Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Accuracy of the Actiheart for the assessment of energy expenditure in adults

Abstract

Background/Objective:

The Actiheart (Mini Mitter, Sunriver, OR, USA) uses heart rate (HR) and activity data to predict activity energy expenditure (AEE). Currently, the Actiheart has only been tested during laboratory conditions. Therefore, the objective of this study was to validate the Actiheart prediction method against indirect calorimetry during a wide range of activities in a field setting.

Subjects/Methods:

Forty-eight participants (age: 35±11.4 years) were recruited for the study. Eighteen activities were split into three routines of six activities and each routine was performed by 20 participants. During each routine, the participants wore an Actiheart and simultaneously, AEE was measured with a Cosmed K4b2 portable metabolic system. The manufacturer's HR algorithm, activity algorithm, and combined activity and HR algorithm were used to estimate AEE.

Results:

The mean error (and 95% prediction intervals) for the combined activity and HR algorithm, HR algorithm, and activity algorithm versus the Cosmed K4b2 were 0.02 kJ kg−1 min−1 (−0.17, 0.22 kJ kg−1 min−1), −0.03 kJ kg−1 min−1 (−0.24, 0.18 kJ kg−1 min−1), and 0.14 kJ kg−1 min−1 (−0.12, 0.40 kJ kg−1 min−1), respectively.

Conclusion:

The Actiheart combined activity and HR algorithm and HR algorithm provide similar estimates of AEE on both a group and individual basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bassett Jr DR, Ainsworth BE, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O'Brien WL, King GA (2000). Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32, S471–S480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bland JM, Altman DG (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet North Am Ed 1, 307–310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brage S, Brage N, Franks PW, Ekelund U, Wareham NJ (2005). Reliability and validity of the combined heart rate and movement sensor Actiheart. Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 561–570.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brage S, Brage N, Franks PW, Ekelund U, Wong MY, Andersen LB et al. (2004). Branched equation modeling of simultaneous accelerometry and heart rate monitoring improves estimate of directly measured physical activity energy expenditure. J Appl Physiol 96, 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge Neurotechnology Ltd (2004). The Actiheart User Manual (v. 3.04). Cambridge Neurotechnology Ltd: Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.

  • Corder K, Brage S, Wareham NJ, Ekelund U (2005). Comparison of PAEE from combined and separate heart rate and movement models in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37, 1761–1767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouter SE, Churilla JR, Bassett Jr DR (2006a). Estimating energy expenditure using accelerometers. Eur J Appl Physiol 98, 601–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouter SE, Clowers KG, Bassett Jr DR (2006b). A novel method for using accelerometer data to predict energy expenditure. J Appl Physiol 100, 1324–1331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J (1998). Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. acclerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30, 777–781.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haskell WL, Yee MC, Evans A, Irby PJ (1993). Simultaneous measurement of heart rate and body motion to quantitate physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25, 109–115.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helmrich SP, Ragland DR, Leung RW, Paffenbarger Jr RS. (1991). Physical activity and reduced occurrence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 325, 147–152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hendelman D, Miller K, Baggett C, Debold E, Freedson P (2000). Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32, S442–S449.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klippel NJ, Heil DP (2003). Validation of energy expenditure prediction algorithms in adults using the Actical electronic activity monitor. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35, S284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee IM, Sesso HD, Oguma Y, Paffenbarger Jr RS. (2003). Relative intensity of physical activity and risk of coronary heart disease. Circulation 107, 1110–1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee I-M, Skerrett PJ (2001). Physical activity and all-cause mortality: what is the dose–response relation? Med Sci Sports Exerc 33, S459–S471.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luke A, Maki KC, Barkey N, Cooper R, McGee D (1997). Simultaneous monitoring of heart rate and motion to assess energy expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29, 144–148.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manson JE, Hu FB, Rich-Edwards JW, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC et al. (1999). A prospective study of walking as compared with vigorous exercise in the prevention of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med 341, 650–658.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mini Mitter Company Inc (2004). Actiheart Instruction Manual. Mini Mitter Company, Inc.: Bend, OR.

  • Montoye HJ, Kemper HCG, Saris WHM, Washburn RA (1996). Measuring Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure. Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon JK, Butte NF (1996). Combined heart rate and activity improve estimates of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production rates. J Appl Physiol 81, 1754–1761.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morris JN, Clayton DG, Everitt MG, Semmence AM, Burgess EH (1990). Exercise in leisure time: coronary attack and death rates. Br Heart J 63, 325–334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols JF, Morgan CG, Chabot LE, Sallis JF, Calfas KJ (2000). Assessment of physical activity with the Computer Science and Applications, Inc., accelerometer: laboratory versus field validation. Res Q Exerc Sport 71, 36–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paffenbarger RSJ, Hyde RT, Wing AL, Hsieh CC (1986). Physical activity, all-cause mortality, and longevity of college alumni. N Engl J Med 314, 605–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paffenbarger RSJ, Wing AL, Hyde RT (1978). Physical activity as an index of heart attack risk in college alumni. Am J Epidemiol 108, 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie K, Rowsell T, Jebb SA, Holburn D, Wareham NJ (2000). A combined heart rate and movement sensor: proof of concept and preliminary testing study. Eur J Clin Nutr 54, 409–414.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strath SJ, Bassett Jr DR, Swartz AM, Thompson DL (2001). Simultaneous heart rate-motion sensor technique to estimate energy expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33, 2118–2123.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strath SJ, Bassett Jr DR, Thompson DL, Swartz AM (2002). Validity of the simultaneous heart rate-motion sensor technique for measuring energy expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34, 888–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strath SJ, Brage S, Ekelund U (2005). Integration of physiological and accelerometer data to improve physical activity assessment. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37, S563–S571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swartz AM, Strath SJ, Bassett Jr DR, O'Brien WL, King GA, Ainsworth BE (2000). Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32, S450–S456.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson D, Batterham AM, Bock S, Robson C, Stokes K (2006). Assessment of low-to-moderate intensity physical activity thermogenesis in young adults using synchronized heart rate and accelerometry with branched-equation modeling. J Nutr 136, 1037–1042.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welk GJ, Blair SN, Wood K, Jones S, Thompson RW (2000). A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32, S489–S497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Cary Springer (UTK Statistical Consulting Services) for assisting with the statistical analyses. Mini Mitter loaned the Actiheart equipment for the duration of the study, but no financial support was provided by the company. This research was supported by the Charlie and Mai Coffey Endowment in Exercise Science. All authors were involved in planning and carrying out the subject testing. Data analysis and the first draft of the manuscript were the primary responsibility of SEC. All authors were closely involved in revisions and final approval. None of the authors had a personal or financial conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S E Crouter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crouter, S., Churilla, J. & Bassett, D. Accuracy of the Actiheart for the assessment of energy expenditure in adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 62, 704–711 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602766

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602766

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links