Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Progenitor Cell Mobilisation

Kinetics of standardized large volume leukapheresis (LVL) in patients do not show a recruitment phenomenon of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC)

Abstract

Although several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of large volume leukapheresis (LVL) to yield high numbers of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC), the mechanisms of stem cell release into circulation and the postulated phenomenon of PBPC recruitment during apheresis have not been investigated in detail. Therefore, we analyzed the kinetics of stem cell enrichment in a total of 34 standardized LVL for patients with hematologic malignancies (lymphoma, multiple myeloma) and solid tumors (breast cancer, rhabdomyosarcoma). LVL was started 2 h after administration of G-CSF processing six times the patient's blood volume. Cells were sequentially collected into six bags and the numbers of leukocytes, mononuclear cells (MNC), CD34+ cells and colony-forming cells (CFU-GM) in each collection bag were analyzed. The numbers of PBPC collected demonstrated a continuous decrease starting after an early maximum during the second processed blood volume (P = 0.001). Interestingly, these kinetics of decreasing stem cell yields during LVL were similar for both entities of patients with hematologic malignancies as well as for both groups of patients with solid tumors. In summary, a recruitment phenomenon, defined as a time-dependent and LVL-induced increase of PBPC, could not be demonstrated in any of the diseases investigated. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2001) 28, 13–20.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Malachowski ME, Comenzo RL, Hillyer CD et al. Large-volume leukapheresis for peripheral blood stem cell collection in patients with hematologic malignancies Transfusion 1992 32: 732–735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Comenzo RL, Malachowski ME, Miller J et al. Engraftment with peripheral blood stem cells collected by large-volume leukapheresis for patients with lymphoma Transfusion 1992 32: 729–731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Passos-Coelho JR, Braine HG, Davis JM et al. Predictive factors for peripheral-blood-progenitor-cell collections using a single large-volume leukapheresis after cyclophosphamide and granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor mobilization J Clin Oncol 1995 13: 705–714

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smolowicz AG, Villman K, Tidefelt U . Large-volume apheresis for the harvest of peripheral blood progenitor cells for autologous transplantation Transfusion 1997 37: 188–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Desikan KR, Jagannath S, Siegel D et al. Collection of more hematopoietic progenitor cells with large volume leukapheresis in patients with multiple myeloma Leuk Lymphoma 1998 28: 501–508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Waller CF, Heinzinger M, Rosenstiel A, Lange W . Mobilization and transplantation of Philadelphia chromosome-negative peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with CML Br J Haematol 1998 103: 227–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hillyer CD, Tiegerman KO, Berkman EM . Increase incirculating colony-forming units-granulocyte–macrophage during large-volume leukapheresis: evaluation of a new cell separator Transfusion 1991 31: 327–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hillyer CD, Lackey DA, Hart KK et al. CD34+ progenitors and colony-forming units-granulocyte macrophage are recruited during large-volume leukapheresis and concentrated by counterflow elutriation Transfusion 1993 33: 316–321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kadar JG, Arseniev L, Schnitger K et al. Technical and safety aspects of blood and marrow transplantation using G-CSF mobilized family donors Transfus Sci 1996 17: 611–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alegre A, Diaz MA, Madero L et al. Large-volume leukapheresis for peripheral blood stem cell collection in children: a simplified single-apheresis approach Bone Marrow Transplant 1996 17: 923–927

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gorlin JB, Humphreys D, Kent P et al. Pediatric large-volume peripheral blood progenitor cell collections from patients under 25 kg: a primer J Clin Apheresis 1996 11: 195–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Diaz MA, Garcia-Sanchez F, Lillo R et al. Large-volume leukapheresis in pediatric patients: pre-apheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cell count predicts progenitor cell yield Haematologica 1999 84: 32–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Madero L, Villa M, Benito A et al. Peripheral blood progenitor cells for autologous transplant in children Bone Marrow Transplant 1998 21: (Suppl. 2) 8–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kanold J, Halle P, Berger M et al. Large-volume leukapheresis procedure for peripheral blood progenitor cell collection in children weighing 15 kg or less: efficacy and safety evaluation Med Pediatr Oncol 1999 32: 7–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Passos-Coelho JR, Braine HG, Wright SK et al. Large-volume leukapheresis using regional citrate anticoagulation to collect peripheral blood progenitor cells J Hematother 1995 4: 11–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cull G, Ivey J, Chase P et al. Collection and recruitment of CD34+ cells during large-volume leukapheresis J Hematother 1997 6: 309–314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smolowicz AG, Villman K, Berlin G, Tidefelt U . Kinetics of peripheral blood progenitor cell harvest during a single apheresis Transfusion 1999 39: 403–409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Boijko P, Stellberg C, Kudde C et al. Kinetic study of CD34+ cells during peripheral blood stem cell collections J ClinApheresis 1999 14: 18–25

