Abstract
Nonlinear deformations can irreversibly alter the mechanical properties of materials. Most soft materials, such as rubber and living tissues, display pronounced softening when cyclically deformed. Here we show that, in contrast, reconstituted networks of crosslinked, bundled actin filaments harden when subject to cyclical shear. As a consequence, they exhibit a mechano-memory where a significant stress barrier is generated at the maximum of the cyclic shear strain. This unique response is crucially determined by the network architecture: at lower crosslinker concentrations networks do not harden, but soften showing the classic Mullins effect known from rubber-like materials. By simultaneously performing macrorheology and confocal microscopy, we show that cyclic shearing results in structural reorganization of the network constituents such that the maximum applied strain is encoded into the network architecture.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
A broad range of materials exhibit dramatic and irreversible changes to their mechanical properties when deformations are large enough to elicit a nonlinear response. In many technological applications nonlinear deformations lead to undesirable changes to the material properties. In some instances, irreversible nonlinear deformations provide a simple route to in situ alterations of the material properties; as is seen in metals1,2 and polymers3. As first reported by Mullins et al. in rubber-like materials4, a cyclically applied load can result in an overall softening of the material. Specifically, a lower stress is reached at strains that are lower than the maximum previously applied strain γ0. The softening is directly dependent on the number of cycles with the most pronounced effect occurring in the first cycle. However, if the system is sheared to a maximum strain >γ0, the stress-strain relation exhibits no memory of the previously applied strain. This type of softening behavior, referred to as the Mullins effect, is observed in pure and filled gums and thermoplastic elastomers5, as well as polymer gels6, living tissues7,8 and biopolymer networks9. The microscopic origin of the Mullins effect remains unclear5 in spite of the variety of existing models10. Reconstituted actin networks are ideal candidates for investigating the effect of cyclic loads at the microscopic scale using confocal fluorescence microscopy due to their large mesh sizes, and their propensity to form large bundles11,12. Interestingly, bundled actin networks also exhibit strain stiffening11,13 one hallmark of materials which show the Mullins effect. From a biological perspective, insight into the response of in vitro biopolymer networks to cyclic loads may be important, as a passive reorganization induced by external mechanical stimuli should prove to be a powerful tool to facilitate the high adaptability of living materials.
Here we show that the mechanical response of actin networks bundled by α-actinin or filamin in the irreversible non-linear regime exhibits strong similarities to the Mullins effect. Depending on the concentration of proteins, we not only observe Mullins-like softening, but also cyclic hardening, indicated by an irreversible increase in the nonlinear elasticity as a consequence of repeated loading cycles. Therefore, these networks show a mechano-memory—the maximal applied strain is stored in the network architecture. We simultaneously use bulk-rheology and confocal microscopy to reveal the microscopic origin of the Mullins effect and cyclic work hardening. We find that cyclic shearing causes drastic network reorganizations, such as bundling and unbundling of the fibers that is accompanied by the appearance of a negative prestrain.
Results
Cyclic hardening in actin networks bundled by α-actinin
Actin networks bundled by α-actinin (actin/α-actinin networks) show a pronounced nonlinear mechanical response to external shear strains. The dependence of the differential modulus on strain in the nonlinear regime can be determined by applying a constant shear rate to the network. Above a certain strain, which is dependent on network parameters as well as external parameters like the shear rate, the network strain hardens (Fig. 1); increasingly higher applied stresses are required to increase the strain. For the network with an actin concentration ca=4.75 μM and a molar ratio of cross-linking molecules to actin, R=1, at 18 °C shown in Figure 1, we apply a continuous shear strain γ at a rate of γ≈1.4% s−1, the strain hardening response begins at γ≈10% and the network withstands a maximal stress of σmax∼10 Pa at γ≈25–30%, after which a decrease of the stress is observed. Repeating the deformation a second time (according to the protocol shown in Fig. 1a) results in a significantly different response of the network; the linear stiffness—given by the slope in the stress strain relation—decreases from ∼12 Pa to less than ∼14 Pa, the strain stiffening response starts not below γ≈20% and a significantly sharper increase of the modulus in the nonlinear regime is observed (Fig. 1b). Each repetition of this deformation protocol results in an increasingly larger linear regime, a continuous decrease of the linear stiffness to ∼12 Pa, an increasingly larger differential modulus in the nonlinear regime and higher maximal stresses at the strain amplitude γ0 (Fig. 1b and inset). Thus the cyclic mechanical loading results in networks that can withstand much higher stresses. A result that is in sharp contrast to the Mullins effect which is accompanied by softening in rubber-like materials.
