Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

High Dose Chemotherapy

Less frequent catheter dressing changes decrease local cutaneous toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy in children, without increasing the rate of catheter-related infections: results of a randomised trial

Abstract

Cutaneous lesions caused by catheter dressing changes can be serious and generate local pain in children undergoing high-dose chemotherapy followed by bone marrow transplantation. One hundred and thirteen children entered a randomised trial to compare two catheter dressing change frequencies (15 days vs 4 days). Skin toxicity was classified according to the following scale: grade 0: healthy skin, to grade 4: severe skin toxicity. A qualitative culture of the skin at the catheter entry site was taken whenever the dressing was changed. Of the 112 evaluable children (56 in each group) 32 developed grade 2 local skin toxicity (eight in the 15-day group and 24 in the 4-day group; P = 0.001). Although higher in the 4-day group, the proportions of children experiencing pain during and between dressing changes were not statistically different between the two groups. The proportion of patients with one or more positive skin culture(s) at the catheter entry site during hospitalisation were similar in the two groups (27% in the 15-day group and 23% in the 4-day group) as were the proportions of documented nosocomial bloodstream infections (11% and 13%; NS). Whereas the planned frequency was maintained in the 4-day group (mean = 4 days, s.d. = 1), it was usually shortened in the 15-day group (mean = 8 days, s.d. = 4), mainly because dressings had loosened. Decreasing the catheter dressing change frequency proved efficient in reducing cutaneous toxicity without increasing the risk of local and systemic infection. In our unit, catheter dressings are changed every 8 days since this analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maki DG, Ringer M . Evaluation of dressing regimens for prevention of infection with peripheral intravenous catheters. Gauze, transparent polyurethane dressing, and an iodophor-transparent dressing JAMA 1987 258: 2396 2403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Maki DG, Stolz S, Mermel L . A prospective, randomized trial of gauze and two polyurethane dressings for site care of pulmonary artery catheters: implications for catheter management Crit Care Med 1994 22: 1729 1737

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kalifa C, Hartmann O, Demeocq F et al. High-dose busulfan and thiotepa with autologous bone marrow transplantation in childhood malignant brain tumors: a phase II study Bone Marrow Transplant 1992 9: 227 233

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vassal G, Hartmann O, Habrand JL et al. Enhanced cutaneous radiation effects following high-dose busulfan therapy Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1989 23: 117 118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Avril M, Hartmann O, Valteau-Couanet D et al. Anti-infective prophylaxis with ceftazidine and teicoplanin in children undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation Ped Hematol Oncol 1994 11: 63 67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Snydman D, Gorbea HF, Pober BR et al. Predictive value of surveillance skin cultures in total-parenteral-nutrition-related infection Lancet 1982 2: 1385 1388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bjornson HS, Colley R, Bower RH et al. Association between microorganism growth at the catheter insertion site and the colonisation of the catheter in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition Surgery 1982 92: 720 727

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guidet B, Nicola I, Barakett V et al. Skin versus hub cultures to predict colonization and infection of central venous catheter in intensive care patients Infection 1994 22: 43 48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Casagrande JT, Pike MC, Smith PG . An improved approximate formula for calculating sample size for comparing two binomial distributions Biometrics 1978 34: 483 486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaplan EL, Meier P . Non parametric estimations from incomplete observations J Am Stat Assoc 1958 53: 457 481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rothman KJ . Estimation of confidence limits for the cumulative probability of survival in life table analysis J Chron Dis 1978 31: 557 560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Peto R, Peto J . Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures J R S Stat Soc A 1972 135: 185 207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Armitage P . Sequential Medical Trials Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford 1960

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goldmann DA, Pier GB . Pathogenesis of infections related to intravascular catheterization Clin Microbiol Rev 1993 6: 176 192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Keung YK, Watkins K, Chen SC et al. Increased incidence of central venous catheter-related infections in bone marrow transplant patients Am J Clin Oncol 1995 18: 469 474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nitenberg G, Antoun S, Escudier B, Leclercq B . Complications infectieuses liées aux abords veineux centraux. In: Nitenberg G, Cordonnier C (eds). Infections graves en Onco-hématologie Masson: Paris 1991: pp 59–73

    Google Scholar 

  17. Andrivet P, Bacquer A, Vu Ngoc C et al. Lack of clinical benefit from subcutaneous tunnel insertion central venous catheters in immunocompromised patients Clin Infect Dis 1994 18: 199 206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fleer A, Krediet T, Gerards L, Roord J . Catheter-related infections in pediatric patients In: Seifert H, Jansen B, Farr B (eds) Catheter-related Infections Marcel Dekker Inc: New York 1997 pp 387 410

    Google Scholar 

  19. Maki DG, Mermel LA . Infections due to infusion therapy In: Benett JE, Brachman PS (eds) Hospital Infections Little Brown and Company: Toronto 1998 pp 699 724

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pfaller MA, Herwaldt LA . Laboratory clinical and epidemiological aspects of coagulase-negative staphylococci Clin Microbial Rev 1988 1: 281 299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Engervall P, Ringertz S, Hagman E et al. Change of central venous catheter dressing twice a week is superior to once a week in patients with haematological malignancies J Hosp Inf 1995 29: 275 286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pearson ML . Guideline for prevention of intravascular device-related infections. Part I. Intravascular device-related infections: an overview. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee Am J Infect Control 1996 24: 262 277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pearson ML . Guideline for prevention of intravascular device-related infections. Part II. Recommendations for the prevention of nosocomial intravascular device-related infections. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee Am J Infect Control 1996 24: 277 293

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Lorna Saint-Ange for editing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benhamou, E., Fessard, E., Com-Nougué, C. et al. Less frequent catheter dressing changes decrease local cutaneous toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy in children, without increasing the rate of catheter-related infections: results of a randomised trial. Bone Marrow Transplant 29, 653–658 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703511

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703511

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links