ANCA-negative glomerulonephritis associated with nonasthmatic Churg–Strauss syndrome
Asha J Chemmalakuzhy, Xin J Zhou and S Susan Hedayati* About the authors
Correspondence *University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Veterans Affairs North Texas Healthcare System, MC 111G1, 4500 South Lancaster Road, Dallas, TX 75216-7167, USA
Email susan.hedayati@utsouthwestern.edu
Medscape Continuing Medical Education online
Medscape, LLC is pleased to provide online continuing medical education (CME) for this journal article, allowing clinicians the opportunity to earn CME credit. Medscape, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide CME for physicians. Medscape, LLC designates this educational activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. All other clinicians completing this activity will be issued a certificate of participation. To receive credit, please complete the post-test.
Learning objectives
Upon completion of this activity, participants should be able to:
- List diagnostic criteria for Churg–Strauss syndrome.
- Identify the organ system most frequently involved in Churg–Strauss syndrome.
- Describe the treatment of Churg–Strauss syndrome.
- Specify how plasma exchange may improve outcomes in severe cases of Churg–Strauss syndrome.
Competing interests
The authors and the Locum Journal Editor C Harman declared no competing interests. The CME questions author CP Vega declared that he has served as an advisor or consultant to Novartis, Inc.
To complete the questions online and earn continuing education credits, you must be a registered user on Medscape.com. If you are not registered on Medscape.com please click on the New Users: Free Registration link on the top left-hand side of the website to register. Registration is free. For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME activity: CME@medscape.net. For technical assistance, contact CME@webmd.net.
Summary
Background A 36-year-old white male with a history of allergic rhinitis and sinusitis presented to the emergency room with abdominal pain and diarrhea. Physical examination revealed fever, hypoxemia and a maculopapular rash. Laboratory tests showed proteinuria, hematuria, leukocytosis, eosinophilia and an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
Investigations Physical examination, urine and blood analysis and culture, chest radiography, chest and abdominal CT, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, skin and kidney biopsy, serology and renal ultrasound.
Diagnosis Pauci-immune focal necrotizing glomerulonephritis with crescents and interstitial eosinophilia, consistent with Churg–Strauss syndrome.
Management The patient was treated with methylprednisolone 1 g/day intravenously for 3 days. He also received oral clotrimazole and combined oral sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim for prophylaxis against candidiasis and pneumonia, respectively. He left the hospital against medical advice and was lost to follow-up.
Keywords:
Churg–Strauss syndrome, eosinophilia, necrotizing glomerulonephritis, small-vessel vasculitis
The case
A 36-year-old white male with a several-year history of urticaria, chronic cough, allergic rhinitis and sinusitis presented to the emergency room with cramping abdominal pain, bloating, and dark and watery diarrhea, all of which had begun 1 week previously. The patient had a 20-pack-year history of smoking, but he denied using any prescription, over-the-counter or herbal medications. He also had a fever, as well as generalized myalgias and arthralgias. Upon physical examination, the patient's temperature was 38.8 °C (101.8 °F), his blood pressure was 144/89 mmHg, his pulse rate was 111 beats per minute, his respiratory rate was 20 breaths per minute, and his pulse oximetry showed oxygen saturation of 93% on room air. Bibasilar pulmonary rales, moderate lower extremity edema and a diffuse maculopapular rash involving both lower legs and feet were noted.
Blood analysis revealed leukocytosis (30,800 cells/mm3; reference range 3–11,000 cells/mm3) with an elevated eosinophil level (8.1%; reference range 0–4%), thrombocytosis (870,000 cells/mm3; reference range 150–400,000 cells/mm3) and anemia (hemoglobin 97 g/l; reference range 135–180 g/l). The patient's blood urea nitrogen level was 6.38 mmol/l (reference range 2.5–6.7 mmol/l), and his serum creatinine level was 123
mol/l (reference range 70–150
mol/l). Abdominal CT with intravenous contrast revealed thickening of the distal duodenum and jejunum, and subcentimeter mesenteric and retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. Other pertinent findings included a low partial pressure of oxygen (58 mmHg) and reduced oxygen saturation (89% on room air) as measured in the patient's arterial blood. A urine sediment examination revealed the presence of numerous white blood cells and dysmorphic red blood cells, but no casts. The protein:creatinine ratio of a spot urine sample was 2.9, and the patient's erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was greater than 120 mm/h (reference range 10–20 mm/h).
