Abstract
Bacteriophages operate via pathogen-specific mechanisms of action distinct from conventional, broad-spectrum antibiotics and are emerging as promising alternative antimicrobials. However, phage-mediated killing is often limited by bacterial resistance development. Here, we engineer phages for target-specific effector gene delivery and host-dependent production of colicin-like bacteriocins and cell wall hydrolases. Using urinary tract infection (UTI) as a model, we show how heterologous effector phage therapeutics (HEPTs) suppress resistance and improve uropathogen killing by dual phage- and effector-mediated targeting. Moreover, we designed HEPTs to control polymicrobial uropathogen communities through production of effectors with cross-genus activity. Using phage-based companion diagnostics, we identified potential HEPT responder patients and treated their urine ex vivo. Compared to wildtype phage, a colicin E7-producing HEPT demonstrated superior control of patient E. coli bacteriuria. Arming phages with heterologous effectors paves the way for successful UTI treatment and represents a versatile tool to enhance and adapt phage-based precision antimicrobials.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Currently, conventional, small-molecule antibiotics with broad target specificity are the most effective treatments against bacterial infections. However, the global emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR)1, as well as adverse effects caused by antibiotic-induced microbiome dysbiosis, highlight the need for novel and more pathogen-specific antimicrobial interventions2,3. Bacteriophages (phages), bacteriocins, synthetic antimicrobial peptides, and target-specific cell wall hydrolases (e.g., phage-derived endolysins) are currently being developed as precision antimicrobials4. Among these, phages are highly promising because of their ubiquity, pathogen specificity, and ability to self-replicate5,6. Although the killing of host bacteria by phages is largely independent of the host drug-resistance profile, treatment with phages often fails to inactivate all bacterial cells within a target population. This can be due to phage tolerance7 or resistance mechanisms that bacteria employ to counteract viral predation, including the production of extracellular matrices, mutation or reduced expression of phage receptors, adaptive CRISPR-Cas immunity, restriction/modification systems, abortive infection systems, and a growing number of other resistance mechanisms described in the literature8,9.
Recent advances in CRISPR-Cas technology and synthetic biology have enabled the rapid modification of phage genomes beyond model phages (such as T4, T7, or lambda) to include therapeutic phage candidates that are typically less well-studied10. As a result, engineering has been applied (i) to adapt phage tropism through directed receptor binding protein modification11,12,13,14, (ii) to construct sequence-specific antimicrobials through phage-mediated, pathogen-specific delivery of programmed CRISPR-Cas modules15,16,17, (iii) to deliver toxic proteins as genetic payloads18, (iv) to develop rapid phage-based (companion) diagnostics through the delivery of reporter genes (reporter phages)10,19,20, and (v) to optimize therapeutic phages for experimental therapy21,22.
In this study, we demonstrate how diverse phages can be engineered to encode bacteriocins and cell wall hydrolases as antimicrobial effector genes, a concept we coin heterologous effector phage therapeutics (HEPTs). Here, effector genes are expressed during infection and their products released upon host cell lysis to function as secondary pathogen-specific antimicrobials, thereby complementing and enhancing phage-mediated killing.
Results and discussion
As a model system, we focused on developing HEPTs as precision antimicrobials against UTI pathogens (concept: Fig. 1a). UTIs are among the most common community-acquired and healthcare-associated microbial infections in all age groups and a major public health concern, resulting in annual healthcare costs exceeding 2.8 billion dollars in the US alone23,24. While the most prevalent causative agent of UTIs is Escherichia coli, the microbial etiology is complex and can involve a wide range of Gram-negative or Gram-positive bacteria and certain fungi25. An analysis of 339 isolates acquired from 227 incidents of UTI during 2020 in Zurich, Switzerland (the Zurich Uropathogen Collection; Supplementary Fig. 1)20 identified 25 different bacterial species, with E. coli (34%), Enterococcus faecalis (18%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (14%) as the most prevalent uropathogens, which is consistent with previous etiological studies on UTIs25.
Guided by these observations, we engineered HEPTs using five distinct and strictly lytic phages that target the predominant uropathogens E. coli (phages E2 and CM001), E. faecalis (phages EfS3 and EfS7), and K. pneumoniae (phage K1). These phages represent various phylogenetic families with distinct virion morphologies and genome sizes20 (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Table 1). To target Gram-negative uropathogens, we selected four colicin-like bacteriocins (CLBs) as effectors, which are active against either E. coli (colicins E6, M, and E7; green) or K. pneumoniae (klebicin M; purple). CLBs are protein toxins with narrow-spectrum activity, characterized by a distinct, three-domain architecture that mediates receptor binding (central domain), Ton- or Tol-dependent translocation (N-terminal domain), and periplasmic or intracellular toxicity (C-terminal domain)26. The cytotoxicity of CLBs that were selected for HEPT engineering is mediated by periplasmic peptidoglycan biosynthesis inhibition (colicin M, klebicin M), intracellular 16s rRNase activity (colicin E6), or unspecific cytosolic nuclease activity (colicin E7)26,27. To target the Gram-positive uropathogen E. faecalis, we employed a phage-derived, chimeric cell wall-hydrolase (EC300; blue) that recognizes and degrades E. faecalis cell walls with high specificity28. EC300 was engineered by fusing an M23 endopeptidase domain from a virion-associated lysin with a cell wall binding domain of an E. faecalis phage endolysin28.
