Original Article
Neuropsychopharmacology (2009) 34, 2329–2343; doi:10.1038/npp.2009.62; published online 17 June 2009
Serotonergic and Dopaminergic Modulation of Gambling Behavior as Assessed Using a Novel Rat Gambling Task
Fiona D Zeeb1, Trevor W Robbins2 and Catharine A Winstanley1
- 1Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- 2Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Correspondence: Fiona D Zeeb or Dr Catharine A Winstanley, Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4, Tel: +1 604 827 5083; Fax: +1 604 822 6923; E-mail: fzeeb@psych.ubc.ca or cwinstanley@psych.ubc.ca
Received 6 February 2009; Revised 6 May 2009; Accepted 10 May 2009; Published online 17 June 2009.
Abstract
Pathological gambling (PG) is characterized by persistent, maladaptive gambling behavior, which disrupts personal and professional life. Animal models of gambling behavior could make a significant contribution to improving our understanding of the neural and neurochemical basis of gambling, and the treatment of PG. When gambling, failing to win critically results in the loss of resources wagered as well as the absence of additional gain. Here, we have incorporated these concepts into a novel rat gambling task (rGT), based, in part, on the 'Iowa' gambling task (IGT) commonly used clinically to measure gambling-like behavior. Rats choose among four different options to earn as many sugar pellets as possible within 30 min. Each option is associated with the delivery of a different amount of reward, but also with a different probability and duration of punishing time-out periods during which reward cannot be earned. The schedules are designed such that persistent choice of options linked with larger rewards result in fewer pellets earned per unit time. Rats learn to avoid these risky options to maximize their earnings, comparable with the optimal strategy in the IGT. Both d-amphetamine and the 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT, impaired task performance. In contrast, the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, eticlopride, improved performance, whereas the D1 receptor antagonist, SCH23390, had no effect. These data suggest that both serotonergic and dopaminergic agents can impair and improve gambling performance, and indicate that the rGT will be a useful tool to study the biological basis of gambling.
Keywords:
D1 receptor, D2 receptor, 5-HT1A receptor, Iowa gambling task, impulsivity, rat
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
REVIEWS
Risky business: the neuroeconomics of decision making under uncertainty
Nature Neuroscience Review (01 Apr 2008)
RESEARCH
Balancing Risk and Reward: A Rat Model of Risky Decision Making
Neuropsychopharmacology Original Article
Dopaminergic Modulation of Risk-Based Decision Making
Neuropsychopharmacology Original Article
Neuropsychopharmacology Original Article
Neuropsychopharmacology Original Article