The patient was admitted to the hospital. Initial blood cultures grew Staphylococcus epidermidis in two of four samples, and a urine culture grew contaminants, so empirical antibiotic therapy was initiated. However, all subsequent cultures, including those from stool samples, tested negative for bacterial and fungal pathogens, and, therefore, antibiotic therapy was discontinued. Chest radiography and CT showed cardiomegaly and bilateral patchy pulmonary infiltrates. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed an ulcerated duodenojejunal mass; a biopsy of the mass showed acute and chronic inflammation. A skin biopsy of the patient's lower extremities revealed subepidermal vesicular dermatitis with infiltration by lymphocytes, eosinophils and neutrophils. A mesenteric lymph node biopsy did not yield an adequate sample for analysis.
A renal ultrasound showed that the patient had normal-sized kidneys but not hydronephrosis. Serologic investigations, including tests for antinuclear antibody, antibodies against rheumatoid factor, hepatitis B and C, HIV types 1 and 2, antiglomerular basement membrane antibody, and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) directed against myeloperoxidase and proteinase 3, were all negative. The patient's complement levels were normal. Serologic testing for syphilis, and serum and urine protein electrophoresis to test for monoclonal gammopathy were also all negative.
A renal biopsy revealed the presence of eleven glomeruli, none of which were globally sclerotic. Three glomeruli had segmental fibrinoid necrosis of capillary tufts surrounded by early crescents (Figure 1). The remaining eight glomeruli were histologically unremarkable. The biopsy also revealed interstitial fibrosis and mild focal tubular atrophy, as well as mild interstitial edema with heavy infiltration of lymphocytes, plasma cells and eosinophils (Figure 2). Immunofluorescence studies did not reveal any immunoglobulins or complement components. No electron-dense deposits were noted on electron microscopy. The final diagnosis was pauci-immune focal necrotizing glomerulonephritis consistent with Churg–Strauss syndrome.
Figure 1 The renal biopsy reveals a glomerular segment with deeply acidophilic, fibrinoid necrosis surrounded by a small cellular crescent.
There is also a substantial interstitial infiltrate composed of lymphocytes, plasma cells and many eosinophils. Hematoxylin and eosin stain; original magnification
200.
Figure 2 High-magnification photomicrograph of the renal biopsy sample showing extensive interstitial inflammation with numerous eosinophils.
There is some tubulitis and tubular injury. Hematoxylin and eosin stain; original magnification
400.
The patient began treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone 1 g daily for 3 days. Oral clotrimazole (10 mg four times daily) and combined oral sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim (400 mg and 80 mg, respectively, once daily) were given for prophylaxis against candidiasis and Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, respectively. Clinical improvement was observed within 48 h; the patient's fever, leukocytosis, eosinophilia and hematuria all decreased. The patient's diarrhea and abdominal pain that had been present on admission were resolved. Treatment with cyclophosphamide in addition to steroids was considered given the poor prognostic factors present in the patient (proteinuria >1 g/day and gastrointestinal involvement), but the patient left the hospital against medical advice and was lost to follow-up despite several attempts to contact him. Loss to follow-up also prevented repeat testing for ANCA, a repeat biopsy of the duodenal mass (to determine whether it was lymphoproliferative and, thus, perhaps related to the eosinophilia), the conducting of a bronchoscopy (to detect possible alveolar hemorrhage) and measurement of the patient's serum IgE levels (which are sometimes raised in Churg–Strauss syndrome), all of which would have been advisable to confirm the diagnosis.
Discussion of diagnosis
Differential diagnosis
In the patient presented here, the involvement of multiple organ systems (Box 1) resulted in a very broad differential diagnosis (Box 2). The presence of cough, allergic rhinitis and sinusitis, and bilateral pulmonary infiltrates suggested a pulmonary–renal syndrome such as small-vessel vasculitis or antiglomerular basement membrane antibody syndrome. Other possibilities, although less probable given the clinical presentation, were systemic lupus erythematosus, amyloidosis and lymphoma. Postinfectious glomerulonephritis and acute interstitial nephritis were also considered given the persistence of fever and leukocytosis and exposure to antibiotics. However, the serologic work-up was negative and the nonrenal biopsies were inconclusive, both of which suggested that an immune-complex deposition disease such as lupus was unlikely. We concluded, therefore, that the patient had pauci-immune vasculitis.