All effector genes were codon-optimized to match scaffold target species specificity29 and integrated within the phage structural gene cassette alongside a strong ribosomal binding site to guide late promoter-driven expression (see Fig. 1c–f). Overall, 14 HEPTs were constructed using five distinct phage scaffolds carrying one of five different payload genes. Engineered HEPT candidates were constructed either using CRISPR-Cas9-assisted engineering10,20 or by rebooting synthetic genomes in suitable surrogate hosts30. To avoid toxicity and fitness costs during phage production, CLB-encoding HEPTs were engineered and amplified in the presence of their respective bacteriocin immunity proteins, which were constitutively expressed from an independent plasmid. The production of active effector protein upon engineered phage infection was demonstrated by spot assays using crude wildtype (WT) phage or HEPT lysates on a selection of clinical target strains (Fig. 1d–f). To ensure that phage activity does not interfere with these assays, we tested lysates from engineered phages encoding effectors with cross-genus activity. All effectors were produced and active against a broad range of urine-derived isolates of the respective target species20 with variable levels of antibacterial activity depending on the phage scaffold, which is most likely due to differences in protein expression level and/or the lysate preparation. The activity profiles of all cross-genus HEPTs against different uropathogenic bacterial isolates can be found in Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Data 1. The klebicin M and EC300 encoding HEPTs targeted up to 54% and 92% of tested isolates, respectively. Among the three colicins, colicin E7 presented the broadest range of activity with HEPT EfS3::colE7 active against 70% of the 56 urological E. coli isolates tested.
Polymicrobial infections are commonly observed within the urinary tract, particularly during catheter-associated UTIs31, which may complicate therapeutic phage selection, combination, and treatment. Interestingly, analysis of the Zurich Uropathogen Collection20 revealed 35% of UTI cases (80/227) as polymicrobial, with E. faecalis identified as a common co-infector associated with polymicrobial UTIs involving E. coli (39%) and K. pneumoniae (26%) (Supplementary Fig. 1c). We therefore assessed the ability of HEPTs to deliver effectors with cross-genus activity to target polymicrobial communities composed of different combinations of clinical isolates through enzymatic collateral damage (cross-targeting HEPTs, Fig. 2a). All cross-targeting HEPTs that were tested in co-culture infection experiments are shown in Fig. 2b. Using turbidity reduction and time kill assays combined with differential plating, we demonstrate the ability of HEPTs EfS3::colE7 and EfS7::colE7 to infect and kill E. faecalis cells (P, producer) while simultaneously eradicating co-cultured E. coli (R, recipient) within two hours of treatment through in situ release of colicin E7 effectors (Fig. 2c, d). Similarly, we demonstrate that the klebicin M-producing HEPTs EfS3::kvarM and Efs7::kvarM can successfully control co-cultures of E. faecalis (P) and K. pneumoniae (R) (Fig. 2e, f), suggesting that CLB effectors provide a viable strategy for cross-genus targeting. Furthermore, since the protective peptidoglycan layer of Gram-positive pathogens such as E. faecalis is externally accessible, cell wall hydrolases are also promising enzyme antibiotics (enzybiotics32) for cross-genus HEPT engineering. As shown in Fig. 2g, h, we demonstrate the ability of an EC300-producing HEPT based on E. coli phage CM001 (CM001::ec300) to target E. faecalis in co-culture, resulting in approximately 4-log reduction in E. faecalis cell count after six hours of treatment for a co-culture of E. coli Ec20 (P) and E. faecalis Ef12 (R) (Fig. 2h). Nevertheless, regrowth of resistant bacteria was consistently observed over extended periods, with some rebounded to saturation in as short as 10 h, underscoring the need for additional measures to combat resistance (Fig. 2c–h).
Regardless of the importance of polymicrobial infections, most UTIs are caused by a single uropathogen, with E. coli and K. pneumoniae as predominant agents25. Infection of monocultures with WT phages typically leads to substantial initial host killing, as can be observed in turbidity reduction assays. However, within hours of infection, stable or transient phage resistance frequently occurs, leading to regrowth of phage resistant populations. To demonstrate this well-known limitation for phage treatment, we infected urine-derived E. coli (Ec20 and Ec41) or K. pneumoniae (Kp18, Kp28, and Kp37) isolates with WT phages E2 or K1, respectively. As expected, regrowth was observed within <18 h and a second round of infection demonstrated that these cells no longer responded to phage challenge, with both transient and stable phage resistance identified for individual clones isolated after the second round of infection (Supplementary Fig. 2).
