Abstract
In a prospective randomised cross-over study, we compared the effects of ACE inhibitor temocapril and calcium channel blocker (CCB) amlodipine on ambulatory blood pressure in 59 asymptomatic elderly hypertensive patients (mean age 69 years). This study was performed in a cross-over fashion after a 2-week placebo period and 4 to 8 weeks each of treatment with temocapril and amlodipine. Of those 59 hypertensive patients, three patients with side effects and 10 patients whose office BPs did not achieve the target BPs were excluded, and the remaining 46 were analysed in this study: they consisted of 30 dippers, with a night time reduction in systolic BP (SBP) ⩾10% and 16 non-dippers, with reduction by <10%. At the baseline, there were no significant differences in the office, 24-h or daytime BPs between the two groups (dippers and non-dippers). Though the office BPs and daytime BPs were successfully controlled to the same levels with both treatments and in both dipping groups, the antihypertensive effects were stronger with the CCB than with the ACE inhibitor in the night time and morning, especially in non-dippers. We conclude that even though office BPs were controlled successfully to almost the same levels, there is a possibility that these long-acting drugs have differential antihypertensive effects on night time and morning BPs among hypertensive patients with different night time BP dipping statuses.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
O’Brien E, Sheridan J, O’ Malley K Dippers and non-dippers (letter) Lancet 1988 2 397
Kario K et alRelationships between nocturnal fall of blood pressure and silent cerebro-vascular damage in elderly hypertensives: advanced silent cerebrovascular damage in extreme-dippers Hypertension 1996 27 130–135
Shimada K et alDiurnal blood pressure variations and silent cerebrovascular damage in elderlypatients with hypertension J Hypertens 1992 10 875–878
Verdecchia P et alAmbulatory blood pressure: an independent predictor of prognosis in essential hypertension Hypertension 1994 24 793–801
Bianchi S et alDiurnal variations of blood pressure and microalbuminuria in essential hypertension Am J Hypertens 1994 7 23–29
Staessen JA et alPredicting cardiovascular risk using conventional vs ambulatory blood pressure in olderpatients with systolic hypertension JAMA 1999 282 539–546
Lorimer AR et alDifference between amlodipine and lisinopril in control of clinic and twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure J Hum Hypertens 1998 12 411–416
Imai Y et alThe accuracy and performance of the A&D TM2421, a new ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device based on the cuff-oscillometric method and the korotkoff sound technique Am J Hypertens 1992 5 719–726
Devereux RB et alEchocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings Am J Cardiol 1986 57 450–458
Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure (JNC VI) Arch Intern Med 1997 157 2413–2446
Canter DA, Texter MJ, McLain RW Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring can play an integral role inpatient selection, dosage adjustment and efficacy assessment in clinical trials of antihypertensive agents J Hypertens 1994 12 491–494
Litter WA, West JW Twenty-four hour action of ACE inhibitors J Hum Hypertens 1990 4 (Suppl 4) 13–16
Sierakowski B et alComparison of temocapril and atenolol in the long-term treatment if mild to moderate essential hypertension Blood Press 1997 6 229–234
Kario K, Shimada K Differential effects of amlodipine on ambulatory blood pressure in elderly hypertensivepatients with different nocturnal reductions in blood pressure Am J Hypertens 1997 10 261–268
Tatti P et alOutcome results of the Fosinopril versus Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Randomized Trial (FACET) inpatients with hypertension and NIDDM Diabetes Care 1998 21 597–603
Estacio RO et alThe effect of nisoldipine as compared with enalapril on cardiovascular outcome inpatients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes and hypertension N Engl J Med 1998 338 645–652
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eguchi, K., Kario, K. & Shimada, K. Effects of long-acting ACE inhibitor (temocapril) and long-acting Ca channel blocker (amlodipine) on 24-h ambulatory BP in elderly hypertensive patients. J Hum Hypertens 15, 643–648 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001252
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001252