001; 409: 1067–1070.

  232. 232

    Hu PP, Shen Z, Huang D, Liu Y, Counter C, Wang X . The MEK pathway is required for stimulation of p21WAF1/CIP1 by transforming growth factor-β. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 35381–35387.

  233. 233

    Funaoka K, Shinodoh M, Yoshida K, Hanzawa M, Hida K, Nishikata S et al. Activation of the p21Waf1/Cip1 promoter by the ets oncogene family transcription factor E1AF. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 1997; 236: 79–82.

  234. 234

    Lallemand D, Spyrou G, Yaniv M, Pfarr CM . Variations in Jun and Fos protein expression and AP-1 activity in cycling, resting and stimulated fibroblasts. Oncogene 1997; 14: 819–830.

  235. 235

    Chinenov Y, Kerppola TK . Close encounters of many kinds: Fos–Jun interactions that mediate transcription regulatory specificity. Oncogene 2001; 20: 2438–2452.

  236. 236

    Jochum W, Passegué E, Wagner EF . AP-1 in mouse development and tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2001; 20: 2401–2412.

  237. 237

    Passegué E, Wagner EF . JunB suppresses cell proliferation by transcriptional activation of p16INK4a expression. EMBO J 2000; 19: 2969–2979.

  238. 238

    Shaulian E, Karin M . AP-1 in cell proliferation and survival. Oncogene 2001; 20: 2390–2400.

  239. 239

    Bakiri L, Lallemand D, Bossy-Wetzel E, Yaniv M . Cell cycle-dependent variations in c-Jun and JunB phosphorylation: a role in the control of cyclin D1 expression. EMBO J 2000; 19: 2056–2068.

  240. 240

    Schreck R, Kistler B, Wirth T . In: Papavassiliou AG (ed). Transcription factors in Eukaryotes, Austin, TX: RG Landes, 1997, pp 153–188.

  241. 241

    Wisdom R, Johnson RS, Moore C . C-Jun regulates cell cycle progression and apoptosis by distinct mechanisms. EMBO J 1999; 18: 188–197.

  242. 242

    Kataoka K, Fujiwara KT, Noda M, Nishizawa M . MafB, a new Maf family transcription activator that can associate with Maf and Fos but not with Jun. Mol Cell Biol 1994; 14: 7581–7591.

  243. 243

    Kerppola TK, Curran T . Maf and Nrl can bind to AP-1 sites and form heterodimers with Fos and Jun. Oncogene 1994; 9: 675–684.

  244. 244

    Van Dam H, Castellazzi M . Distinct roles of Jun:Fos and Jun:ATF dimers in oncogenesis. Oncogene 2001; 20: 2453–2464.

  245. 245

    Mechta-Grigoriou F, Lallemand D, Pfarr CM, Yaniv M . Transformation by ras modifies AP1 composition and activity. Oncogene 1997; 14: 837–847.

  246. 246

    Behrens A, Sibilia M, Wagner EF . Amino-terminal phosphorylation of c-Jun regulates stress-induced apoptosis and cellular proliferation. Nat Genet 1999; 21: 326–329.

  247. 247

    Passegué E, Jochum W, Schorpp-Kistner M, Möhle-teinlein U, Wagner EF . Chronic myeloid leukemia with increased granulocyte progenitors in mice lacking junB expression in the myeloid lineage. Cell 2001; 104: 21–32.

  248. 248

    Pfarr CM, Mechta F, Spyrou G, Lallemand D, Carillo S, Yaniv M . Mouse JunD negatively regulates fibroblast growth and antagonizes transformation by ras. Cell 1994; 76: 747–760.

  249. 249

    Mechta-Grigoriou F, Gerald D, Yaniv M . The mammalian Jun proteins: redundancy and specificity. Oncogene 2001; 20: 2378–2389.

  250. 250

    Angel P, Hattori K, Smeal T, Karin M . The jun proto-oncogene is positively autoregulated by its product, Jun/AP-1. Cell 1988; 55: 875–885.

  251. 251

    Han TH, Prywes R . Regulatory role of MEF2D in serum induction of the c-jun promoter. Mol Cell Biol 1995; 15: 2907–2915.

  252. 252

    Chen J, Fujii K, Zhang L, Roberts T, Fu H . Raf-1 promotes cell survival by antagonizing apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 through a MEK-ERK independent mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 7783–7788.

  253. 253

    Boyle WJ, Smeal T, Defize LH, Angel P, Woodgett JR, Karin M et al. Activation of protein kinase C decreases phosphorylation of c-Jun at sites that negatively regulate its DNA-binding activity. Cell 1991; 64: 573–584.

  254. 254

    Lin A, Frost J, Deng T, Smeal T, al-Alawi N, Kikkawa U et al. Casein kinase II is a negative regulator of c-Jun DNA binding and AP-1 activity. Cell 1992; 70: 777–789.

  255. 255

    Vogt PK . Jun, the oncoprotein. Oncogene 2001; 20: 2365–2377.

  256. 256

    Weitzman JB . Quick guide, Jnk. Curr Biol 2000; 10: R290.