To circumvent this limitation, HEPTs were engineered to target resistant subpopulations through phage-mediated delivery of CLBs that provide an orthogonal killing mechanism against the same target species (self-targeting HEPTs, Fig. 3a). To this end, we constructed HEPTs E2::colE7 and K1::kvarM (Fig. 3b) to treat E. coli or Klebsiella monocultures and compared performance to their WT phage counterparts. Depending on the target isolate, E2 WT treatment led to rapid (E. coli Ec20) or delayed (E. coli Ec41) regrowth due to the expansion of tolerant or resistant subpopulations, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 2a, b). Strikingly, treatment with E2::colE7 led to a sustained (18 h) reduction in optical density and dramatic reduction of E. coli cell counts (>6-log reduction as compared to E2 WT at 18 h post infection) (Fig. 3c). Similar results were obtained for the self-targeting HEPT K1::kvarM, which strongly reduced Klebsiella cell counts at 10 h post-infection (p.i.) and delayed the regrowth of Klebsiella cells when measured at 18 h p.i. (Fig. 3d).
In experimental phage therapy, polymicrobial infections would typically require simultaneous application of multiple phages targeting each infecting bacterial species (i.e., a phage cocktail)33. To test this approach in the context of UTI, we assessed the antimicrobial activity of wildtype and HEPT cocktails for the control of E. coli/K. pneumoniae co-cultures in synthetic urine (Fig. 3e, f). Using a combination of two self-targeting HEPTs (E2::colE7 and K1::kvarM), we were able to demonstrate a strongly enhanced killing of both E. coli and K. pneumoniae in co-culture (Fig. 3e). In addition, akin to the use of dual self-targeting HEPTs, the combination of two cross-targeting HEPTs (E2::kvarM and K1::colE7) led to a comparable improvement of E. coli and Klebsiella killing in co-culture as well (Fig. 3f). Notably, in both cases, while E. coli Ec41 exhibited moderate sensitivity toward phage-mediated killing, K. pneumoniae Kp37 was highly resistant to treatment when targeted by phage alone, potentially due to its encapsulation and biofilm formation capacity (grey and green boxes). However, the emergence of bacterial resistance and consequent resurgence in cell growth was effectively mitigated by imposing secondary damage from co-released Klebsiella-targeting effectors (purple and red boxes). Combinations of two HEPTs outperformed cocktails containing one HEPT and one wildtype phage and the presence of any colicin E7-producing HEPT led to complete eradication of E. coli. This data suggest that each bacterial species can be leveraged as an effector-producing host, even if it might not be the pathogenic agent of the polymicrobial UTI. Overall, HEPTs provide an effective, localized, and two-pronged attack to target bacteria and prevent or delay their regrowth through in situ production of self- or cross-targeting effectors.
In the future, phage-based precision antimicrobials will likely be designed and implemented as personalized treatment options. Therefore, a rapid and reliable companion diagnostic would be helpful to guide phage selection and/or predict therapeutic success20,34,35. To assess the performance of self-targeting HEPTs against E. coli in patient urine, we combined our recently developed reporter phage-based diagnostic20 with ex vivo urine treatment using HEPT E2::colE7 (workflow: Fig. 4a). To this end, 39 fresh and untreated patient urine samples from the Balgrist University Hospital (Zürich, Switzerland) were collected and immediately subjected to reporter phage-based E. coli identification and phage susceptibility screening using a nanoluciferase-encoding reporter phage E2 (E2::nluc)20. Reporter phage-induced bioluminescence was quantified within 5 h as an indicator of successful phage genome delivery and expression. Concurrently, the presence of E. coli in individual urine specimens was screened and confirmed using differential plating. Eight out of thirty-nine urine samples were culture-positive for E. coli, seven of which were detected by E2::nluc (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 3a, urinalysis).
