Abstract
Study design:
Multi-centre, single cohort.
Objectives:
To assess the needs, perceived environmental barriers, level of participation and psychological function of spinal cord injured patients living in the community 3–18 months after discharge.
Setting:
The National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville, UK.; Princess Royal Spinal Injuries Centre, Sheffield UK.; Midlands Centre for Spinal Injuries, Oswestry, UK.
Method:
Participants sustaining injury aged 18 or above were recruited from one of three spinal cord injuries units 3–18 months after discharge. Postal packs containing questionnaires, consent forms and information were distributed and a 2-week reminder was sent.
Results:
Main findings showed community needs to be generally well addressed however psychosocial needs were rated significantly lower than physical. Responses suggested no environmental impact on participation levels, however, qualitative data highlighted delays in accommodation, adaptations and availability of equipment to interfere with transition to community living. A substantial amount of respondents reported significant impact on independence and activity from secondary conditions and pain. Nearly all the sample reported dissatisfaction with their sexual life and these needs were not well addressed.
Conclusions:
Societal participation continues to be affected by secondary conditions and pain, whereas delays in equipment and structural adaptations impact on the transition to community living. Sexual needs and problems remain an issue for the spinal cord injured population and a need which is left unaddressed in the community.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Kennedy et al.1 recognize the fundamental goal of rehabilitation as being one of societal participation; however, the literature suggests that unaddressed needs in the community continue to impact on this aim. If community reintegration is considered to be the major aim of outpatient rehabilitation, the extent to which individuals with disabilities lack integration into important aspects of life can be considered to constitute a need. Therefore, measuring peoples' level of community integration and the barriers that prevent integration can be used to identify community needs.
Wheelchairs have been reported as being the most frequently stated barrier to participation, preceding the actual physical impairment,2 highlighting the need for high-quality wheelchairs to provide as little restriction as possible to facilitate participation.
Other environmental barriers such as transport may prevent community participation3 although Richards et al.4 report environmental access to be positively associated with satisfaction.
Secondary complications are found to negatively impact quality of life.5 Chronic pain is also widely experienced among the population with spinal cord injury (SCI). Kennedy et al.6 found that 25–45% of people with SCI experience persistent pain. In one study 27% of the 86% of participants who reported pain found it to negatively impact on activity participation7, 8 and have a negative impact on psychological affect and activities in daily living.
This indicates a need to target pain in early rehabilitation and again after discharge when residing in the community.
It is essential to reduce secondary complications where possible because they have been found to pose serious physical and psychological barriers to community participation.9
Sexual function has also been recognized as an area that has not been sufficiently addressed1 and most likely due to the sensitive nature of the subject.
Bowel and bladder accidents, altered body image, concerns about autonomic dysreflexia, pain and spasms have been identified as factors that may prevent patients from pursuing a physical relationship.
A further area of need has been found to be employment and leisure participation. In Tasiemski et al.10 sport participation and employment declined after injury due to reduced access to facilities, whereas in a separate study work and leisure time was found to reduce by 40% compared to pre-injury status.11
Access to employment has been recognized as particularly weak within the community for people with SCI. Furthermore, outpatients report a lack of informational support for them to pursue a specific job they had re-trained for and were provided with information for a more ‘suitable’ placement. This information highlights a discrepancy between what the individual wishes and service objectives.
Suicide within the SCI population is 2–6 times more prevalent than the general population12 with high levels of depression.13 The importance of assessing psychological well-being within the community is essential to minimizing clinical disorder.
The literature indicates there are needs that still require attention. The purpose of the proposed study is to investigate the community needs of people with SCIs in the first 18 months after discharge.
The study aims to identify key areas in which needs are not being met, to highlight disparities in rehabilitation service provision and environmental barriers impacting on the individual's community participation.
Methods
Participants were recruited 3–18 months following discharge from one of three centres (National Spinal Injuries Centre, Princess Royal Spinal Injuries Centre and Midlands Centre for Spinal Injuries). Inclusion criteria were that their injury had been sustained aged 18 or above and medical clearance had been obtained from their consultant.
Postal packages containing questionnaire booklets, consent forms and information letters were sent; a reminder letter was sent after 2 weeks.
