Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:

Distinct roles for p53 transactivation and repression in preventing UCN-01-mediated abrogation of DNA damage-induced arrest at S and G2 cell cycle checkpoints

Abstract

The topoisomerase I inhibitor SN38 arrests cell cycle progression primarily in S or G2 phases of the cell cycle in a p53-independent manner. The Chk1 inhibitor, 7-hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01), overcomes both S and G2 arrest preferentially in cells mutated for p53, driving cells through a lethal mitosis and thereby enhancing cytotoxicity. The mechanism by which p53 maintains S and G2 arrest was investigated here. The p53 wild-type MCF10A cells were arrested in S phase by incubation with SN38 for 24 h. Subsequent incubation with UCN-01 failed to abrogate arrest. To examine the impact of p53, MCF10A cells were developed, which express the tetramerization domain of p53 to inhibit endogenous p53 function. These cells were attenuated in SN38-mediated induction of p21WAF1 and UCN-01 induced S, but not G2 progression. In contrast, MCF10A cells expressing short hairpin RNA to ablate p53 expression underwent both S and G2 phase progression with UCN-01. The difference in G2 progression was attributed to p53-mediated gene repression; the MCF10A cells expressing the tetramerization domain retained p53 protein and repressed both cyclin B and Chk1, while cells ablated for p53 did not repress these proteins. Hence, inhibition of p53 activator function permits S phase abrogation, while additional inhibition of p53 repressor function is required for abrogation of G2 arrest. These studies provide a mechanistic explanation for how this therapeutic strategy can selectively target tumor cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banin S, Moyal L, Shieh S, Taya Y, Anderson CW, Chessa L, Smorodinsky NI, Prives C, Reiss Y, Shiloh Y and Ziv Y . (1998). Science, 281, 1674–1677.

  • Bunch RT and Eastman A . (1996). Clin. Cancer Res., 2, 791–797.

  • Canman CE, Lim D-S, Cimprich KA, Taya Y, Tamai K, Sakaguchi K, Appella E, Kastan MB and Siliciano JD . (1998). Science, 281, 1677–1679.

  • Curtin JC, Dragnev KH, Sekula D, Christie AJ, Dmitrovsky E and Spinella MJ . (2001). Oncogene, 20, 2559–2569.

  • Damia G, Sanchez Y, Erba E and Broggini M . (2001). J. Biol. Chem., 276, 10641–10645.

  • Demarcq C, Bunch RT, Creswell D and Eastman A . (1994). Cell Growth Differ., 5, 983–993.

  • Falck J, Mailand N, Syljuasen RG, Bartek J and Lukas J . (2001). Nature, 410, 842–847.

  • Fan S, Smith ML, Rivet DJ, Duba D, Zhan Q, Kohn KW, Fornace AJ and O'Connor PM . (1995). Cancer Res., 55, 1649–1654.

  • Flatt PM, Tang LJ, Scatena CD, Szak ST and Pietenpol JA . (2000). Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 4210–4223.

  • Gorczyca W, Sarode V, Juan G, Melamed MR and Darzynkiewicz Z . (1997). Mod. Pathol., 10, 457–462.

  • Haupt Y, Maya R, Kazaz A and Oren M . (1997). Nature, 387, 296–299.

  • Hengstschlager M, Braun K, Soucek T, Miloloza A and Hengstschlager-Ottnad E . (1999). Mutat. Res., 436, 1–9.

  • Hirao A, Kong Y-Y, Matsuoka S, Wakeham A, Ruland J, Yoshida H, Liu D, Elledge SJ and Mak TW . (2000). Science, 287, 1824–1827.

  • Hirose Y, Berger MS and Pieper RO . (2001). Cancer Res., 61, 5843–5849.

  • Ho J and Benchimol S . (2003). Cell Death Differ., 10, 404–408.

  • Husain A, Yan X-J, Rosales N, Aghajanian C, Schwartz GK and Spriggs DR . (1997). Clin. Cancer Res., 3, 2089–2097.

  • Johnson RA, Ince TA and Scotto KW . (2001). J. Biol. Chem., 276, 27716–27720.