To assess the advantage of heterologous effector delivery, all E2::nluc-responsive urine samples were subjected to HEPT (E2::colE7) or WT phage treatment, with E. coli killing quantified over 24 h using time kill assays (Fig. 4c, ex vivo). In addition, patient-derived E. coli strains were isolated and tested for phage and colicin E7 susceptibility, with phage susceptibility defined as the ability to form plaques (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 3b). Specimen #5 was excluded due to the presence of >107 CFU/mL K. pneumoniae (detected only after 16 h plating on differential agar). The remaining six patient isolates could be classified into three categories based on their susceptibility profiles: (I) phage- and colicin-sensitive, (II) phage-resistant but colicin-sensitive, and (III) phage-sensitive but colicin-resistant. Compared to E2 WT, improved E. coli killing by E2::colE7 was observed for both ex vivo treatments of urine containing phage- and colicin-sensitive E. coli (specimens #7 and #30), which was subsequently confirmed in vitro using turbidity reduction assays performed in SHU (Fig. 4c, in vitro). For urine containing phage-resistant but colicin-sensitive E. coli (specimens #12 and #16), a slight enhancement of activity was observed during ex vivo HEPT treatment; however, no improvement could be validated during in vitro turbidity reduction analysis. This was attributed to incomplete infectivity of phage E2 towards specimens #12 and #16, as observed by a lack of plaque formation (Supplementary Fig. 3b). As expected, due to a lack of colicin sensitivity for specimens #21 and #32, no difference in activity was observed between E2 WT and E2::colE7 for urine containing only phage-sensitive E. coli. Overall, the ex vivo study demonstrated enhanced HEPT-mediated killing of E. coli in fresh patient urine, provided that the isolate is susceptible to both phage and effector, i.e., colicin E7. To further evaluate the potential benefit of E2::colE7, we compared it’s performance versus E2 WT using an additional eleven E. coli isolates from the Zurich Uropathogen collection20 and a model UTI strain (MVAST0072) with different phage and colicin susceptibility profiles (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 3d). HEPT vs. WT phage activity was assessed using turbidity reduction assays in synthetic urine, followed by endpoint plating (Supplementary Fig. 4). In accordance with the ex vivo urine treatment results presented in Fig. 4, while prominent enhancement in HEPT-mediated killing was observed with all phage- and effector-sensitive isolates, the absence of colicin E7 susceptibility rendered E2::colE7 comparable to its wildtype counterpart. For future implementation of HEPTs and other phage-based therapeutics, careful and rapid screening of relevant susceptibility profiles, e.g., using reporter phage companion diagnostics, may become an essential component to support their therapeutic precision.
In conclusion, we present HEPTs as precision antimicrobials that combine the inherent, pathogen-specific killing activity of bacteriophages with in situ production and release of secondary antimicrobial effectors. This localized, two-pronged approach enhances the antimicrobial activity of phages, is capable of suppressing outgrowth of phage resistant subpopulations, and can be harnessed to provide cross-genus control of bacterial pathogens using a single HEPT or HEPT cocktails. Compared to wildtype phage cocktails, recombinant effector proteins, or a combinatorial treatment involving both as separate components, HEPTs offer several advantages from developmental, therapeutic, and translational perspectives. Firstly, owing to the simplicity of our engineering pipelines and the inherent genomic plasticity of phages, a single phage scaffold can be easily engineered to carry different, and potentially multiple, effector genes, generating HEPTs capable of delivering an assortment of therapeutic effects. In addition to antimicrobial enhancement, HEPTs could also be equipped with other payload classes, e.g., immune modulators or biofilm-dispersing enzymes, to further benefit bacterial clearance and patient outcomes. Secondly, as HEPT amplification and concomitant payload release are reliant on phage infection of the target bacteria, the activity from released effectors is limited to sites of bacterial infection, which ensures for optimal temporal and spatial effector activity with minimal off-target effects. Thirdly, assisted by their genetically encoded secondary antimicrobials, HEPT(s) can achieve the desired therapeutic effects using a minimal number of phage constituents, largely reducing the effort, cost, and complexity associated with phage manufacturing, formulation, and administration. For UTI treatment, previously established intravesical instillation protocols can be adopted to deliver HEPT(s) directly to the site of infection while minimizing microbiome disturbances and the risk of systemic side effects36. Furthermore, the growing availability of phage scaffolds and effector libraries, coupled with advances in genome editing, functional screening, and analytical techniques, offer exciting possibilities for the establishment of a design-build-test-learn platform to rapidly customize HEPTs toward individual patient’s needs. This personalized treatment approach, along with reporter phage-based companion diagnostics, holds great promise for improving antimicrobial therapy not only for UTIs but also for other infectious diseases.
Methods
Compliance with ethical regulations
Our research complies with all relevant ethical regulations. All patients who provided urine samples (as outlined in Fig. 4) gave a general written informed consent, in line with the local ethics committee (Kantonale Ethikkommission Zurich, Switzerland), agreeing for further use of health-related personal data and biological material for research purposes. The study was performed in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki37 and conformed with the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Guidelines (E6) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO, 14,155).
Bacterial strains and culture conditions
E. coli BL21 (New England Biolabs), E. coli Ec2020, K. pneumoniae KpGe38, E. faecalis JH2-2, and E. faecalis Ef5720 were used as phage propagation and engineering hosts. E. coli XL1-Blue MRF’ (Stratagene) was used as a cloning host for plasmid construction. Clinical strains used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Data 1, which includes isolates taken from the Zurich Uropathogen Collection; a library of 663 patient isolates identified from urine specimens of patients from the Department of Neuro-Urology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland, acquired between January and December 2020 and provided after routine testing by the Institute of Medical Microbiology (IMM), University of Zurich20. Gram-negative bacteria were grown at 37 °C in Lysogeny Broth (LB) or Synthetic Human Urine (SHU39). Gram-positive bacteria were cultivated at 37 °C in BHI-fc broth (37 g/L Brain-Heart-Infusion broth from Biolife Italiana, 4 g/L glycine, 3.2 mM L-cysteine HCl, 50 mM Tris, 5 ng/mL choline chloride) under microaerophilic conditions.