Measures
In addition to demographics questions and open-ended questions regarding rehabilitation, the following measures were included within the questionnaire booklet:
Functional Independence Measure:14 a self-administered scale to examine level of independence in activities of daily living. Each domain is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (total assistance) to 7 (total independence). It has been validated for use within the SCI population.1
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale:15 a self-administered, 14-item scale to assess depression and anxiety state levels. It has widely been used within the SCI population.
Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors (CHIEF-SF):16 25 environmental barriers measured on a Likert-type scale according to frequency (0=daily, 4=never) and size of problem. Overall impact is measured by the sum of these measures.
Craig Handicap and Assessment Reporting Technique (CHART):17 used as an objective measure of participation for people with physical disabilities in six areas: physical independence, cognitive independence, social integration, mobility, occupation and economic self-sufficiency. The highest score is 100, which suggests a level of participation similar to that of a non-disabled person (used within the SCI population).
Pain Numerical Rating Scale: ratings of pain ‘in the last 24 hours’, ‘at its worst this week’, ‘at its least this week’ on a 10-point scale. Total impact of pain expressed as sum of three subscales.
Life Satisfaction Questionnaire:18 a scale examining satisfaction in nine life domains. Responses range from dissatisfying (1) to very satisfying (6).
Current Needs Assessment: the needs were extracted from the current needs checklist in Kennedy et al.1 Items scored according to whether need is considered to be addressed (1=fully, 5=not at all). Scores were recoded in reverse order before analysis.
Secondary Complication Screening Instrument:19 frequency and impact of secondary problems on independent activity is measured on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 3, items were selected as those that were most relevant to the SCI population.
Female Sexual Function Index:20 a self-administered scale used to assess female sexual function. The subscale of ‘satisfaction’ will be used for the purpose of this study, and has been validated for use in male samples.
Open questions (researcher developed): These questions were compiled based on certain areas highlighted in the literature and designed for the purpose of identifying more specific problems with service delivery that may impact community reintegration. For example, questions were asked about availability of resources, delays in receiving resources, what makes a difference to quality of life and what services would the individual like more access to. Responses to open-ended questions were categorized in to commonly occurring themes. Percentages for each theme were calculated from the total number of responses to each question.
All three centres were involved in data collection, and analysis was conducted at the NSIC, Stoke Mandeville Hospital using SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for Windows. Data were dealt with in accordance to ethical guidelines and data protection laws.
We certify that all applicable institutional and governmental regulations concerning the ethical use of human volunteers were followed during the course of this research.
Results
Mean age was 50.37 years, a range of 18–81 and a ratio of 2:1 men/women. A total of 32% (26) of the respondents were employed at time of study with a further 7.6% actively seeking employment. Injury characteristics were as follows: 8 participants (10%) had complete tetraplegia, 23 (29%) had incomplete tetraplegia, 17 (21%) had complete paraplegia, 23 (29%) had incomplete paraplegia and 9 (11%) did not know their injury type.
Functional Independence Measure
Participants rated their level of independence on a seven-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (total assistance) to 7 (total independence). As 13 items corresponded to motor function and 5 to cognitive, total scores for each subsection were recoded to remain on a seven-point scale. Mean motor independence was 67.16 (recoded to 5 ‘modified dependence’) whereas mean cognitive independence was 33.14 (recoded to 7 ‘completely independent’). Non-parametric analysis found a significantly higher level of independence in the cognitive (M=6.74, s.d.=0.96) domain than motor (M=5.54, s.d.=1.92), Z=−4.392, P<0.00.
Hospital anxiety and depression scores
Mean anxiety score was 6.12 (s.d.=4.43), mean depression score was 6.30 (s.d.=4.14), meaning the majority of the sample were classified under ‘non-clinical’ levels.
The researchers were interested in whether there would be a gender difference in this area. A Mann–Whitney U-test revealed women to have significantly higher anxiety scores than men (U=491, N1=54, N2=27, P=0.017). No significant gender difference was found on depression scores.
Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors
The overall impact of environmental barrier is calculated by the product of occurrence frequency and degree of problem. With a maximum impact of 8, mean score in Attitudes and Support was 0.51 (s.d.=1.14), Services and Assistance 1.44 (s.d.=1.85), Physical and Structural 2.24 (s.d.=2.27), Policies 0.86 (s.d.=1.76), and Work and School 0.18 (s.d.=0.56). The results would suggest that in this sample environmental barriers do not appear to have a large impact on activities.
Craig Handicap and Assessment Reporting Technique
The CHART can be divided into six subsections each with an optimum score of 100.