Box 1 Key clinical features of the case.
- History of allergic rhinitis and sinusitis
- Abdominal pain, diarrhea
- Fever
- Myalgias and arthralgias
- Rash, urticaria
- Pulmonary infiltrates
- Normocytic anemia
- Leukocytosis with eosinophilia
- Hematuria and proteinuria
- Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Box 2 Differential diagnoses of the case.
Small-vessel vasculitides
- Pauci-immune necrotizing small-vessel vasculitis:
Wegener's granulomatosis
Microscopic polyangiitis
Churg–Strauss syndrome - Vasculitis related to connective tissue disorders:
Systemic lupus erythematosus
Rheumatoid arthritis - Vasculitis related to viral infection:
Hepatitis B
Hepatitis C
HIV infection - Other small-vessel vasculitides:
Henoch–Schönlein purpura
Essential cryoglobulinemic vasculitis
Antiglomerular basement membrane antibody syndrome
Lymphoma
Amyloidosis
Postinfectious glomerulonephritis
Acute interstitial nephritis
Pauci-immune vasculitides, which affect small blood vessels, include Wegener's granulomatosis, microscopic polyangiitis and Churg–Strauss syndrome. These conditions are characterized by a lack of deposition of immune complexes in the tissues—which is why they are called pauci-immune—and they are usually associated with ANCA expression. The current patient's renal biopsy revealed the presence of pauci-immune vasculitus, but the finding of interstitial eosinophil infiltration in the presence of peripheral eosinophilia made Churg–Strauss syndrome the most probable diagnosis.
Churg–Strauss syndrome
The syndrome of "allergic granulomatosis and angiitis" was first described in 1951 by Churg and Strauss in a report of 13 autopsies.1 The 1994 Chapel Hill Consensus Conference on the nomenclature of systemic vasculitides defined Churg–Strauss syndrome as a granulomatous inflammation involving the respiratory tract in combination with necrotizing vasculitis of both small-sized and medium-sized blood vessels, asthma and eosinophilia.2 The incidence of Churg–Strauss syndrome in the general population is approximately 0.5–6.8 per million, the mean age at diagnosis is 48 years and the male to female distribution is 1:1.3
Churg–Strauss syndrome progresses via three successive stages: the 'prodromal phase', involving asthma and/or allergic rhinitis, with or without sinus polyposis; the 'eosinophilic phase', which is characterized by eosinophil infiltration into tissues such as the lungs, heart and gastrointestinal tract, with or without granulomas; and finally the 'systemic phase', during which necrotizing vasculitis develops in the skin, kidneys and peripheral nerves.3 This final phase usually occurs 3–4 years after the onset of asthma.3
The clinical presentation of Churg–Strauss syndrome is variable and can involve any organ system, but pulmonary involvement is the hallmark of Churg–Strauss syndrome, with asthma reported in 98% of cases and pulmonary infiltrates in 50% of patients.3 Allergic rhinitis is reported in about 70% of patients. Neurologic manifestations, which include peripheral neuropathy, occur in about 50% of patients, and cardiac involvement, usually in the form of myocarditis or pericarditis, occurs in 60%. Gastrointestinal involvement is found in about 50% of patients, and symptoms range from abdominal pain and diarrhea to eosinophilic gastroenteritis, an irritable-bowel-syndrome-like condition.4 Skin manifestations, most commonly palpable purpura, affect 40–70% of patients and can also include urticaria, maculopapular rash and subcutaneous nodules.3
Approximately one-third of patients with Churg–Strauss syndrome display renal involvement as indicated by a raised serum creatinine level; of these, about one-fifth have rapidly progressive renal failure (Table 1).1, 5, 8 Patients with renal involvement usually present with nephritic urinary sediment, although nephrotic syndrome has also been reported.3
Table 1 Prevalence of renal disease in Churg–Strauss syndrome.
