Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Do siblings of myocardial infarction patients have a specific management of hypertension?

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether the management of hypertension differs between siblings of myocardial infarction patients and the general population. Siblings aged 35 to 74 years, unaffected by myocardial infarction, were drawn from the Augsburg Family Heart Study, conducted in 1996–1997 in southern Germany (n = 524). The reference group consisted of participants of the third MONICA population-based survey conducted in 1994–1995 in the same area, who were aged 35 to 74 years and also unaffected by myocardial infarction (n = 3802). Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension (defined by blood pressure 140/90 mm Hg or use of antihypertensive medication) were compared between the two groups. The result was that the prevalence of hypertension was higher in the siblings (men: age-adjusted OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 0.99–1.75; women: age-adjusted OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.39–2.41). Male hypertensive siblings were more often aware and treated for hypertension than male hypertensives of the reference group whereas the level of awareness and treatment was comparable between female hypertensives of the two groups. In both genders, no difference in the degree of control was shown between hypertensives of the two groups. In conclusion the siblings and their physicians should pay more attention to the family history of myocardial infarction in order to improve the management of hypertension in this high risk group.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Snowden CB et al. Predicting coronary heart disease in siblings – a multivariate assessment – The Framingham Heart Study Am J Epidemiol 1982 115: 217–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Roncaglioni MC et al. Role of family history inpatients with myocardial infarction. An Italian case-control study. GISSI-EFRIM Investigators Circulation 1992 85: 2065–2072

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eaton CB et al. Family history and premature coronary heart disease J Am Board Fam Pract 1996 9: 312–318

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pohjola-Sintonen S, Rissanen A, Liskola P, Luomanmaki K . Family history as a risk factor of coronary heart disease inpatients under 60 years of age Eur Heart J 1998 19: 235–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Keil U et al. Classical risk factors and their impact on incident non-fatal and fatal myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality in southern Germany. Results from the MONICA Augsburg cohort study 1984–1992 Eur Heart J 1998 19: 1197–1207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Van den Hoogen PCW et al for the Seven Countries Study Research Group. The relation between blood pressure and mortality due to coronary heart disease among men in different parts of the world N Engl J Med 2000 342: 1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hense HW et al. Ten-year trends of cardiovascular risk factors in the MONICA Augsburg region in Southern Germany – Results from the 1984/1985, 1989/1990, and 1994/1995 surveys CVD Prevention 1998 1: 318–327

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gasse C et al. Population trends in antihypertensive drug use: results from the MONICA Augsburg project 1984 to 1995 J Clin Epidemiol 1999 52: 695–703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization–International Society of Hypertension. Guidelines for the management of hypertension J Hypertens 1999 17: 151–183

  10. WHO MONICA Project Principal Investigators. The World Health Organization MONICA Project (Monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease): a major international collaboration J Clin Epidemiol 1988 41: 105–114

  11. Löwel H, Lewis M, Hörmann A, Keil U . Case finding, data quality aspects and comparability of myocardial infarction registers: results of a south German register study J Clin Epidemiol 1991 44: 249–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. The Expert Committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Report of the Expert Committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus Diabetes Care 1998 21 (Suppl 1): S5–S19

  13. Peters AL, Davidson MB, Schriger DL, Hasselblad V for the meta-analysis research group on the diagnosis of diabetes using glycated hemoglobin levels. A clinical approach for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. An analysis using glycosylated hemoglobin levels JAMA 1996 276: 1246–1252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Keil U et al. The relation of alcohol intake to coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality in a beer-drinking population Epidemiology 1997 8: 150–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Becker DM et al. Risk factors in siblings of people with premature coronary heart disease J Am Coll Cardiol 1988 12: 1273–1280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yanek LR et al. Hypertension among siblings of persons with premature coronary heart disease Hypertension 1999 32: 123–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Becker DM et al. Markedly high prevalence of coronary risk factors in apparently healthy African-American and white siblings of persons with premature coronary heart disease Am J Cardiol 1998 82: 1046–1051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brenn T, Njolstad I . Coronary heart disease risk factors in subjects whose brothers, sisters or husbands developed premature myocardial infarction during 12 years of follow-up. The Finnmark Study (1977–1989) J Cardiovasc Risk 1998 5: 325–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Benetos A . Pulse pressure and cardiovascular risk J Hypertens 1999 17 (Suppl 5): S21–S24

    Google Scholar 

  20. Franklin SS et al. Is pulse pressure useful in predicting risk for coronary heart disease? The Framingham Heart Study Circulation 1999 100: 354–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Higgins M . Epidemiology and prevention of coronary heart disease in families Am J Med 2000 108: 387–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Swanson JR, Pearson TA . Screening family members at high risk for coronary disease Why isn't it done? Am J Prev Med 2001 20: 50–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG-FKZ:HO 1073/8-1) and the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF-FKZ: 01ER9502/0). We thank Anita Schuler and the KORA-team of the examination centre as well as the laboratory team of the central hospital for their technical support, Dr Margit Heier for the realisation of the medication database, Birgit Filipiak and Dr Annette Peters for their statistical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M-H Metzger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Metzger, MH., Engel, S., Hengstenberg, C. et al. Do siblings of myocardial infarction patients have a specific management of hypertension?. J Hum Hypertens 16, 67–74 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001296

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001296

Keywords

Search

Quick links