Mean score for Physical Independence was 91.05 (s.d.=10.69), Mobility 78.12 (s.d.=24.34), Occupation 56.05 (s.d.=36.57), Social Integration 86.82 (s.d.=25.42), Economic Self-Sufficiency 77.66 (s.d.=31.48) and Cognitive Independence 65.97 (s.d.=31.10).
Notably, 51.9% of participants were found to score the maximum score of 100 in the Social Integration domain, and on removing retired aged adults from analysis, mean scores for Occupation were taken to 64.17 (s.d.=35.58).
The research team were interested to look at whether injury type had an impact on participation levels. Kruskall–Wallis analysis revealed a significant effect of level of injury on Physical Independence (χ2=8.37, d.f.=3, P=0.039). The CHART total mean scores were 336.89 for participants with a cervical level of injury, 411.29 for those injured at the thoracic region and 429.29 for those injured at the lumbar region. A Kruskall–Wallis test revealed a significant main effect of level of injury for CHART total scores (χ2=8.54, d.f.=2, P=0.01).
Pain
On a scale of 0–10, mean pain in the last 24 h was 3.28 (s.d.=2.78), pain at its worst in the last week 3.83 (s.d.=3.06), and 3.53 (s.d.=2.76) for average pain unpleasantness in the past 24 h. 48 participants (59.3%) scored below 10 on total pain scores, 19 participants (23.4%) scored between 11 and 20, and 14 (17.3%) scored in the higher end of the scale. Responses are shown in Figure 1.
Life Satisfaction Questionnaire
Ratings of satisfaction in nine areas of life on a five-point scale were recoded into ‘Satisfied’ or ‘Dissatisfied’ as indicated in Fugl-Meyer et al.18 As Figure 2 shows, in the areas of vocation, leisure and sexual life there is a large discrepancy between ratings of satisfaction, with the majority of respondents feeling dissatisfied with these areas of life.
Current needs
The mean recoded score for the current needs questionnaire was 4 ‘quite well addressed’. The individual needs questions were grouped according to ‘physical’ or ‘psychosocial’ domains. Wilcoxen analysis found a significantly lower level of addressed needs within the psychosocial areas than physical (Z=−5.978, P<0.00).
Secondary conditions
Participants rated on a three-point scale the amount each of seven secondary conditions. As seen in Figure 3, the majority of participants had rare/mild impact of secondary conditions however there were a substantial proportion (n=50) stating significant disruption due to the effects of secondary conditions.
Sexual satisfaction
On a scale ranging 0–6, sexual satisfaction was frequently rated as very low, the mean total sexual satisfaction score was 1.98. Analysis found no significant difference in rated sexual satisfaction between genders.
Qualitative findings
The majority of participants (67.9%) felt there were issues after discharge that made transition difficult, mostly due to accommodation and adaptations (29%), example responses included ‘family home was not appropriate, I spent fourteen months in a care home before moving into a bungalow’, Psychological/Social/Adjustment issues such as feeling ‘abandoned and scared’, ‘anxiety and problems integrating’ were experienced by 25% of respondents and Rehabilitation Services proved problematic for 22%, comments such as ‘after six months of transition, services forget about you’ and ‘preparation for life at home was almost non existent’ were included within this theme. Forty-nine per cent of respondents experienced a delay in acquiring the necessary adaptations. The lack of resources making transition most difficult were, in order, adaptations (35%), equipment, (27%) and poor access (19%). In a question focusing on quality of life, the majority of participants felt independence to be a main factor (16%), some of the responses gathered were ‘being able to live independently, in my own home and manage my own affairs’, and ‘being able to get out and about’. This was followed by relationships (14%), with ‘family’, ‘wife’, ‘partner’ and ‘friends’ frequently observed. Issues of participation were felt as being important in 13% of the responses, with ‘Sport/Exercise’ frequently mentioned alongside ‘Employment’, ‘Outdoor opportunities’ and ‘Activities’. Results are summarized in Table 1.
Discussion
The main findings from this study show that within the current sample community needs were generally well addressed. However, there was a discrepancy between the number of psychosocial needs being met and those of physical. Answers given to open-ended questions highlighted delays in accommodation, adaptations and availability of equipment. A substantial amount of respondents reported significant impact on independence and activity from secondary conditions and pain, and nearly all the sample reported that they were dissatisfied with their sexual life and these needs were not well addressed. Clearly, there remain issues within the SCI population that may be targeted to improve the transition to community living and improve quality of life.
