Can we ever hope to pin down the genetic changes that underlie the big steps in evolution? Possibly so, if a study of the variation in the pelvic fins of sticklebacks is anything to go by.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Darwin, C. On The Origin of Species (Murray, London, 1859).
Shapiro, M. D. et al. Nature 428, 717–723 (2004).
Morse, E. S. Ann. Lyceum Nat. Hist. NY 10, 141–158 (1872).
Lande, R. Evolution 32, 73–92 (1978).
Lanctôt, C. et al. Development 126, 1805–1810 (1999).
Szeto, D. P. et al. Genes Dev. 13, 484–494 (1999).
Marcil, A. et al. Development 130, 45–55 (2003).
Carroll, S. B. Cell 101, 570–580 (2000).
Levine, M. & Tjian, R. Nature 424, 147–151 (2003).
Mundy, N. I. et al. Science 303, 1870–1873 (2004).
Colosimo, P. F. et al. PLoS Biol. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020109
Gould, S. J. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shubin, N., Dahn, R. Lost and found. Nature 428, 703–704 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/428703a
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/428703a
This article is cited by
-
The role of self-organization in developmental evolution
Theory in Biosciences (2014)
-
Evo-devo and the search for homology (“sameness”) in biological systems
Theory in Biosciences (2005)