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gorlin JB, Vamvakas EC, Cooke E et al. Large-volume leukapheresis in pediatric patients: processing more blood diminishes the apparent magnitude of intra-apheresis recruitment Transfusion 1996 36: 879–885

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamaguchi E, Yamato K, Miyata Y . Kinetics of peripheral blood stem cell collection in large-volume leukapheresis for pediatric patients undergoing chemotherapy and adult patients before chemotherapy J Hematother Stem Cell Res 2000 9: 565–572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kanz L, Brugger W . Mobilization and ex vivo manipulation of peripheral blood progenitor cells for support of high-dose cancer therapy In: Thomas ED, Blume KG, Forman SJ (eds) Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation 2nd edn Blackwell Science: Malden, MA 1999 pp 455–468

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kröger N, Zeller W, Hassan HAT et al. Stem cell mobilization with G-CSF alone in breast cancer patients: higher progenitor cell yield by delivering divided doses (2 × 5 μg/kg) compared to a single dose (1 × 10 μg/kg) Bone Marrow Transplant 1999 23: 125–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Reiser M, Josting A, Draube A et al. Successful peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with etoposide (VP16) in patients with relapsed or resistant lymphoma who failed cyclophosphamide mobilization Bone Marrow Transplant 1999 23: 1223–1228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tanaka H, Kaneko T . Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparisons between human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor purified from human bladder carcinoma cell line 5637 culture medium and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor produced in Escherichia coli J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1992 252: 439–444

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fischer J, Unkrig C, Ackermann M et al. Intra-day CD34+ cell counts depend on time to application and correlate with the resulting G-CSF plasma level after steady-state mobilization of PBPC by filgrastim Blood 1994 84: (Suppl. 1) 23a (Abstr. 81)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gillespie TW, Hillyer CD . Peripheral blood progenitor cells for marrow reconstitution: mobilization and collection strategies Transfusion 1996 36: 611–624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cassens U, Sibrowski W . Large-volume leukapheresis in pediatric patients Transfusion 1997 37: 671–672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gutensohn K, Serke S, Cassens U et al. Guidelines on flow cytometric analysis of CD34 expressing hematopoietic cells in blood and apheresis products. German Society of Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology (DGTI)/German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO) Infusionsther Transfusionsmed 1996 23: 1–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Eaves CJ, Eaves AC . Erythropoietin (Ep) dose response curves for three classes of erythroid progenitors in normal human marrow and in patients with polycythemia vera Blood 1978 52: 1196–1210

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rowley SD, Prather K, Bui KT et al. Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells with an automated leukapheresis system Transfusion 1999 39: 1200–1206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cassens U, Ostkamp-Ostermann P, van der Werf N et al. Volume-dependent collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells during large-volume leukapheresis for patients with solid tumours and haematological malignancies Transfus Med 1999 9: 311–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stroncek DF, Clay ME, Smith J et al. Comparison of two blood cell separators in collecting peripheral blood stem cell components Transfus Med 1997 7: 95–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hiruma K, Nakayama S, Okuyama Y . A comparative study of a new, fully automated procedure and the standard mononuclear cell program using the Cobe Spectra for peripheral blood stem cell collection Ther Apher 1998 2: 273–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ravagnani F, Siena S, De Reys S et al. Improved collection of mobilized CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells by a novel automated leukapheresis system Transfusion 1999 39: 48–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bolin RB, Stewart DA, Cheney BA et al. Granulocyte progenitor cell (CFUC) harvest by continuous apheresis in dogs. Effects of blood volume and lithium on yields Exp Hematol 1983 11: 226–230

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Comenzo RL, Michelle D, LeBlanc M et al. Mobilized CD34+ cells selected as autografts in patients with primary light-chain amyloidosis: rationale and application Transfusion 1998 38: 60–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Astrid Kraemer, Kordula Lippert and the nurses of the University Blood Donation Center for excellent technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cassens, U., Momkvist, P., Zuehlsdorf, M. et al. Kinetics of standardized large volume leukapheresis (LVL) in patients do not show a recruitment phenomenon of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). Bone Marrow Transplant 28, 13–20 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703082

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703082

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links