Results found that the majority of participants were generally psychologically well adjusted with non-clinical levels of anxiety and depression. The percentage of respondents exhibited clinical levels of anxiety were similar to a previous study however slightly elevated levels of depression in comparison. The higher levels of anxiety reported by women in this study and previous research suggest a susceptibility that should be regularly assessed through outpatient services to prevent clinical levels of anxiety impacting on rehabilitation in the community.
The overall impact of environmental barriers was found to be relatively low. Highest levels were aspects of the physical environment and transportation and support previous research.21 Of concern is the range of responses in this area, with some participants indicating the largest scores in some domains. This is clearly an area that requires close observation due to its relationship with life satisfaction, and the results obtained from open-ended questions showed that transition to community living had been made difficult due to problems with environmental issues. It is important to acknowledge these problems and establish why they continue to occur. It may be that clearer communication is required between services, departments and funding bodies, and equipment ordered at an earlier time point. Patients should be in receipt of comprehensive information regarding equipment and supplies before they are discharged, and where possible given details of timescales for any adaptations that take place. Not only will this communication aid the discharge process but also give the individual a sense of empowerment and improve psychological well-being. Clearly, such changes would be advantageous to community transition and prevent problems impacting on levels of participation and rehabilitation.
As identified in the results of the CHART measurement, this sample of spinal cord injured people was found to be participating well, with 51.9% of respondents achieving the same level of Social Integration as one without a disability, and with 43% of respondents scoring the maximum on measures of Economic Self-Sufficiency.
Low levels of CHART Cognitive Independence and Occupation were found, with Occupation also being identified as an area with low satisfaction. However, the sample contained a large proportion of retired participants (31%), which may have impacted on these results. The high levels of economic self-sufficiency found may be an explanation for low occupational participation—if an individual is in receipt of sufficient funds this may discourage them from seeking alternate income.
The mean rating of current needs was that they were ‘Quite Well Addressed’; however the research identified a significant difference between the degrees of need addressed in physical areas and psychosocial areas. Areas that reported most dissatisfaction were Sexual Issues, Community Services, Employment and Recreation, which support previous findings finding employment and sexual activity to be rated as ‘least well addressed’ across four European countries.1 As such, although SCI patients are entering the community with physical needs addressed and with the skills to adjust to their injury, psychosocial issues remain lacking. A large amount of evidence suggests that employment and social interaction are important to successful adjustment. Ongoing employment clinics and links to voluntary organizations may be potential services offered to the SCI population in the community, alongside giving patients more information on where to get accessible recreation activities after discharge.
Low scores were generally reported for secondary complications, which was unexpected due to a high prevalence of complications reported in the SCI literature. The above findings may be attributable to the relatively early stages of discharge and the more regular follow-up appointments during this stage. Sleep problems, spasticity and contractures were reported by many to be impacting on their ability to carry out activities independently and may be a focus of attention for outpatient services, for example regular medication reviews.
Similarly, low average pain scores were reported, which is contrary to the SCI literature. However, despite the average score being relatively low, frequencies revealed that 17% of participants were experiencing pain ‘as bad as one can imagine’. Due to the relationship between pain and quality of life and the negative impact on participation,7, 10 it is essential that pain is addressed for people living in the community and that they should have regular reviews of pain management and medication.
The majority of participants reported the lowest sexual satisfaction score possible. It has been previously highlighted as an area of need in this population and the results from this scale relate to the dissatisfaction expressed in the current needs domain. This scale also reflected responses when measuring secondary complications and Functional Independence, supporting the view that physical barriers present problems for people with SCI to engage in sexual activity. Many patients would not feel comfortable seeking advice or openly discussing sexual dysfunction, despite it impacting on psychological well-being. Education and information on this matter may be better translated through booklets. Alternatively, approved Internet accessible pages and peer group support may be more favoured than addressing issues with clinical team members.
The results of this study are promising, and have clear clinical implications in the focus of community rehabilitation. Although in this study needs were found to be generally well addressed, the results reiterate the importance of sexuality in overall levels of satisfaction and the necessity in addressing such issues during rehabilitation. The current study investigated a large number of factors potentially impacting on participation levels and as such necessitated the use of many measures. Although this may have resulted in respondent fatigue studies such as this, wider research into the quality and patient satisfaction in community residence would be beneficial to the process of reintegration and participation.
