Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Janus faces of the white coat effect: blood pressure not only rises, it may also fall

Journal of Human Hypertension volume 16, pages 725–728 (2002)Cite this article

Abstract

For reliable control of hypertension, it is essential to know the prevalence of the white coat effect (WCE), which is defined as either a difference of 10 mmHg or more in systolic blood pressure (BP) and/or a difference of 5 mmHg or more in diastolic BP measured by a general practitioner (GP), a nurse, or the patient him/herself. The objective was to assess the WCE in hypertensive patients visiting GPs in primary healthcare centres. A blinded, randomised study in six primary healthcare centres was conducted, where eight GPs, nine nurses and 210 patients (92 men and 118 women) on a hypertension control regimen participated. Heart rate and BP in GPs', nurses' and self-service rooms were measured twice using a sphygmomanometer and an automatic device. Altogether, 148 patients (70%) performed the self-measurements of BP and heart rate perfectly successfully in all the three rooms. These were included in the final analyses. One out of three patients (33%) showed a marked alerting WCE in the GP's room (systolic BP rose by at least 10 mmHg and/or diastolic BP by at least 5 mmHg). On the contrary, one out of 10 (10%) showed a marked relaxing WCE in the GP's room (systolic BP decreased by at least 10 mmHg and/or diastolic BP by at least 5 mmHg). It can be concluded that the WCE in general practice has two faces: an alerting reaction and a relaxing reaction. This should be taken into account in hypertension control.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mancia G et al. Effects of blood-pressure measurement by the doctor on patients' blood pressure and heart rate Lancet 1983 2: 695–698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mancia G et al. Alerting reaction and rise in blood pressure during measurement by physician and nurse Hypertension 1987 9: 209–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mancia G, Zanchetti A . Editors' corner: White-coat hypertension: misnomers, misconceptions and misunderstandings. What should we do next? J Hypertens 1996 14: 1049–1052

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. La Batide-Alanore A et al. Comparison of nurse- and physician-determined clinic blood pressure levels in patients referred to hypertension clinic: implications for subsequent management J Hypertens 1999 18: 391–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Enström I, Pennert K, Lindholm LH . Difference in blood pressure, but not in heart rate, between measurements performed at a health centre and at a hospital by one and the same physician J Hum Hypertens 2000 14: 355–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. WHO/ISH Guidelines Sub-Committee. 1993 Guideline Sub-Committee. 1993 Guideline for the management of mild hypertension: memorandum from World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension Meeting Highlights of 1993 Guidelines J Hypertens 1993 11: 905–918

  7. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, Thomas M . Evaluation of three devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the revised British Hypertension Society Protocol: the Omron HEM-705CP, Philips HP5332 and Nissei DS-175 Blood Press Monit 1996 1: 55–61

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Millar J, Accioly J . Measurement of blood pressure may be affected by an interaction between subject and observer based on gender J Hum Hypertens 1996 10: 449–453

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health and General Practice, Kuopio University, Finland

    E Kumpusalo, A Teho & J Takala

  2. General Practice, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland

    E Kumpusalo

  3. A&R Medics, Pihtipudas, Finland

    R Laitila

Authors
  1. E Kumpusalo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A Teho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R Laitila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J Takala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E Kumpusalo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumpusalo, E., Teho, A., Laitila, R. et al. Janus faces of the white coat effect: blood pressure not only rises, it may also fall. J Hum Hypertens 16, 725–728 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001475

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001475

Keywords

Search

Advanced search

Quick links