Memory effect in actin networks bundled by α-actinin
Interestingly, the actin/α-actinin networks exhibit history dependence demonstrated by shearing to strains higher than γ1>γ0 after such a cyclic hardening procedure (Fig. 2). We observe a sharp peak in the stress-strain relation when γ is slightly above the previously applied maximum strain γ0. By performing additional cycles up to the new maximal strain γ1, the network is further cyclically work hardened; concomitantly the previous stress barrier at γ0 is erased. As shown in Figure 3, the cyclic hardening behavior is qualitatively independent of the strain amplitudes—as long as they are far in the non-linear regime and a significant part of the network is still connected to the surface. However, the saturation value of the stress at γ0 depends on γ0 (Fig. 3c). The fact that the strain memory is located at the previous maximum strain and not at the maximum stress indicates that the deformation history is coded into a geometrical rearrangement of the network architecture.
Structural reorganizations account for cyclic hardening
To test this, a simultaneous observation of the structure and the mechanical response is required as a way to pinpoint the microscopic origins of the cyclic hardening behavior. Using our confocal-rheometer we provide three dimensional structural information while simultaneously measuring the mechanical response to applied shear strains. We first apply a cyclic deformation protocol to the network while acquiring confocal z-stacks after each cycle at strain γ=0 (see Fig. 2c).
Initially, the bundled network shown in Figure 2 appears homogeneous with a mesh size of ξ∼12.5 μm and clearly visible attachment points of the bundles to the glass substrate with a density of ρ∼5,000 mm−2. We observe a clear structural reorganization of the network after the first deformation cycle. Indeed, the upper surface has been sheared to the left side and the attachment points of the network at the upper surface are shifted to the right side (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Movie S1). The entire network structure appears as though a negative strain of roughly γ≈−15% was applied (Fig. 2d). This observation is verified by the rheology. By focusing on low strains, we reveal that negative stresses of up to σ∼3 Pa are required to drive the system back to its initial γ=0 position (Fig. 1c).
In subsequent shear cycles, the network orientation no longer opposes the applied deformations. Most fibers become reorganized into structures that correspond to the spanning distance set by the previously applied strain amplitude. Therefore, the network only bears significant forces when the fibers are strongly stretched. During the subsequent cycles up to γ0 the shear induced network reorganization becomes increasingly diminished consistent with the observation that the maximal stress reached at γ0 is saturating with increasing cycle number (Fig. 1b, inset) and that the necessary negative strain is saturating and decreasing with cycle number (Fig. 1c, inset).
The reorganization described above, taken together with the resulting negative prestrain, provides insights into the physical mechanism of the extended linear regime with lower stresses and the sharp increase of the modulus near γ0. In addition, increasingly higher stresses σmax at γ0 are obtained and the total energy necessary to deform the network up to its complete failure is increased after the cyclic hardening procedure is performed (Fig. 2b, inset). Due to the viscoelastic character of the network, the reorganization of attachment points could account for this effect. However, it might also indicate that a wholesale reorganization of the network constituents occurs; this is directly observed in cycles with strains to γ=112%. We observe that the cyclic shearing results in drastic bundle fusion and reorganizations while attachment points to the surface are lost thus lowering the density of attachment sites from ρ∼5,000 mm−2 to only ρ∼500 mm−2.
Stepwise shearing of actin networks bundled by α-actinin
To better understand the process of network reorganization we apply a stepwise shear while visualizing the network response (Fig. 4, Supplementary Fig. S1 and Supplementary Movie S2). Stepwise shearing to γ0=56% results in continuous rupture of attachment points and an overall contraction of the network with increasing strain. The detachment from the glass appears to be cooperative; on a length scale on the order of the field of view, bonds break only at one surface while all bonds on the opposing surface remain unaffected. The observed network contraction correlates with a decrease in the measured stress (Fig. 4c). Shearing back to γ=0 results only in a partial relaxation of the network contraction (Fig. 4). Some of the detached bundles find new contact points at the glass surface in locations where rupturing occurred. After establishing a new connection, a negative prestrain returns when the strain direction is reversed. In the subsequent deformation cycle, very few dramatic reorganization events occur. The reestablished attachment points remain in place and the network volume is almost constant and only excess lengths are extended when γ0=56%. Above γ0, rupturing, shrinkage, and reorganizations of the network are once again observed. This time most rupture events occur at the opposite—in this case the upper surface; suggesting that the reformed attachment sites at the lower surface are strengthened during the first cycle and demonstrating the cooperative nature of detachment.