  • Kitaura H, Shinshi M, Uchikoshi Y, Ono T, Tsurimoto T, Yoshikawa H, Iguchi-ariga SMM and Ariga H . (2000). J. Biol. Chem., 275, 10477–10483.

  • Kohn EA, Ruth ND, Brown MK, Livingstone M and Eastman A . (2002). J. Biol. Chem., 277, 26553–26564.

  • Kohn EA, Yoo CJ and Eastman A . (2003). Cancer Res., 63, 31–35.

  • Kubbutat MH, Jones SN and Vousden KH . (1997). Nature, 387, 299–303.

  • Lau CC and Pardee AB . (1982). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 79, 2942–2946.

  • Mailand N, Falck J, Lukas C, Syljuasen RG, Welcher M, Bartek J and Lukas J . (2000). Science, 288, 1425–1429.

  • Manni I, Mazzaro G, Gurtner A, Mantovani R, Haugwitz U, Krause K, Engeland K, Sacchi A, Soddu S and Piaggio G . (2001). J. Biol. Chem., 276, 5570–5576.

  • Matsuoka S, Huang M and Elledge SJ . (1998). Science, 282, 1893–1897.

  • Matsuoka S, Rotman G, Ogawa A, Shiloh Y, Tamai K and Elledge SJ . (2000). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 10389–10394.

  • Ossovskaya VS, Mazo IA, Chernov MV, Strezoska Z, Kondratov R, Stark GR, Chumakov PM and Gudkov AV . (1996). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 10309–10314.

  • Park M, Chae H-D, Yun J, Jung M, Kim Y-S, Kim S-H, Han MH and Shin DY . (2000). Cancer Res., 60, 542–545.

  • Powell SN, DeFrank JS, Connell P, Eogan M, Preffer F, Dombkowski D, Tang W and Friend S . (1995). Cancer Res., 55, 1643–1648.

  • Russell KJ, Wiens LW, Demers GW, Galloway DA, Plon SE and Groudine M . (1995). Cancer Res., 55, 1639–1642.

  • Sagata N . (2002). Science, 298, 1905–1907.

  • Santoni-rugiu E, Falck J, Mailand N, Bartek J and Lukas J . (2000). Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 3497–3509.

  • Schlegel R and Pardee AB . (1986). Science, 232, 1264–1266.

  • Schwarz JK, Lovly CM and Piwnica-Worms H . (2003). Mol. Cancer Res., 1, 598–609.

  • Shao R-G, Cao C-X, Shimizu T, O'Connor PM, Kohn KW and Pommier Y . (1997). Cancer Res., 57, 4029–4035.

  • Shieh S-Y, Ahn J, Tamai K, Taya Y and Prives C . (2000). Genes Dev., 14, 289–300.

  • Vigo E, Muller H, Prosperini E, Hateboer G, Cartwright P, Moroni MC and Helin K . (1999). Mol. Cell. Biol., 19, 6379–6395.

  • Wang Q, Fan S, Eastman A, Worland PJ, Sausville EA and O'Connor PM . (1996). J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 88, 956–965.

  • Xiong Y, Hannon GJ, Zhang H, Casso D, Kobayashi R and Beach D . (1993). Nature, 366, 701–704.

  • Zeng Y, Forbes KC, Wu Z, Moreno S, Piwnica-Worms H and Enoch T . (1998). Nature, 395, 507–510.

  • Zhao H and Piwnica-Worms H . (2001). Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 4129–4139.

  • Zhao H, Watkins JL and Piwnica-Worms H . (2002). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 14795–14800.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Mark Livingstone, Cell Signaling, for consultation and early access to many of the phospho-specific antibodies used. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant CA82220 and a Cancer Center Support Grant CA23108 to the Norris Cotton Cancer Center. AAL was supported by a National Institutes of Health training Grant T3209658. EAK was supported by a fellowship from the Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levesque, A., Kohn, E., Bresnick, E. et al. Distinct roles for p53 transactivation and repression in preventing UCN-01-mediated abrogation of DNA damage-induced arrest at S and G2 cell cycle checkpoints. Oncogene 24, 3786–3796 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208451

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208451

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links