Feature |
Featured
-
-
Feature |
Open computational materials science
The materials modelling community is emerging as a champion for reproducible and reusable science. Aron Walsh discusses how FAIR databases, collaborative codes and transparent workflows are advancing this movement.
- Aron Walsh
-
Feature |
Better standards are needed for membrane materials
Tae Hoon Lee and Zachary P. Smith argue that some of the most exciting materials that could be used for gas separations are metastable or crystalline, with properties that are altered by sample preparation and testing, but there are no widely accepted standards.
- Tae Hoon Lee
- & Zachary P. Smith
-
Feature |
Lifting the fog in ferroelectric thin-film synthesis
Frustrated by reproducibility in electrical measurements on ferroelectric films, Lane Martin, Jon-Paul Maria and Darrell Schlom discuss tactics to reliably synthesize ‘good’ ferroelectric samples, especially in the search for superior materials and device heterostructures.
- Lane W. Martin
- , Jon-Paul Maria
- & Darrell G. Schlom
-
Feature |
Thermoelectric measurements
Joseph Heremans and Joshua Martin discuss the reproducibility of thermoelectric measurements and conclude that the uncertainty on the figure of merit zT is of the order of 15–20%.
- Joseph P. Heremans
- & Joshua Martin
-
Editorial |
Trust but verify
With a continuing increase in scientific studies, there is a growing awareness of the need to reproduce scientific results.
-
News & Views |
Echoes from quantum confinement
The discovery of intrinsic quantum confinement effects in the form of oscillations in the optical absorption of formamidinium lead triiodide thin films is a vivid example of the surprising physical properties of these hybrid organic–inorganic materials.
- Alejandro R. Goñi
-
Editorial |
Dealing with data
Nature Materials now requests that all original research articles contain a Data Availability Statement declaring the accessibility of the data and where it can be found.
-
Editorial |
Beware the impact factor
The journal impact factor is a good predictor of the quality of journals as measured by citations to primary research articles. It is, however, a poor indicator of citations to specific papers or of the future performance of individual researchers.