Abstract
Ultracold atoms are emerging as an important platform for precision sensing and measurement, quantum information science, and simulations of condensed-matter phenomena. Microscopic imaging is a powerful tool for measuring cold-atom systems, enabling the readout of ultracold atomic simulators1,2 and registers3, the characterization of inhomogeneous environments4, and the determination of spatially varying thermodynamic quantities5,6,7,8. Cold-atom microscopy has recently been demonstrated with imaging resolution sufficient to detect and address single9 or multiple10 atoms at individual optical-lattice sites with lattice spacings of micrometres11,12 and below1,2,13,14. However, those methods, which rely either on the fluorescence1,2,9,11,12,13 or ionization10,14 of atoms, destroy the quantum states being measured and have limited dynamic range. Here we demonstrate magnetic resonance imaging of atomic gases in optical lattices, obtained by dispersively coupling atoms to a high-finesse optical cavity. We achieve state-sensitive, single-lattice-site images with high dynamic range. We also apply this technique to measure the non-equilibrium transport dynamics of the gas.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
The sensitivity of optical cavities has been used to make nondestructive15, state-sensitive16, and high-dynamic-range17 measurements of atomic gases, whereas magnetic resonance has been used to address the spin states of single atoms in single optical-lattice sites9,18. In this experiment we use light in a high-finesse optical cavity, together with radio-frequency (RF) radiation and an inhomogeneous magnetic field, to perform real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of atomic spins in an optical lattice. We obtain a spatial resolution of 150 nm, far below the 425 nm spacing of the lattice sites. We obtain a number-counting sensitivity of 10 for up to 1,000 atoms in each site or 2.5 for up to 70 atoms, both well below the level of Poissonian atom-number fluctuations. Furthermore, the MRI is minimally destructive of the atoms’ internal states, allowing the single-site observation of spatially dependent spin dynamics. We use this technique to measure the transport dynamics of an initially localized gas via resonant quantum tunnelling between lattice sites, as the atoms undergo first ballistic and then interaction-inhibited transport. We also demonstrate the ability to address the spins of large numbers of atoms at selected lattice sites, enabling new studies of magnetism, transport, cavity spin optodynamics19, and cavity optomechanics20,21,22.
In contrast to traditional MRI, which measures transverse magnetization at the Larmor precession frequency, here we use the cavity to perform a quantum non-demolition measurement of the static longitudinal magnetization23 by applying a magnetic bias field along the cavity axis (Fig. 1). To resolve the atoms spatially we apply a strong field gradient B′ along the dimension to be imaged. For the data presented here we image along the cavity axis, although any axis can be imaged by applying the appropriate gradient. We note especially that 3D images can be taken by imaging along a suitable number of axes and applying tomographic reconstruction24.
For a sufficiently large detuning Δca between the cavity resonance frequency and the atomic optical resonance, the absorption of cavity light by the atoms is negligible, and the light–atom interaction may be described by a real-valued index of refraction. This index causes the cavity resonance frequency ωc to be shifted from its empty-cavity value ω0. Because the atoms are circularly birefringent, the resonance frequency of circularly polarized light is shifted by an amount ΔN that depends on the atom density ρ(r) and the density s(r) of the dimensionless atomic spin (see the Supplementary Information):
Here g(r) is the scalar dispersive atom–cavity coupling parameter at position r, taking into account the spatially varying intensity of the cavity mode. The ± corresponds to σ± light polarizations, and C is derived from a sum over probability amplitudes and relative detunings from the atomic excited hyperfine states. For 87Rb atoms with hyperfine spin F=2 and probe light detuned by several gigahertz from the D2 atomic resonance, C≃1/4.
We invert the local magnetization by means of adiabatic passage using a chirped RF field. We use a linear chirp, with detuning from the magnetic resonance at position z given at time t by δ=ω̇rft−μ B′z/ℏ, where μ/ℏ is the atomic gyromagnetic ratio. The radially integrated density sk(z) of the dimensionless atomic spin can be extracted from the time derivative of the cavity frequency. For narrow magnetic resonance, where the spins at z flip completely as the RF is swept from just below to just above resonance, the spin density is:
Here is the density-weighted radial average of the cavity coupling at z. We neglect the small radial variation of the magnetic field across the gas. This formula is easily refined to account for the finite frequency width of the magnetic resonance (see the Supplementary Information).