Phage propagation and purification
Phages were propagated on their respective propagation hosts using the soft-agar-overlay method as described previously20. To avoid toxicity, colicin-encoding HEPTs E2::colE7, K1::colE7, and K1::colE6 were propagated in the presence of their immunity plasmids, pIm_immE7 and pIm_immE6, respectively (Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Data 2). In brief, after overnight incubation, phage particles were extracted using 5 ml SM buffer per plate (50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 8 mM MgSO4) and filter-sterilized (0.2 µm) to obtain crude phage lysates (used for effector susceptibility testing as described below). Phage lysates were further purified and concentrated by PEG precipitation (7% PEG 8000 and 1 M NaCl) followed by cesium chloride isopycnic centrifugation and finally dialyzed against a 1000-fold excess of SM buffer.
Bacterial genome sequencing
Bacterial strains used for in vitro HEPT assessment were sequenced and typed (provided in Supplementary Data 1). Bacterial gDNA was extracted using a GenElute™ Bacterial Genomic DNA Kit (NA2120, Merck, USA) and Illumina sequenced (2 × 150 bp) by Eurofins Genomics Europe Sequencing GmbH (Constance, Germany). Contigs were de novo assembled using the CLC Genomics Workbench version 20 (QIAGEN Bioinformatics) with default settings and subsequently assessed using the multi locus sequence typing (MLST) and SeroTypeFinder services provided by the Center for Genomic Epidemiology at the Technical University of Denmark (www.genomicepidemiology.org/).
Phage genome sequencing
E. coli phage CM001 was isolated from a mixture of wastewaters collected in Switzerland using E. coli Ec20 as a host, purified using three sequential rounds of the soft-agar-overlay method, and further propagated as described above. Genomic DNA was extracted from purified phage particles using the phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) extraction method. Purified DNA was Illumina sequenced (2 × 150 bp) by Eurofins Genomics Europe Sequencing GmbH (Constance, Germany). A single contig was obtained by de novo assembly using the CLC Genomics Workbench version 20 (QIAGEN Bioinformatics) with default settings. Coding DNA sequence (CDS) identification and annotation was performed using the RAST server40, with tRNAscan-SE used to identify possible tRNA genes (none detected)41. Subsequent manual curation and validation was performed using related E. coli phage K1H (NC_027994) as a reference genome.
Transmission electron microscopy
Phage particles were negatively stained for 20 s with 2% uranyl acetate on carbon-coated copper grids (Quantifoil) and observed at 100 kV on a Hitachi HT 7700 equipped with an AMT XR81B Peltier cooled CCD camera (8 M pixel) at the ScopeM facility, ETH Zurich.
CRISPR-Cas9-assisted phage engineering
All HEPTs based on phages E2, K1, EfS3, and EfS7::colM/kvarM were constructed using the homologous recombination-based and CRISPR-Cas9-assisted engineering as previously described20. In short, WT phages were propagated in the presence of the respective editing template (pEdit) to enable sequence-specific transgene integration through homologous recombination. WT phages were selectively restricted using a SpyCas9-based counterselection system (pSelect) directed at the flanking homology arms within individual phage genomes. Silent mutations within the protospacer-adjacent motifs (PAMs) on the homology arms of pEdit enable CRISPR-escape and enrichment of engineered phage. When PAM mutation is impossible, multiple silent mutations were introduced within the SpyCas9-targeted seed sequence (12 nucleotides immediately upstream of the PAM) to abrogate CRISPR targeting. All pEdit and pSelect vectors used for phage construction are compiled in Supplementary Data 2; synthetic DNA strings used for effector amplification are shown in Supplementary Data 3.
Phage genome assembly and rebooting
EfS7::colE7 and CM001::ec300 genomes were assembled in vitro from six PCR fragments with ~40 bp overlapping ends using the Gibson isothermal method (NEBuilder HiFi DNA assembly master mix, NEB) as previously described20. In brief, 20 ng of PCR products per 1 kb of genomic fragment length were used for assembly. Synthetic genomes of E. faecalis HEPTs were rebooted through transfection into L. monocytogenes Rev2L L-form bacteria as previously described30. To reboot CM001::ec300, 3 µl of assembly mixture was electroporated into 42 µL of electrocompetent E. coli XL1-Blue cells at 1.8 kV, 25 µF, 200 Ω using a BTX ECM630 electroporator (BTX Molecular Delivery Systems, MA, USA). 1 mL of SOC medium was supplemented immediately after electroporation and cells were recovered at 37 °C for 4 h with shaking (180 rpm). Subsequently, 10 µl of chloroform (132950, Sigma-Aldrich) was added to assist host lysis and phage release. Following centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 1 min, dilutions of the supernatant were mixed with 200 µL of an overnight culture of E. coli Ec20 and 5 mL of molten LC soft agar, layered onto pre-warmed LB plates, and incubated for 16 h at 37 °C. Synthetic DNA strings used for amplification of effector genes are compiled in Supplementary Data 3. Primers and templates used for phage genome fragmentation and effector gene integration are summarized in Supplementary Table 3.