Cyclic hardening is sensitive to network architecture
To confirm that the network reorganizations we observe are a necessary precondition for the measured strain hardening effect, we test a system with comparable microstructure that lacks the cyclic hardening response (Fig. 5). The protocol observed is described in Figure 5a, whereas the responses to strain are depicted in Figure 5b–e. Networks with a lower effective α-actinin concentration exhibit a cyclic softening in accordance with the classic Mullins effect (Fig. 5b,f) and do not show dramatic reorganizations with an encoding of a prestrain (Fig. 5g). However, through the cyclic shearing process, some attachments to the surface are lost, which may explain the observed similarity to the Mullins effect. The stress necessary to shear the network back to its initial position is compared with that of a network with an effectively higher α-actinin concentration, which shows the cyclic hardening effect. For the network that hardens, the negative stresses reached at γ=0 are far higher than for the network with the lower α-actinin concentration (Fig. 5d,e)—although the maximum positive stresses which are reached during the cyclic shearing procedure are comparable in magnitude for both networks (Fig. 5b,c). This supports that the negative prestrain observed with confocal microscopy accounts for the negative stresses and contributes to the cyclic hardening effect.
Cyclic hardening in actin networks bundled by filamin
To test if the high binding propensity of α-actinin is a precondition for the observed reorganization and cyclic hardening behavior12,14, we also utilize the actin crosslinking protein filamin, a protein that kinetically traps actin networks similar to α-actinin15. The architecture of the bundled actin/filamin networks, at the concentrations chosen, resembles that of actin/α-actinin networks. Interestingly, cyclic shearing of actin/filamin networks also results in hardening (Fig. 6). In contrast to the response of actin/α-actinin networks the stress reached at the maximal cyclically applied strain γ0 decreases as a function of the cycle number (Fig. 6c)—in accordance with the classic Mullins effect. However, if the network is sheared to larger strains significantly higher stresses than in the control measurement are obtained. Also, stepwise shearing of the network results in a higher maximum stress if a single stepwise cycle to a lower strain is previously applied (Supplementary Fig. S2). Confocal imaging reveals that cyclic shearing not only results in a negative prestrain, but in addition the actin/filamin bundles are partially unbundled. As shown in Figure 6d and Supplementary Movie S3 and S4, a larger number of thin bundles is observed after the cyclic shearing procedure resulting in a decrease in the mesh size. Quantitative image analysis reveals that the mesh size of the network shown in Figure 6 decreases from initially 34.3 to 27.4 μm at time point 2 (see Fig. 6). One potential consequence of the unbundling is an increase in the length of bundle-paths percolating between the surfaces. Thus, the cyclic training results in bundles which are longer than the maximal cyclically applied strain would imply. In this scenario, higher strains have to be applied to fully stretch bundles and detach them from the surface. This causes that the sharp increase of stress is seen at higher strains, while the stress reached at γ0 decreases.
The fact that also for actin/filamin bundle networks cyclic loads result in irreversible structural reorganizations which manifest themselves in the non-linear mechanical response, suggests that this might be a typical feature of kinetically trapped actin bundle networks.
Discussion
Using confocal-rheology, we reveal that bundled actin networks demonstrate a significant mechanical history dependence, which is encoded into the network architecture as a strain memory. This sets the mechanical response of these biopolymer networks. At low concentrations of the crosslinking protein α-actinin, a cyclic softening is observed, similar to the classic Mullins5. By simultaneously recording the rheology while visualizing the mechanical response of bundled actin networks, the classic Mullins effect is traced back to detachments of bundles. In contrast, strongly crosslinked α-actinin networks show a pronounced cyclic hardening behavior. Cyclic shearing results in a reorganization of the network architecture accompanied by the development of a negative prestrain and a reorganization of the network constituents. Shearing enables a reorganization of the bundles through a disruption of network structures that leads to new contacts being formed between bundles. The surface-network interface seems to play an important role for the shear induced network reorganization. The most drastic rupture events occur at the surface—this is presumably the case because these links are the weakest in the system. A remaining challenge is understanding the intricate balance between rupturing events, reorganization and prestrain and their combined consequence for the mechanical response. The high binding propensity of the α-actinin and filamin coupled with their tendency to kinetically trap actin networks seem to be a prerequisite for the observed effects; actin networks cross-linked by other cross-linking proteins, such as fascin or HMM do not cyclically harden at the conditions we tested.