Full tableFigures & Tables indexDownload Power Point slide (153K)
Laboratory evaluation in patients with Churg–Strauss syndrome often shows eosinophilia, but this finding is not universal.9 Less-specific findings include normocytic anemia, elevated ESR and raised serum IgE levels.9 ANCA, usually directed against myeloperoxidase, are found in only about 35–50% of patients with Churg–Strauss syndrome.7, 10, 11, 12 ANCA-negative patients usually present with eosinophilic tissue infiltration involving the heart and the gastrointestinal tract, whereas ANCA-positive patients tend to present with small-vessel vasculitis in the form of glomerulonephritis, pulmonary hemorrhage or mononeuritis multiplex.11 This difference suggests that the pathogenic mechanisms of ANCA-negative and ANCA-positive Churg–Strauss syndrome are different.7, 10, 11, 12 However, the role of ANCA in the development of Churg–Strauss syndrome remains hypothetical at present (Figure 3).10 In the ANCA-negative subset of patients, the pathogenesis of Churg–Strauss syndrome is thought to be mediated by cytotoxic products of eosinophils.3, 7, 12
Figure 3 Postulated pathogenesis of ANCA-mediated pauci-immune vasculitis.
Abbreviations: ANCA, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies; MPO, myeloperoxidase; PR3, proteinase 3; ROS, reactive oxygen species.
Full figure and legend (60K)Figures & Tables indexDownload Power Point slide (176K)Various diagnostic criteria are available for the classification of small-vessel vasculitis such as Churg–Strauss syndrome, but the most specific appear to be those formulated by the American College of Rheumatology (Box 3).13 The presence of at least four of the six criteria indicates that Churg–Strauss syndrome is very likely to be the correct diagnosis (85% sensitivity and 99.7% specificity in the original sample of 20 patients reported by Masi et al.).13
Box 3 American College of Rheumatology criteriaa for classification of Churg–Strauss syndrome.13
- Asthma
- Eosinophilia >10%
- Neuropathy
- Pulmonary infiltrates
- Paranasal sinus abnormality
- Extravascular eosinophil infiltration on biopsy
AThe presence of at least four of the six criteria indicates that Churg–Strauss syndrome is very likely to be the correct diagnosis.
The patient described here had both typical and atypical features of Churg–Strauss syndrome. In line with the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria, he had eosinophilia (albeit below the 10% threshold), pulmonary infiltrates, allergic rhinitis and sinusitis, and extravascular eosinophil infiltration of the skin and kidney. He also had urticaria, rash, gastrointestinal involvement, normocytic anemia and elevated ESR, all of which are commonly reported in patients with Churg–Strauss syndrome. Like most patients with renal involvement, he had a nephritic urinary sediment.
The patient presented with a maculopapular rash, which is a rare skin manifestation of Churg–Strauss syndrome.3 The skin biopsy showed subepidermal vesicular dermatitis, which is consistent with dermatitis herpetiformis, a condition not previously reported in association with Churg–Strauss syndrome. Unlike some other cases, the patient had no neurologic manifestations. Most importantly, he displayed no asthma symptoms and exhibited ANCA-negative glomerulonephritis. Although the patient reported chronic cough, he denied a prior diagnosis of asthma or use of a
-adrenoceptor agonist inhaler. Fewer than 10 reported cases of Churg–Strauss syndrome have occurred in the absence of asthma.9 Of the two that were associated with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, both were ANCA-positive.14, 15 We acknowledge that vasculitis might simply have preceded the onset of asthma in the patient described here. However, the finding of glomerulonephritis, a typical manifestation of ANCA-positive Churg–Strauss syndrome, questions the concept that the pathogenesis of the ANCA-negative disease differs from that of the ANCA-positive disease. As ANCA negativity has not previously been reported in the absence of asthma, we planned to repeat serologic testing for ANCA, but the patient was lost to follow-up.
