Abstract
Objective: To examine prospectively the effects of antihypertensive therapy on office blood pressure (BP) and home BP, in a large-scale hypertensive population followed by their general practitioners.Patients: A total of 760 hypertensive patients either never treated or after a 2-week washout period, aged 18–75 years, with a diastolic office BP between 95 and 110 mm Hg and a systolic office BP below 180 mm Hg.Methods: Patients measured their BP at home using an automated printer-equipped oscillometric device (OMRON-HEM 705 CP) twice daily for 8 days before the visit to their general practitioner who recorded three office BP. These measurements were performed before and after 8 weeks of antihypertensive therapy with sustained-release diltiazem 300 mg once daily.Results: Diltiazem reduced systolic and diastolic office BP and home BP and heart rate (P < 0.01). systolic and diastolic office bp were higher than home bp before (P < 0.01) but not during treatment. correlation coefficients between the two methods before and during therapy were 0.6 and 0.7 for systolic bp and 0.4 and 0.6 for diastolic bp (P < 0.01). both methods did not agree equally throughout the range of bp: home bp was higher than office bp for high values and lower for low values.Conclusion: The results show that BP measured at home by patients can be higher than office BP in the highest range of BP.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leeman, M., Lins, R., Sternon, J. et al. Effect of antihypertensive treatment on office and self-measured blood pressure: The Autodil Study. J Hum Hypertens 14, 525–529 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001068
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001068