Cyclic work hardening is not expected for flexible polymers16. However, we show that semi-flexible polymers bundled by transient cross-links demonstrate work hardening and mechano-memory. Such a smart material may be interesting for the ability to adapt to repeated deformations. Our experiments demonstrate that rather simple composite biological systems consisting of solely actin and cross-linking proteins passively adapt their structural and mechanical properties upon external mechanical stimuli. Living cells may make use of such mechanisms to adapt or reorganize cytoskeletal structures through external mechanical stimuli. We speculate that a strain memory effect, where the material drastically softens within an applied strain range, but exhibits a high stress barrier at higher strains, might be utilized in biological systems to allow for movement in a certain but adaptable range while maintaining mechanical stability.
Methods
Protein purification
G-actin is obtained from rabbit skeletal muscle by a modified protocol of ref. 17, where an additional gel filtration (Sephacryl S-300 HR) as well as an additional polymerization-depolymerization step is done. The actin is stored in lyophilized form at −21 °C17. The G-actin solution is prepared by dissolving lyophilized actin in deionized water and dialyzing against G-buffer (2 mM Tris, 0.2 mM ATP, 0.2 mM CaCl2, 0.2 mM DTT and 0.005% NaN3, pH 8) at 4 °C. The G-actin solution is kept at 4 °C and is used within two weeks. Polymerization is initiated by adding 10% volume 10x F-buffer (20 mM Tris, 5 mM ATP, 20 mM MgCl2, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 M KCl, 2 mM DTT, pH 7.5). For confocal imaging, actin is labelled with Atto 488 phalloidin (Invitrogen). α-actinin is isolated from turkey gizzard smooth muscle following18, dialyzed against G-buffer and stored at 4 °C for several weeks. Muscle filamin is isolated from chicken gizzard, and further purified as reported in ref. 19.
Confocal rheology
Experiments are performed with a Leica TCS SP5 point-scanning confocal microscope coupled to a modified Anton Paar MCR 301 stress-controlled rheometer. A plate cone geometry is used. The metal cone is rinsed with H2O and wiped ten times prior to use. A fresh glass cover slip which has been rinsed with H2O is used as lower plate. For the cyclic hardening procedure strain is controlled. After upward and downward shearing with constant shear rate, strain is kept at 0% in the pauses between the cycles. Similarly, strain is kept constant in the pauses of stepwise shear experiments. The confocal-rheometer coupling allows us to image three-dimensional volumes of the network over time while simultaneously applying a precisely controlled shear strain.
Image analysis
We characterize the mesh size of the networks by quantifying the spatial separation between filaments extracted along horizontal and vertical lines within thresholded z-resolved planar confocal images. We fit the distribution of filament spacing to an exponential decay to obtain an estimate of the characteristic length scale describing the network mesh or pore size20. The number of attachment sites at the surface is determined by counting within a representative area.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Schmoller, K.M. et al. Cyclic hardening in bundled actin networks. Nat. Commun. 1:134 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1134 (2010).
Change history
07 February 2012
A correction has been published and is appended to both the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has not been fixed in the paper.
References
Polak, J., Fardoun, F. & Degallaix, S. Analysis of the hysteresis loop in stainless steels i. austenitic and ferritic steels. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 297, 144–153 (2001).
Walther, F. & Eifler, D. (Mater Sci Eng A) Cyclic deformation behavior of steels and light-metal alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 468–470, 259–266 (2007).
Bigg, D. M. A review of techniques for processing ultra-high modulus polymers. Polymer Engineering and Science 16, 725–734 (2004).
Mullins, L. Softening of rubber by deformation. Rubber Chem. Technol. 42, 339–362 (1969).
Diani, J., Fayolle, B. & Gilormini, P. A review on the mullins effect. Eur. Polym. J. 45, 601–612 (2009).
Webber, R. E., Creton, C., Brown, H. R. & Gong, J. P. Large strain hysteresis and mullins effect of tough double-network hydrogels. Macromolecules 40, 2919–2927 (2007).
Rubod, C. et al. Biomechanical properties of vaginal tissue: preliminary results. Int. Urogynecol. J. 19, 811–816 (2008).
Munoz, M. J. et al. An experimental study of the mouse skin behaviour: damage and inelastic aspects. J. Biomech. 41, 93–99 (2008).
Wagenseil, J. E., Wakatsuki, T., Okamoto, R. J., Zahalak, G. I. & Elson, E. L. One-dimensional viscoelastic behavior of fibroblast populated collagen matrices. J. Biomech. Engrg. 125, 719–725 (2003).