Treatment and management
The treatment of Churg–Strauss syndrome is very similar to that of other pauci-immune vasculitides, and is divided into three stages: induction of remission (defined as the resolution of clinical and biological manifestations of active vasculitis, including an inactive urine sediment); maintenance of remission; and treatment of relapse. Monitoring the response to induction therapy is best achieved by clinical evaluation as well as by repeated evaluation of eosinophilia and ESR, and by urinanalysis in those with renal involvement.3 The level or presence of ANCA is not a good marker of disease activity, nor does it seem to influence the likelihood of remission, relapse or death; therefore, it should not be used to guide therapy.7, 16
As with the other pauci-immune vasculitides, intravenous and oral glucocorticoids are the mainstay of therapy for induction, maintenance and treatment of relapse, and the patient described here was initially treated with intravenous methylprednisolone. Addition of oral or intravenous cyclophosphamide can be considered if one or more poor prognostic factors are present at induction, if steroids fail to induce remission or if relapse occurs.3, 17 In a study of 342 patients with Churg–Strauss syndrome and polyarteritis nodosa, the French Vasculitis Study Group identified five factors associated with a poor outcome (Box 4).18 Patients who had none of these risk factors had a 5-year mortality of 12%, and 93% of these patients achieved remission with intravenous corticosteroids followed by oral corticosteroids alone; however, relapse was common (35% in the first year), and one-third of the patients required additional treatment with cyclophosphamide or azathioprine.19 In the presence of one risk factor, 5-year mortality was 25.9%, and if two or more factors were present, 5-year mortality increased to 46%.18 Given that upon hospital admission the patient reported here had two of the risk factors reported in Box 4 (proteinuria >1 g/day and gastrointestinal involvement), cyclophosphamide therapy was considered in addition to steroids at the start of therapy. However, the patient left the hospital against medical advice and has not contacted his physicians since.
Box 4 Five-factor score for quantification of mortality risk in Churg–Strauss syndrome.a
- Proteinuria >1 g/day
- Serum creatinine >140
mol/l (>1.58 mg/dl) - Cardiomyopathy
- Gastrointestinal involvement
- Central nervous system involvement
AEach factor carries a score of 1. Total scores of 0, 1 and
2 are associated with 5-year mortality rates of 12%, 25.9% and 46%, respectively.18
A study of 48 patients with Churg–Strauss syndrome and at least one poor prognostic factor at baseline found no significant difference in major relapse rates when intravenous cyclophosphamide was administered in either 12 or 6 pulses, but there was a significantly higher number of mild relapses in the 6-pulse than in the 12-pulse group.20 The authors concluded that 12 cyclophosphamide pulses were better than 6 pulses to control severe Churg–Strauss syndrome. The risk:benefit ratio should be considered when contemplating the administration of a higher number of cyclophosphamide pulses, given the associated drug toxicity. In patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis, remission can be maintained over 18 months as effectively by cyclophosphamide as by azathioprine, both administered orally.11, 21 One study reported less-serious adverse events with azathioprine compared with cyclophosphamide (10% versus 18%), even though the study was not specifically designed to detect such differences.21 Switching from cyclophosphamide to azathioprine after remission to reduce drug toxicity is, therefore, an option.
Jayne et al. studied standard treatment plus either plasma exchange or intravenous pulses of methylprednisolone in patients who had severe ANCA-associated vasculitis.22 The addition of plasma exchange conferred no survival benefit over addition of intravenous methylprednisolone, but the former was associated with better renal outcomes among patients with severe renal dysfunction at presentation; 81% of the plasma exchange group versus 61% of the methylprednisolone group were dialysis-free at 1 year (P <0.01). Intravenous immunoglobulin might be helpful, in combination with steroids, cyclophosphamide and plasmapheresis, at maintaining remission, but this finding has yet to be confirmed.23 Rituximab, a chimeric antibody against the B cell antigen CD20, is currently being studied in the Rituximab for ANCA-associated Vasculitis (RAVE) trial; the antibody is being used in combination with steroids and being compared to the cyclophosphamide–steroid combination treatment for induction of remission in ANCA-associated vasculitides including Churg–Strauss syndrome.
Conclusions
Churg–Strauss syndrome is challenging to diagnose because of its highly variable presentation. Renal involvement is not universal and rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis is uncommon. This patient seems to be the first reported nonasthmatic case of ANCA-negative Churg–Strauss syndrome with necrotizing glomerulonephritis. The presence of glomerulonephritis in the absence of ANCA raises questions about the differences in the pathogenesis of ANCA-negative and ANCA-positive Churg–Strauss syndrome that have been postulated on the basis of differences in organ involvement.10 Treatment of Churg–Strauss syndrome should be started early in the course of the disease, and poor prognostic factors should prompt the addition of cyclophosphamide to glucocorticoid therapy.