References
Kennedy P, Lude P, Taylor N . Quality of life, social participation, appraisals and coping post spinal cord injury: a review of four community samples. Spinal Cord 2006; 44: 95–105.
Chaves ES, Boninger ML, Cooper R, Fitzgerald SG, Gray D, Cooper RA . Assessing the influence of wheelchair technology on perception of participation in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1854–1858.
Wehman P, Wilson K, Parent W, Sherron-Targett P, McKinley W . Employment satisfaction of individuals with spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 79: 161–169.
Richards JS, Bombardier CH, Tate D, Dijkers M, Gordon W, Shewchuk R et al. Access to the environment and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 1501–1506.
Post MWM, De Witte LP, Van Asbeck FWA, Van Dijk AJ, Schrijvers AJP . Predictors of health status and life satisfaction in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 395–401.
Kennedy P, Frankel H, Gardner B, Nuseibeh I . Factors associated with acute and chronic pain following traumatic spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord 1998; 35: 814–817.
Donnelly C, Eng JJ . Pain following spinal cord injury: the impact on community reintegration. Spinal Cord 2005; 43: 278–282.
Boschen KA, Tonack M, Gargaro J . Long-term adjustment and community reintegration following spinal cord injury. Int J Rehabil Res 2003; 26: 157–164.
Forsythe E, Horsewell JE . Sexual rehabilitation of women with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2006; 44: 234–241.
Tasiemski T, Bergstrõm E, Savic G, Gardner BP . Sports, recreation and employment following spinal cord injury—a pilot study. Spinal Cord 2000; 38: 173–184.
Schönherr MC, Groothoff JW, Mulder GA, Eisma WH . Participation and satisfaction after spinal cord injury: results of a vocational and leisure outcome study. Spinal Cord 2005; 43: 241–248.
Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA . Behavioural and demographic predictors of suicide after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 72: 488–493.
Beedie A, Kennedy P . Quality of social support predicts hopelessness and depression post spinal cord injury. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2002; 9: 227–234.
Hamilton BB, Granger C, Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD . Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measured by the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 566–573.
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP . The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia 1983; 67: 361–370.
WHO. International Classification of Impairments Disabilities, and Handicaps 1980. World Health Organization: Geneva.
Whiteneck GG, Brooks CA, Charlifue S, Gerhart KA, Mellick D, Overholser D et al. Guide for Use of the CHART: Craig Handicap and Assessment Reporting Technique. Craig Hospital, Engelwood, CO, USA, 1992.
Fugl-Meyer AR, Branholm IB, Fugl-Meyer KS . Happiness and domain specific life satisfaction in adult northern Swedes. Clin Rehabil 1991; 5: 25–33.
Seekins T, Smith N, McCleary T, Clay J, Walsh J . Secondary disability prevention: involving consumers in the development of a public health surveillance instrument. J Disabil Policy Stud 1990; 1: 21–35.
Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R et al. The Female Function Index (FSFI): a multi-dimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26: 191–208.
Cox RJ, Amsters DI, Pershouse KJ . The need for a multidisciplinary outreach service for people with spinal cord injury living in the community. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15: 600–606.
Acknowledgements
We thank the staff and patients from the National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville; the Princess Royal Spinal Injuries Centre, Sheffield and the Midlands Centre for Spinal Injuries, Oswestry, for their contributions and participation in this study. We also thank Emilie Smithson, who assisted in the preparation of this paper. We acknowledge UK Spinal Cord Injury Research Network (UKSCIRN) who funded this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kennedy, P., Sherlock, O., McClelland, M. et al. A multi-centre study of the community needs of people with spinal cord injuries: the first 18 months. Spinal Cord 48, 15–20 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2009.65
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2009.65
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Socioeconomic consequences of traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injuries: a Danish nationwide register-based study
Spinal Cord (2022)
-
A comparative examination of models of service delivery intended to support community integration in the immediate period following inpatient rehabilitation for spinal cord injury
Spinal Cord (2020)
-
Prevalence of and factors associated with expressed and unmet service needs reported by persons with spinal cord injury living in the community
Spinal Cord (2019)
-
Urinary tract infections and bladder management over the first year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation
Spinal Cord Series and Cases (2018)
-
The influence of clarification and threats on life situation: patients’ experiences 1 year after TSCI
Spinal Cord Series and Cases (2017)