Marckmann, G. et al. A theory of network alteration for the mullins effect. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 50, 2011–2028 (2002).
Schmoller, K. M., Lieleg, O. & Bausch, A. R. Structural and viscoelastic properties of actin/filamin networks: cross-linked versus bundled networks. Biophys. J. 97, 83–89 (2009).
Lieleg, O., Schmoller, K. M., Cyron, C. J., Wall, W. A. & Bausch, A. R. Structural polymorphism in heterogeneous cytoskeletal networks. Soft. Matter 5, 1796–1803 (2009).
Kasza, K. E. et al. Nonlinear elasticity of stiff biopolymers connected by flexible linkers. Phys. Rev. E. 79, 041928 (2009).
Lieleg, O., Claessens, M.M.A.E. & Bausch, A. R. Structure and dynamics of cross-linked actin networks. Soft. Matter 10, 218–225 (2010).
Schmoller, K. M., Lieleg, O. & Bausch, A. R. Internal stress in kinetically trapped actin bundle networks. Soft. Matter 4, 2365–2367 (2008).
Rabinowitz, S. & Beardmore, P. Cyclic deformation and fracture of polymers. J. Mater. Sci. 9, 81–99 (1974).
Spudich, J. A. & Watt, S. Regulation of rabbit skeletal muscle contraction. 1. Biochemical studies of interaction of tropomyosin-troponin complex with actin and proteolytic fragments of myosin. J. Biol. Chem. 246, 4866–4871 (1971).
Craig, S. W., Lancashire, C. L. & Cooper, J. A. Preparation of smooth muscle alpha-actinin. Methods Enzymol. 85, 316–321 (1982).
Shizuta, Y., Shizuta, H., Gallo, M., Davies, P. & Pastan, I. Purification and properties of filamin, an actin binding protein from chicken gizzard. J. Biol. Chem. 251, 6562–6567 (1976).
Kaufman, L. J. et al. Glioma expansion in collagen i matrices: analyzing collagen concentration-dependent growth and motility patterns. Biophys. J. 89, 635–650 (2005).
Acknowledgements
We thank M. Rusp for the actin preparation. This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft by the DFG through Grant No. BA2029/8 and the Cluster of Excellence Nanosystems Initiative Munich. KMS acknowledges support from CompInt in the framework of the ENB Bayern and the IGSSE. DLB and RCA acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation under grant #DMR: 0804782 and AFOSR under grant number FA9550-10-1-0473.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KMS, PF, DLB and ARB designed the experiments. KMS and PF performed the experiments. RCA and DLB provided the confocal rheomter. KMS, PF, RCA, DLB and ARB analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Figures
Supplementary Figures S1 and S2. (PDF 347 kb)
Supplementary Movie 1
Strain induced network reorganizations explain cyclic hardening in actin/α-actinin networks. The image sequence corresponds to the experiment shown in Figs. 1 and 2. During each holding step at γ = 0, one z-stack is taken, as shown in Fig. 2A in red. (AVI 10361 kb)
Supplementary Movie 2
Stepwise shearing of actin/α-actinin networks. The image sequence corresponds to the experiment shown in Fig. 4. After each shear step, one z-stack is taken, as shown in Fig. 4. (AVI 8556 kb)
Supplementary Movie 3
Cyclic hardening in actin/filamin networks. The image sequences correspond to the x-projections in the experiment shown in Fig. 6. During each holding step, at γ = 0 one z-stack is taken, as shown in Fig. 6a in blue. (AVI 7218 kb)
Supplementary Movie 4
Cyclic hardening in actin/filamin networks. The image sequences correspond to the z-projections in the experiment shown in Fig. 6. During each holding step, at γ = 0 one z-stack is taken, as shown in Fig. 6a in blue. (AVI 11524 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmoller, K., Fernández, P., Arevalo, R. et al. Cyclic hardening in bundled actin networks. Nat Commun 1, 134 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1134
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1134
This article is cited by
-
Mechanical plasticity of collagen directs branch elongation in human mammary gland organoids
Nature Communications (2021)
-
Global mapping of live cell mechanical features using PeakForce QNM AFM
Biophysics Reports (2020)
-
From mechanical resilience to active material properties in biopolymer networks
Nature Reviews Physics (2019)
-
Towards the understanding of cytoskeleton fluidisation–solidification regulation
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology (2017)
-
Multiscale deformations lead to high toughness and circularly polarized emission in helical nacre-like fibres
Nature Communications (2016)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.