Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Genetic and environmental influences on body fat and blood pressure in African-American adult twins

Abstract

Objective:

African Americans have a particularly high prevalence of excessive body fat and high blood pressure. Genetic and environmental influences may be implicated for both of these risk factors. We investigated the potential for common genetic and environmental influences on body fat (waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI)) and blood pressure measures (systolic and diastolic pressure (SBP, DBP)) among African-American male and female subjects.

Research methods and procedures:

Measurements were taken as part of the Carolina African-American Twin Study of Aging (CAATSA). The CAATSA sample contains 217 same-sex African-American male and female twins with average age of 47 years. This analysis included 39 monozygotic male pairs (MZ), 43 dizygotic male pairs (DZ); 63 MZ female pairs, and 72 DZ female pairs. Maximum likelihood quantitative genetic analyses were used.

Results:

The total genetic variance for SBP was 22% in male subjects and 40.1% in female subjects. Of this total variance, 3.1% was in common with BMI in male subjects and 6% was in common with BMI in female subjects. After controlling for the effects of BMI, WC had less than 1% of its variance in common with SBP in male and female subjects. For DBP, the total genetic variance was 16.9% in male and 38.7% in female subjects. Of this total variance 6.1% was in common with BMI in male subjects and 3.7% was in common in female subjects. Again, WC had less than 1% of its genetic variance in common with DBP in both male and female subjects. The environmental variance common among these measures was also very small. The remaining variance was primarily accounted for by genetic and environmental effects unique to each measure as well as age.

Discussion:

Based on the very small common genetic variance for BMI, SBP, and DBP as well as WC and the blood pressure measures, our results suggest that searching for common genes among these measures may be inconclusive.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Heart Association. Risk factors and coronary heart disease: AHA scientific position. In: http://www.americanheart.org/Heart_and_Stroke_A_Z_Guide/riskfact.html 2004.

  2. American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics – 2004 Update. American Heart Association: Dallas, TX., 2003.

  3. Mokdad A, Bowman BA, Ford ES, Vinicor F, Marks JS, Koplan JP . The continuing epidemics of obesity and diabetes in the US. JAMA 2001; 286: 1195–1200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuczmarski R . Increasing prevalence of overweight among US adults: The national health and nutrition examination surveys, 1960–1991. 1994; 272: 205–211.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Despres J, Lemieux S, Lamarche B . The insulin resistance-dyslipidemic syndrome: contribution of visceral obesity and therapeutic implications. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1995; 19: s76–s86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kissebah A, Krawkower G . Regional adipose tissue and morbidity. Physio Rev 1994; 74: 761–811.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bouchard C, Savard R, Despres JP, Tremblay A, Theriault G . Inheritance of the amount and distribution of human body fat. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1988; 12: 205–215.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stunkard A, Harris JR, Pedersen NL, McClearn GE . The body-mass index of twins who have been reared apart. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1483–1487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bray GA, Bouchard C, James WPT (eds). Handbook of Obesity. Marcel Dekker: New York, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bjorntorp P, Rosmond R . The metabolic syndrome—a neuroendocrine disorder? Br J Nutr 2000; 83 (Suppl 1): S49–S57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bouchard C, Rice T, Lemieux S, Despres J, Perusse L, Rao D . Major gene for abdominal visceral fat area in the Quebec Family Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1996; 20: 420–427.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nelson TL, Vogler GP, Pedersen NL, Miles TP . Genetic and environmental influences on waist-to-hip ratio and waist circumference in an older Swedish twin population. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999; 23: 449–455.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson N . Racial differences in stress-induced cardiovascular reactivity and hypertension: current status and substantive issues. Psychol Bull 1989; 105: 89–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dressler W . Hypertension in the African American community: social, cultural, and psychological factors. Semin Nephrol 1996; 16: 71–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grim C, Luft FC, Weinberger MH, Miller JZ, Rose RJ, Christian JC . Genetic, familial and racial influences on blood pressure control systems in man. Aust NZ J Med 1984; 14: 453–457.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cui J, Hopper JL, Harrap SB . Genes and family environment expalin correlations between blood pressure and body mass index. Hypertension 2002; 40: 7–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schieken R, Mosteller M, Goble MM, Moskowitz WB, Hewitt JK, Eaves LJ et al. Multivariate genetic analysis of blood pressure and body size. The Medical College of Virginia Twin Study. Circulation 1992; 86: 1780–1788.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Livshtis G, Gerber LM . Familial factors of blood pressure and adiposity covariation. Hypertension 2001; 37: 928–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Allison DB, Heshka S, Neale MC, Tishler PV, Heymsfield SB . Genetic, environmental, and phenotypic links between body mass index and blood pressure among women. Am J Med Genet 1995; 55: 335–341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vinck W, Vlietinck R, Fagard RH . The contribution of genes, environment and of body mass to blood pressure variance in young adult males. J Hum Hypertens 1999; 13: 191–197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Snieder H, Harshfield GA, Treiber FA . Heritability of blood pressure and hemodynamics in African- and European – American Youth. Hypertension 2003; 41: 1196–1201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Blair D, Habicht JP, Sims EA, Sylwester D, Abraham S . Evidence for an increased risk for hypertension with centrally located body fat and the effect of race and sex on this risk. Am J Epidemiol 1984; 119: 526–540.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Landsberg L . Obesity and hypertension: experimental data. J Hypertens 1992; 10: s195–s201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Whitfield K, Brandon DT, Wiggins SA, Vogler G, McClearn G . Does intact pair status matter in the study of African American twins? The Carolina African American Twin Study of Aging. Exp Aging Res 2003; 29: 407–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nichols R, Bilbro Jr WC . The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genet Stat Med 1966; 16: 265–275.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Arbuckle J, Wothke W . Amos 4.0 User's Guide. Smallwaters Corp: Chicago, IL, 1995–1999.