Effector susceptibility assessment
400 μL of a log-phase culture of the target bacterial strain was mixed with 10 mL of molten LC soft agar, poured onto a square plate (12 × 12 cm) containing the appropriate growth agar, and dried for 15 min. 10 μL of each sterile-filtered crude phage lysate (~109−1010 PFU/mL) was spotted on the bacterial lawn, dried, and incubated overnight. Bacterial susceptibility to effectors presented in HEPT lysate would result in the formation of growth inhibition zone.
Turbidity reduction assays
Log-phase cultures were diluted in BHI-fc (E. faecalis) or SHU (E. coli and K. pneumoniae) to an OD600nm of 0.05 − 0.1, distributed into clear, flat-bottom 96-well plates (Bioswisstech) and infected with phages to obtain a final concentration of 5 × 107 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL. The plates were sealed with a microplate sealing film (AxygenTM) and OD600nm was quantified every 5 min at 30 °C using a spectrophotometer (SPECTROstar Omega or SPECTROstar Nano, BMG Labtech). Uninfected bacterial dilutions were used as growth controls, and growth medium without bacteria was used as a background/sterility control. All cross-genus HEPT experiments used a ratio of 10:1 producer to recipient cells. Experiments were performed as technical triplicates and reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Data was prepared and analysed using GraphPad Prism (Version 9). When indicated, triplicate reactions were combined, serially diluted, and plated on agar plates at 10 or 18 h post-infection.
Time kill assays (TKAs)
For cross-genus HEPT TKAs, 1 mL of co-culture was infected with 109 or 5 × 107 PFU/mL of HEPTs derived from EfS7 and CM001 scaffolds, respectively. The ratio of producer cell to recipient cell was always 10:1 with starting concentrations (CFU/mL) provided in Fig. 2. Differential and selective plating was used to enumerate the different bacterial species. E. coli and K. pneumoniae were counted on chromogenic coliform agar (CCA, Biolife italiana) and E. faecalis was counted on KFS agar (Biolife italiana) after incubation at 37 or 42 °C for 16 or 48 h, respectively. Experiments were performed as biological triplicates and reported as mean ± SEM. Data was prepared and analysed using GraphPad Prism (Version 9).
Repeated phage exposure and resistance development
E. coli strains Ec20 and Ec41 and K. pneumoniae strains Kp18, Kp28, and Kp37 were diluted to an OD600nm of 0.1 and infected with 108 PFU/mL of phages E2 or K1 (round I) in SHU. After 18 h of infection, phage-exposed bacterial cultures were combined (n = 3), diluted to an OD600nm of 0.1 in fresh SHU, and spiked with the WT phage (108 PFU/mL) or fresh media again for another 18 h (round II). Individual surviving clones were isolated after round II (36 h total experimental time) by re-streaking on LB agar and tested in vitro for phage susceptibility using spot-on-the-lawn assays.
Reporter-phage-based urinalysis and ex vivo activity assessment
Reporter phage urinalysis was performed as described previously20. In brief, 1 mL of patient urine sample was directly mixed with 4 mL of LB. Samples were enriched for 1 h at 37 °C with shaking (180 rpm). 50 µL of reporter phage was added to individual 450 µL aliquots of enriched urine (106 PFU/mL final concentration) and incubated at 37 °C with shaking. LB media spiked with reporter phages alone served as background controls. Bioluminescence measurements were taken at 3 h post infection. Based on the manufacturer’s instructions, a buffer-reconstituted NLuc substrate (Nano-Glo Luciferase Assay System, Promega) was mixed at a 1:1 ratio with a sample of the infection mixture (40 µL total) in Nunc™ F96 MicroWell™ plates (Thermo Fisher). Bioluminescence was quantified 5 min after substrate addition using a GloMax® Navigator Luminometer (Promega) with 5 s integration and 2 s delay. Relative light units (RLUs) were background corrected by division of the RLU from phage-only controls. Samples producing >103 RLU fold change (FC) were considered positive. To confirm reporter phage results and to isolate strains, patient urine was plated on differential agar (UriSelect4, BioRad). E. coli isolates were tested for phage-sensitivity by determining the efficiency of plating using the soft-agar-overlay method. For ex vivo TKA experiments, 250 μL of patient urine was infected with 250 μL of a 109 PFU/mL stock of E2 or E2::colE7 in PBS solution, incubated for 24 hours at 37 °C, and plated on LB at the indicated time points. T = 0 was plated prior to phage addition as an input control. To replicate TKA conditions, in vitro turbidity reduction assays were performed by adding 100 μl of a 109 PFU/mL stock solution of E2 or E2::colE7 to 100 μl of bacterial culture in SHU at a lower starting OD600nm of 0.005 to reproduce bacterial loads in patient urine.
