Abstract
The Cochrane Collaboration helps people make well-informed decisions about health care by preparing, maintaining and promoting the accessibility of systematic reviews of the effects of healthcare interventions. In all, 51 Cochrane Review Groups are responsible for preparing and maintaining the reviews. Most of these Review Groups are problem-based. However, there are a number of areas or dimensions of health care, such as the setting of care (eg primary care) or the type of patient/consumer (eg older persons), that cannot be usefully conceptualised as ‘health problems’. In order to reflect the interests of these dimensions, or ‘fields’, of health care more effectively, the Cochrane Collaboration created another type of entity: Cochrane Fields or Networks. The core functions of these Fields are described.
It is proposed that a new Cochrane Subfield for Diet and Nutrition should be set up to attract a cadre of new reviewers in order to ensure the proper representation of diet and nutrition expertise in the relevant Collaborative Review Groups. The methodological pitfalls of the use of nonrandomised studies will be a key issue for the new Subfield, since the focus of the Cochrane Collaboration's programme of searching databases, journals and conference proceedings has been on the identification of reports of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Some of these sources will be need to be searched again for non-RCT studies. The financial considerations of establishing of a Cochrane Subfield for Diet and Nutrition are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bush V (1945): As we may think. Atlantic Monthly, July.
Cochrane AL (1979): 1931–1971: a critical review, with particular reference to the medical profession. In Medicines for the Year 2000: A Symposium held at the Royal College of Physicians, eds G Teeling-Smith & N Wells, pp 1–11. London: Office of Health Economics.
Prevention and risk research in the UK (2004): Report of the NCRI Strategic Planning Group on Prevention and Risk. London: National Cancer Research Institute.
The Cochrane Collaboration (2005): The Cochrane Manual Issue 1 (updated 17 November 2004).http://www.cochrane.org/admin/manual.htm.
UICC (2004): Evidence-based cancer prevention strategies for NGOs International Union against Cancer (UICC).
Acknowledgements
We express our appreciation to Dr Rob Scholten (Co-Director of the Dutch Cochrane Centre) for his support for this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lodge, M., Becker, L., van Binsbergen, J. et al. Organisation of a proposed Cochrane Diet and Nutrition Field. Eur J Clin Nutr 59 (Suppl 1), S162–S166 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602191
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602191
This article is cited by
-
The Cochrane Library: more systematic reviews on nutrition needed
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2005)