Experiments are conducted using a Fabry–Perot optical cavity integrated onto a microfabricated atom-chip device22. The chip is used for sample preparation, delivering atomic gases of up to 5,000 atoms, spin polarized in the |F,mF〉=|2,2〉 hyperfine state, at temperatures of 1–3 μK into the optical lattice. Chip wires are then used to apply strong magnetic field gradients, allowing us to resolve and address individual lattice sites.
The optical cavity is driven with two different wavelengths of light. Light at a wavelength of 850 nm establishes a far-off-resonant optical lattice potential. A cavity probe beam, detuned 14–17 GHz to the red of the D2 atomic resonance at a wavelength of 780 nm, measures the number of atoms and the spin densities as described above. The atoms are loaded into a few (between 2 and 5) adjacent lattice sites, centred on a site that overlaps with an antinode of the probe field.
To measure the cavity shift we detect the photon flux of σ+ -polarized probe light transmitted through the cavity. A feedback loop tunes the probe frequency ωp, maintaining the flux at a constant value equal to a fixed fraction of the incident photon flux. The probe frequency is thus locked at a fixed detuning Δpc from cavity resonance, the frequency of which is determined by ωc=ωp−Δpc. Variations in the cavity resonance frequency faster than the 20 kHz feedback bandwidth can be assessed by using the residual deviation of the instantaneous photon flux γ from .
Figure 2 shows a typical single-shot image of a spin-polarized atomic gas taken with a linear RF chirp. As the RF is swept through the resonance of each lattice site, atoms are flipped from the |2,2〉 to the |2,−2〉 state, causing a jump in the cavity resonance frequency. The atom density is obtained by calculating sk(z)/2 using equation (1). We account for the thermal radial and axial distribution of atoms within each lattice site in determining . We also account for the difference between the trap and probe light wavelengths, although this latter correction is minor for lattice sites near the common antinode of the two cavity modes. Images may also be averaged (see Fig. 4), although shot-to-shot variations in the bias field cause broadening of the averaged images. The flatness of the slope of the cavity shift between spin flips verifies our ability to address single lattice sites (see the Supplementary Information).
The spatial resolution with which we can image the spins is 150 nm (full width at half-maximum). The resolution is proportional to the ratio of the magnetic resonance width (14 kHz, see Fig. 2c) to the gradient of the magnetic resonance frequency (114 kHz μm−1). The minimum resolution is limited by two considerations. First, the Rabi frequency must be sufficiently high that the spins are inverted adiabatically. Second, the maximum magnetic field gradient is limited by transverse field curvatures, which expel atoms from the optical trap (see the Supplementary Information).
The atomic magnetization is largely preserved during the imaging process and can be recovered by reversing the RF chirp, as shown in Fig. 2. The magnetization is slightly diminished as a result of radiation pressure fluctuations caused by the probe light20, which reduce the trapping lifetime to 120 ms, and spin decoherence and gradient-induced loss associated with executing the spin flips. Together, these processes result in 85% of the magnetization being preserved during the image. Less destructive imaging could be achieved at the expense of reduced signal-to-noise ratio or spatial resolution, for example by decreasing , increasing the RF drive strength, or decreasing B′.
Precise measurements of the longitudinal spin in a single lattice site can be taken by measuring the cavity resonance frequency before and after the spins in a single site are inverted (Fig. 3). The resonance frequency is first measured for a time τ with the RF off. The RF is then adiabatically turned on (125 μs linear ramp-on) at a frequency 20 kHz above the spin-resonance frequency, chirped to 20 kHz below the spin-resonance frequency, and adiabatically ramped off. Finally, ΔN is again measured, and the total projection Sk of the site’s dimensionless spin is calculated using , where Δωc is the change in the cavity resonance frequency.
