Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

The impact of physician vs automated blood pressure readings on office-induced hypertension

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) readings in the doctor’s office are frequently higher than home or ambulatory values. This study examines the role of the physician in the aetiology of the ‘white coat’ effect, by comparing standard readings taken by the family physician of 27 treated hypertensive patients with readings taken by an automated BP recording device, with the patient alone in the examining room during the same office visit. The physician and automated readings were each compared to the mean awake ambulatory BP. Mean (± s.e.m.) routine office BP (mm Hg) recorded by the patient’s physician (155 ± 4/80 ± 2) was similar to the mean value obtained using the automated BP recording device (157 ± 3/83 ± 2). The mean awake ambulatory BP was 145 ± 3/78 ± 2 with the systolic value lower (P < 0.05) than either the physician or automated reading. self-measurement of bp by the patient in the office setting does not reduce the magnitude of the white coat effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Myers, M., Meglis, G. & Polemidiotis, G. The impact of physician vs automated blood pressure readings on office-induced hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 11, 491–493 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1000483

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1000483

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links