Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:

An extended bipartite nuclear localization signal in Smad4 is required for its nuclear import and transcriptional activity

Oncogene volume 22, pages 1057–1069 (2003)Cite this article

Abstract

Smad proteins are a class of tumor suppressors that play critical roles in inhibiting the proliferation of a variety of cell types by modulating the transcriptions of target genes. Despite recent advances, the mechanism of their nuclear import is not completely understood. Smad proteins contain a conserved basic motif in their N-terminal MH1 domains that resembles a nuclear localization signal (NLS). Previous studies indicate that in receptor-regulated Smads such as Smad1 and Smad3 this motif determines their interactions with nuclear import receptors and mediates their ligand-induced nuclear translocation. Common-Smads such as Smad4 display constant nucleocytoplasmic shuttling and are capable of autonomous nuclear import and export. Mutations of the basic motif in Smad4 disrupted its nuclear accumulation. However, this motif is not sufficient to confer nuclear translocation to a fused heterologous protein, suggesting that it is only part of the bona fide Smad4 NLS. We mapped the Smad4 NLS by fusing various segments of Smad4 sequence covering the basic motif to GFP and tested the localization of the fusion proteins. We identified an extended NLS, starting from the basic motif and extending into the DNA-binding region (AA 45–110), that is sufficient to confer nuclear localization to GFP. Among the 14 basic residues in the NLS, only four (K45, K46, K48 and R81) are critical for import. This NLS is critical not only for autonomous nuclear import of Smad4, but also for its nuclear translocation in the presence of activated R-Smads, further confirming the functional relevance of the Smad4 NLS in TGF-β signal transduction. Structural modeling demonstrated that the four critical basic residues are all solvent exposed and map to a single localized segment on one surface of the Smad4 MH1 domain. Their distribution and spacing resemble a classical bipartite NLS. Smad4 displays specific binding to importin α through its MH1 domain, which was abrogated by loss-of-function mutations in Smad4 NLS. Finally, the Smad4 NLS is essential for its transcriptional activity since loss-of-function NLS mutants are also transcriptionally inactive.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • de Caestecker MP, Yahata T, Wang D, Parks WT, Huang S, Hill CS, Shioda T, Roberts AB and Lechleider RJ . (2000). J. Biol. Chem., 275, 2115–2122.

  • Conti E, Uy M, Leighton L, Blobel G and Kuriyan J . (1998). Cell, 94, 193–204.

  • Gorlich D and Mattaj IW . (1996). Science, 271, 1513–1518.

  • Hanyu A, Ishidou Y, Ebisawa T, Shimanuki T, Imamura T and Miyazono K . (2001). J. Cell Biol., 155, 1017–1027.

  • Jones JB and Kern SE . (2000). Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 2363–2368.

  • Kobe B . (1999). Nat. Struct. Biol., 6, 388–397.

  • Kurisaki A, Kose S, Yoneda Y, Heldin CH and Moustakas A . (2001). Mol. Biol. Cell., 12, 1079–1091.

  • Liu F, Pouponnot C and Massague J . (1997). Genes Dev. 11, 3157–3167.

  • Massague J and Wotton D . (2000). EMBO J., 19, 1745–1754.

  • Moren A, Itoh S, Moustakas A, Dijke P and Heldin CH . (2000). Oncogene, 19, 4396–4404.

  • Nicols A, Sharkp KA and Honig B . (1991). Proteins, 11, 140–163.

  • Pierreux CE, Nicolas FJ and Hill CS . (2000). Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 9041–9054.

  • Sali A and Blundell T . (1993). J. Mol. Biol., 234, 779–815.

  • Sekimoto T, Imamoto N, Nakajima K, Hirano T and Yoneda Y . (1997). EMBO J., 16, 7067–7077.

  • Shi Y, Wang YF, Jayaraman L, Yang H, Massague J and Pavletich NP . (1998). Cell, 94, 585–594.

  • Watanabe MN, Masuyama M, Fukuda K and Nishida E . (2000). EMBO Rep., 1, 176–182.

  • Wu RY, Zhang Y, Feng XH and Derynck R . (1997). Mol. Cell Biol., 17, 2521–2528.

  • Xiao Z, Liu X, Henis YI and Lodish HF . (2000a). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 7853–7858.

  • Xiao Z, Liu X and Lodish HF . (2000b). J. Biol. Chem., 275, 23425–23428.

  • Xu J and Attisano L . (2000). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 4820–4825.

  • Ying X and Dong X . (2000). Proteins: Struct. Function Genet., 40, 343–354.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Lodish group for stimulating discussions. We thank Dr M Yoshida (The University of Tokyo, Japan) for providing Leptomycin B (LMB). This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant CA63260 to HFL and by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Damon Runyon – Walter Winchell Cancer Research Foundation to ZX.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Nine Cambridge Center, Cambridge, 02142, MA, USA

    Zhan Xiao, Robert Latek & Harvey F Lodish

  2. Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 02139, MA, USA

    Harvey F Lodish

Authors
  1. Zhan Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Latek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Harvey F Lodish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harvey F Lodish.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xiao, Z., Latek, R. & Lodish, H. An extended bipartite nuclear localization signal in Smad4 is required for its nuclear import and transcriptional activity. Oncogene 22, 1057–1069 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1206212

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1206212

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links