For small τ, the precision of the single-site measurement is limited by the photon shot noise on the cavity resonance measurement to , where ɛ is the photodetection quantum efficiency and |dωc/dγ| is the resonance frequency measurement sensitivity, ≃11 for our system (see Supplementary Information). For τ above 1 ms, a measurement of the Allan deviation (Fig. 3) of ωc indicates that photon shot noise is superseded by technical noise, for example variations of the laser frequency or of ω0, yielding a frequency uncertainty of 60 kHz for τ=2.2 ms. With Δca=−14 GHz, the number of atoms in a single lattice site is thus determined with an rms uncertainty δ N=10. This sensitivity should be sufficient to observe atom-number differences between lattice sites25 below the limit of Poissonian statistics (δ N∼30 for N∼1,000), while maintaining the probed gas for further experiments. We have also measured populations to δ N=2.5, by using Δca=−2.0 GHz, although at this detuning the dynamic range of our measurement is limited to N≲70 within each site. Systematic uncertainties (Supplementary Information) affect the accuracy of the single-site measurement on the few-per cent level but do not significantly impact the measurement precision.
We use MRI to probe the transport dynamics of an atomic gas in an optical lattice under the effects of atomic interactions. We begin with atoms localized to a few lattice sites and image the initial stages of their expansion. We prepare a nondegenerate spin-polarized sample at 380 nK, with an initial width of 380 nm. We allow the gas to evolve for variable time t in a shallow optical lattice, which has a potential depth of 10.1Er, where Er=h×3.17 kHz is the rubidium recoil energy at a wavelength of 850 nm. The lattice depth is then raised to perform MRI. The gravitational force is compensated by applying a weak levitating magnetic field gradient (μ B′/h=454 Hz per lattice constant) during transport. The experiment is repeated 15 times at each of several different values of t, and the images for each hold time are averaged together, after correcting for shot-to-shot variations of the bias field (Fig. 4).
The position variance of the atomic distribution grows as a result of quantum tunnelling. At early times (t≤4 ms) the growth matches the ballistic expansion of non-interacting atoms in the lattice, for an initial atomic axial distribution given by an incoherent mixture of single-site Wannier states. At later times the expansion slows markedly. Previous experiments have observed self-trapping in Bose–Einstein condensates26. The behaviour we observe agrees qualitatively with our simulations of interaction-induced self-trapping in a nondegenerate gas, enabled in this experiment by high atom density.
Using dispersive optical measurement, cavity enhancement, and magnetic resonance, we have demonstrated a spin-sensitive technique for imaging atomic gases with a spatial resolution of 150 nm. The single-shot atom-number sensitivity is as small as 2.5 within a single lattice site, low enough to observe sub-Poissonian statistics of atom-number differences between sites with more than 10 atoms. Extending this technique to single-spin and single-atom counting should be possible by reducing technical measurement noise and increasing the experimental photon detection efficiency, currently limited by cavity losses.
The ability to control and to read out spins in single lattice sites provides new tools to engineer and study atomic gases at a microscopic level. Here we have measured the initial dynamics of bosonic atom transport in a 1D lattice with single-site resolution. Other experiments could include the observation of cavity-mediated long-range interactions between independently prepared spin populations or the observation of individual magnetic domains for antiferromagnetically ordered systems. Finally, because our dispersive measurement can be made minimally destructive, the method could be used to provide real-time feedback to spin projections of individual lattice sites for studies of quantum measurement and control27, and for applications to atomic magnetometry.
References
Bakr, W. S. et al. A quantum gas microscope for detecting single atoms in a Hubbard-regime optical lattice. Nature 462, 74–77 (2009).
Sherson, J. F. et al. Single-atom-resolved fluorescence imaging of an atomic Mott insulator. Nature 467, 68–72 (2010).
Schrader, D. et al. Neutral atom quantum register. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 150501 (2004).
Vengalattore, M. et al. High-resolution magnetometry with a spinor Bose–Einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 200801 (2007).
Shin, Y. I., Schunck, C. H., Schirotzek, A. & Ketterle, W. Phase diagram of a two-component Fermi gas with resonant interactions. Nature 451, 689–693 (2008).