    Google Scholar 

  27. WHO. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. WHO Division of Noncommunicable Diseases: Geneva, 1998.

  28. Choh A, Gage TB, McGarvey ST, Comuzzie AG . Genetic and environmental correlations between various anthropometric and blood pressure traits among adult Samoans. Am J Phys Anthropol 2001; 115: 304–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bhattacharyya S, Luan J, Challis B, Schmitz C, Clarkson P, Franks PW et al. Association of polymorphisms in GRP10, the gene encoding the prolactin-releasing peptide receptor with blood pressure, but not obesity, in a UK Caucasian population. Diabetes 2003; 52: 1296–1299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Thomas G, Tomlinson B, Critchley J . Modulation of blood pressure and obesity with the dopamine D2 receptor gene TaqI polymorphism. Hypertension 2000; 36: 177–182.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ji Q, Ikegami H, Fujisawa T, Kawabata Y, Ono M, Nishino M et al. A common polymorphism of uncoupling protein 2 gene is associated with hypertension. J Hypertens 2004; 22: 97–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rodriguez-Esparragon F, Rodriguez-Perez JC, Macias-Reyes A, Alamo-Santana F . Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma2-pro12Ala and endothelial nitric oxide synthase-4a/bgene polymorphisms are associated with essential hypertension. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1649–1655.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Damcott C, Moffett SP, Feingold E, Barmada MM, Marshal JA, Hamman RF et al. Genetic variation in fatty acid-binding protein-4 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma interactively influence insulin sensitivity and body composition in males. Metabolism 2004; 53: 303–309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Nelson TL, Vogler GP, Pedersen NL, Hong Y, Miles TP . Genetic and environmental influences on body fat distribution, fasting insulin levels and CVD: are the influences shared? Twin Res 2000; 3: 43–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hong Y, Pedersen NL, Brismar K, de Faire U . Genetic and environmental architecture of the features of the insulin-resistance syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 1997; 60: 143–152.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Poch E, Giner V, Gonzalez-Nunez D, Coll E, Oriola J, de la Sierra A . Association of the G protein beta3 subunit T allele with insulin resistance in essential hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens 2002; 24: 345–353.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rocchini A . Obesity and blood pressure. In: Bray G, Bouchard C, James WPT (eds). Handbook of Obesity. Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, 1998. pp 677–695.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Livshits G, Pantsulaia I, Gerber LM . Association of leptin levels with obesity and blood pressure: possible common genetic variation. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2005; 29: 85–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Khoury MJ, Beaty TH, Cohen BH (eds). Genetic approaches to familial aggregation: analysis of heritability. Fundamentals of Genetic Epidemiology. Oxford University Press, Inc.: New York, 1993. pp 200–232.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rice T, Province M, Perusse L, Bouchard C, Rao DC . Cross-trait familial resemblance for body fat and blood pressure familial correlations in the Quebec Family Study. Am J Hum Genet 1994; 55: 1019–1029.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The CAATSA (Carolina African-American Twin Study of Aging) is funded by a grant from the National Institute on Aging (grant #1RO1-AG13662-01A2) to KEWT. Nelson is funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease (grant #1 K01 DK064647-01). Special thanks to Coren Burton, Kimya Jackson, Letyana Love, Kim Newsome, and Mattie Richmond for their assistance in data collection and Jovan Adams, Shaista Khan, Sherice Laud-Hammond, Adebola Odunlami, and Tirzah Spencer who assisted in the data entry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T L Nelson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nelson, T., Brandon, D., Wiggins, S. et al. Genetic and environmental influences on body fat and blood pressure in African-American adult twins. Int J Obes 30, 243–250 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803121

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803121

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links