Acknowledgments
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Charles P Vega, University of California, Irvine, CA, is the author of and is solely responsible for the content of the learning objectives, questions and answers of the Medscape-accredited continuing medical education activity associated with this article.
References
- Churg J and Strauss L (1951) Allergic angiitis and periarteritis nodosa. Am J Pathol 27: 277–301 | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
- Jennette JC et al. (1994) Nomenclature of systemic vasculitides: proposal of an international consensus conference. Arthritis Rheum 37: 187–192 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
- Pagnoux C et al. (2007) Churg–Strauss syndrome. Curr Opin Rheumatol 19: 25–32 | Article | PubMed |
- Noth I et al. (2003) Churg–Strauss syndrome. Lancet 361: 587–594 | Article | PubMed | ISI |
- Shimamoto C et al. (1990) Churg–Strauss syndrome (allergic granulomatosis angiitis) with peculiar multiple colonic ulcers. Am J Gastroenterol 85: 316–319 | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Guillevin L et al. (1999) Churg–Strauss syndrome: clinical study and long-term follow-up of 96 patients. Medicine. (Baltimore) 78: 26–37 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Sablé-Fourtassou R et al. (2005) Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies and the Churg–Strauss syndrome. Ann Intern Med 143: 632–638 | PubMed |
- Sinico RA et al. (2006) Renal involvement in Churg–Strauss syndrome. Am J Kidney Dis 47: 770–779 | Article | PubMed |
- Sevinc A et al. (2004) Allergic granulomatosis and angiitis in the absence of asthma and blood eosinophilia: a rare presentation of limited Churg–Strauss syndrome. Rheumatol Int 24: 301–304 | Article | PubMed |
- Kallenberg CG (2007) Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated small-vessel vasculitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 19: 17–24 | Article | PubMed |
- Kallenberg CG et al. (2006) Mechanisms of disease: pathogenesis and treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitides. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 2: 661–670 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Sinico RA et al. (2005) Prevalence and clinical significance of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in Churg–Strauss syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 52: 2926–2935 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Masi AT et al. (1990) The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Churg–Strauss syndrome (allergic granulomatosis and angiitis). Arthritis Rheum 33: 1094–1100 | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
- Yamashita Y et al. (1998) Nonasthmatic case of Churg–Strauss syndrome with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. Intern Med 37: 561–563 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Malik TQ et al. (2002) Atypical presentation of Churg–Strauss syndrome: another "forme fruste" of the disease. Am J Med Sci 324: 276–278 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Cohen P et al. (1995) Persistence of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) in asymptomatic patients with systemic polyarteritis nodosa or Churg–Strauss syndrome: follow-up of 53 patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol 13: 193–198 | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
- Gayraud M et al. (2001) Long-term followup of polyarteritis nodosa, microscopic polyangiitis, and Churg–Strauss syndrome: analysis of four prospective trials including 278 patients. Arthritis Rheum 44: 666–675 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Guillevin L et al. (1996) Prognostic factors in polyarteritis nodosa and Churg–Strauss syndrome: a prospective study in 342 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 75: 17–28 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Ribi C et al. (2008) Treatment of Churg–Strauss syndrome without poor-prognosis factors: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label study of seventy-two patients. Arthritis Rheum 58: 586–594 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Cohen P et al. (2007) Churg–Strauss syndrome with poor-prognosis factors: a prospective multicenter trial comparing glucocorticoids and six or twelve cyclophosphamide pulses in forty-eight patients. Arthritis Rheum 57: 686–693 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
- Jayne D et al. (2003) A randomized trial of maintenance therapy for vasculitis associated with antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies. N Engl J Med 349: 36–44 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
- Jayne D et al. (2007) Randomized trial of plasma exchange or high-dosage methylprednisolone as adjunctive therapy for severe renal vasculitis. J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2180–2188 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
- Danieli MG et al. (2004) Long term effectiveness of intravenous immunoglobulin in Churg–Strauss syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 63: 1649–1654 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
Competing interests
The authors declared no competing interests.
Contact the journal about this article
Subject areas under which this article appears: Glomerular diseases (glomerulonephritis, FSGS, cryoglobulinemia)



