Abstract
Wolbachia (Rickettsiaceae) is a genus of maternally inherited endosymbiotic bac-teria commonly found in the reproductive tissues of arthropods. These bacteria manipulate host reproduction to increase the number of infected individuals within the population, erecting intraspecific fertility barriers, causing parthenogenesis or resulting in the feminization of genetic males1. They are usually transmitted vertically, so we predicted that they should have evolved a mechanism to target the host's germ cells during development. Here we show that Wolbachia become concentrated in the germ plasm of the Drosophila egg. Mutations in developmental patterning genes2 demonstrate that this localization is dependent on the assembly of germ plasm.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
The endosymbiotic bacteria (fluorescent staining in Fig. 1) are maternally inherited and sensitive to the antibiotic tetracycline. Analysis of their DNA after amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) revealed an ftsZ sequence3 that was identical to that of Wolbachia strain A. This sequence was the same in both the Canton S wild-type Drosophila stock and the laboratory stock4 that we used as a source of endosymbionts for all the other stocks.
These bacteria are found throughout the syncytial embryos of infected strains of Drosophila, concentrating in the region of the cortical actin cytoskeleton and accumulating with the mitochondrial motor protein KLP67A on the microtubules of mitotic asters4,5,6. These mechanisms might ensure transmission of the bacteria, as would colonization of the posterior pole, the site of germ-cell formation. This has been reported for Nasonia wasp embryos, which also show cortical localization7,8, but not for Drosophila.
To identify the host genes required for posterior localization of Wolbachia in the absence of asters, we counted the bacteria in four regions of unfertilized eggs (Table 1) from wild-type females and from females bearing mutations in gurken or oskar, two maternally acting genes that determine the site of germ-cell formation. The posterior pole region P1 had a mean bacterial density significantly different from those of areas A1, A2 and P2 in eggs from wild-type and heterozygous mothers. The bacteria were not localized in eggs from homozygous mutant mothers. The posterior localization of Wolbachia therefore requires not only the functional anteroposterior axis of polarized microtubules specified by Gurken signalling9, but also the germ plasm determined by Oskar2.
The eggs of our Canton S strain had a density of 3.04±1.04×106 bacteria per mm3. We used published data7 to calculate the density in the Nasonia vitripennis egg as 0.51±0.13×106 bacteria per mm3. In contrast to the tight posterior localization of Wolbachia in the Nasoniaembryo, most bacteria in Drosophila colonize somatic cells. The fate of these bacteria is unknown, but they may infect the germ line later in development.
Alternatively, the symbiosis may be less well established in Drosophila. We considered that transferring Wolbachia from Nasonia to Drosophila would show whether the germ-cell signals of the two species are recognized by a conserved bacterial mechanism. We found that early germline association seems to be symbiotic: Wolbachia infection was not a significant variable influencing the number of germ cells or the fidelity of their migration to the gonad in the Canton S strain (results not shown).
Posterior localization of Wolbachia was also abolished in eggs of Drosophila that are mutant for the vasa or tudor genes, which encode germplasm components localized by Oskar (data not quantified). Functional germ-cell determinants are localized in the mature oocyte (stage 14)10, but we could find no oocytes at stages 1–14 that had posterior localization of Wolbachia, in contrast to 80% of unfertilized eggs 0–3 hours after egg deposition (results not shown).
If germ plasm is merely a rich food source that stimulates local proliferation, why are Wolbachia not seen there earlier in oogenesis? Although we have not excluded the possibility of rapid local proliferation after egg deposition, we think it is more likely that the bacteria seen in ovarian nurse cells and oocytes relocate in response to a component of pole plasm that is translated only after egg activation11.
References
Werren, J. H. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42, 587–609 (1997).
Rongo, C. & Lehmann, R. Trends Genet. 12, 102–109 (1996).
Holden, P. R., Brookfield, J. F. Y. & Jones, P. Mol. Gen. Genet. 240, 213–220 (1993).
Glover, D. M. et al. Nature 348, 117–117 (1990).
Callaini, G., Riparbelli, M. G. & Dallai, R. J. Cell Sci. 107, 673–682 (1994).
Pereira, A. J., Dalby, B., Stewart, R. J., Doxsey, S. J. & Goldstein, L. S. B. J. Cell Biol. 136, 1081–1090 (1997).
Breeuwer, J. A. J. & Werren, J. H. Nature 346, 558–560 (1990).
Breeuwer, J. A. J. & Werren, J. H. Genetics 135, 565–574 (1993).
Gonzalez-Reyes, A., Elliot, H. & St Johnston, D. Nature 375, 654–658 (1995).
Illmensee, K. & Mahowald, A. P. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 71, 1016–1020 (1974).
Jongens, T. A., Hay, B., Jan, L. Y. & Jan, Y. N. Cell 70, 569–584 (1992).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hadfield, S., Axton, J. Germ cells colonized by endosymbiotic bacteria. Nature 402, 482 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/45002
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/45002
This article is cited by
-
The cellular lives of Wolbachia
Nature Reviews Microbiology (2023)
-
Role of vertically transmitted viral and bacterial endosymbionts of Aedes mosquitoes. Does Paratransgenesis influence vector-borne disease control?
Symbiosis (2022)
-
Apvasa marks germ-cell migration in the parthenogenetic pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea)
Development Genes and Evolution (2007)
-
Somatic stem cell niche tropism in Wolbachia
Nature (2006)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.