Statistics and reproducibility
No statistical method was used to predetermine sample size. A single transmission electron microscopy image of each phage (Fig. 1b) was selected from multiple micrographs taken from a single phage-coated grid as is common practice. All TKAs are biological triplicates excluding the ex vivo urine treatment. The field evaluation, including bioluminescence-based detection and ex vivo TKA, was performed once due to time and material limitations of working with multiple fresh urine samples. Phage susceptibility test (efficiency of plating; Supplementary Fig. 3b) was performed in biological triplicates with isolated strains. All TRA (and corresponding endpoint CFU plating) and spot lysis data were reproduced at least two times, with one set of data shown.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The phage CM001 genome is available from the GenBank database (UTI-CM001, OM810255) alongside previously sequenced genomes of phage E2 (OL870316), K1 (OL870318), EfS3 (OL870611), and EfS7 (OL870612). Original data used to analyze UTI incidences (Supplementary Fig. 1) were sourced from Meile et al.20. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Murray, C. J. et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 399, 629–655 (2022).
CDC. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in The United States 2019 (CDC, 2019).
de la Fuente-Nunez, C., Torres, M. D., Mojica, F. J. & Lu, T. K. Next-generation precision antimicrobials: towards personalized treatment of infectious diseases. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 37, 95–102 (2017).
Mills, S., Ross, R. P. & Hill, C. Bacteriocins and bacteriophage; a narrow-minded approach to food and gut microbiology. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 41, S129–S153 (2017).
Gordillo Altamirano, F. L. & Barr, J. J. Phage therapy in the postantibiotic era. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 32, 1–25 (2019).
Meile, S., Du, J., Dunne, M., Kilcher, S. & Loessner, M. J. Engineering therapeutic phages for enhanced antibacterial efficacy. Curr. Opin. Virol. 52, 182–191 (2022).
Tzipilevich, E., Pollak‐Fiyaksel, O., Shraiteh, B. & Ben‐Yehuda, S. Bacteria elicit a phage tolerance response subsequent to infection of their neighbors. EMBO J. 41, 1–14 (2022).
Bernheim, A. & Sorek, R. The pan-immune system of bacteria: antiviral defence as a community resource. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 113–119 (2020).
Hampton, H. G., Watson, B. N. J. & Fineran, P. C. The arms race between bacteria and their phage foes. Nature 577, 327–336 (2020).
Kilcher, S. & Loessner, M. J. Engineering bacteriophages as versatile biologics. Trends Microbiol. 27, 355–367 (2019).
Dunne, M. et al. Reprogramming bacteriophage host range through structure-guided design of chimeric receptor binding proteins. Cell Rep. 29, 1336.e4–1350.e4 (2019).
Yehl, K. et al. Engineering phage host-range and suppressing bacterial resistance through phage tail fiber mutagenesis. Cell 179, 459.e9–469.e9 (2019).
Ando, H., Lemire, S., Pires, D. P. & Lu, T. K. Engineering modular viral scaffolds for targeted bacterial population editing. Cell Syst. 1, 187–196 (2015).
Yosef, I., Goren, M. G., Globus, R., Molshanski-Mor, S. & Qimron, U. Extending the host range of bacteriophage particles for DNA transduction. Mol. Cell 66, 721–728.e3 (2017).
Bikard, D. et al. Exploiting CRISPR-cas nucleases to produce sequence-specific antimicrobials. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1146–1150 (2014).
Citorik, R. J., Mimee, M. & Lu, T. K. Sequence-specific antimicrobials using efficiently delivered RNA-guided nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1141–1145 (2014).
Gencay, Y. E. et al. Engineered phage with antibacterial CRISPR–Cas selectively reduce E. coli burden in mice. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01759-y (2023).
Cass, J., Barnard, A. & Fairhead, H. Engineered bacteriophage as a delivery vehicle for antibacterial protein, SASP. Pharmaceuticals 14, 1038 (2021).
Meile, S., Kilcher, S., Loessner, M. J. & Dunne, M. Reporter phage-based detection of bacterial pathogens: design guidelines and recent developments. Viruses 12, 944 (2020).
Meile, S. et al. Engineered reporter phages for detection of Escherichia coli, Enterococcus, and Klebsiella in urine. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39863-x (2023).
Dedrick, R. M. et al. Engineered bacteriophages for treatment of a patient with a disseminated drug-resistant Mycobacterium abscessus. Nat. Med. 25, 730–733 (2019).
Nick, J. A. et al. Host and pathogen response to bacteriophage engineered against Mycobacterium abscessus lung infection. Cell 185, 1860.e12–1874.e12 (2022).
Simmering, J. E., Tang, F., Cavanaugh, J. E., Polgreen, L. A. & Polgreen, P. M. The increase in hospitalizations for urinary tract infections and the associated costs in the United States, 1998–2011. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 4, 1–7 (2017).
