Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Volume 9 Issue 4, April 2010

In This Issue

Top of page ⤴

Comment

Top of page ⤴

News and Analysis

Top of page ⤴

News in Brief

Top of page ⤴

Biobusiness Briefs

Top of page ⤴

News and Analysis

Top of page ⤴

Patent Watch

Top of page ⤴

An Audience With

  • The Executive Director of US think tankFasterCuresdiscusses how the organization acts as a catalyst to accelerate the development of innovative therapies.

    An Audience With
Top of page ⤴

From the Analyst's Couch

Top of page ⤴

Fresh from the Pipeline

    • Daniel J. Drucker
    • Argyris Dritselis
    • Peter Kirkpatrick
    Fresh from the Pipeline
Top of page ⤴

Research Highlight

Top of page ⤴

In Brief

Top of page ⤴

Opinion

  • Computational chemistry — in particular, virtual screening — can provide valuable contributions in hit and lead discovery. However, it seems that there are relatively few examples so far of drug discovery projects in which virtual screening has been the key contributor. This article discusses aspects that could be limiting the potential of virtual screening, and proposes key directions in which significant progress could be made.

    • Gisbert Schneider
    Opinion
Top of page ⤴

Outlook

  • Third-party payers typically base their reimbursement decisions for a new drug predominantly on its health benefits relative to existing treatment options — termed relative efficacy (RE). Over the past decade, the role of payers has become more prominent, and drug developers increasingly need to satisfy the sometimes divergent needs of both regulators and payers to achieve market success. This article describes the political background to the RE debate and the challenges of RE assessment, and discusses the impact of RE on drug development.

    • Hans-Georg Eichler
    • Brigitte Bloechl-Daum
    • Steven Pearson
    Outlook
Top of page ⤴

Review Article

  • This Review highlights the Toll-like receptors (TLRs) that hold the most promise for drug discovery research, discussing agents that are in the discovery phase or in clinical trials, as well as new aspects of TLR-mediated signalling that might offer further possibilities of therapeutic manipulation.

    • Elizabeth J. Hennessy
    • Andrew E. Parker
    • Luke A. J. O'Neill
    Review Article
  • Antibiotic drug resistance has increased interest in developing vaccines against carbohydrate structures on the surface of bacterial pathogens. Astronomo and Burton examine recent progress in the identification, synthesis and evaluation of glycan epitopes found not only on bacteria, but also on protozoa, helminths, viruses, fungi and cancer cells for vaccine design.

    • Rena D. Astronomo
    • Dennis R. Burton
    Review Article
  • A growing number of monoclonal antibodies are being developed for the treatment of malignancies, transplant rejection, autoimmune and other immune disorders; however, they can have severe side effects. Hansel and colleagues consider the mechanisms underlying these effects and strategies to minimize them during preclinical screening and in first-in-human trials.

    • Trevor T. Hansel
    • Harald Kropshofer
    • Andrew J. T. George
    Review Article
Top of page ⤴

Careers and Recruitment

Top of page ⤴

Search

Quick links