Ho, T. L. & Zhou, Q. Obtaining the phase diagram and thermodynamic quantities of bulk systems from the densities of trapped gases. Nature Phys. 6, 66–69 (2010).
Navon, N., Nascimbene, S., Chevy, F. & Salomon, C. The equation of state of a low-temperature Fermi gas with tunable interactions. Science 328, 729–732 (2010).
Horikoshi, M., Nakajima, S., Ueda, M. & Mukaiyama, T. Measurement of universal thermodynamic functions for a unitary Fermi gas. Science 327, 442–445 (2010).
Weitenberg, C. et al. Single-spin addressing in an atomic Mott insulator. Nature 471, 319–324 (2011).
Würtz, P., Langen, T., Gericke, T., Koglbauer, A. & Ott, H. Experimental demonstration of single-site addressability in a two-dimensional optical lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 080404 (2009).
Scheunemann, R., Cataliotti, F. S., Hansch, T. W. & Weitz, M. Resolving and addressing atoms in individual sites of a CO2-laser optical lattice. Phys. Rev. A 62, 051801 (2000).
Nelson, K. D., Li, X. & Weiss, D. S. Imaging single atoms in a three-dimensional array. Nature Phys. 3, 556–560 (2007).
Karski, M. et al. Nearest-neighbour detection of atoms in a 1D optical lattice by fluorescence imaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 053001 (2009).
Gericke, T. et al. High-resolution scanning electron microscopy of an ultracold quantum gas. Nature Phys. 4, 949–953 (2008).
Khudaverdyan, M. et al. Quantum jumps and spin dynamics of interacting atoms in a strongly coupled atom-cavity system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 123006 (2009).
Gehr, R. et al. Cavity-based single atom preparation and high-fidelity hyperfine state readout. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 203602 (2010).
Leroux, I. D., Schleier-Smith, M. H. & Vuletić, V. Implementation of cavity squeezing of a collective atomic spin. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 073602 (2010).
Karski, M. et al. Imprinting patterns of neutral atoms in an optical lattice using magnetic resonance techniques. New J. Phys. 12, 065027 (2010).
Brahms, N. & Stamper-Kurn, D. M. Spin optodynamics analog of cavity optomechanics. Phys. Rev. A 82, 041804 (2010).
Murch, K. W., Moore, K. L., Gupta, S. & Stamper-Kurn, D. M. Observation of quantum-measurement backaction with an ultracold atomic gas. Nature Phys. 4, 561–564 (2008).
Brennecke, F., Ritter, S., Donner, T. & Esslinger, T. Cavity optomechanics with a Bose–Einstein condensate. Science 322, 235–238 (2008).
Purdy, T. et al. Tunable optomechanics with ultracold atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 133701 (2010).
Kuzmich, A. et al. Quantum nondemolition measurements of collective atomic spin. Phys. Rev. A 60, 2346–2350 (1999).
Rowland, S. W. in Image Reconstruction from Projections 1st edn (ed. Herman, G. T.) (Springer, 1979).
Esteve, J. et al. Squeezing and entanglement in a Bose–Einstein condensate. Nature 455, 1216–1219 (2008).
Anker, T. et al. Nonlinear self-trapping of matter waves in periodic potentials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 020403 (2005).
Förster, L. et al. Microwave control of atomic motion in optical lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 233001 (2009).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NSF Grant #PHY-0801827 and the AFOSR. D.M.S-K. acknowledges support from the Miller Institute for Basic Science, and T.B. acknowledges support from Le Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies. The authors thank A. M. Rey and K. Hazzard for discussions on the transport experiment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Experimental data were taken by T.P.P., N.B., D.W.C.B. and T.B. All authors were involved with experimental design, data analysis, and production of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 331 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brahms, N., Purdy, T., Brooks, D. et al. Cavity-aided magnetic resonance microscopy of atomic transport in optical lattices. Nature Phys 7, 604–607 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1967
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1967
This article is cited by
-
Robust site-resolvable quantum gates in an optical lattice via inhomogeneous control
Nature Communications (2013)
-
Optical magnetic resonance imaging with an ultra-narrow optical transition
Applied Physics B (2012)