Foxman, B., Barlow, R., D’Arcy, H., Gillespie, B. & Sobel, J. D. Urinary tract infection: self-reported incidence and associated costs. Ann. Epidemiol. 10, 509–515 (2000).
Flores-Mireles, A. L., Walker, J. N., Caparon, M. & Hultgren, S. J. Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 269–284 (2015).
Cascales, E. et al. Colicin biology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 71, 158–229 (2007).
Chérier, D., Patin, D., Blanot, D., Touzé, T. & Barreteau, H. The biology of colicin m and its orthologs. Antibiotics 10, 1–23 (2021).
Proença, D., Leandro, C., Garcia, M., Pimentel, M. & São-José, C. EC300: a phage-based, bacteriolysin-like protein with enhanced antibacterial activity against Enterococcus faecalis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 99, 5137–5149 (2015).
Grote, A. et al. JCat: a novel tool to adapt codon usage of a target gene to its potential expression host. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 526–531 (2005).
Kilcher, S. et al. Cross-genus rebooting of custom-made, synthetic bacteriophage genomes in L-form bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 567–572 (2018).
Kline, K. A. & Lewis, A. L. Gram-positive uropathogens, polymicrobial urinary tract infection, and the emerging microbiota of the urinary tract. Microbiol. Spectr. 4, 459–502 (2016).
Danis-Wlodarczyk, K. M., Wozniak, D. J. & Abedon, S. T. Treating bacterial infections with bacteriophage-based enzybiotics: in vitro, in vivo and clinical application. Antibiotics 10, 1–36 (2021).
Abedon, S. T., Danis-Wlodarczyk, K. M. & Wozniak, D. J. Phage cocktail development for bacteriophage therapy: toward improving spectrum of activity breadth and depth. Pharmaceuticals 14, 1019 (2021).
Braun, P., Raab, R., Bugert, J. J. & Braun, S. Recombinant reporter phage rTUN1::nLuc enables rapid detection and real-time antibiotic susceptibility testing of Klebsiella pneumoniae K64 strains. ACS Sens. 8, 630–639 (2023).
Zelcbuch, L. et al. Luminescent phage-based detection of klebsiella pneumoniae: from engineering to diagnostics. Pharmaceuticals 14, 347 (2021).
Leitner, L. et al. Intravesical bacteriophages for treating urinary tract infections in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 21, 427–436 (2021).
World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bull. World Health Organ. 79, 373–374 (2001).
Lima, W. C. et al. Genome sequencing and functional characterization of the non-pathogenic Klebsiella pneumoniae KpGe bacteria. Microbes Infect. 20, 293–301 (2018).
Sarigul, N., Korkmaz, F. & Kurultak, İ. A new artificial urine protocol to better imitate human urine. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–11 (2019).
Aziz, R. K. et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9, 1–15 (2008).
Chan, P. P. & Lowe, T. M. tRNAscan-SE: searching for tRNA genes in genomic sequences. Methods Mol. Biol. 1962, 1–14 (2019).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all members of the CAUTIphage consortium including Jochen Klumpp, Hendrik Koliwer-Brandl, Jonas Marschall, Shawna McCallin, Vera Neumeier, and Reinhard Zbinden for their scientific input and assistance with organizing clinical samples. We thank the clinical care team at the Department of Neuro-Urology, Balgrist University Hospital (Zurich, Switzerland) for urine specimen collection. We also thank Karin Moelling for scientific discussions, Alexander Harms for providing E. coli UTI89 and CFT073, and Leo Meile for providing E. faecalis JH2-2. Finally, we acknowledge the ScopeM facility at ETH Zurich for assistance with transmission electron microscopy of phage particles. J.D., L.L., T.M.K., M.J.L., and M.D. were supported by a Sinergia grant (CRSII5_189957) from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF). S.M. and S.K. were supported by an Ambizione grant (PZ00P3_174108) from the SNSF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, J.D., S.M., M.J.L., S.K., M.D.; methodology, J.D., S.M., S.K., M.D.; project administration, S.K., M.D.; supervision, S.K., M.D.; investigation, J.D., S.M., J.B., T.J., P.P., L.H., C.I.M., S.K., M.D.; data curation, J.D., S.M., S.K., M.D.; visualization, S.K.; writing—original draft, S.K., M.D.; writing—review and editing, J.D., S.M., L.L., T.M.K., M.J.L., S.K., M.D.; funding acquisition, L.L., T.M.K., M.J.L., S.K., M.D.; resources, T.M.K., M.J.L., S.K.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
M.D. and S.K. are also employees of Micreos GmbH and M.J.L. is a scientific advisor to Micreos GmbH. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Du, J., Meile, S., Baggenstos, J. et al. Enhancing bacteriophage therapeutics through in situ production and release of heterologous antimicrobial effectors. Nat Commun 14, 4337 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39612-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39612-0
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.